Clinical analysis of hemodialysis vascular access: comparision of autogenous arterioveonus fistula & arteriovenous prosthetic graft

Clinical Outcomes of Arteriovenous Grafts Using the Superficial Vein versus Venae Comitantes as Venous Outflow

Background

The superficial veins are commonly used in conventional autogenous arteriovenous fistulas and the placement of prosthetic grafts. When they are unsuitable, however, the use of the deep veins (venae comitantes) is generally considered to be a reasonable alternative. This study conducted a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for arteriovenous grafts between 2 groups based on the type of venous outflow: superficial veins or venae comitantes.

Methods

In total, 151 patients who underwent arteriovenous grafts from November 2005 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (superficial veins, n=89) and group B (venae comitantes, n=62). The primary, secondary patency, and complication rates were analyzed in each group. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed.

Results

In total, 55 well-balanced pairs were matched. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in the primary patency rate between the 2 groups at 1-year, 3-year and 5-year intervals (group A, 54.7%, 35.9%, 25.4% vs. group B, 47.9%, 16.8%, 12.6%; p=0.14), but there was a difference in the secondary patency rate (group A, 98.2%, 95.3%, 86.5% vs. group B, 87.3%, 76.8%, 67.6%; p=0.0095). The rates of complications, simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and stent insertion were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

Although this study demonstrated not particularly favorable secondary patency rates in the venae comitantes group, the venae comitantes may still be a viable option for patients with unsuitable superficial veins because there were no significant differences in the primary patency and complication rates between the 2 groups.

First-in-human feasibility study of the aXess graft (aXess-FIH): 6-Month results

OBJECTIVE

The creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is considered the most effective hemodialysis (HD) vascular access. For patients who are not suitable for AVF, arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are the best access option for chronic HD. However, conventional AVGs are prone to intimal hyperplasia, stenosis, thrombosis, and infection. Xeltis has developed an AVG as a potential alternative to currently available AVGs based on the concept of endogenous tissue restoration. The results of the first 6-month follow-up are presented here.

METHODS

The aXess first-in-human (FIH) study [NCT04898153] is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter feasibility study that evaluates the early safety and performance of the aXess Hemodialysis Graft. A total of 20 patients with end-stage renal disease were enrolled across six European investigational sites.

RESULTS

At 6-months follow-up, all grafts were patent with primary and secondary patency rates were 80% and 100%, respectively. Three patients required a re-intervention to maintain graft patency, while one re-intervention was required to restore patency. One graft thrombosis and zero infections were reported.

CONCLUSION

The expected advantages of the novel aXess Hemodialysis Graft over conventional AVGs would be evaluated by the analysis on long-term safety and effectiveness during the 5-year follow-up of the currently ongoing trial.

Mid-term cumulative patency of fistula and PTFE grafts among hemodialysis patients: A retrospective, single-center study from Palestine

BACKGROUND

Due to the long waiting time for kidney transplantation, most End-Stage renal disease patients are commenced on either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Reusable fistulas have the lowest risk for death, cardiovascular events, and infections among all vascular accesses. This study aims to report the outcomes of the arteriovenous fistulas and PTFE grafts and the related predictive clinical and demographic variables.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the charts of all hemodialysis patients between January 2017 and January 2021 at the Dialysis Center of An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, Palestine. Our outcomes were a primary failure, primary and secondary patency, and the related factors. Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method was conducted, and the log-rank test was used to compare patency rates. The Cox proportional hazards regression model tested factors relevant to primary and secondary patency rates in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 312 procedures were performed during the study period. Primary failure was 7.1% for AVF, 13.9% for arterio-venous graft (AVG) procedures. Peripheral arterial disease and left-sided AVF were associated with more primary failure rates. AVF, primary patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 82%, 69%, and 59%, respectively, while secondary patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 85%, 72%, and 63%, respectively. Factors associated with increased AVF patency in a proportional hazard model were younger age and dual antiplatelet administration.

CONCLUSION

Our study adds further evidence that autogenous AVF has better results than prosthetic AVG in both primary and secondary patency rates as well as less primary failure rates. Therefore, we encourage further longitudinal studies that assess the benefits of using antiplatelet on AVF outcome versus risks of bleeding, especially with dual agents.

Combined treatment of dysfunctional dialysis access with cutting balloon and paclitaxel-coated balloon in real world

Background: Dysfunction in arteriovenous (AV) access is a common reason for subsequent intervention. To evaluate the results of endovascular treatment of AV access lesions using cutting balloon (CB) and drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty compared to standard treatment using plain-old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Patients and methods: Patients who retrospectively were selected from a prospectively maintained database. Primary endpoint was primary patency rate at the target lesion up to 12 months after index procedure. Secondary endpoints were the acute treatment success, the "bail out" stent rate, primary patency at 6 months, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), AV access replacement and surgical revision during a follow-up period up to 12 months, and all-cause mortality rate stratified to patients treated with and without DCB. Results: One hundred and eighty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. POBA as stand alone or combined with DCB angioplasty was performed in 71 patients (38.6%), CB in 54 patients (29.3%), and in 59 patients (32.1%), both CB and DCB were used. Primary patency rate at 12 months was 31.6% for the POBA/DCB-group, 52.3% for the CB-group, and 64.8% for the CB/DCB-group, respectively. In total, 80 patients (51.6%) had a TLR including endovascular or surgical revision, or a shunt replacement. All-cause mortality at 12 months was 7.2% in the DCB group and 9.1% in the group of patients treated without a DCB (p=0.747). Conclusions: The use of CB seems to be crucial for a better outcome. The combination of CB and DCB achieves the best patency results at mid-term.

Bare-Metal Stent in Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Access: An Assessment of Circuit Patency according to Access Type and Stent Location

Purpose

To evaluate the circuit patency after nitinol bare-metal stent (BMS) placement according to the type of access and location of the stent in dysfunctional hemodialysis access.

Materials and Methods

Between January 2017 and December 2019, 159 patients (mean age, 64.1 ± 13.2 years) underwent nitinol BMS placement for dysfunctional access. The location of stents was as follows: 18 brachiocephalic vein, 51 cephalic arch, 40 upper arm vein, 10 juxta-anastomotic vein, 7 arteriovenous (AV) anastomosis, and 33 graft-vein (GV) anastomosis. Circuit patency was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and cox regression model.

Results

A total of 159 stents were successfully deployed in 103 AV fistula (AVF) and 56 AV graft (AVG). AVG showed lower primary and secondary patency at 12-months compared with AVF (primary patency; 25.0% vs. 44.7%; p = 0.005, secondary patency; 76.8% vs. 92.2%; p = 0.014). Cox regression model demonstrated poorer primary patency at 12 months after stenting in the cephalic arch and GV anastomosis compared with the other sites.

Conclusion

AVF showed better primary and secondary circuit patency at 12 months following the placement of BMS compared with AVG. Stents in the cephalic arch and GV anastomosis were associated with poorer primary patency at 12 months compared to those in other locations.

Impact of arteriovenous fistulas versus arteriovenous grafts on vascular access performance in haemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the best-performing vascular access type for patients undergoing haemodialysis. We aimed to compare outcomes of starting dialysis on arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) versus arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of multiple electronic information sources and bibliographic reference lists. The following outcome parameters were evaluated at 1, 2 and 5 years: primary failure, defined as access never used for dialysis; primary patency, defined as intervention-free access survival; primary-assisted patency, defined as uninterrupted access survival with interventions; and secondary patency, defined as cumulative access survival.

RESULTS

We identified 15 comparative studies reporting a total of 118,434 patients who initiated haemodialysis with AVF (n = 95,143) or AVG (n = 23,291). Our analysis demonstrated that AVF was associated with significantly higher primary failure rate (OR: 2.05, p = .0005) but significantly higher rate of primary patency at 1 year (OR: 1.91, p < .00001), at 2 years (OR: 2.52, p < .00001) and at 5 years (OR: 2.59, p < .00001); and primary-assisted patency at 1 year (OR: 1.71, p < .00001), at 2 years (OR: 2.13, p < .00001) and 5 years (OR: 2.79, p < .00001). There was no significant difference in secondary patency at 1 year (OR: 1.08, p < .00001) but AVF had better secondary patency at 2 years (OR: 1.26, p < .00001) and 5 years (OR: 1.60, p < .00001) than AVG.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis of best available comparative evidence (Level 2) demonstrated that AVFs may be associated with significantly higher primary failure rate but higher primary patency, primary-assisted patency and secondary patency at 1, 2 and 5 years compared to AVGs. However, the available evidence is subject to significant selection bias and confounding by indication.

Outcomes of arteriovenous fistula creation: A Jordanian experience

Objective:

The arteriovenous fistula is considered the preferred hemodialysis access due to its lower complication rate and longer patency. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes of arteriovenous fistula creation and to study the predictive factors for these outcomes.

Study design and method:

This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent autogenous arteriovenous fistula creation procedure by a single surgeon during the period from October 2011 till December 2017.

Material:

All the procedures were performed at an academic referral center by a single surgeon. All patients who underwent arteriovenous fistula creation in the upper limb during the study period were included. All patients were diagnosed with end-stage renal disease and referred for arteriovenous fistula creation either before or after initiating hemodialysis.

Method:

Data were collected from the patients’ charts. The primary outcomes were the primary failure and secondary patency rates. Secondary outcome was to find the factors associated with decreased patency. The Kaplan–Meier curve with the log-rank test was used to describe the patency while univariate and multivariate analyses were done to the factors considered relevant to the patency.

Results:

The total number of procedures was 291; of which, 18 were lost to follow-up. The primary failure rate was 12%. Secondary patency rate at 1 and 5 years was 79% and 53%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus and fistulae placed on right side were associated with decreased patency.

Conclusion:

The primary failure rate was relatively low in this study but the long-term functionality of the arteriovenous fistulae needs to be improved.

Clinical Results of Arteriovenous Fistulas Constructed Using Autologous Vessels in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Hemodialysis

Background

For hemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), it is important to construct an efficient vascular access with a superior patency rate. This study investigated the factors influencing the efficiency of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) constructed using an autologous vessel and evaluated the necessity of ultrasonography as a preoperative tool for AVF construction.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed of 250 patients in whom an AVF was constructed using an autologous vessel due to ESRD at our institution from January 2009 to April 2016.

Results

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patency rates for all subjects were 87.6%, 85.6%, and 84.4%, respectively. The patients who underwent a preoperative evaluation of their vessels via ultrasonography had better patency rates than those who did not. Superior patency rates were found in patients under 65 years of age or with an anastomotic vein diameter of 3 mm or more. The 1-year patency rate and the diameter of the anastomotic vein showed a positive relationship.

Conclusion

Ultrasonography is strongly recommended for AVF construction, and efforts should be made to increase the patency rate in patients over 65. Superior clinical results can be expected when an AVF is made using an autologous vessel with an anastomotic vein diameter of at least 3 mm.

Surgical Outcomes of Forearm Loop Arteriovenous Fistula Formation Using Tapered versus Non-Tapered Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts

Background

Tapered grafts, which have a smaller diameter on the arterial side, have been increasingly used for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) formation. We compared the outcomes of 4–6-mm tapered and 6-mm straight forearm loop arteriovenous grafts.

Methods

A total of 103 patients receiving forearm loop arteriovenous grafts between March 2005 and March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed and separated into 2 groups (group A, 4- to 6-mm tapered grafts, n=78; group B, 6-mm straight grafts, n=25). In each group, complications and patency rates after surgery were assessed.

Results

Clinical characteristics and laboratory results, except for cerebrovascular disease history (group A, 7.7%; group B, 28.0%; p=0.014), were similar between the groups. No significant differences were found for individual complications. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant differences in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year patency rates between groups (61.8%, 44.9%, and 38.5% vs. 62.7%, 41.1%, and 35.3%, respectively).

Conclusion

We found no significant differences in complication and patency rates between the tapered and straight graft groups. If there are no differences in complication and patency between the two graft types, tapered grafts may be a valuable option for AVF formation in light of their other advantages.

Surgical treatment for occlusion of graft arteriovenous fistula in patients undergoing hemodialysis

Background

Maintenance of adequate vascular access for hemodialysis is important in patients with end-stage renal disease. Once arteriovenous fistula (AVF) occlusion occurs, the patient should be treated with rescue therapy. This study was performed to evaluate the results of a rescue therapy for AVF occlusion.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2012, 47 patients who underwent surgical rescue therapy for AVF occlusion after graft AVF formation, were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups, namely the graft repair group (group A, n=19) and the thrombectomy group (group B, n=28). Postoperative results of both groups were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. In terms of the duration of AVF patency after the first rescue therapy, group A showed a longer AVF patency duration than group B (24.5±21.9 months versus 17.7±13.6 months), but there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.310). In terms of the annual frequency of AVF occlusion after the rescue therapy of group A was lower than that of group B (0.59 versus 0.71), but there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.540). The AVF patency rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after the first rescue therapy in group A were 52.6%, 31.5%, 21.0%, and 15.7%, respectively, and those in group B, they were 32.1%, 25.0%, 17.8%, and 7.14%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.402).

Conclusion

Graft repair revealed comparable results. Although there was no statistically significant difference, the patent duration and annual frequency of AVF occlusion of group A were better than those of group B. Therefore, graft repair is considered as a safe and useful procedure for maintaining graft AVF.