Expression of Tight Junction Proteins According to Functional Dyspepsia Subtype and Sex

Breaking Barriers in Functional Dyspepsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Duodenal Tight Junction Protein Expression

Background/Aims

Disruptions in tight junction (TJ) protein expression leading to duodenal epithelial barrier impairment may contribute to increased intestinal permeability, potentially playing a role in functional dyspepsia (FD) pathophysiology. Currently published studies evaluated the role of several TJ proteins in FD patients with inconsistent results. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and metaanalysis to evaluate the duodenal mucosal expression of several TJ proteins in FD.

Methods

We performed a systematic electronic search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus using predefined keywords. Diagnosis of FD by Rome III or Rome IV criteria was considered acceptable. Full articles satisfying our inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. The principal summary outcome was the mean difference of several TJ proteins in FD patients and control subjects.

Results

A total of 8 and 5 studies were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis, respectively, with a total population of 666 participants, out of which 420 were FD patients. No significant differences were observed between FD patients and controls in the expression of claudin-1 (-0.102 [95% CI, -0.303, 0.099]), claudin-2 (0.161 [95% CI, -0.134, 0.456)], claudin-3 (0.278 [95% CI, -0.280, 0.837]), claudin-4 (0.045 [95% CI, -0.264, 0.354]), ZO-1 (-0.221 [95% CI, -0.683, 0.241]), ZO-2 (-0.070 [95% CI, -0.147, 0.007]), ZO-3 (-0.129 [95% CI, -0.376, 0.118]), β-catenin (-0.135 [95% CI, -0.484, 0.214]), E-cadherin (-0.083 [95% CI, -0.229, 0.063]), and occludin (-0.158 [95% CI, -0.409, 0.093]).

Conclusions

The expressions of all evaluated proteins including claudin-1, claudin-2, claudin-3, claudin-4, ZO-1, ZO-2, ZO-3, β-catenin, E-cadherin, and occludin did not significantly differ between FD patients and controls. However, due to the limited number of included studies, results should be interpreted with caution.

Polyphenol- and Glucuronoxylan-Rich Fiber Extract from Birch (Betula sp.) Wood Regulates Colonic Barrier Function and Cell Proliferation in Healthy Rats

Birch wood-derived fiber extracts containing glucuronoxylans (GX) and polyphenols show potential for various food technological applications. This study investigated the effect of two extracts, GXpoly and pureGX, differing in lignin content on colonic barrier function. Healthy rats were fed diets containing 10% GXpoly, pureGX, or cellulose for 4 weeks. Colon crypt depth was lower in the GX groups than in the control group, but in the proximal colon, the result was significant only in GXpoly. An artificial intelligence approach was established to measure the mucus content and goblet cells. In the distal colon, their amounts were higher in the control group than in the GX groups. All diets had a similar effect on the expression of the tight junction proteins occludin, claudin-1, and claudin-7. GXpoly enhanced the fecal IgA production. Our results suggest that GX-rich extracts could support the colonic barrier and work as functional food ingredients in the future.

Intestinal Barrier and Gut Microbiota in Patients with Overlapping Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Disturbances in the intestinal barrier and gut dysbiosis have been observed in patients with functional bowel diseases.

AIMS

To investigate the correlation between biomarkers of intestinal barrier disorders at different layers and the severity of symptoms in patients with overlapping diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia (IDFO), as well as with gut microbiota taxa.

METHODS

This study included 45 patients with IDFO and 16 healthy controls. Endoscopy with biopsy of the duodenum and sigmoid colon (SC) was performed to count intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) and mucosal eosinophils (subepithelial layer), assess fatty acid binding protein (FABP; epithelial layer) level, and stain for mucin-2 (MUC-2; pre-epithelial layer). Composition of the gut microbiota was evaluated using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

RESULTS

Patients with IDFO exhibited an increase in biomarkers of intestinal barrier disorders at all layers studied. IEL count in the duodenum was correlated with the severity of bloating (r = 0.336; p = 0.024) and, in the SC, was correlated with tenesmus severity (r = 0.303; p = 0.042). FABP-1 level in the SC was correlated with the severity of diarrhea (r = 0.577; p = 0.001), and FABP-5 concentration in the SC was correlated with abdominal distension (r = 0.477; p = 0.010). MUC-2 concentration in the duodenum was correlated with the severity of heartburn (r = 0.572; p = 0.025) and burning sensation in the epigastrium (r = 0.518; p = 0.048). All biomarkers of intestinal barrier permeability were correlated with the abundance of some gut microbiota taxa.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IDFO exhibited disrupted intestinal barrier function in all layers, which was associated with clinical symptom severity and changes in the gut microbiota.

Rabeprazole destroyed gastric epithelial barrier function through FOXF1/STAT3-mediated ZO-1 expression

Rabeprazole is a representative of proton pump inhibitors and widely used in anti-ulcer treatment. However, the effect of Rabeprazole on gut barrier function remains to be identified. In this study, we show that ZO-1 expression is decreased in patients receiving Rabeprazole by immunofluorescence (IF) analysis. Western blotting (WB) and real-time PCR (qPCR) results demonstrate that Rabeprazole treatment leads to a significant downregulation of ZO-1 expression through inhibition of the FOXF1/STAT3 pathway, leading to destroy barrier function, which illustrates a novel pathway that Rabeprazole regulates barrier function in gastric epithelial cells. Mechanistically, Rabeprazole treatment led to a downregulation of STAT3 and FOXF1 phosphorylation, leading to inhibit nuclear translocation and decrease the binding of STAT3 and FOXF1 to ZO-1 promoter, respectively. Most important, endogenous FOXF1 interacted with STAT3, and this interaction was dramatically abolished by Rabeprazole stimulation. Overexpression of STAT3 and FOXF1 in GES-1 cells reversed the inhibitory effect of Rabeprazole on ZO-1 expression, respectively. These finding extended the function of Rabeprazole and established a previously unappreciated mechanism by which the Rabeprazole/FOXF1/STAT3 axis facilitated ZO-1 expression to regulate barrier function, and a comprehensive consideration and evaluation was required in treatment of patients.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on the expression of tight junction proteins in the gastric epithelium in relation to gastric carcinogenesis

BACKGROUND

Tight junction proteins (TJPs) play a role in epithelial defense mechanisms. However, the effect of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) on TJPs remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the expression of TJPs in relation to Hp infection and eradication in gastric carcinogenesis.

METHODS

In total, 510 subjects (284 controls and 226 gastric cancer [GC] patients) were prospectively enrolled in the study. The expression of claudin-1 and -2 (CLDN-1, -2), occludin (OCLN), and tight junction protein 1 (TJP1) was measured based on their Hp infection status in normal corpus mucosa and evaluated following Hp eradication using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

RESULTS

The expression of TJP1 in Hp⁺ controls was significantly lower than that in Hp^- controls (p = 0.006), whereas it was higher in Hp⁺ than in Hp^- GC patients (p = 0.001). Moreover, the increased expression of TJP1 in Hp⁺ GC patients was reduced to levels in Hp^- within a year after Hp eradication and was maintained for more than 5 years. Furthermore, IHC results for TJP1 were similar to qPCR results. In particular, the higher IHC staining intensity of TJP1 in the cytosol of GC patients (p = 0.019) decreased after Hp eradication (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

Hp infection affects TJP expression. The high expression of TJP1 in Hp⁺ GC patients was restored to control levels after Hp eradication, suggesting that TJP1 plays a role in gastric carcinogenesis.

Enterochromaffin Cells-Gut Microbiota Crosstalk: Underpinning the Symptoms, Pathogenesis, and Pharmacotherapy in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction

Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs) are common conditions in community and clinical practice. As specialized enteroendocrine cells, enterochromaffin (EC) cells produce up to 95% of total body serotonin and coordinate luminal and basolateral communication in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. EC cells affect a broad range of gut physiological processes, such as motility, absorption, secretion, chemo/mechanosensation, and pathologies, including visceral hypersensitivity, immune dysfunction, and impaired gastrointestinal barrier function. We aim to review EC cell and serotonin-mediated physiology and pathophysiology with particular emphasis on DGBIs. We explored the knowledge gap and attempted to suggest new perspectives of physiological and pathophysiological insights of DGBIs, such as (1) functional heterogeneity of regionally distributed EC cells throughout the entire GI tract; (2) potential pathophysiological mechanisms mediated by EC cell defect in DGBIs; (3) cellular and molecular mechanisms characterizing EC cells and gut microbiota bidirectional communication; (4) differential modulation of EC cells through GI segment-specific gut microbiota; (5) uncover whether crosstalk between EC cells and (i) luminal contents; (ii) enteric nervous system; and (iii) central nervous system are core mechanisms modulating gut-brain homeostasis; and (6) explore the therapeutic modalities for physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms mediated through EC cells. Insights discussed in this review will fuel the conception and realization of pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic clues to improve the management and clinical care of DGBIs.

Current Treatment Options and Therapeutic Insights for Gastrointestinal Dysmotility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) have been re-named as disorders of gut-brain interactions. These conditions are not only common in clinical practice, but also in the community. In reference to the Rome IV criteria, the most common FGIDs, include functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Additionally, there is substantial overlap of these disorders and other specific gastrointestinal motility disorders, such as gastroparesis. These disorders are heterogeneous and are intertwined with several proposed pathophysiological mechanisms, such as altered gut motility, intestinal barrier dysfunction, gut immune dysfunction, visceral hypersensitivity, altered GI secretion, presence and degree of bile acid malabsorption, microbial dysbiosis, and alterations to the gut-brain axis. The treatment options currently available include lifestyle modifications, dietary and gut microbiota manipulation interventions including fecal microbiota transplantation, prokinetics, antispasmodics, laxatives, and centrally and peripherally acting neuromodulators. However, treatment that targets the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the symptoms are scanty. Pharmacological agents that are developed based on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying pathologies of these disorders might provide the best avenue for future pharmaceutical development. The currently available therapies lack long-term effectiveness and safety for their use to treat motility disorders and FGIDs. Furthermore, the fundamental challenges in treating these disorders should be defined; for instance, 1. Cause and effect cannot be disentangled between symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms due to current therapies that entail the off-label use of medications to treat symptoms. 2. Despite the knowledge that the microbiota in our gut plays an essential part in maintaining gut health, their exact functions in gut homeostasis are still unclear. What constitutes a healthy microbiome and further, the precise definition of gut microbial dysbiosis is lacking. More comprehensive, large-scale, and longitudinal studies utilizing multi-omics data are needed to dissect the exact contribution of gut microbial alterations in disease pathogenesis. Accordingly, we review the current treatment options, clinical insight on pathophysiology, therapeutic modalities, current challenges, and therapeutic clues for the clinical care and management of functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, and functional diarrhea.

Gut microbiota dysbiosis in functional gastrointestinal disorders: Underpinning the symptoms and pathophysiology

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), currently known as disorders of gut-brain interaction, are emerging microbiota-gut-brain abnormalities that are prevalent worldwide. The pathogenesis of FGIDs is heterogeneous and is intertwined with gut microbiota and its derived molecule-modulated mechanisms, including gut dysmotility, visceral hypersensitivity, gut immune abnormalities, abnormal secretion, and impaired barrier function. There has been phenomenal progress in understanding the role of gut microbiota in FGIDs by underpinning the species alternations between healthy and pathological conditions such as FGIDs. However, the precise gut microbiota-directed cellular and molecular pathogeneses of FGIDs are yet enigmatic. Determining the mechanistic link between the gut microbiota and gastrointestinal (GI) diseases has been difficult due to (i) the lack of robust animal models imitating the various aspects of human FGID pathophysiology; (ii) the absence of longitudinal human and/or animal studies to unveil the interaction of the gut microbiota with FGID-relevant pathogenesis; (iii) uncertainty about connections between human and animal studies; and (iv) insufficient data supporting a holistic view of disease-specific pathophysiological changes in FGID patients. These unidentified gaps open possibilities to explore pathological mechanisms directed through gut microbiota dysbiosis in FGIDs. The current treatment options for dysbiotic gut microbiota are limited; dietary interventions, antibiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation are the front-line clinical options. Here, we review the contribution of gut microbiota and its derived molecules in gut homeostasis and explore the possible pathophysiological mechanisms involved in FGIDs leading to potential therapeutics options.

Transcriptome profiling implicated in beneficiary actions of kimchi extracts against Helicobacter pylori infection

Dietary intervention to prevent Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-gastric cancer might be ideal because of no risk of bacterial resistance, safety, and rejuvenating action of atrophic gastritis. We have published data about the potential of fermented kimchi as nutritional approach for H. pylori. Hence recent advances in RNAseq analysis lead us to investigate the transcriptome analysis to explain these beneficiary actions of kimchi. gastric cells were infected with either H. pylori or H. pylori plus kimchi. 943 genes were identified as significantly increased or decreased genes according to H. pylori infection and 68 genes as significantly changed between H. pylori infection and H. pylori plus kimchi (p<0.05). Gene classification and Medline database showed DLL4, FGF18, PTPRN, SLC7A11, CHAC1, FGF21, ASAN, CTH, and CREBRF were identified as significantly increased after H. pylori, but significantly decreased with kimchi and NEO1, CLDN8, KLRG1, and IGFBP1 were identified as significantly decreased after H. pylori, but increased with kimchi. After KEGG and STRING-GO analysis, oxidative stress, ER stress, cell adhesion, and apoptosis genes were up-regulated with H. pylori infection but down-regulated with kimchi, whereas tissue regeneration, cellular anti-oxidative response, and anti-inflammation genes were reversely regulated with kimchi (p<0.01). Conclusively, transcriptomes of H. pylori plus kimchi showed significant biological actions.

Roles of Sex Hormones and Gender in the Gut Microbiota

The distribution of gut microbiota varies according to age (childhood, puberty, pregnancy, menopause, and old age) and sex. Gut microbiota are known to contribute to gastrointestinal (GI) diseases such as irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and colon cancer; however, the exact etiology remains elusive. Recently, sex and gender differences in GI diseases and their relation to gut microbiota has been suggested. Furthermore, the metabolism of estrogen and androgen was reported to be related to the gut microbiome. As gut microbiome is involved in the excretion and circulation process of sex hormones, the concept of “microgenderome” indicating the role of sex hormone on the gut microbiota has been suggested. However, further research is needed for this concept to be universally accepted. In this review, we summarize sex- and gender-differences in gut microbiota and the interplay of microbiota and GI diseases, focusing on sex hormones. We also describe the metabolic role of the microbiota in this regard. Finally, current subjects, such as medication including probiotics, are briefly discussed.

Functional Dyspepsia: A Narrative Review With a Focus on Sex-Gender Differences

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is among the most common gastrointestinal disorders affecting quality of life (QoL). As it frequently occurs in women than in men the comparison of various aspects including prevalence, clinical manifestations, and QoL in FD between women and men is very important for understanding the disease distribution and burden, evaluating treatment options, developing new drugs, and allocating medical resources. However, little is known about sex or gender differences among patients with FD. In spite of limited studies, consistent points are that FD occurs more often in women than in men and there are several symptom differences between men and women with FD. In addition, women with FD tend to have lower QoL than men with FD. Similarly, the pathophysiology of FD likely to vary depending on gender. Furthermore, a sex-gender-oriented approach in healthcare system could enhance understanding heterogeneous patients suffering from FD. Due to the sex-gender differences in physiological and psychological factors, treatment strategies should differ between women and men with FD. In conclusion, an individualized and multicomponent approach that considers sex and gender issues might improve FD treatment and improve patient Qol, especially for women.