Comparison of the efficacy and safety of hybrid and sequential therapies as a first-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection in Turkey

Is hybrid therapy more efficient in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hybrid therapy (HT) is a non-bismuth quadruple therapy created to surpass Helicobacter pylori's (H. pylori) resistance rates to antibiotics. HT has excellent eradication rates, as well as a very good compliance and safety profile. We aim to compare HT with sequential therapy (ST) and concomitant therapy (CT) for the eradication of H. pylori.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the principles of the PRISMA guidelines. Literature was electronically searched on the CENTRAL library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome evaluated was eradication rate of H. pylori. The secondary outcomes evaluated were adverse events and compliance rates. Meta-analyses were performed with Cochrane Review Manager 5.4. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to estimate the pooled relative risk and 95% confidence interval of the eradication rates between HT and other regimens, as well as the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

10 studies were included, comprising 2993 patients. The mean eradication rates achieved by HT with intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were, respectively, 86% (range: 79.2-90.8%) and 91.7% (range: 82.6-96.1%). No statistically significant difference was found in ITT eradication rate between HT and CT (relative risk: 1; 95% CI: 0.96- 1.03) and between HT and ST (relative risk: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.92-1.14). PP analysis revealed similar results. HT was associated with higher compliance rates than CT and slightly lower than ST. As far as adverse events are concerned, this meta-analysis demonstrated a higher occurrence of adverse events on the group of patients treated with CT when compared with HT. HT and ST showed similar results.

CONCLUSION

HT has similar eradication, compliance and adverse event rates when compared to ST, but a better safety profile than the CT.

Comparison between Hybrid, Reverse Hybrid, and Non-Bismuth Levofloxacin Quadruple Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Egypt: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in developing countries is 50.8%, with the highest occurrence presented in Africa (79.1%). It increases the risk of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, cancer of the stomach, and lymphoma. The effect of standard treatment for H. pylori eradication is below 80%, and evaluation of alternative lines of treatment is needed. We aimed to compare the hybrid, reverse hybrid, and levofloxacin quadruple therapies as first-line therapy in Egypt. METHODS This was a randomized interventional trial done in the clinics affiliated with the Internal Medicine Department. 330 individuals were selected according to the inclusion criteria. They were divided into three groups: group 1 (110 subjects who received a reverse hybrid regimen), group 2 (110 subjects who received a hybrid regimen), and group 3 (110 subjects who received a non-bismuth levofloxacin quadruple regimen). RESULTS Group 3 had a significantly lower eradication rate of 82.7% versus 92.7% and 91.8% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There were non-significant differences in the incidence rates of adverse events among the three groups. CONCLUSION Both the reverse hybrid and hybrid groups had good eradication rates in the Egyptian population, but non-bismuth levofloxacin quadruple therapy did not obtain a sufficient eradication rate.

Comparative efficacy and safety of high-dose dual therapy, bismuth-based quadruple therapy and non-bismuth quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection: a network meta-analysis

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated with the development of multiple diseases. The eradication rate of H. pylori has gradually decreased, suggesting the need to discover more effective therapies. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of first-line treatments including high-dose dual therapy (HDDT), bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT), sequential therapy (ST), concomitant therapy (CT) and hybrid therapy (HT) by network meta-analysis (NMA). A comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, was performed from their inception to 1 September 2019. A network analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing first-line therapies were carried out using Stata 14.0 and Revman 5.2. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by omitting non-Asian studies. Finally, 41 RCTs with 14 119 patients were included. The NMA showed that, in terms of eradication rate, ST for 10 days (ST-10) was significantly lower than CT for 10 or 14 days (CT ≥ 10). Sensitivity analysis among the Asian population showed that ST-10 denoted the lowest effectiveness among the interventions. The ranking results based on probability showed that HDDT ranked first for the eradication rate. As for adverse events, HDDT was significantly less than BQT and CT regardless of duration, while BQT for 14 days represented higher adverse events than ST, HT and CT ≥ 10. HDDT ranked first among the therapies. In conclusion, HDDT for 14 days appeared to be the most optimal first-line therapy for H. pylori among the Asian population with comparable efficacy and compliance but causing fewer adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of bismuth-containing quadruple treatment and concomitant treatment for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bismuth-containing quadruple treatment (BQT) and concomitant treatment (CT) were recommended as alternative first-line treatments of Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the cure rates and compare efficacy and safety of BQT and CT for H. Pylori eradication. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched on June 16, 2020. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis were conducted by Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 11.0. Ten studies were collected. We found no difference of cure rate between BQT and CT in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (84.6% vs. 82.9%, OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.94-1.38; P = 0.19) and marginally statistical difference in per-protocol (PP) analysis (92.4% vs 90.1%, OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00-1.73; P = 0.05). Based on the results of subgroup analyses, we found statistical difference of eradication rate between BQT and CT (amoxicillin + clarithromycin + metronidazole + PPI treatment) according to PP analysis (94.3% vs. 91.5%, OR = 1.49, 95% CI:1.03-2.15; P = 0.03) and marginally statistical difference according to ITT analysis (87.5% vs. 84.6%, OR = 1.28, 95% CI:1.00-1.65; P = 0.05). BQT and CT may be both good treatment options for H. pylori infection. However, BQT was superior to current scheme of CT (amoxicillin + clarithromycin + metronidazole + PPI treatment) in subgroup analysis. It is very necessary to choose tailored therapy as an outstanding way to reduce the impact of antibiotic.

Efficacy and safety of Zuojin Pill for chronic gastritis: Protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Chronic gastritis (CG), as the highest incidence of gastrointestinal diseases, has been gradually increasing around globally. With the obvious disadvantages of standard treatment, more and more people ask the traditional Chinese medicine for help in the treatment of CG. As a traditional Chinese medicine compound, Zuojin Pill (ZJP) has a long history of clinical application in the treatment of digestive system diseases. Whereas, neither systematic nor meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials explain the efficacy and safety of ZJP in treating CG. Thus, we provide a protocol to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ZJP for CG.

METHODS

From the beginning to December 2019, the following electronic databases will be searched for studies in English or Chinese: the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and the Wanfang Database. Clinical efficiency, helicobacter pylori infection clearance rate, quality of life and symptom scores will be measured as primary outcomes. Meta-analysis will be performed using the Stata 15.

OUTCOMES

This study will provide the current evidence of CG treated with ZJP from the several aspects including clinical efficiency, helicobacter pylori infection clearance rate, quality of life, symptom scores, the 1-year recurrent rate, efficacy under endoscopy and number of reported adverse events associated with the use of ZJP.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of this review will be served as a proof to evaluate if ZJP is effective in the treatment of CG.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020155036.