1
|
Zhou Z, Zhou M, Ding Y, Li X, Wang Y, Xie T, Shi Z. Endovascular treatment of type B aortic dissection in patients with end-stage renal disease. Vascular 2023; 31:1043-1050. [PMID: 35791091 DOI: 10.1177/17085381221112550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative and intermediate outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing TEVAR at our single center from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients with pre-existing ESRD were enrolled as the study group. One hundred consecutive patients from September 2013 to March 2015 without ESRD were included as the control group. The primary and secondary outcomes were adverse events and survival, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves of survival and freedom from adverse events were calculated and analyzed using the log-rank univariate test. Multivariable analysis was used to isolate the effects of ESRD. RESULTS A total of 39 patients with ESRD and TBAD underwent TEVAR during the study period. The median follow-up time of patients with and without ESRD was 45 and 46 months, respectively. There was significant difference between the survival at 4 years of patients with and without ESRD (72.8% vs 94.9%; p = 0.011). Meanwhile, the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in patients with ESRD (p = 0.026). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that ESRD (OR, 2.46; p = 0.049) and peripheral artery disease (OR, 4.11; p = 0.002) were the predictors of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The rates of adverse events and survival expectancy were poor in patients with ESRD and TBAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyu Zhou
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Zhou
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Ding
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yonggang Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianchen Xie
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenyu Shi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Howard C, Sheridan J, Picca L, Reza S, Smith T, Ponnapalli A, Calow R, Cross O, Iddawela S, George M, Livra Dias D, Srinivasan A, Munir W, Bashir M, Idhrees M. TEVAR for complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection-Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2021; 36:3820-3830. [PMID: 34310731 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type B aortic dissection (TBAD), is defined as a dissection involving the aorta distal to left subclavian artery with the ascending aorta and the aortic arch not affected. TBAD is classified due to the time frame and presence of complications. Complicated TBAD (co-TBAD) patients have a greater mortality rate than uncomplicated TBAD (un-TBAD) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is considered the gold-standard intervention for these clinical challenges. METHODS We undertook a systematic review of the literature regarding TEVAR intervention in co-TBAD and un-TBAD. A comprehensive search was undertaken across four major databases and was evaluated and assessed until June 2020. RESULTS A total of 16,104 patients were included in the study (7772 patients co-TBAD and 8352 un-TBAD). A significantly higher proportion of comorbidities were seen in co-TBAD patients compared with un-TBAD. Acute dissection was more frequent in the co-TBAD group (73.55% vs. 66.91%), while chronic dissection was more common in un-TBAD patients (33.8% vs. 70.73%). Postprocedure stroke was higher in co-TBAD (5.85% vs. 3.92%; p < .01), while postprocedural renal failure was higher in un-TBAD patients (7.23 vs. 11.38%; p < .01). No difference was observed in in-hospital mortality however the 30 days mortality was higher in the co-TBAD group. One-year survival was higher in the uncomplicated group but this difference was not observed in the 5-year survival. CONCLUSION In our analysis we can appreciate that despite significantly higher comorbidities in the co-TBAD cohort, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups and the 5-year survival did not have any difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callum Howard
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jonathan Sheridan
- Academic Unit of Medical Education, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Leonardo Picca
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sihab Reza
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tristan Smith
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anuradha Ponnapalli
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Calow
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Olivia Cross
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Sashini Iddawela
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melvin George
- Clinical Pharmacology, SRM Medical College Hospital, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Deidre Livra Dias
- Senior Medical Reviewer, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Pune, India
| | - Anand Srinivasan
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Wahaj Munir
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mohammad Bashir
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, NHS Wales Health Education and Improvement, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mohammed Idhrees
- Institute of Cardiac and Aortic Disorders (ICAD), SRM Institutes for Medical Science (SIMS Hospital), Vadapalani, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Open stented elephant trunk for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection: a single-center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 15:282. [PMID: 32993726 PMCID: PMC7526183 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01341-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Open stented elephant trunk (SET) or SET with left subclavian artery (LSCA) to left common carotid artery (LCCA) bypass is proven to a potentially alternative treatment for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD). In the current study, we reported our experience with ten consecutive TBAD patients who underwent open SET. Methods Patients with complicated TBAD underwent open SET from May 2016 to November 2018 in our institution were included. Patients’ clinical data were obtained from the electronic medical record system, and long-term clinical outcomes were collected by telephone interviews or outpatient interviews. Results A total of ten patients with nine males and one female were included, and the average age was 47.3 (31–65) years. Increased D-dimer and fibrinogen degradation products were observed in all patients at admission, and two patients had renal insufficiency. The average postoperative mechanical ventilation time, length of stay in intensive care unit, and postoperative hospital length of stay were 46.9 (6.7–151.2) hours, 7.7 (4–17) days, and 15.7 (10–26) days. No postoperative death occurred. Acute kidney injury and other complications were observed, and they were recovered well when discharge. In long-term follow-up, computed tomography angiography indicated that aortas were completely well remodeled, and blood supply of the brachiocephalic trunks was normal without anastomotic complications. All patients lived well. Conclusion SET or SET with subclavian artery correction shows satisfactory clinical outcomes, and it could be considered as an alternative treatment. Well-designed, large-scale studies with long-term follow-up are still needed.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bavaria JE, Brinkman WT, Hughes GC, Shah AS, Charlton-Ouw KM, Azizzadeh A, White RA. Five-year outcomes of endovascular repair of complicated acute type B aortic dissections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 163:539-548.e2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
5
|
Chen HD, He F, Qian XM. Treatment experience of thoracic aortic aneurysm recurrence after multiple surgeries for Marfan syndrome: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e17391. [PMID: 31577745 PMCID: PMC6783246 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000017391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Marfan syndrome (MFS), an autosomal dominant hereditary disease, often results in structural and functional abnormalities of the aortic wall. Because of residual aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection, patients with MFS usually need repeat operations after the first operation. PATIENT CONCERNS A patient diagnosed with MFS who had undergone 2 surgeries because of abdominal aortic dissection aneurysm and Stanford A type aortic dissection at different times. DIAGNOSES MFS. INTERVENTIONS Due to aneurysmal dilatation of the residual descending aorta, we performed the third surgery for him through using 2 artificial stent grafts to fix and package the area of the remaining vessel in our hospital. OUTCOMES The result was good, and the patient was discharged successfully. LESSONS Using artificial material to repair and wrap the area of the residual vessel during the first surgery can provide an anchor area for future endovascular stent implantation and also offer a possibility for stent implantation in patients with MFS.
Collapse
|