Common variable immunodeficiency: different faces of the same disease

Analysis of B cell proliferation in response to in vitro stimulation in patients with CVID

BACKGROUND

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by defective antibody production and impaired differentiation of B cells. B cell proliferation is an essential step for antibody synthesis. Depending on the nature of the stimulus, their response may be either T-cell-dependent or T-cell-independent.

METHODS

We studied 23 CVID patients and 14 healthy donors (HD). The patients were categorized based on their percentage of memory B cells. In addition to standard immunophenotyping of circulating human B and T cell subsets, an in vitro CFSE dilution assay was used to assess the proliferative capacity of B cells and to compare the activation of the T cell-dependent and T cell-independent response among the patients.

RESULTS

Patients with a reduction in memory B cells exhibited an increase in follicular T cells (Tfh) and showed low proliferation in response to PKW, CpG, and SAC stimuli (Condition II) (p= 0.0073). In contrast, patients with a normal percentage of memory B cells showed a high expression of IL-21R and low proliferation in response to CPG (Condition III); IL-21, CD40L, and anti-IgM (Condition IV) stimuli (p= 0.0163 and p = 0.0475, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Defective proliferation in patients depends on the type of stimulus used and the phenotypic characteristics of the patients. Further studies are necessary to understand the disease mechanisms, which may guide us toward identifying genetic defects associated with CVID.

Assessment of autoantibodies in paediatric population with primary immunodeficiencies: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The correlation between primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) and autoimmunity shows ethnic and geographical diversity. The aim of our study was to accumulate more data in paediatric PID population.

METHODS

58 children aged 1-17 and with PID (study group) and 14 age-matched immunocompetent individuals (control group) were included in the study. Serum levels of 17 different specific IgG antibodies against autoantigens were measured by means of a quantitative enzyme immunoassay. Immunoglobulin levels were analysed in relation to a detailed medical examination.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies against one or more antigens were detected in the sera of 24.14% (n = 14) subjects in the study group. The most frequent were anti-thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) antibodies (n = 8; 13.8%). Anti-TPO antibody levels were elevated more often in PID patients with a positive family history of autoimmune diseases (p = 0.04). The screening for anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) and anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies in our series allowed identifying two previously undiagnosed cases of coeliac disease in PID patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the study and the control group in terms of the autoantibodies prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides data on the prevalence of autoantibodies in paediatric population diagnosed with PID. Selected autoantibodies (i.e. anti-tTG, anti-DGP) might be useful for the screening of PID to avoid the delay of diagnosis of an autoimmune disease.

Extended List of Warning Signs in Qualification to Diagnosis and Treatment of Inborn Errors of Immunity in Children and Young Adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) refer to genetically determined disorders presenting with recurrent infections, autoimmunity, allergies, and malignancies. IEI is now commonly used, replacing the previously used term primary immunodeficiencies (PID). The 10 warning signs of IEI are widely used in the identification patients with IEI. The aim of the study was to determine and compare the utility of the 10 and 14 warning signs in IEI diagnosing.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 2851 patients was performed (98.17% were subjects under 18 years old and 1.83% were adults). All patients were questioned about the 10 warning signs and four additional signs: severe eczema, allergies, hemato-oncologic disorders and autoimmunity. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and odds ratio were calculated for the 10 and 14 warning signs.

RESULTS

IEI were diagnosed in a total of 896 (31.4%) patients and excluded in 1955 (68.6%). The strongest predictors of IEI were hemato-oncologic disorders (OR = 11.25; p < 0.001) and autoimmunity (OR = 7.74; p < 0.001). The strongest predictors of severe IEI were hemato-oncologic disorders (OR = 89.26; p < 0.001), positive family history (OR = 25.23; p < 0.001), and autoimmunity (OR = 16.89; p < 0.001). There were 20.4% and 14% of IEI patients without any signs from the 10 and 14 warnings signs, respectively (p < 0.001). 20.3% and 6.8% of patients with severe PIDs had no presence of any signs from 10 and 14 signs, respectively (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10 warning signs have limited usefulness in identifying IEI. The modified list of 14 warning signs seems to represent an effective diagnostic method for the detection of IEI patients, especially those with severe PIDs.

Diagnostic Challenges in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity with Different Manifestations of Immune Dysregulation

Inborn errors of immunity (IEI), formerly known as primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs), are inherited disorders caused by damaging germline variants in single genes, which result in increased susceptibility to infections and in allergic, autoimmune, autoinflammatory, nonmalignant lymphoproliferative, and neoplastic conditions. Along with well-known warning signs of PID, attention should be paid to signs of immune dysregulation, which seem to be equally important to susceptibility to infection in defining IEI. The modern diagnostics of IEI offer a variety of approaches but with some problems. The aim of this review is to discuss the diagnostic challenges in IEI patients in the context of an immune dysregulation background.