1
|
Molina-Lopez VH, Ortiz-Cartagena I, Mercado-Crespo J, Campos-Esteve MA. Optimizing Valve Selection in Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case Study on Addressing Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch and Early Structural Valve Deterioration in a Morbidly Obese Patient. Cureus 2024; 16:e53191. [PMID: 38425595 PMCID: PMC10901697 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has increasingly become a fundamental approach for treating aortic valve stenosis (AVS), especially in high surgical risk patients. This case study underscores the criticality of meticulous procedural planning and precise valve selection in patients with severe AVS compounded by obesity. We report a case of a patient who, after receiving a 26 mm Edwards Sapiens 3 valve, presented with worsening exertional dyspnea and a declining indexed effective orifice area (EOAi). This deterioration indicated early structural valve deterioration (SVD), presumably due to patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). A subsequent valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR using a 29 mm Medtronic Evolut Fx valve was successfully executed, leading to a notable improvement in EOAi. This case study emphasizes the complexities inherent in valve choice and sizing in TAVR, particularly highlighting the impact of PPM on obese patients and its potential to precipitate early SVD. The report further explores the emerging strategies in addressing TAVR valve dysfunctions via ViV interventions, shedding light on the nuanced and dynamic nature of TAVR management in obese patients. It advocates for tailored treatment strategies in managing such intricate cases, demonstrating the evolving landscape of TAVR procedures.
Collapse
|
2
|
Alnajar A, Hamad N, Azhar MZ, Mousa Y, Arora Y, Lamelas J. Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on outcomes. J Card Surg 2022; 37:5388-5394. [PMID: 36378858 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.17217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The hemodynamics of most prosthetic valves are often inferior to that of the normal native valve, and a significant proportion of patients undergoing surgical (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have high residual transaortic pressure gradients due to prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). As the experience with TAVR has increased and long-term outcomes are reported, a close look at the PPM literature is required in light of new evidence. METHODS For this review, we searched the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2022. Articles reporting PPM as an outcome following aortic valve replacements were identified and reviewed. RESULTS The impact of PPM on clinical outcomes in aortic valve replacement has not been clear as multiple studies failed to report PPM incidence. However, the PPM outcomes after SAVR vary more widely than after TAVR, ranging from 8% to 80% in SAVR and from 24% to 35% in TAVR. Incidence of severe PPM following redo SAVR ranges from 2% to 9% and following valve-in-valve TAVR is from 14% to 33%, however, while PPM is higher in valve-in-valve TAVR, patients had better survival rates. CONCLUSIONS The gap between valve performance and clinical outcomes in SAVR and TAVR could be reduced by carefully selecting patients for either treatment option. Understanding predictors of PPM can add to the safety, effectiveness, and increased survival benefit of both SAVR and TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Alnajar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Naser Hamad
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Yaseen Mousa
- Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - Yingyot Arora
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Joseph Lamelas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Russo M, Werner P, Kastner J, Andreas M. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation requiring valve fracturing via a subclavian access: new insights with a word of caution. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2019; 20:787-791. [PMID: 31449177 DOI: 10.2459/jcm.0000000000000861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Johannes Kastner
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schaefer AK, Andreas M, Werner P, Sassi CG, Haberl T, Kocher A, Laufer G, Russo M. Excessive Pannus Overgrowth on the Aortic Side of Trifecta Valve Causing Severe Regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 108:e87-e89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
5
|
Ziccardi MR, Groves EM. Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture for Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Rationale, Patient Selection, Technique, and Outcomes. Interv Cardiol Clin 2019; 8:373-382. [PMID: 31445721 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2019.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) is common after surgical valve aortic replacement. A significant percentage of patients with a small annulus have moderate to severe PPM. The outcomes for patients with larger effective orifice areas and lower gradients are better than for patients with PPM. With the advent of valve-in-valve TAVR, a degenerated surgical bioprosthesis can be treated with a percutaneous approach. However, the issue of PPM cannot be overcome by simply implanting a new valve. The technique of bioprosthetic valve fracture was therefore developed. This allows for implantation of a fully expanded transcatheter valve and results in a large effective orifice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Rodriguez Ziccardi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street Suite 920S, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Elliott M Groves
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, 840 South Wood Street Suite 920S, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nardi P, Pisano C, Bertoldo F, Vacirca SR, Greci M, Bassano C, Scafuri A, Pellegrino A, Ruvolo G. Clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance of St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: short-term follow-up and risk factors analysis. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:1465-1474. [PMID: 31179089 PMCID: PMC6531685 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We retrospectively analysed the short-term outcome of the third-generation St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis. METHODS Between December 2014 and December 2017, 177 patients (mean age 75.1±6.8 years, 95 males, 82 females) underwent aortic valve replacement with a St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis and were followed up to 27±9 months. Preoperatively 92 patients (52.0%) were in NYHA class III-IV, EuroSCORE II was 3.2%±2.1%. RESULTS Trifecta sizes implanted were 19 mm (n=46) (26%), 21 mm (n=69) (39%), 23 mm (n=46) (26%), 25 mm (n=16) (9%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 60 patients (34.0%). Operative mortality was 3.4% (1.7% for isolated aortic valve replacement versus 6.7% for combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting) (P=0.084). The only independent predictor of mortality was the need for the mechanical ventilation greater than 24 hours (P=0.037); recently occurring myocardial infarction was risk factor for mortality at the univariate analysis only (P=0.013). Three-year survival was 84%±6%, freedom from cardiac death 98%±1%, freedom from prosthetic endocarditis 97%±1%. No thromboembolisms or structural valve degeneration were observed. Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was absent in 126 patients (71.2%), mild-to-moderate in 32 (18.1%), moderate in 19 (10.7%), severe in no any patient. Follow-up echocardiography showed an average mean and peak trans-aortic valve gradients reduction more than 70% in comparison with preoperative value (P<0.0001), and a significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (P<0.0001). Moderate PPM did not negatively affect survival. Concomitant severe coronary artery disease was found as an independent predictor of reduced survival (72%±12% versus 86%±6%) (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS Trifecta aortic prosthesis seems to provide very favourable clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance. At three years, survival was negatively affected by severe coronary artery disease detected at the time of operation. During short-term follow-up, no early structural valve degeneration was been observed. Due to low incidence of PPM and low peak and mean trans-prosthetic aortic valve gradients, third generation Trifecta aortic prosthesis should be considered as one of the best options in the setting of the aortic valve replacement surgery. However, a long-term follow-up is mandatory to confirm the early promising data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Nardi
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Calogera Pisano
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Bertoldo
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Rita Vacirca
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Monica Greci
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Bassano
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Scafuri
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Ruvolo
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chiariello GA, Bruno P, Villa E, Pasquini A, Pavone N, Cammertoni F, Mazza A, Colizzi C, Nesta M, Iafrancesco M, Perri G, Messina A, Troise G, Massetti M. Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients With Small Aortic Annulus: Results With Three Different Bioprostheses. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2019; 14:27-36. [DOI: 10.1177/1556984519826430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with small aortic annulus (diameter ≤21 mm) is considered a challenging scenario because of technical aspects and the high risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). The choice of the appropriate prosthesis is crucial, and at the moment, an ideal device has yet to be identified. We compare clinical and hemodynamic results after AVR with three bioprostheses with different design and characteristics. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 76 consecutive patients from two cardiac surgery centers who underwent AVR (Trifecta = 24; Edwards INTUITY Elite valve system = 26, and Perceval = 26) for severe aortic stenosis between 2013 and 2017. Patients selected were older than 75 years and with an annulus diameter ≤21 mm at preoperative echocardiogram. Reinterventions and combined procedures were excluded. Minimally invasive AVR was performed in 44 (57.8%) patients. Telephonic interview was obtained at 2.9 ± 0.5 years and echocardiographic follow-up at 2.2 ± 0.8 years. Results Clinical outcome was similar in the three groups. At follow-up, Trifecta patients presented significantly higher peak and mean transprosthetic pressure gradients ( P = 0.04 and 0.01). Effective orifice area and left ventricular mass regression were comparable, although an advantage was observed in Perceval patients without reaching the statistical significance. Incidence of moderate ( P = 0.2) and severe PPM ( P = 0.7) was comparable. Conclusions Despite higher postoperative pressure gradients observed with the Trifecta valve, all three prostheses (Trifecta, Edwards INTUITY Elite, and Perceval) have proven to be reliable when implanted in small aortic annuli, with good clinical outcome and favorable left ventricular mass regression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni A. Chiariello
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Bruno
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Emmanuel Villa
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pasquini
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Natalia Pavone
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Cammertoni
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Mazza
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Colizzi
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marialisa Nesta
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Iafrancesco
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Perri
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Messina
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Troise
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Massimo Massetti
- Cardiovascular Sciences Department, Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|