Bendamustine in combination with ifosfamide, etoposide, and vinorelbine (VIBE) is an effective salvage regimen for heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: a single-center experience

Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Dexamethasone as a Salvage and Mobilization Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation is Effective and Safe Outpatient Regimen in Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

BACKGROUND

Second line salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the current standard treatment for eligible patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Several salvage regimens have been used before ASCT. However the optimal salvage regimen is still unclear. We report outcome of patients with R/R HL treated with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (GDP) regimen before ASCT in this retrospective study aiming at evaluating efficacy, stem cell mobilization activity and safety of GDP in a real-life setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with R/R HL who were treated with GDP as salvage and mobilization regimen before ASCT were analyzed retrospectively. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were collected after GDP. All patients underwent ASCT after 2 cycles of GDP.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (80%) patients achieved overall response including 24 (53.3%) complete response (CR). PBSC collections were adequate in all patients with a median number of 11.01 × 10⁶/kg CD34+ cells. The most common grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31.1%) and neutropenia (22.2%). There were no febrile neutropenic episodes. Grade 3 or 4 renal, hepatic, or cardiac toxicity was not observed. The 4 year progression-free survival and overall survival for patients receiving GDP followed by ASCT were 72% and 92%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that GDP is a viable therapeutic option before ASCT with high response rate, favorable toxicity profile and excellent mobilization potential. Applicability of GDP on an outpatient setting also provides advantage over other effective salvage regimens.

Relapsed Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma and Brentuximab Vedotin-Bendamustine Combination Therapy as a Bridge to Transplantation: Real-World Evidence From a Middle-Income Setting and Literature Review

Introduction

Despite high cure rates with standard treatment, 30% patients with Hodgkin lymphoma develop relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Salvage therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is considered standard of care. Brentuximab Vedotin (Bv) in combination with Bendamustine (B) has been tested in the salvage setting with promising results.

Materials and Methodology

We conducted a single centre retrospective chart review of patients who received BBv salvage therapy to determine its activity and safety in patients with R/R classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Between May 2011- December 2019, 179 patients were diagnosed with R/R HL.

Results

Thirty patients received BBv [median age: 30 (15-59) years, females (n=15)]. Primary refractory disease in 19 patients (63%), and 26 patients (87%) had advanced stage at treatment. Most patients received BBv after 2 prior lines of therapy [n=16 (53%)]. The median number of cycles of BBv were 3 (1-6). The number of BBv cycles delivered as outpatient was 63%. The most common Grade III/IV hematological adverse event was neutropenia [n=21, (70%)], while grade III/IV non-hematological toxicities included infections in 4 (13%), neuropathy in 4(13%), skin rash in 2 (7%), GI toxicities in 3 (10%) and liver dysfunction in 2 (7%) patients. The ORR and CR rates were 79% and 62%, respectively. Seventeen patients (57%) underwent an autologous HCT and 8 (26%) underwent an Allogeneic HCT (all haploidentical). The median follow up time from BBv administration was 12 months. Six patients died: 2 = disease progression, and 4 = non-relapse causes (Infection and sepsis = 2, GVHD=2). In addition to this, one patient progressed soon after HCT and another patient relapsed 22 months post HCT. Three year Overall survival (OS) and Event free survival (EFS) probability post-BBv treatment was 75% and 58%, respectively. OS and EFS analysis based on response (viz., CMR) to BBv demonstrated that patients in CMR had better survival probability [93% (p=0.0022) 3yr-OS and 72% (p=0.038) 3yr-EFS probability].

Conclusions

BBv is an active and well-tolerated salvage treatment for patients with R/R HL, even in refractory and advanced settings. In middle-income settings, cost constraints and access determine patient uptake of this regimen.