Evaluation of the efficacy of RF microneedling and oral isotretinoin in comparison with oral isotretionoin alone in the treatment of acne vulgaris.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2023;
40:111-114. [PMID:
36909913 PMCID:
PMC9993193 DOI:
10.5114/ada.2022.124109]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction
Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin illnesses in teenagers, affecting 80% of people aged 11-30 years. Scars on the face are caused by high inflammation, severe acne, physical manipulation of the skin, and delayed treatment.
Aim
To compare the effectiveness and safety of an automated RF micro needling device and oral isotretinoin with oral isotretinon alone alone for treating active acne.
Material and methods
A cross-sectional study of 40 moderate acne sufferers. Twenty patients with active acne were treated with an automated RF microneedling device and isotretinoin 0.5-1 mg/kg. Group B included 20 people with active acne, who were given a single dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg isotretinoin.
Results
In this cross-sectional research, 40 acne vulgaris patients were divided into 2 groups: group A: 23.8 ±3.2 years old, 58.95 ±5.5 kg, 13 females, and 7 males. There were 15 females and 5 males in group B: 24.4 ±3.7 years old and weighing 56.4 ±8.46 kg. After 12 weeks, group A shows better global acne assessment scale (GAAS) outcomes than group B than group B. After 6 months, group A showed better results than group B. The GAAS meaning global acne assessment scale did not change after 4-8 weeks of treatment. There was no age or weight difference.
Conclusions
Acne vulgaris may be treated with fractional RF microneedling. Active acne treatment with RF microneedling is safe and effective, has a quicker response, causes less scarring, and reduces recurrence.
Collapse