A New Approach to the Prophylaxis of Cyclic Vomiting: Topiramate

Treatment Options for Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome: A Real-World, Single-Center Experience with Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

The optimal therapeutic management of cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) remains elusive. The objective of this study was to document our clinical experience in the Pediatric Department of San Marco Hospital and to survey the literature on pediatric CVS treatment, aiming to update the guidance on the most effective treatment strategies for this not-so-uncommon condition. Data from 70 patients with CVS, admitted to our Pediatric Department between September 2011 and December 2021, were aggregated and included in the study. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool and the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) method. Treatment responses, as observed both in the literature and in our own experience, are variable. In our cohort, topiramate demonstrated superiority over other pharmacological treatments, exhibiting an efficacy of 85% in the patients treated. A universally accepted treatment protocol for pediatric CVS has yet to be established. The efficacy of first-line treatments is generally suboptimal, suggesting that topiramate might serve as a safe and effective primary therapeutic option for pediatric CVS.

Diagnosis and Management of Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome: A Critical Review

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a chronic disorder of gut-brain interaction characterized by recurrent disabling episodes of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. CVS affects both children and adults with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the United States. CVS is more common in female individuals and affects all races. The pathophysiology of CVS is unknown and a combination of genetic, environmental, autonomic, and neurohormonal factors is believed to play a role. CVS is also closely associated with migraine headaches and likely have a shared pathophysiology. The diagnosis of CVS is based on the Rome criteria, and minimal recommended testing includes an upper endoscopy and imaging studies of the abdomen. CVS is frequently associated with anxiety, depression, and autonomic dysfunction. Patients with CVS commonly use cannabis therapeutically for symptom relief. By contrast, cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is believed to be a subset of CVS with chronic heavy cannabis use leading to hyperemesis. Due to the recalcitrant nature of the illness, patients often visit the emergency department and are hospitalized for acute CVS flares. Guidelines on the management of CVS recommend a biopsychosocial approach. Prophylactic therapy consists of tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline), antiepileptics (topiramate), and aprepitant in refractory patients. Abortive therapy consists of triptans, antiemetics (ondansetron), and sedation. Treatment of comorbid conditions is extremely important to improve overall patient outcomes. CVS has a significant negative impact on patients, families, and the healthcare system, and future research to understand its pathophysiology and develop targeted therapies is needed.

Relapse Rate of Clinical Symptoms After Stopping Treatment in Children with Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome

Background: Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder. It is characterized by recurrent episodes of vomiting typically separated by periods of symptom-free or baseline health. The present study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of propranolol and the relapse rate of clinical symptoms after stopping treatment in children suffering from CVS. Methods: Records of 504 patients below the age of 18 years with CVS who were treated with propranolol from March 2008 to March 2018 were reviewed. The duration of follow-up was 10 years. Results: The average age of CVS affliction was 4.3 years and the average age at the diagnosis was 5.8 years. All subjects were treated with propranolol (for an average of 10 months). 92% of treated subjects were cured, causing a dramatic decrease in the rate of vomiting (P < 0.001). Only an average of 10.5% of the studied subjects (53 people) showed a relapse of symptoms after stopping the treatment. The results of a 10-year follow-up period of the patients showed that 24 had abdominal migraine and 6 had migraine headaches, all of whom lacked the symptoms of disease relapse (prognostic evaluation). Conclusion: The findings of this investigation show that the duration of treating CVS with propranolol could be shortened to 10 months with a low percent of symptoms relapse and this shortening may be effective in preventing the undesirable side effects of the drug. The presence of abdominal migraine and migraine headaches in patients after treatment accomplishment and the lack of disease relapse can be prognostic measures for this disease, which require intensive attention.

Abdominal migraine and cyclical vomiting syndrome

Abdominal migraine and cyclical vomiting syndrome (CVS) are characteristic syndromes which have overlapping characteristics with migraine but lack the cardinal symptom of headache. Both abdominal migraine and CVS are characterized by recurrent attacks of nausea, vomiting, and/or abdominal pain lasting hours to a few days, with symptom freedom between attacks. Both abdominal migraine and CVS typically occur in children and adolescents, who often go on to develop more typical migraine headaches when older, but may also present for the first time in adults. Due to their shared characteristics and association with migraine headaches, abdominal migraine and CVS are sometimes called "migraine equivalents," and their pathophysiology is assumed to overlap with migraine headache. This chapter describes what is known about the clinical characteristics, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and prognosis of abdominal migraine and CVS, and explores their relationship to migraine. We also review the existing evidence for the nonpharmacological management, acute treatment of attacks, and preventive treatments for both abdominal migraine and CVS.

Current understanding of the etiology of cyclic vomiting syndrome and therapeutic strategies in its management

INTRODUCTION

Cyclic vomiting syndrome is a chronic debilitating disorder of the gut-brain interaction and is characterized by recurrent episodes of nausea and vomiting.Recent studies indicate that it is common and affects 2% of the US population. Unfortunately, there is significant heterogeneity in the management of these patients in the medical community. This review article aims to bridge this gap and will review the epidemiology and etiology with a focus on management of CVS.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the epidemiology, and pathophysiology of CVS and impact on patients. It also discusses management based on recent guidelines based on which is intended for the busy clinician. A literature search was done using PubMed and key words "cyclic vomiting", "management", "etiology", and pathophysiology were used to identify articles of importance.

EXPERT OPINION

CVS is a complex, poorly understood disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and has a significant negative impact on patients, families and the healthcare system. Recent guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary approach to management using prophylactic therapy in moderate-severe CVS and abortive medication for acute flares. However more research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology and develop targeted therapies for CVS.

Clinical features and long-term outcomes in pediatric cyclic vomiting syndrome: A 9-year experience at three tertiary academic centers

BACKGROUND

Pediatric cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a little-known clinical condition, frequently diagnosed with delay. This study aims to describe the clinical presentation and management and to define possible predictive factors of the disease outcome.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all children who were diagnosed with CVS during the period 2010-2019 in three tertiary academic centers were included. The association between clinical variables and outcomes was investigated.

KEY RESULTS

Fifty-seven children were included (male/female ratio 1.3:1; mean age at diagnosis 8.2 years). At the time of diagnosis, 63% of children had at least one episode every month. One or more prodromes were reported by 75% of patients. Family history of migraine was reported for 47% of children. Nearly, all of the children were started on prophylactic treatment. The median follow-up period was 29 months ± 15. Overall, 56% of children had resolution of vomiting. Twenty-six percent of children developed migraine. There were no differences in gender, age at onset, duration of follow-up, severity, medication, family history, or trigger factors between children who underwent resolution of vomiting and those who did not, or between children who suffered from migraine or not at follow-up. Four types of disease outcome were recognized, that is, resolution of vomiting with or without associated symptoms; persistence of vomiting with or without associated symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Cyclic vomiting syndrome clinical presentation has inter-individual variability. Most children recover at follow-up, but often develop further somatic symptoms. In this study, no clinical variable clearly predicted the evolution of the syndrome toward one or the other outcome.

Cyclic vomiting syndrome in children

QUESTION

Several children in my office have recurrent vomiting events and they usually end up in the emergency department for intravenous rehydration. One of them has been suffering from those attacks approximately once per month for the past 2 years, leading to a reduction in her quality of life. What is known about cyclic vomiting syndrome and can it be prevented?

ANSWER

Cyclic vomiting syndrome includes severe episodic vomiting lasting for hours or days, separated by symptom-free intervals. This gut-brain interaction is poorly understood and is difficult to diagnose. Children suffer from relentless vomiting, lethargy, abdominal pain, anorexia, and nausea. Half of the children require intravenous rehydration. Once diagnosis is made, supportive measures to reduce suffering are recommended and include administering fluids, encouraging sleep, promoting quiet environments, and administering antiemetics or sedatives. In adults, tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline, as well as topiramate as second-line therapy, have been proposed for prophylactic treatment. However, pediatric data are very limited and evidence does not support any recommended course of prophylactic therapy for children with the condition.

[Not Available]

Question

Plusieurs enfants de ma clinique ont des épisodes récurrents de vomissements, et ils se retrouvent habituellement au service d’urgence pour une réhydratation par intraveineuse. L’un d’entre eux souffre de l’une de ces attaques environ 1 fois par mois depuis les 2 dernières années, ce qui nuit à sa qualité de vie. Que sait-on du syndrome des vomissements cycliques, et peut-on le prévenir ?

Réponse

Le syndrome des vomissements cycliques désigne des vomissements épisodiques sévères qui durent des heures, voire des jours, entrecoupés d’intervalles sans symptômes. Cette interaction entre l’appareil digestif et le cerveau est mal comprise et difficile à diagnostiquer. Les enfants souffrent de vomissements incessants, de léthargie, de douleur abdominale, d’anorexie et de nausée. Chez la moitié de ces enfants, il faut une réhydratation par intraveineuse. Une fois le diagnostic posé, des mesures de soutien pour réduire la souffrance sont recommandées, y compris l’administration de liquides, la favorisation du sommeil, la promotion d’environnements calmes et l’administration d’antiémétiques ou de sédatifs. Chez les adultes, des antidépresseurs tricycliques comme l’amitriptyline, de même que le topiramate comme thérapie de deuxième intention, ont été proposés comme prophylaxie. Par ailleurs, les données pédiatriques sont très limitées, et les données probantes ne corroborent aucune thérapie prophylactique recommandée pour les enfants souffrant de cette affection.

Retrospective review of patients treated for cyclic vomiting syndrome with topiramate

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines recommend topiramate as second-line treatment for the prevention of moderate-severe cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) in adults. However, data are limited to small studies in children.

AIM

To characterise the response to topiramate as prophylactic therapy in adults with CVS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with CVS. Clinical characteristics, number of CVS episodes, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalisations the year before and after initiating topiramate were recorded. Response was defined as a global improvement in symptoms or >50% reduction in the number of CVS episodes, ED visits or hospitalisations.

RESULTS

Sixty-five percent (88/136) of patients responded to topiramate in an intent-to-treat analysis. There was a significant decrease in the annual number of CVS episodes (18.1 vs 6.2, P < 0.0001), CVS-related ED visits (4.3 vs 1.6, P = 0.0029), and CVS-related hospitalisations (2.0 vs 1.0, P = 0.035). Logistic regression revealed that higher doses of topiramate, longer use of topiramate (≥12 months) and topiramate as monotherapy were associated with a response to treatment. Anxiety was associated with non-response to topiramate. Fifty-five percent of patients experienced side effects, and 32% discontinued the medication as a result. The most common side effects were cognitive impairment (13%), fatigue (11%) and paresthesia (10%). This represented a refractory group with topiramate being initiated in patients (92%) who had failed treatment with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).

CONCLUSIONS

Topiramate may be an effective second-line prophylaxis for patients with moderate-severe CVS, but its use is limited by side effects. Efforts to develop better-tolerated therapies for CVS are warranted.

Cyclic vomiting syndrome: A narrative review and guide to management

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a disabling disorder of gut-brain interaction manifested by stereotypical and severe episodes of nausea and vomiting. Prevalence data indicate that CVS affects 1-2% of children and there has been a recent dramatic rise in diagnosed adults.

METHODS

This narrative review summarizes relevant literature pertaining to pediatric and adult CVS and provides a guide to management based on extensive clinical experience.

RESULTS

More timely diagnosis is facilitated by an expert consensus diagnostic approach and limited testing. Some diagnostic tests of exclusion remain essential. These include an upper gastrointestinal (GI) contrast study to exclude intestinal malrotation and basic laboratory screening. An abdominal ultrasound is recommended to exclude renal hydronephrosis in children and biliary disease in adults. Exclusion of metabolic/genetic conditions is warranted in those with specific warning signs, presentation in infants/toddler age, and in those with refractory disease. In the absence of chronic GI symptoms, referral to a GI specialist for upper endoscopy is generally not necessary in children but recommended in adults. A large subset termed migraine-equivalent CVS display strong clinical and genetic features of migraine. A unifying pathophysiologic core concept involves neuronal hyperexcitability and aberrant central modulation of autonomic signals. This is coupled with multiple susceptibility factors including mitochondrial dysfunction/cellular energy deficits, a hyper-responsive hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and many comorbidities that increase vulnerability to triggering events. CVS episodes are frequently triggered by stressors and intercurrent illnesses. Lifestyle and non-pharmacological interventions thus play a pivotal role in successful management. Pharmacological therapies are categorized into abortive, supportive/rescue, and prophylactic treatments. The majority respond particularly well to migraine-focused treatment strategies.

CONCLUSION

Despite improved characterization and understanding, CVS remains classified as a functional disorder of brain-gut interaction that is often disjointly managed by generalists and subspecialists. Early recognition, evaluation, and management will facilitate care and improve outcomes. Further research into its natural history with common progression to migraine headaches, neuroendocrine mechanisms, and the pathophysiologic relation to migraine diathesis is much needed.

Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome in Children

Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome (CVS) is an underdiagnosed episodic syndrome characterized by frequent hospitalizations, multiple comorbidities, and poor quality of life. It is often misdiagnosed due to the unappreciated pattern of recurrence and lack of confirmatory testing. CVS mainly occurs in pre-school or early school-age, but infants and elderly onset have been also described. The etiopathogenesis is largely unknown, but it is likely to be multifactorial. Recent evidence suggests that aberrant brain-gut pathways, mitochondrial enzymopathies, gastrointestinal motility disorders, calcium channel abnormalities, and hyperactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in response to a triggering environmental stimulus are involved. CVS is characterized by acute, stereotyped and recurrent episodes of intense nausea and incoercible vomiting with predictable periodicity and return to baseline health between episodes. A distinction with other differential diagnoses is a challenge for clinicians. Although extensive and invasive investigations should be avoided, baseline testing toward identifying organic causes is recommended in all children with CVS. The management of CVS requires an individually tailored therapy. Management of acute phase is mainly based on supportive and symptomatic care. Early intervention with abortive agents during the brief prodromal phase can be used to attempt to terminate the attack. During the interictal period, non-pharmacologic measures as lifestyle changes and the use of reassurance and anticipatory guidance seem to be effective as a preventive treatment. The indication for prophylactic pharmacotherapy depends on attack intensity and severity, the impairment of the QoL and if attack treatments are ineffective or cause side effects. When children remain refractory to acute or prophylactic treatment, or the episode differs from previous ones, the clinician should consider the possibility of an underlying disease and further mono- or combination therapy and psychotherapy can be guided by accompanying comorbidities and specific sub-phenotype. This review was developed by a joint task force of the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (SIGENP) and Italian Society of Pediatric Neurology (SINP) to identify relevant current issues and to propose future research directions on pediatric CVS.

Management of cyclic vomiting syndrome in adults: Evidence review

BACKGROUND

This evidence review was conducted to inform the accompanying clinical practice guideline on the management of cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) in adults.

METHODS

We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework and focused on interventions aimed at prophylactic management and abortive treatment of adults with CVS. Specifically, this evidence review addresses the following clinical questions: (a) Should the following pharmacologic agents be used for prophylaxis of CVS: amitriptyline, topiramate, aprepitant, zonisamide/levetiracetam, or mitochondrial supplements? (b) Should the following pharmacologic agents be used for abortive treatment: triptans or aprepitant?

RESULTS

We found very low-quality evidence to support the use of the following agents for prophylactic and abortive treatment of CVS: amitriptyline, topiramate, aprepitant, zonisamide/levetiracetam, and mitochondrial supplements. We have moderate certainty of evidence for the use of triptans as abortive therapy. We found limited evidence to support the use of ondansetron and the treatment of co-morbid conditions and complementary therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

This evidence review helps inform the accompanying guideline for the management of adults with CVS which is aimed at helping clinicians, patients, and policymakers, and should improve patient outcomes.

Cyclic vomiting syndrome: Pathophysiology, comorbidities, and future research directions

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is characterized by severe episodic emesis in adults and children. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is an increasingly recognized CVS-like illness that has been associated with chronic cannabis use. There are significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical features, comorbidities, and effective management options of CVS. Recommendations for treating CVS are based on limited clinical data, as no placebo-controlled, randomized trials have yet been conducted. Diseases associated with CVS, including migraine, mitochondrial disorders, autonomic dysfunction, and psychiatric comorbidities, provide clues about pathophysiologic mechanisms and suggest potential therapies. We review our current understanding of CVS and propose future research directions with the aim of developing effective therapy. Establishing a multicenter, standardized registry of CVS patients could drive research on multiple fronts including developing CVS-specific outcome measures to broaden our understanding of clinical profiles, to serve as treatment end points in clinical trials, and to provide a platform for patient recruitment for randomized clinical trials. Such a robust database would also facilitate conduct of research that aims to determine the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and genetic basis for CVS, as well as identifying potential biomarkers for the disorder. Soliciting government and industry support is crucial to establishing the necessary infrastructure and achieving these goals. Patient advocacy groups such as the Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome Association (CVSA), which partner with clinicians and researchers to disseminate new information, to promote ongoing interactions between patients, their families, clinicians, investigators, to support ongoing CVS research and education, must be an integral part of this endeavor.

Guidelines on management of cyclic vomiting syndrome in adults by the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome Association

The increasing recognition of cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) in adults prompted the development of these evidence-based guidelines on the management of CVS in adults, which was sponsored by the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS) and the Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome Association (CVSA). GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework was used and a professional librarian performed the literature search. The expert committee included the President of the CVSA who brought a patient perspective into the deliberations. The committee makes recommendations for the prophylaxis of CVS, treatment of acute attacks, diagnosis, and overall management of CVS. The committee strongly  recommends that adults with moderate-to-severe CVS receive a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), such as amitriptyline, as a first-line prophylactic medication and receive topiramate or aprepitant as alternate prophylactic medications. Zonisamide or levetiracetam and mitochondrial supplements (Coenzyme Q10, L-carnitine, and riboflavin) are conditionally recommended as alternate prophylactic medications, either alone or concurrently with other prophylactic medications. For acute attacks, the committee conditionally recommends using serotonin antagonists, such as ondansetron, and/or triptans, such as sumatriptan or aprepitant to abort symptoms. Emergency department treatment is best achieved with the use of an individualized treatment protocol and shared with the care team (example provided). The committee recommended screening and treatment for comorbid conditions such as anxiety, depression, migraine headache, autonomic dysfunction, sleep disorders, and substance use with referral to appropriate allied health services as indicated. Techniques like meditation, relaxation, and biofeedback may be offered as complementary therapy to improve overall well-being and patient care outcomes.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Amitriptyline and Topiramate in Prophylaxis of Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder with no certain treatment. We aimed to compare the efficacy of amitriptyline and topiramate on prophylactic therapy of CVS.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This randomized clinical trial (registration number: IRCT2015102316844N2) was conducted during 2016 in Isfahan, central Iran. The inclusion criteria were CVS patients (based on Rome III) aging 3-15 yr with normal physical examination, no metabolic disorder, and no gastrointestinal obstruction or renal impairment. Recruited patients were divided into two groups of amitriptyline (1 mg/kg/d) and topiramate (1-2 mg/kg/d) and were followed for 3-months. The outcome was evaluated by comparing severity of attacks (monthly frequency and duration of attacks) before and after intervention.

RESULTS

Thirty-six children entered each group and two patients left the amitriptyline group. Patients and disease characteristics were similar between groups before intervention (P>0.05). The frequency of attacks (standard deviation) after intervention in amitriptyline and topiramate group was 0.91 (0.40) and 1.07 (0.55), respectively (P=0.368) and the duration of attacks (SD) after intervention were 3.43 (2.46) and 4.90 (3.03), respectively (P=0.017). Twenty-three patients (68%) in amitriptyline group and 14 patients (39%) in topiramate group stopped having attacks after intervention (P=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Amitriptyline is a better choice to reduce severity of CVS attacks compared to topiramate, in a short-term evaluation. Studies with longer follow-up are required to investigate these findings in a longer period.

Migraine, Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome, and Other Gastrointestinal Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by episodic nausea and vomiting and is diagnosed using Rome IV criteria. CVS is being recognized more frequently in adults with a prevalence of 2%. It is associated with several functional disorders like autonomic dysfunction, anxiety, and depression, but the strongest association is with migraine. We will elucidate the close relationship between migraine and CVS and briefly discuss its association with other gastrointestinal disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

We highlight similarities in pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and response to medications between CVS and migraine (tricyclic antidepressants, triptans, antiepileptics). We also discuss novel therapies like CGRP inhibitors which are effective in migraine and have potential for adaptation in patients with CVS. Using migraine as a template should enable investigators to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this disorder, develop novel therapies, and direct future research in CVS.

An overview of the clinical management of cyclic vomiting syndrome in childhood

This narrative review provides an update on cyclic vomiting syndrome pathogenesis, diagnosis and management, based upon studies published after the 2008 North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) official recommendations. The review began with a comprehensive PubMed/Medline search for "cyclic vomiting syndrome", "periodic syndromes" and "pediatrics" from 2000 up to October 2017. Additional papers were identified by reviewing the re-ference lists of retrieved publications. Cyclic vomiting syndrome is a severe, debilitating disorder of the brain-gut axis with unclear pathogenesis, that significantly affects long-term quality of life of affected children and their families. The 2008 NASPGHAN recommendations defined the major clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic peculiarities. Over the last 10 years, advancements in pathogenesis and diagnostic criteria have been made, and new prophylactic and therapeutic strategies have been proposed. These aspects are discussed in this manuscript. For the pediatrician, the major aim is to have early clinical suspicion to avoid diagnostic delay and to start adequate, phase-related, symptom-tailored management.

Cyclic vomiting syndrome: diagnostic approach and current management strategies

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a disorder characterized by episodes of nausea and vomiting lasting for 1-5 days followed by asymptomatic periods. The etiology of CVS is unknown, but it shares similar characteristics to migraine headaches. CVS is generally classified as having four phases: prodromal, acute/vomiting/hyperemesis, recovery, and remission/interepisodic. Current management strategies include trigger avoidance, abortive and prophylactic medication therapies, and supportive care. The goal of therapy for the remission phase is prophylaxis of further episodes. Antidepressant, antiepileptic, and antimigraine medications show an overall reduction or remission of CVS symptoms in more than 70% of patients. This article provides a summary of diagnostic strategies and reviews current management strategies for CVS.

Managing cyclic vomiting syndrome in children: beyond the guidelines

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) in children is characterized by frequent hospitalizations, multiple comorbidities, and poor quality of life. In the absence of robust data, the treatment of CVS remains largely empiric starting with the 2008 NASPGHAN Consensus Statement recommendations of cyproheptadine for children < 5 years of age and amitriptyline for those ≥ 5 years with propranolol serving as the second-line agent. Comprehensive management begins with lifestyle alterations, and extends to medications, supplements, and stress reduction therapies. Standard drug therapy is organized by the four phases of the illness: (1) interictal (preventative medications and mitochondrial supplements), (2) prodromal (abortive agents), (3) vomiting (fluids/energy substrates, antiemetics, analgesics, and sedatives) and (4) recovery (supportive care and nutrition). Because the response to treatment is heterogeneous, clinicians often trial several different preventative strategies including NK1 antagonists, cautious titration of amitriptyline to higher doses, anticonvulsants, Ca²⁺-channel blockers, and other TCA antidepressants. When the child remains refractory to treatment, reconsideration of possible missed diagnoses and further mono- or combination therapy and psychotherapy can be guided by accompanying comorbidities (especially anxiety), specific subphenotype, and when available, genotype. For hospital intervention, IV fluids with 10% dextrose, antiemetics, and analgesics can lessen symptoms while effective sedation in some instances can truncate severe episodes.

CONCLUSION

Although management of CVS remains challenging to the clinician, approaches based upon recent literature and accumulated experience with subgroups of patients has led to improved treatment of the refractory and hospitalized patient. What is Known: • Cyclic vomiting syndrome is a complex disorder that remains challenging to manage. • Previous therapy has been guided by the NASPGHAN Consensus Statement of 2008. What is New: • New prophylactic approaches include NK1 antagonists and higher dosages of amitriptyline. • Strategies based upon comorbidities and subphenotype are helpful in refractory patients.

Emerging Topics in Gastroenterology

The bacteria and fungi in the human gut make up a community of microorganisms that lives in symbiosis with humans, engaging in numerous diverse interactions that influence health. This article outlines the current knowledge on emerging topics in gastroenterology, including microbiome and probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, cyclic vomiting syndrome, eosinophilic esophagitis, and microscopic colitis.