Normal Values of High-resolution Manometry Parameters With Provocative Maneuvers

Integrated Relaxation Pressure and Its Diagnostic Ability May Vary According to the Conditions Used for HREM Recording

Integrated Residual Pressure (IRP) measured under conditions alternative to supine single swallows may provide clinically useful information regarding EGJ relaxation. This study aimed to compare IRP values obtained under different situations and explore their potential clinical utility. We analyzed and compared the values of IRP obtained from healthy volunteers and patients with suspected achalasia during supine single swallows (Ssup-IRP), sitting single swallows (Ssit-IRP), supine multiple rapid swallows (Msup-IRP), and sitting multiple rapid swallows (Msit-IRP). We analyzed the HREM recordings of 40 healthy volunteers and 53 patients with suspected achalasia. The four metrics were significantly different from each other in healthy volunteers (Ssup-IRP > Msup-IRP > Ssit-IRP > Msit-IRP) and their corresponding 95th percentiles were substantially distinct (Ssup-IRP: 25.3 mmHg, Ssit-IRP: 20.9 mmHg, Msup-IRP: 15.9 mmHg, and Msit-IRP: 11.9 mm Hg, respectively). Complete agreement among the four metrics in predicting abnormal IRP was found in 39 of the 47 patients with suspected achalasia who completed the protocol. Optimal cutoffs derived from ROC curve analysis demonstrated ≥ 0.95 specificities for detection of impaired EGJ relaxation among patients with suspected achalasia. Among the eight patients with suspected achalasia with normal Ssup-IRP, five demonstrated abnormal Msit-IRP and four abnormal Ssit-IRP. Significant differences of IRP exist depending on the measurement situation, indicating that correct interpretation of IRP values requires specific cutoffs for each situation.The sensitivities of Ssit-IRP and Msit-IRP in detecting defective EGJ relaxation appear to be slightly higher than that of Ssup-IRP.

Contraction reserve in high resolution manometry is correlated with lower esophageal acid exposure time in patients with normal esophageal motility: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

In high resolution manometry (HRM), distal contractile integral post multiple rapid swallow augmentation is considered as contraction reserve. The relationship between contraction reserve and esophageal acid reflux remains unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the correlation between contraction reserve and esophageal acid exposure in ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and normal HRM.

METHODS

Patients who underwent HRM and ambulatory reflux monitoring were retrospectively screened. Those with diagnosis of normal HRM or IEM were included in the analysis. The proportion of patients with abnormal acid exposure time (AET) was compared between patients with and without contraction reserve. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of abnormal AET and contraction reserve.

RESULTS

A total of 338 patients, including 264 normal HRM and 74 IEM, were included in the analysis. In patients with normal HRM, proportion of abnormal total AET (AET > 6.0%) was significantly lower in patients with supine contraction reserve than patients without contraction reserve (13.85% vs. 24.63%, p = 0.027). Multivariate regression analysis showed that supine contraction reserve could independently predict abnormal total AET (OR = 0.468, 95% CI: 0.249-0.948, p = 0.034), while upright contraction reserve trended strongly (OR = 0.558, 95% CI: 0.290-1.071, p = 0.079). Subgroup analysis showed that upright contraction reserve was an independent predictor of abnormal total AET in patients with 50-70% infective swallows (OR = 0.205, 95% CI: 0.051-0.821, p = 0.025), whereas supine contraction reserve did not have predictive value (p = 0.359).

CONCLUSIONS

Supine contraction reserve correlates with esophageal acid reflux in patients with normal HRM, while only upright contraction reserve correlates with esophageal acid reflux in patients with infective swallows of 50-70%.

Peroral esophageal myotomy for esophageal motility disorders

The concept of third space endoscopy first described in 2007, was adapted and performed in humans in 2010 by Inoue et al. in a group of patients with esophageal achalasia (EA). Since then, esophageal endoscopic myotomy (E-POEM), has been performed in more than 10,000 patients worldwide up to now. Safety and efficacy have been confirmed at early, mid and long-term evaluations, in different gastrointestinal diseases including achalasia, refractory gastroparesis, and other esophageal motility disorders (EMD). Nowadays, this treatment has shown to be not only an excellent option, but also with its excellent outcomes, the first option in certain clinical scenarios such as type III achalasia. Thus, the minimal invasive nature of POEM gives us multiple advantages compared with the classical treatments that includes pneumatic dilation (PD) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), including not only clinical aspects but also economical. High resolution manometry (HRM) has substantially redefined the actual approach of esophageal motility disorders with the major changes in instrumental use, diagnostic algorithms, and therapeutics. The previous Chicago's classification V 3.0 clearly improved our knowledge about pathophysiology of spastic esophageal motor disorders, however, with its recent update (Chicago V 4.0), multiple changes in diagnosis and treatment are expected. In the present article, we aimed to review and analyze the most important aspects about the results of E-POEM in the management of EMD according to the view of the new Chicago's classification V 4.0.

Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry Helps Identify Clinically Relevant Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction per Chicago Classification v4.0

INTRODUCTION

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO) per Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) represents a high-resolution manometry (HRM) diagnosis with uncertain clinical significance. This study aimed to evaluate functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry among patients with EGJOO on HRM/CCv4.0 to assess clinical/manometric associations and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was performed on patients who completed FLIP during endoscopy and had an HRM/CCv4.0 diagnosis of EGJOO, i.e., HRM-EGJOO (inconclusive). Abnormal FLIP panometry motility classifications were applied to identify FLIP-confirmed conclusive EGJOO. Rapid drink challenge on HRM and timed barium esophagram were also assessed. Clinical management plan was determined by treating physicians and assessed through chart review. Clinical outcome was defined using the Eckardt score (ES) during follow-up evaluation: ES < 3 was considered a good outcome.

RESULTS

Of 139 adult patients with manometric EGJOO (inconclusive per CCv4.0), a treatment outcome ES was obtained in 55 after achalasia-type treatment (i.e., pneumatic dilation, peroral endoscopic myotomy, laparoscopic Heller myotomy, or botulinum toxin injection) and 36 patients after other nonachalasia-type treatment. Among patients with conclusive EGJOO by HRM-FLIP complementary impression, 77% (33/43) had a good outcome after achalasia-type treatment, whereas 0% (0/12) of patients had a good outcome after nonachalasia-type treatment. Of patients with normal EGJ opening on FLIP, one-third of patients treated with achalasia-type treatment had a good outcome, while 9 of the 10 treated conservatively had a good outcome.

DISCUSSION

FLIP panometry provides a useful complement to clarify the clinical significance of an HRM/CCv4.0 EGJOO diagnosis and help direct management decisions.

High-resolution manometry with additional maneuvers using the Starlet system: normative thresholds and diagnostic yields for relevant esophagogastric junction outflow disorders

BACKGROUND

Chicago classification version 4.0 suggests additional maneuvers, such as upright testing, multiple rapid swallows (MRS), and the rapid drink challenge (RDC), for high-resolution manometry (HRM) to minimize ambiguity in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. The present study investigated normative thresholds for these new metrics using the Starlet system as well as their diagnostic yields for relevant esophagogastric outflow disorders (EGJOD).

METHODS

In study 1, 30 asymptomatic volunteers prospectively performed HRM including MRS and RDC in the supine/upright positions. We calculated normative thresholds for the new metrics, such as upright integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), upright intrabolus pressure (IBP), and IRP during RDC (RDC-IRP). In study 2, we retrospectively analyzed the HRM tracings of 82 patients who underwent HRM in both positions at our hospital to assess the diagnostic yields of HRM metrics.

RESULTS

Based on the results of study 1, we adopted the following normative thresholds: upright IRP < 20 mmHg, upright IBP < 21 mmHg, and RDC-IRP < 16 mmHg. In study 2, 45 patients with dysphagia or chest pain were included in the analysis to identify predictive factors for clinically relevant esophagogastric outflow disorders (true EGJOD). Supine/upright IRP, RDC-IRP, and pan-esophageal pressurization > 20 mmHg during RDC (RDC-PEP) predicted true EGJOD with RDC-PEP with the highest sensitivity of 91.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

HRM with additional maneuvers may facilitate the diagnosis of clinically relevant EGJOD.