Outcomes of concomitant percutaneous coronary interventions and transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Comparative Analysis of PCI Strategies in Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing TAVI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been increasingly used in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Since coronary artery disease (CAD) is common among these patients, it is crucial to choose the best method and timing of revascularization. This study aims to compare different timing strategies of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI to clarify whether PCI timing affects the patients' outcomes or not.

METHODS

A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted comparing three different revascularization strategies in patients with CAD undergoing TAVI. The 30-day all-cause mortality, in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality at 1 year, 30-day rates of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding, and the need for pacemaker implantation at 6 months were analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis revealed that PCI during TAVI had higher 30-day mortality (RR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.40-4.32) and in-hospital mortality (RR = 1.70, 95% CI = [1.08-2.69]) compared to no PCI. Post-TAVI PCI was associated with higher 1-year mortality compared to other strategies. While no significant differences in major bleeding or stroke were observed, PCI during TAVI versus no PCI (RR = 3.63, 95% CI = 1.27-10.43) showed a higher rate of 30-day MI.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that among patients with severe AS and CAD undergoing TAVI, PCI concomitantly with TAVI seems to be associated with worse 30-day outcomes compared with no PCI. PCI after TAVI demonstrated an increased risk of 1-year mortality compared to alternative strategies. Choosing a timing strategy should be individualized based on patient characteristics and procedural considerations.

In-Hospital Outcomes of Combined Coronary Revascularization and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Inpatient Nationwide Analysis

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is accepted as an alternative to surgery, but data on combined percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and TAVI during the same in-hospital stay are still lacking. Using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database, we identified all TAVI encounters and compared in-hospital outcomes of patients who had TAVI only to patients who had TAVI and PCI. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR). Of 291,810 patient encounters with TAVI, 13,114 (4.5%) had combined PCI during the same index admission. The average age was 79.61 ± 8.61 years in the TAVI-only vs 80.25 ± 8.73 years in the combined TAVI-PCI group. Combined TAVI and PCI was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (4.5% vs 1.8%, aOR: 2.3), stroke (4.7% vs 2.9%, aOR: 1.4), net adverse events (NAE) (20.2% vs 5.7%, aOR: 3.6), major bleeding (40.1% vs 24.3%, aOR: 1.8), vascular complications (10.6% vs 2.5%, aOR: 3.9), acute kidney injury (AKI) (23.3% vs 11.7%, aOR: 2.1), hemodialysis (HD) (4.2% vs 2.4%, aOR: 1.4), postoperative cardiogenic shock (1.2% vs 0.4%, aOR: 2.8), need for mechanical circulatory support (6.9% vs 1%, aOR: 7); p-value < 0.001 for all. The utilization of permanent pacemakers was similar between the groups (9.8% vs 9.2%, aOR: 1; p = 0.6). Combining TAVI and PCI during the same index admission is associated with worse outcomes. The decision to do PCI for patients undergoing TAVI should be individualized and tailored based on the patient's clinical conditions.

Impact of same-admission percutaneous coronary intervention on periprocedural outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background

Current guidelines recommend percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) if significant coronary artery disease is present, but whether PCI should be done in the same admission as TAVI is not determined.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019 to compare TAVI with and without same-admission PCI and compare in-hospital outcomes after propensity score matching.

Results

Among 170,030 hospitalizations for TAVI, 4425 (2.6%) had same-admission PCI performed. After propensity score matching, 4425 hospitalizations were allocated to those with and without same-admission PCI. No difference in in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-3.12) was observed between the two groups. However, TAVI with same-admission PCI was associated with higher odds of cardiac arrest (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.02-4.98), cardiogenic shock (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.29-3.79), and acute myocardial infarction (OR 3.23, 95% CI 2.11-4.93). It was also associated with longer length of stay and more expensive hospital cost.

Conclusion

TAVI with same-admission PCI was associated with higher odds of periprocedural complications and higher immediate cost. Our findings should be interpreted in the context of the same-admission PCI and TAVI cohort potentially being sicker and the isolated TAVI control group may or may not having obstructive coronary artery disease.

Clinical Outcomes of Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prior studies on revascularization prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), in patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD), have reported mixed results.

AIM

We sought to perform a meta-analysis combining current evidence by investigating outcomes of revascularization in patients who undergo TAVR with coexisting CAD.

METHODS

We searched literature for studies reporting on outcomes following TAVR performed with versus without pre-TAVR PCI, for coexisting CAD. Random-effect model was used to pool estimates of odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Twenty-four reports with 12,182 TAVR patients were included: 22 observational and 2 clinical trials. 4,110 (33.7%) were in the pre-TAVR PCI group, 51.4% were females, and mean age was 81.9 years. The 30-day mortality was 5.2% versus 5.0% in patients with versus without pre-TAVR PCI, respectively [OR= 1.19 (95% CI: 0.91-1.55, p= 0.20)]. Pooled 1-year mortality was 18.1% versus 19.1% in patients with versus without pre-TAVR PCI (OR= 1.12, 95% CI: 0.95-1.31, p= 0.61). There was no significant difference between the groups for myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, pacemaker implantation, or rehospitalization. Pre-TAVR PCI was associated with increased risk of life-threatening bleeding at 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Pre-TAVR revascularization with PCI was not associated with improved 30-day or 1-year mortality; however, it was associated with increased risk of life-threatening bleeding at 30-day post-TAVR. Our results do not support routine revascularization with PCI prior to TAVR with coexisting CAD. Future trials addressing anatomical complexity and symptom burden may help better risk stratify patients who may benefit with pre-TAVR revascularization.