Paracentesis-induced acute kidney injury in decompensated cirrhosis - prevalence and predictors

Hospital Utilization for Patients With Cirrhosis and Severe Ascites in a Model of Outpatient Paracentesis by Interventional Radiology

BACKGROUND

 Paracentesis is currently performed by interventional radiologists (IR) rather than gastroenterologists/hepatologists or internists. In this model of care, there is usually no evaluation of patients' renal function or adjustment of their medications at the time of paracentesis. The objectives of this study were to analyze hospital utilization and cirrhosis complications within six months of index outpatient paracentesis by IR and to identify potential areas of improvement in care.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients with cirrhosis and ascites who underwent outpatient paracentesis by IR between October 15, 2015, and October 15, 2018, at a tertiary academic medical center. We collected demographics, data on cirrhosis etiology/complications, laboratory tests, provider notes, outpatient paracentesis dates, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions within the following six months post index paracentesis. Associations between categorical predictors and clinical outcomes were analyzed using the chi-square test. Associations between quantitative predictors and clinical outcomes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Our study included 69 unique patients who had at least one outpatient encounter for paracentesis by IR in the study period. Most patients were men (71%), had alcohol-related cirrhosis as primary etiology (53.6%), an average age of 60 years, and an average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium (MELDNa) score at baseline of 16. Within six months from index paracentesis, 44 patients (64.7%) underwent repeat IR outpatient paracentesis (total 187 paracenteses, 4.25 paracenteses/patient), 43 patients (62.3%) had ER visits (total 118 ER visits, 2.8/patient), 41 patients (59.4%) had hospital admissions (total 88 admissions, 2.2/patient), and 11 patients required ICU admission. Complications of cirrhosis noted during follow-up included hepatic encephalopathy (40.5%), acute kidney injury (38.2%), upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding (16%), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in 15%. The mortality rate at six months was 20%. On multivariate analysis, the predictive factors for mortality were older age (p = 0.03) and MELDNa score (p = 0.02). Baseline MELDNa was predictive of acute kidney injury (p = 0.02), UGI bleed (p < 0.01), and ICU admission (p < 0.01), but not of SBP, encephalopathy, ED visit, or hospital admissions. Among patients with more than one paracentesis (64%),six patients underwent transjugular portosystemic shunt (TIPS), but there was no documentation of TIPS consideration in 31 patients (70.4%). A total of 20 patients (29%) were waitlisted for liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

In this contemporary cohort of patients with cirrhosis undergoing outpatient IR paracentesis, we found a high rate of short-term cirrhosis complications and hospital utilization, while TIPS consideration was very low. Further data are needed to identify specific gaps in care, but IR paracentesis should be integrated within a multidisciplinary management model, with emphasis on early TIPS in eligible patients, as recommended by the current practice guidelines.

Management of refractory ascites

The development of refractory ascites in approximately 10% of patients with decompensated cirrhosis heralds the progression to a more advanced stage of cirrhosis. Its pathogenesis is related to significant hemodynamic changes, initiated by portal hypertension, but ultimately leading to renal hypoperfusion and avid sodium retention. Inflammation can also contribute to the pathogenesis of refractory ascites by causing portal microthrombi, perpetuating the portal hypertension. Many complications accompany the development of refractory ascites, but renal dysfunction is most common. Management starts with continuation of sodium restriction, which needs frequent reviews for adherence; and regular large volume paracentesis of 5 L or more with albumin infusions to prevent the development of paracentesisinduced circulatory dysfunction. Albumin infusions independent of paracentesis may have a role in the management of these patients. The insertion of a covered, smaller diameter, transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic stent shunt (TIPS) in the appropriate patients with reasonable liver reserve can bring about improvement in quality of life and improved survival after ascites clearance. Devices such as an automated low-flow ascites pump may be available in the future for ascites treatment. Patients with refractory ascites should be referred for liver transplant, as their prognosis is poor. In patients with refractory ascites and concomitant chronic kidney disease of more than stage 3b, assessment should be referred for dual liver-kidney transplants. In patients with very advanced cirrhosis not suitable for any definitive treatment for ascites control, palliative care should be involved to improve the quality of life of these patients.

CLIF-SOFA and CLIF-C scores for the prognostication of acute-on-chronic liver failure and acute decompensation of cirrhosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome characterized by decompensation in individuals with chronic liver disease, generally secondary to one or more extra-hepatic organ failures, implying an elevated mortality rate. Acute decompensation (AD) is the term used for one or more significant consequences of liver disease in a short time and is the most common reason for hospital admission in cirrhotic patients. The European Association for the Study of Liver-Chronic-Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) Group modified the intensive care Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score into CLIF-SOFA, which detects the presence of ACLF in patients with or without AD, classifying it into three grades.

AIM

To investigate the role of the EASL-CLIF definition for ACLF and the ability of CLIF-SOFA, CLIF-C ACLF, and CLIF-C AD scores for prognosticating ACLF or AD.

METHODS

This study is a literature review using a standardized search method, conducted using the steps following the guidelines for reporting systematic reviews set out by the PRISMA statement. For specific keywords, relevant articles were found by searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, and BioMed Central-BMC. The databases were searched using the search terms by one reviewer, and a list of potentially eligible studies was generated based on the titles and abstracts screened. The data were then extracted and assessed on the basis of the Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/).

RESULTS

Most of the included studies used the EASL-CLIF definition for ACLF to identify cirrhotic patients with a significant risk of short-term mortality. The primary outcome in all reviewed studies was mortality. Most of the study findings were based on an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis, which revealed that CLIF-SOFA, CLIF-C ACLF, and CLIF-C AD scores were preferable to other models predicting 28-d mortality. Their AUROC scores were higher and able to predict all-cause mortality at 90, 180, and 365 d. A total of 50 articles were included in this study, which found that the CLIF-SOFA, CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-C AD scores in more than half of the articles were able to predict short-term and long-term mortality in patients with either ACLF or AD.

CONCLUSION

CLIF-SOFA score surpasses other models in predicting mortality in ACLF patients, especially in the short-term. CLIF-SOFA, CLIF-C ACLF, and CLIF-C AD are accurate short-term and long-term mortality prognosticating scores.

Risk and protective factors of acute kidney injury in decompensated cirrhotic patients with ascites on tolvaptan

Background and Aim

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a life‐threatening complication of liver cirrhosis. Here, we evaluated the risk factors and characteristics of AKI in cirrhosis.

Patients/Methods

This was a single‐center retrospective study. A total of 199 Japanese patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis (104 men, median age 61 years) were enrolled and received tolvaptan orally. Survival rates and new onset of AKI were monitored, and risk factors were evaluated.

Results

Forty‐six patients (23.1%) suffered an AKI complication and exhibited significantly poorer survival (P < 0.01). The rates of hepatic encephalopathy (P < 0.01) and chronic kidney disease (CKD; P = 0.02) were significantly increased in patients with AKI. The rate of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)/H2 blocker treatment (P = 0.04) was significantly lower, whereas that of ascites drainage was significantly higher in the AKI cases (P < 0.01). The AKI risk was significantly increased in patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HR 4.18, 95% CI 1.618–10.771). In contrast, the incidence of AKI was significantly lower in patients with a higher serum albumin level (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.142–0.914, P = 0.03). Treatment with PPI/H2 blockers (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.126–0.711, P < 0.01) or kanamycin/rifaximin (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.075–0.929, P = 0.04) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of AKI development.

Conclusions

AKI incidence was increased in patients with decreased liver function and was associated with poor survival. PPI/H2 blocker or kanamycin/rifaximin treatment may reduce the risk of AKI.

Prevalence, risk factors, and short-term outcomes of postparacentesis acute kidney injury using revised criteria of the international club of ascites

Acute kidney injury (AKI) can become complicated after paracentesis due to extrarenal fluid loss and inadequate blood flow to the kidneys. The objective of this study was to explore the incidence and clinical implications of postparacentesis AKI.A retrospective cohort of 137 liver cirrhosis patients (mean age: 61.3 ± 11.8 years, male: 100 [73.0%], viral hepatitis: 93 [67.9%]) who underwent paracentesis was analyzed. The incidence of AKI as defined by the international club of ascites (ICA) criteria, the risk factors, and its impact on early mortality were all assessed.Thirty two patients (23.4%) developed AKI after paracentesis. In multivariate analysis, the Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-Na score was an independent factor associated with AKI development (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.23) after paracentesis. The incidence of early mortality was significantly higher for those with AKI than without AKI (71.9% [23/32 patients] vs 11.4% [12/105 patients], P < .001). AKI (hazard ratio [HR], 7.56; 95% CI, 3.40-16.8) and MELD-Na score (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14) were independent factors associated with early mortality. In subgroup analysis, AKI after paracentesis was associated with significantly higher early mortality in both MELD-Na groups, that is, patients with a MELD-Na score >26 (87.5% vs 22.2%, P < .001) and those with a MELD-Na score ≤26 (56.3% vs 9.2%, P < .001).Postparacentesis AKI occurred frequently in cirrhotic patients. Furthermore, it was associated with early mortality. Baseline MELD-Na score was associated with AKI, indicating that careful attention is required for those with a higher MELD-Na score who are being considered for therapeutic paracentesis.

Clinical implications of prompt ascitic drain removal among cirrhosis with refractory ascites

INTRODUCTION

Large-volume paracentesis (LVP) is the first-line treatment for decompensated cirrhosis with refractory ascites. While ascitic drain removal (ADR) within 72 hours was once considered safe, it was uncertain if ADR within 24 hours could further reduce the risk of ascitic drain-related bacterial peritonitis (AdBP). This study aimed to investigate the association between the timing of ADR and the presence of AdBP.

METHODS

All cirrhotics with refractory ascites who underwent LVP in our institution from 2014 to 2017 were studied. AdBP was diagnosed based on ascitic fluid neutrophil count ≥ 250 cells/mm3 or positive ascitic fluid culture following recent paracentesis within two weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients who underwent LVP were followed up for 1,806 patient-months. Their mean age was 68.3 ± 11.6 years, and 65.6% were male. Their mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15.2. The overall incidence of AdBP was 5.3%. ADR beyond 24 hours was significantly associated with longer median length of stay (five days vs. three days, p < 0.001), higher risk of AdBP (0% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.042) and AKI following LVP (odds ratio 20.0, 95% confidence interval 2.4-164.2, p = 0.021). Overall survival was similar in patients with ADR within and beyond 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

ADR within 24 hours is associated with reduced risk of AdBP and AKI. As AdBP is associated with resistant organism and AKI, we recommend prompt ADR within 24 hours, especially among patients who have Child-Pugh C with alcoholic cirrhosis.

Could KIM-1 and NGAL levels predict acute kidney injury after paracentesis? - preliminary study

Background

Kidney dysfunction is a common complication in patients with severe liver cirrhosis. There is a need for discovery and validation of novel biomarkers for earlier AKI detection. The aim of this study was to determine if tubular injury markers: NGAL and KIM-1 could be helpful in the early diagnosis of AKI in patients undergoing therapeutic paracentesis.

Methods

This preliminary study included 24 adult patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis who had been hospitalized due to massive ascites requiring paracentesis. Pre- and post-paracentesis plasma samples were taken from each patient and biomarkers were measured.

Results

Before paracentesis, the levels of serum and urinary NGAL were similar between patients and controls; while urinary KIM-1 was markedly increased in liver cirrhotic patients (0.76 vs. 0.24 ng/ml; respectively). Although urinary NGAL levels in AKI patients were 5-time greater than in non-AKI subgroup, the difference did not reach statistical significance (13.2 vs 1.5 pg/mL, p = 0.06). Serum NGAL level, post-procedure, was 3 times greater in AKI subgroup.

Conclusion

Kidney injury markers, especially serum NGAL, may be useful for the early detection of AKI. However, further research is required to determine if biomarkers of kidney injury may help identify patients with cirrhosis who would most likely benefit from early AKI prevention and treatment.