HDR and LDR Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Lip Cancer: the Experience of the Catalan Institute of Oncology

High dose rate brachytherapy for lip cancer with interstitial, surface, or a combination of interstitial and surface mold technique

PURPOSE

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is now becoming more common than low-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate BT in the treatment of lip cancer. However, due to the limited history of HDR-BT, relatively few studies have been published. Two institutions (in Ukraine and the USA) reviewed their clinical outcomes of lip cancer patients treated with HDR-BT as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An interstitial (IS), surface custom mold (SC), or a combination of IS and SC (IS+SC) was used for treatments based on the depth of tumor invasion. Prescription doses were 24 Gy in 6 BID fractions when combined with 46-50 Gy of EBRT, 45-55 Gy in 9-10 BID fractions for IS and IS+SC monotherapy or 3 Gy × 16 daily fractions for SC monotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 33 cases of lip cancer were treated from 2015 to 2021. By using TNM staging classification, there were 14 stage I (42.4%), 15 stage II (45.5%), and 4 stage III (12.1%) lip cancers. Thirty-one patients (93.9%) had a complete response to the treatment. Only 2 patients (6.1%) displayed local recurrence. Grade 1, 2, and 3 acute toxicities were observed in 30.3%, 51.5%, and 18.2% of patients, respectively. Grade 1, 2, and 3 late toxicities were observed in 39.4%, 21.2%, and 0.0% of cases. Cosmetic results were excellent in 21.2%, good in 54.5%, fair in 18.2%, and poor in 6.1% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-BT is an effective and safe treatment for lip carcinomas with excellent local control, functional, and cosmetic outcomes and should be considered as a standard treatment.

GEC-ESTRO recommendations for head & neck cancer brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy): 2nd update with focus on HDR and PDR

Modern brachytherapy (BT) is playing an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment of Head and Neck (H&N) cancer, as an organ- and function-preserving therapy. Low-dose-rate (LDR) technology has been replaced by modern remote afterloading and stepping source equipment using pulsed dose rate (PDR) or high dose rate (HDR) sources, improved image guidance and 3D treatment planning systems. This is an update of the previous GEC-ESTRO recommendations for H&N tumors, mainly applied to squamous carcinomas. Indications, results and recommended doses for different tumor sites are presented according to the published studies.

Interstitial brachytherapy for lip carcinomas: Comparison between Ir-192 low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate treatment

PURPOSE

Low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy are known to be effective in the treatment of lip carcinomas. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare oncologic and toxicity outcomes between the two techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2007 to 2018, patients at the Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine (France) who received exclusive or adjuvant interstitial brachytherapy for lip squamous carcinomas were studied. Two groups were defined: the LDR/PDR group, including patients treated with iridium-192 wires, or pulsed-dose rate technique, and the high-dose-rate group, with patients treated by high-dose-rate technique. The dose ranged between 50Gy and 65Gy (depending on previous surgery) for low-dose-/pulsed-dose rate treatments, and 39Gy for high-dose-rate (twice a day). Early, late toxicity events and oncologic control were reported.

RESULTS

Among the 61 patients whose data were analyzed retrospectively, 36 received the low-dose-/pulsed-dose rate treatment (59%) and 25 the high-dose-rate brachytherapy (41%). The median follow-up time was 44 months. At 36 months, the local control rates were 96.3% for LDR/PDR group and 100% for HDR (P=0.180). The regional control rates were 85.9% and 92% without any difference according to the two groups (P=0.179). The specific overall survival rate was 95.5% with no difference between groups. There were more grade 2 or higher mucositis in the HDR group than in LDR/PDR group (40% versus 16.7%, P=0.042). One case of grade 3 mucositis was recorded in each group. No grade 3 late complications were recorded. High-dose-rate brachytherapy reduced the length of hospitalization by 2 days (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

High-dose- or low-dose-/pulsed-dose rate brachytherapy seemed to be as effective and well tolerated in our experience of 61 patients.

High dose interstitial brachytherapy for treatment of carcinoma of the lip as an alternative to surgery: a case report

Lip cancer (LC) is the most common cancer of the oral cavity and is the second most common in the head and neck. Brachytherapy (BT) is a good treatment option for this type of cancer because it administers high doses of radiation to the target. BT has similar cure and survival rates as surgery for the same type of cancer, but it often produces more favourable aesthetic results, especially when the tumour is treated in its early stages. We present a case of a patient diagnosed with stage II lower LC who refused surgical treatment. Instead, high-dose-rate interstitial BT was performed with ¹⁹²Ir. A 2-year post-treatment follow-up indicated there were neither serious complications nor recurrence of cancer during that period.

Pulsed Dose Rate Brachytherapy of Lip Carcinoma: Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life Analysis

Simple Summary

Lip cancer accounts for 25–30% of all oral cancers, with 23,000 new cases per year in the world. Carcinomas of the lip can be successfully treated with different methods: surgery, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy. The choice of the treatment depends on the tumor size, location and expected functional and esthetic results with each option, but also depends on treatment type accessibility. There are no randomized studies comparing these different treatment strategies. In this article, we investigated the complications and outcomes of patients treated with interstitial pulsed dose rate brachytherapy in our institution.

Abstract

Purpose: Lip carcinoma represents one of the most common types of head and neck cancer. Brachytherapy is a highly effective therapeutic option for all stages of lip cancers. We report our experience of pulsed dose rate brachytherapy (PDR) as treatment of lip carcinoma. Methods and Materials: this retrospective single center study included all consecutive patients treated for a lip PDR brachytherapy in our institution from 2010 to 2019. The toxicities and outcomes of the patients were reported, and a retrospective quality of life assessment was conducted by phone interviews (FACT H&N). Results: From October 2010 to December 2019, 38 patients were treated in our institution for a lip carcinoma by PDR brachytherapy. The median age was 73, and the majority of patients presented T1-T2 tumors (79%). The median total dose was 70.14 Gy (range: 60–85 Gy). With a mean follow-up of 35.4 months, two patients (5.6%) presented local failure, and seven patients (19%) had lymph node progression. The Kaplan–Meier estimated probability of local failure was 7.2% (95% CI: 0.84–1) at two and four years. All patients encountered radiomucitis grade II or higher. The rate of late toxicities was low: three patients (8.3%) had grade II fibrosis, and one patient had grade II chronic pain. All patients would highly recommend the treatment. The median FACT H&N total score was 127 out of 148, and the median FACT H&N Trial Outcome Index was 84. Conclusions: This study confirms that an excellent local control rate is achieved with PDR brachytherapy as treatment of lip carcinoma, with very limited late side effects and satisfactory functional outcomes. A multimodal approach should help to improve regional control.

Brachytherapy of the head and neck: An University of California Los Angeles guide to morbidity reduction

The head and neck (H&N) region is among the most intricate and functional part of our anatomy. Major functional nerves and blood vessels with importance that affect the entire body emanate from the base of skull. Brachytherapy plays an important role as a single modality therapy in early cancer of the lip and oral cavity and a supplemental role in the pharynx or in advanced or recurrent disease. Morbidity in the H&N is intensely personal and disabling. Its avoidance is critical in determining the success or failure of a treatment program, and it is essential to preservation of quality of life. This article summarizes the current literature regarding morbidity related to H&N brachytherapy to aid patients and physicians to achieve optimal outcomes.

Brachytherapy in head and neck malignancies: Indian Brachytherapy Society (IBS) recommendations and guidelines

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy (BT) forms major treatment modality in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck cancers (HNC). However, there is a dearth of literature and guidelines for the use in various indications. High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in Indian scenario is an important treatment modality, and the recommendations in this guidelines aim to provide the necessary recommendations for the use of HDR-BT for uniform application across the country in patients with HNC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A panel consisting of members of the Indian Brachytherapy Society (IBS), based on their clinical experience was invited. The process involved defining important steps, precautions, target volumes and indications, thorough literature review, and discussion with fellow members. The guidelines were established and formulated the recommendations for HDR-BT based on available evidences and individual experience for sites, relevant to Indian settings.

RESULTS

The IBS recommends the use of HDR brachytherapy as a part of treatment of head and neck tumors. The scope of these guidelines and recommendations included practical suggestions, ensuring efficient use of brachytherapy treatment as radical with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost, palliative and adjuvant as definitive, or re-radiation as salvage for HNC in India. The IBS has made specific site-wise recommendations for previously untreated and recurrent HNC patients on their selection criteria, implant techniques, target volume definition, and HDR treatment parameters, such as time, dose rate, total dose, and fractionation schedules. Limited experience exists with HDR-BT in patients with head and neck cancers in India and across the globe.

CONCLUSIONS

IBS provided a consensus statement and guidelines for the head and neck brachytherapy and believed that these recommendations will overcome the fear of practicing radiation oncologists. This should generate interest amongst students and will help radiation oncologists all across the country to use the art of brachytherapy carefully in HNC patients, with better curative and salvage options.

Radiotherapy treatment for nonmelanoma skin cancer

Non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common malignancy in the USA, with an estimated 3.5 million cases per year. Treatment options include surgical excision, radiation therapy (RT), photodynamic therapy and topical agents. Although surgical excision remains the mainstay of therapy, RT offers an effective alternative. RT can be used as an adjunct to surgery in high-risk situations, or in cases where surgical excision would lead to impaired cosmesis and/or functional outcomes. Radiation treatment modalities for non-melanoma skin cancers are diverse. Studies in the literature have examined the clinical effects of a wide variety of modalities, areas of the body and dosages. The most common modalities include superficial or orthovoltage RT, electron beam therapy and high dose-rate brachytherapy. This article aims to review the diverse radiotherapy treatment modalities for non-melanoma skin cancers, focusing on tumor control and toxicity.

Modern head and neck brachytherapy: from radium towards intensity modulated interventional brachytherapy

Intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) is a modern development of classical interventional radiation therapy (brachytherapy), which allows the application of a high radiation dose sparing severe adverse events, thereby further improving the treatment outcome. Classical indications in head and neck (H&N) cancers are the face, the oral cavity, the naso- and oropharynx, the paranasal sinuses including base of skull, incomplete resections on important structures, and palliation. The application type can be curative, adjuvant or perioperative, as a boost to external beam radiation as well as without external beam radiation and with palliative intention. Due to the frequently used perioperative application method (intraoperative implantation of inactive applicators and postoperative performance of radiation), close interdisciplinary cooperation between surgical specialists (ENT-, dento-maxillary-facial-, neuro- and orbital surgeons), as well interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) experts are obligatory. Published results encourage the integration of IMBT into H&N therapy, thereby improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy of lip cancer

Purpose

Purpose: To present our experience with pulsed dose rate brachytherapy (PDR BT) of lip cancer.

Material and methods

The study group included 32 T1-4N0M0 lip cancer patients with a median age of 71 years (ranged 41-87 years), treated with interstitial PDR BT to the planned total dose of 60-70 Gy; 1 Gy/pulse, pulses repeated every hour a day. There were 26 untreated patients, and six patients after previous surgery including five implanted at the time of cancer relapse.

Results

PDR BT was delivered over few days and was well tolerated. After therapy, all patients experienced temporary, usually mild, acute mucositis. Late severe (Grade 3) mucositis of oral vestibule mucosa occurred in one case. Among 31 patients who completed the therapy, local control was achieved in 29 (93.5%). One patient with reccurrent upper lip T2 tumor was susccessfully salvaged surgically, another one died due to persisted T3 lip tumor with lymph node metastases. Overall, four patients developed neck nodal cancer relapse and two – distant metastases. The 5-year local control, and all-cause overall survival probabilities are 94% and 73%, respectively. Good/excellent cosmetic and functional outcome was obtained in all but two patients.

Conclusions

PDR at the dose of 1 Gy/pulse is effective and well tolerated BT technique in treating lip cancer patients.

High dose rate versus low dose rate brachytherapy for oral cancer--a meta-analysis of clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of high dose rate (HDR) and low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy in treating early-stage oral cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases, restricted to English language up to June 1, 2012, was performed to identify potentially relevant studies.

STUDY SELECTION

Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) and controlled trials that compared HDR to LDR brachytherapy in treatment of early-stage oral cancer (stages I, II and III) were of interest.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two investigators independently extracted data from retrieved studies and controversies were solved by discussion. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1. One RCT and five controlled trials (607 patients: 447 for LDR and 160 for HDR) met the inclusion criteria. The odds ratio showed no statistically significant difference between LDR group and HDR group in terms of local recurrence (OR = 1.12, CI 95% 0.62-2.01), overall mortality (OR = 1.01, CI 95% 0.61-1.66) and Grade 3/4 complications (OR = 0.86, CI 95% 0.52-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated that HDR brachytherapy was a comparable alternative to LDR brachytherapy in treatment of oral cancer. HDR brachytherapy might become a routine choice for early-stage oral cancer in the future.