Esophageal Motility Patterns After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients With Achalasia

Clinical outcomes and manometry results of peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: experience in a Latin American referral centre

INTRODUCTION

Currently there is little information in Latin America on the clinical outcome and manometric evolution of patients with Achalasia undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Evaluate the manometric and clinical changes in adult patients with achalasia after peroral endoscopic myotomy at a referral center in Bogotá, Colombia.

METHODS

Observational, analytical, longitudinal study. Adult patients with achalasia according to the Chicago 4.0 criteria were included. Sociodemographic, clinical and manometric variables were described. To compare the pre- and post-surgical variables, the Student's or Wilcoxon's t test was used for the quantitative variables according to their normality, and McNemar's chi-square for the qualitative variables.

RESULTS

29 patients were included, 55.17% (n=16) women, with a mean age at the time of surgery of 48.2 years (±11.33). The mean post-procedure evaluation time was 1.88±0.81 years. After the procedure, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with weight loss (37.93% vs 21.43% p 0.0063), chest pain (48.28% vs 21.43, p 0.0225) and the median Eckardt score (8 (IQR 8 -9) vs 2(IQR 1-2), p <0.0001). In addition, in fourteen patients with post-surgical manometry, significant differences were found between IRP values (23.05±14.83mmHg vs 7.69±6.06mmHg, p 0.026) and in the mean lower esophageal sphincter tone (9.63±7.2mmHg vs 28.8±18.60mmHg, p 0.0238).

CONCLUSION

Peroral endoscopic myotomy has a positive impact on the improvement of symptoms and of some manometric variables (IRP and LES tone) in patients with achalasia.

Prediction, prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: An update

Achalasia cardia, the most prevalent primary esophageal motility disorder, is predominantly characterized by symptoms of dysphagia and regurgitation. The principal therapeutic approaches for achalasia encompass pneumatic dilatation (PD), Heller's myotomy, and the more recent per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). POEM has been substantiated as a safe and efficacious modality for the management of achalasia. Although POEM demonstrates superior efficacy compared to PD and an efficacy parallel to Heller's myotomy, the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following POEM is notably higher than with the aforementioned techniques. While symptomatic reflux post-POEM is relatively infrequent, the significant occurrence of erosive esophagitis and heightened esophageal acid exposure necessitates vigilant monitoring to preclude long-term GERD-related complications. Contemporary advancements in the field have enhanced our comprehension of the risk factors, diagnostic methodologies, preventative strategies, and therapeutic management of GERD subsequent to POEM. This review focuses on the limitations inherent in the 24-h pH study for evaluating post-POEM reflux, potential modifications in the POEM technique to mitigate GERD risk, and the strategies for managing reflux following POEM.

Presence of esophageal contractility after achalasia treatment is associated with improved esophageal emptying

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Some achalasia patients exhibit esophageal contractile activity on follow-up after treatment, yet its importance remains unclear. We aimed to identify factors associated with presence of contractility after treatment and to assess its impact on timed barium esophagram (TBE) and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with type I or II achalasia on baseline high-resolution manometry (HRM) who completed HRM, TBE, and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) after treatment were retrospectively identified. Contractility was defined on post-treatment HRM as presence of at least 1 supine swallow with DCI ≥100 mmHg s cm.

KEY RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients were included (mean age 48 ± 17 years, 50% female). At follow-up evaluation after treatment (54% peroral endoscopic myotomy, 24% pneumatic dilation, 22% laparoscopic Heller myotomy), 61 (50%) patients had contractility on HRM. Patients with contractility (compared to those without) more frequently had type II achalasia (84% vs 57%, p = 0.001) and a post-treatment normal EGJ opening classification on FLIP (69% vs 49%; p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with post-treatment integrated relaxation pressure <15 mmHg and normal EGJ opening on FLIP (n = 53), those with contractility had a lower median column height on TBE at 1 min (4 vs 7 cm, p = 0.002) and 5 min (0 vs 5 cm, p = 0.001). In patients with "abnormal" EGJ metrics, patients with contractility showed lower symptom scores (median Eckardt score 2 vs 3, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Occurring more frequently in type II achalasia, and if adequate EGJ opening is achieved after treatment, esophageal contractility may contribute to improved esophageal emptying and improved symptoms in non-spastic achalasia. Preservation of esophageal body muscle could improve outcomes in these patients.

Malaysian joint societies' consensus recommendations on diagnosis and management of disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow

Disorders of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow, including achalasia and EGJ outflow obstruction, are motility disorders characterized by inadequate relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter with or without impaired esophageal peristalsis. Current guidelines are technical and less practical in the Asia-Pacific region, and there are still massive challenges in timely diagnosis and managing these disorders effectively. Therefore, a Malaysian joint societies' task force has developed a consensus on disorders of EGJ outflow based on the latest evidence, while taking into consideration the practical relevance of local and regional context and resources. Twenty-one statements were established after a series of meetings and extensive review of literatures. The Delphi method was used in the consensus voting process. This consensus focuses on the definition, diagnostic investigations, the aims of treatment outcome, non-surgical or surgical treatment options, management of treatment failure or relapse, and the management of complications. This consensus advocates the use of high-resolution esophageal manometry for diagnosis of disorders of EGJ outflow. Myotomy, via either endoscopy or laparoscopy, is the preferred treatment option, while pneumatic dilatation can serve as a secondary option. Evaluation and management of complications including post-procedural reflux and cancer surveillance are recommended.

Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy on growth and esophageal motility for pediatric esophageal achalasia

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), a novel minimally invasive treatment for esophageal achalasia, has been shown to be effective and safe for both adult and pediatric patients. However, studies on its application in children in Taiwan and its impact on growth and esophageal motility are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive pediatric patients who were diagnosed with esophageal achalasia at National Taiwan University Hospital and underwent POEM during 2015-2022. Disease characteristics and treatment outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ten patients (age 16.9 ± 3.1 years), nine newly diagnosed and one previously treated with pneumatic dilatation, underwent POEM for achalasia (type I/II/III: 3/7/0). Average symptom duration before diagnosis was 19.4 ± 19.9 months, mean POEM procedure time was 83.6 ± 30.7 min, and clinical success (Eckardt score ≤3) was achieved in all patients. Eight patients experienced mild adverse events during POEM, but none required further endoscopic or surgical intervention. Over a mean follow-up period of 3.7 ± 1.6 years, mean Eckardt score decreased significantly from 5.7 ± 2.4 to 1.1 ± 0.7 (p = 0.0001). The BMI z-score also increased significantly after POEM (p = 0.023). Five patients received follow-up high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM), and all had improved lower esophageal sphincter resting pressures (p = 0.011), body contractility, and bolus transit (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

POEM is an effective and safe treatment for pediatric achalasia in Taiwan. Early diagnosis and treatment with POEM may help to restore esophageal function and nutrition status in children.

True peristaltic recovery is uncommon following treatment, particularly endoscopic dilation for achalasia cardia, though pseudo-recovery often occurs

BACKGROUND

Relieving esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction has been the focus of treatment for achalasia cardia. The recovery of peristalsis has been an elusive goal. Studies analyzing post-intervention peristaltic recovery have several limitations such as the use of conventional manometry or lack of standard definitions of peristalsis. Accordingly, we undertook this study to analyze frequency and pattern of peristaltic recovery following treatment for achalasia cardia on high-resolution manometry (HRM) and standard Chicago definition of peristalsis.

METHODS

Pre and post-intervention HRM records of 71 treatment-naive patients diagnosed as achalasia cardia were retrospectively analyzed. Records with pre and post-intervention HRM on different systems (e.g. solid state and water perfusion) and those with inadequate information were excluded. All HRMs were interpreted as per Chicago classification version 3.0. After pneumatic dilation (PD) or laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM), pseudorecovery of peristalsis was defined as any contraction at least 3 cm in length along 20 mmHg isobaric contour with a distal latency of less than 4.5 seconds. True recovery and premature contractions were defined by standard Chicago classification v3.0 criteria.

RESULTS

Change in diagnosis was observed in 38 of 71 (53.5%) patients after intervention. While pseudo-peristaltic recovery occurred in 11 of 71 (15.5%) patients, only three (4.2%) had a true recovery. Another nine (12.7%) patients showed new premature contractions.

CONCLUSION

True peristaltic recovery is uncommon in achalasia cardia following intervention, particularly PD. Pseudo-peristaltic recovery is more common. Further research is warranted on this issue.

Identifying spastic variant of type II achalasia after treatment with high-resolution manometry and FLIP Panometry

BACKGROUND

Panesophageal pressurization (PEP) defines type II achalasia on high-resolution-manometry (HRM) but some patients exhibit spasm after treatment. The Chicago Classification (CC) v4.0 proposed high PEP values as predictor of embedded spasm, yet supportive evidence is lacking.

METHODS

Fifty seven type II achalasia patients (47 ± 18 years, 54% males) with HRM and LIP Panometry before and after treatment were retrospectively identified. Baseline HRM and FLIP studies were analyzed to identify factors associated with post-treatment spasm, defined on HRM per CC v4.0.

RESULTS

Seven patients (12%) had spasm following treatment (peroral endoscopic myotomy 47%; pneumatic dilation [PD] 37%; laparoscopic Heller myotomy 16%). At baseline, greater median maximum PEP pressure (MaxPEP) values on HRM (77 vs 55 mmHg, p = 0.045) and spastic-reactive contractile response pattern on FLIP (43% vs 8%, p = 0.033) were more common in patients with post-treatment spasm while absent contractile response on FLIP was more common in patients without spasm (14% vs 66%, p = 0.014). The strongest predictor of post-treatment spasm was the percentage of swallows with MaxPEP ≥70 mmHg (best cut-off: ≥30%), with AUROC of 0.78. A combination of MaxPEP <70 mmHg and FLIP 60 mL pressure < 40 mmHg identified patients with lower rates of post-treatment spasm (3% overall, 0% post-PD) compared to those with values above these thresholds (33% overall, 83% post-PD).

CONCLUSIONS

High maximum PEP values, high FLIP 60 mL pressures and contractile response pattern on FLIP Panometry prior to treatment identified type II achalasia patients more likely to exhibit post-treatment spasm. Evaluating these features may guide personalized patient management.

Impact of peroral endoscopic myotomy on high-resolution manometry findings and their association with the procedure's outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is conducted for patients with esophageal motility disorders based on high-resolution manometry (HRM) findings. However, the impact of POEM on HRM findings and the associations between post-POEM HRM and outcomes have not been clarified.

METHODS

In a multicenter, observational, cohort study, patients with achalasia treated by POEM received follow-up HRM. Associations between patient characteristics, POEM procedures, and post-POEM HRM findings, including integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and distal contractile integral (DCI), were investigated. Furthermore, POEM procedure outcomes were compared with post-POEM HRM findings.

RESULTS

Of 2171 patients, 151 (7.0%) showed residual high post-POEM IRP (≥26 mm Hg; Starlet [Starmedical Ltd, Tokyo, Japan]). In a multivariate analysis, high pre-POEM IRPs (odds ratio [OR], 24.3) and gastric myotomy >2 cm (OR, .22) were found to be positive and negative predictive factors of high post-POEM IRPs, respectively. Peristalsis recovery (DCI ≥500 mm Hg/cm/s, at least 1 swallow; Starlet) was visible in 121 of 618 patients (19.6%) who had type II to III achalasia. High pre-POEM IRP (OR, 2.65) and DCI ≥500 (OR, 2.98) predicted peristalsis recovery, whereas esophageal dilation (OR, .42) predicted a risk of no recovery. Extended myotomy did not reveal a significant impact on peristalsis recovery. High or low post-POEM IRP and DCI did not increase the incidence of clinical failure, reflux esophagitis, or symptomatic GERD.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended gastric myotomy decreased IRP values, whereas peristalsis recovery depended on the characteristics of achalasia. A residual high post-POEM IRP does not necessarily mean clinical failure. Routine HRM follow-up is not recommended after POEM.

TYPE II ACHALASIA WITH SUBSEQUENT RECOVERY OF ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY - POEM

CASE REPORT

54-year-old woman with acromegaly due to pituitary macroadenoma that consulted for dysphagia for solids. In gastroscopy, it is observed difficulty in passing in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Under the suspect of Achalasia, a high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) was performed, observing a complete absence of motility of the esophageal body, panesophageal pressurization in > 20% of swallows and IRP of 21mmHg, confirming the diagnosis of type II Achalasia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is performed. After the intervention, the patient presented clinical improvement. In the control HRM carried out one year after the POEM, in addition to a decrease in IRP, is remarkable a partial recovery of motility in the upper and middle third of the esophagus.

DISCUSSION

Achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder characterized by incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and a complete absence of peristalsis in the esophageal body. The cause of the absence of motility is the loss of the inhibitory neurons of the myenteric plexus, but the accurate etiopathogenesis is still unknown. Therefore, there is no curative treatment and all therapeutic options are symptomatic, aimed to relieve the obstruction of the EGJ. POEM is the newest method. Absence of motility of the esophageal body in patients with achalasia was believed to be irreversible. Nevertheless, more and more studies describe a partial recovery of motility observed in manometry after POEM, especially in type II Achalasia. The exact pathophysiological mechanism of this recovery is still unknown.

IMAGES DESCRIPTION

Figure 1 (Before POEM): High-resolution manometry with a diagnosis of type II Achalasia: Absence of motility, panesophageal pressurization and IRP 21mmHg Figure 2 (After POEM): High resolution manometry showing ineffective esophageal motility (partial recovery of motility) after POEM with IRP of 4mmHg.

Clinical and financial outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy compared to laparoscopic heller myotomy for treatment of achalasia

BACKGROUND

Previous studies analyzing short-term outcomes for per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) have shown excellent clinical response rates and shorter operative times compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Despite this, many payors have been slow to recognize POEM as a valid treatment option. Furthermore, comparative studies analyzing long-term outcomes are limited. This study compares perioperative and long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and reimbursement for POEM and LHM at a single institution.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent POEM or LHM between 2014 and 2021 and had complete preoperative data with at least one complete follow up, were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, success rate, operative time, myotomy length, length of stay, pre- and postoperative symptom scores, anti-reflux medication use, cost and reimbursement were compared.

RESULTS

58 patients met inclusion with 25 undergoing LHM and 33 undergoing POEM. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics. Treatment success (Eckardt ≤ 3) for POEM and LHM was achieved by 88% and 76% of patients, respectively (p = 0.302). POEM patients had a shorter median operative time (106 min. vs. 145 min., p = 0.003) and longer median myotomy length (11 cm vs. 8 cm, p < 0.001). All LHM patients had a length of stay (LOS) ≥ 1 day vs. 51.5% for POEM patients (p < 0.001). Both groups showed improvements in dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation, Eckardt score, GERD HRQL, RSI, and anti-reflux medication use. The improvement in dysphagia score was greater in patients undergoing POEM (2.30 vs 1.12, p = 0.003). Median hospital reimbursement was dramatically less for POEM ($3,658 vs. $14,152, p = 0.002), despite median hospital costs being significantly lower compared to LHM ($2,420 vs. $3,132, p = 0.029).

RESULTS

POEM is associated with a shorter operative time and LOS, longer myotomy length, and greater resolution of dysphagia compared to LHM. POEM costs are significantly less than LHM but is poorly reimbursed.

Post-per-oral endoscopic myotomy heartburn: It's not always reflux: Expert review

Patients with achalasia frequently develop gastroesophageal reflux (GER)-related symptoms and complications after per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Reflux symptoms are thought to be due to GER and the current treatment of post-POEM GER focuses on acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPI). However, reflux symptoms in achalasia patients post-POEM can be due to true reflux, nonreflux esophageal acidification due to stasis or acid fermentation, or esophageal hypersensitivity to chemical or mechanical stimuli. True acidic reflux is not always the cause of reflux symptoms. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring with impedance is essential to differentiate causes of esophageal acidification. PPI is useful only in true acidic reflux. Detection of acid fermentation requires manual review of a 24-h pH study, as automated review often overestimates acid exposure time due to its inability to differentiate true reflux from fermentation. Stasis of ingested acidic food warrants evaluation of esophageal emptying by timed barium esophagogram. In cases of inadequate emptying, esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility can be evaluated by a functional lumen imaging probe. Impaired distensibility with inadequate esophageal emptying suggests treatment failure and may require retreatment. In treatment-refractory patients, esophageal hypersensitivity should be considered and treated with neuromodulators. Thus, the diagnostic approach to post-POEM reflux symptoms should evolve to identify various patterns of esophageal acidification, esophageal emptying patterns, EGJ distensibility, and hypersensitivity. Consequently, the treatment of GER post-POEM should not be limited to treating esophageal acidification by reflux, but should encompass other causes of acidification and esophageal hypersensitivity.

Clinical efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: A multicenter study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), a novel minimally invasive treatment for esophageal achalasia, is becoming more popular globally because of its efficacy and safety. We aimed to clarify the technical concerns, efficacy, and safety of POEM for treating esophageal achalasia in Taiwan.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between October 2016 and May 2021 at three medical centers in Taiwan. All patients underwent a comprehensive work-up before POEM, including symptom questionnaires, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, timed barium esophagogram (TBE), and high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM), and were re-evaluated three months after POEM. We compared procedure variables, adverse events, and clinical responses, including Eckardt score ≤3 and TBE and HRIM findings.

RESULTS

We analyzed 92 patients in total (54 men; mean age 49.5 years [range: 20-87]; type I/II/III/unclassified: 24/51/1/16). The mean POEM procedure duration was 89.5 ± 38.2 min, though it was significantly longer in patients with prior treatment or sigmoid-type achalasia. In total, 91 patients (98.9%) showed immediate technical success, and the overall clinical success rate at three months after POEM was 95.7%. Nearly 60% of patients experienced adverse events during POEM, but most of these were mild and none required further endoscopic or surgical intervention. During a follow-up period of up to five years (median 25 months), only four patients (4.3%) showed symptomatic recurrence, but none required further treatment.

CONCLUSION

POEM is a very effective and safe treatment for Taiwanese patients with achalasia, irrespective of their achalasia subtype or prior treatment failure.