The retina dose-area histogram: a metric for quantitatively comparing rival eye plaque treatment options

Comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and protons for uveal melanoma patients

Background and purpose

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy. We compared fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with proton therapy, including toxicity risks for UM patients.

Materials and methods

For a total of 66 UM patients from a single center, SRT dose distributions were compared to protons using the same planning CT. Fourteen dose-volume parameters were compared in 2-Gy equivalent dose per fraction (EQD2). Four toxicity profiles were evaluated: maculopathy, optic-neuropathy, visual acuity impairment (Profile I); neovascular glaucoma (Profile II); radiation-induced retinopathy (Profile III); and dry-eye syndrome (Profile IV). For Profile III, retina Mercator maps were generated to visualize the geographical location of dose differences.

Results

In 9/66 cases, (14 %) proton plans were superior for all dose-volume parameters. Higher T stages benefited more from protons in Profile I, especially tumors located within 3 mm or less from the optic nerve. In Profile II, only 9/66 cases resulted in a better proton plan. In Profile III, better retina volume sparing was always achievable with protons, with a larger gain for T3 tumors. In Profile IV, protons always reduced the risk of toxicity with a median RBE-weighted EQD2 reduction of 15.3 Gy.

Conclusions

This study reports the first side-by-side imaging-based planning comparison between protons and SRT for UM patients. Globally, while protons appear almost always better regarding the risk of optic-neuropathy, retinopathy and dry-eye syndrome, for other toxicity like neovascular glaucoma, a plan comparison is warranted. Choice would depend on the prioritization of risks.

Uncertainties in ocular proton planning and their impact on required margins

PURPOSE

To review required margins in ocular proton therapy (OPT) based on an uncertainty estimation and to compare them with widely used values. Further, uncertainties when using registered funduscopy images in the 3D model is investigated.

METHODS

An uncertainty budget in planning and delivery was defined to determine required aperture and range margins. Setup uncertainties were considered for a cohort of treated patients and tested in a worst-case estimation. Other uncertainties were based on a best-guess and knowledge of institutional specifics, e.g. range reproducibility. Margins for funduscopy registration were defined resulting from scaling, rotation and translation of the image. Image formation for a wide-field fundus camera was reviewed and compared to the projection employed in treatment planning systems.

RESULTS

Values for aperture and range with margins of 2.5 mm as reported in literature could be determined. Aperture margins appear appropriate for setup uncertainties below 0.5 mm, but depend on lateral penumbra. Range margins depend on depth and associated density uncertainty in tissue. Registration of funduscopy images may require margins of >2 mm, increasing towards the equator. Difference in the projection may lead to discrepancies of several mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The commonly used 2.5 mm aperture margin was validated as an appropriate choice, while range margins could be reduced for lower ranges. Margins may however not include uncertainties in contouring and possible microscopic spread. If a target base is contoured on registered funduscopy images care must be taken as they are subject to larger uncertainties. Multimodal imaging approach in OPT remains advisable.

Transitioning from a COMS-based plaque brachytherapy program to using eye physics plaques and plaque simulator treatment planning system: A single institutional experience

The aim of this work is to describe the implementation and commissioning of a plaque brachytherapy program using Eye Physics eye plaques and Plaque Simulator treatment planning system based on the experience of one institution with an established COMS-based plaque program. Although commissioning recommendations are available in official task groups publications such as TG-129 and TG-221, we found that there was a lack of published experiences with the specific details of such a transition and the practical application of the commissioning guidelines. The specific issues addressed in this paper include discussing the lack of FDA approval of the Eye Physics plaques and Plaque Simulator treatment planning system, the commissioning of the plaques and treatment planning system including considerations of the heterogeneity corrected calculations, and the implementation of a second check using an FDA-approved treatment planning system. We have also discussed the use of rental plaques, the analysis of plans using dose histograms, and the development of a quality management program. By sharing our experiences with the commissioning of this program this document will assist other institutions with the same task and act as a supplement to the recommendations in the recently published TG-221.

Individualized dosimetry in Ru-106 ophthalmic brachytherapy based on MRI-derived ocular anatomical parameters

PURPOSE

To estimate ocular geometry-related inaccuracies of the dosimetric plan in Ru-106 ophthalmic brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty patients with intraocular lesions were treated with brachytherapy using a Ru-106 plaque-shell of inner radius of 12 mm. Magnetic resonance imaging was employed to determine the external scleral radius at tumor site and the tumor margins. A mathematical model was developed to determine the distance between the external sclera and the internal surface of the plaque associated with the tangential application of the plaque on the treated eye. Differences in delivered dose to the tumor apex, sclera and tumor margins as derived by considering the default eye-globe of standard size (external sclera radius = 12 mm) against the individual-specific eye globe were determined.

RESULTS

The radius of external sclera at the tumor site was found to range between 10.90 and 13.05 mm for the patient cohort studied. When the patient specific eye-globe/tumor geometry is not taken into account, the delivered dose was found to be overestimated by 8.1% ± 4.1% (max = 15.3%) at tumor apex, by 1.5% ± 2.8% (max = 5.7%) at anterior tumor margin, by 16.6% ± 7.5% (max = 36.4%) at posterior tumor margin and 8.1% ± 3.8% (max = 13.2%) at central sclera of eyes with lower than the default radius. The corresponding dose overestimations for eyes with higher than the default radius was 13.5% ± 4.3% (max = 22.3%), 1.5% ± 2.8% (max = 5.7%), 12.6% ± 4.5% (max = 20.0%), and 15.1% ± 5.0% (max = 24.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed patient-specific approach for Ru-106 brachytherapy treatment planning may improve dosimetric accuracy. Individualized treatment planning dosimetry may prevent undertreatment of intraocular tumors especially for highly myopic or hyperopic eyes.

Radiobiological evaluation of organs at risk for electronic high-dose-rate brachytherapy in uveal melanoma: a radiobiological modeling study

Purpose

The objective of this study was to examine feasibility of single- or hypo-fraction of high-dose-rate (HDR) electronic brachytherapy (eBT) in uveal melanoma treatment.

Material and methods

Biologically effective doses (BED) of organs at risk (OARs) were compared to those of iodine-125-based eye plaque low-dose-rate brachytherapy (¹²⁵I LDR-BT) with vitreous replacement (VR). Single- or hypo-fractionated equivalent physical doses (SFEDs or HFEDs) for tumor were calculated from tumor BED of ¹²⁵I LDR-BT using linear-quadratic (LQ) and universal survival curve (USC) models. BED OARs doses to retina opposite the implant, macula, optic disc, and lens were calculated and compared among SFED, HFED, and ¹²⁵I LDR-BT. Electronic BT of 50 kVp was considered assuming dose fall-off as clinically equivalent to ¹²⁵I LDR-BT. All OARs BEDs were analyzed with and without silicone oil VR.

Results

For a single-fraction incorporating VR, the median/interquartile range of LQ (USC)-based BED doses of the retina opposite the implant, macula, optic disc, and lens were 16%/1.2% (33%/4%), 35%/19.5% (64%/17.7%), 37%/19% (75%/17.8%), and 27%/7.9% (68%/23.2%) of those for ¹²⁵I LDR-BT, respectively. SFED tumor values were 29.8/0.2 Gy and 51.7/0.5 Gy when using LQ and USC models, respectively, which could be delivered within 1 hour. SFED can be delivered within 1 hour using a high-dose-rate eBT. Even four-fraction delivery of HFED without VR resulted in higher OARs doses in the macula, optic disc, and lens (135 ~ 159%) than when using ¹²⁵I LDR-BT technique. A maximum p-value of 0.005 was observed for these distributions.

Conclusions

The simulation of single-fraction eBT, including vitreous replacement, resulted in significantly reduced OARs doses (16 ~ 75%) of that achieved with ¹²⁵I LDR-BT.

The application of metal artifact reduction methods on computed tomography scans for radiotherapy applications: A literature review

Metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods are used to reduce artifacts from metals or metal components in computed tomography (CT). In radiotherapy (RT), CT is the most used imaging modality for planning, whose quality is often affected by metal artifacts. The aim of this study is to systematically review the impact of MAR methods on CT Hounsfield Unit values, contouring of regions of interest, and dose calculation for RT applications. This systematic review is performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines; the PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using the main keywords "metal artifact reduction", "computed tomography" and "radiotherapy". A total of 382 publications were identified, of which 40 (including one review article) met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The selected publications (except for the review article) were grouped into two main categories: commercial MAR methods and research-based MAR methods. Conclusion: The application of MAR methods on CT scans can improve treatment planning quality in RT. However, none of the investigated or proposed MAR methods was completely satisfactory for RT applications because of limitations such as the introduction of other errors (e.g., other artifacts) or image quality degradation (e.g., blurring), and further research is still necessary to overcome these challenges.

EyeDose: An open-source tool for using published Monte Carlo results to estimate the radiation dose delivered to the tumor and critical ocular structures for 125I Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study eye plaques

PURPOSE

Radiation side effects and visual outcome for uveal melanoma patients managed with plaque radiotherapy are dependent on the radiation dose administered to the tumor and nearby healthy tissues. We have developed an open-source software tool, EyeDose, to simplify and standardize tumor and critical structure dose reporting for Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study eye plaques.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

EyeDose is a MATLAB-based program that calculates point dose and volume dose metrics for standard models of the tumor and critical ocular structures. It uses published three-dimensional dose distributions for eye plaques, calculated with Monte Carlo methods, which are oriented with respect to the eye using the tumor's position on a fundus diagram. A standard model for the ocular structures was created using published measurements and patient CT scans. EyeDose reports radiation statistics for the fovea, optic disc, lens, lacrimal gland, retina, and tumor. The dosimetric margin for implant placement uncertainty is also calculated.

RESULTS

EyeDose calculations were validated against previously published Monte Carlo results for eight different tumor positions, including the dose to the fovea, optic disc, lacrimal gland, lens, and along the central axis. EyeDose accepts a spreadsheet input for rapidly processing large retrospective patient data sets, with an average run time of <40 s per patient. EyeDose is published as an open-source tool for easy adaptation at different institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

EyeDose calculates radiation statistics for Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study eye plaque patients with Monte Carlo accuracy and without a treatment planning system. EyeDose streamlines data collection for large retrospective studies and can also be used prospectively to assess plaque applicability.

Outcomes of choroidal melanomas treated with eye physics plaques: A 25-year review

PURPOSE

To review long-term outcomes of the University of Southern California Plaque Simulator (PS) software and Eye Physics (EP) plaques. We hypothesize that the PS/EP system delivers lower doses to critical ocular structures, resulting in lower rates of radiation toxicity and favorable visual outcomes compared to Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study plaques, while maintaining adequate local tumor control.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective review of 133 patients treated for choroidal melanoma with ¹²⁵I brachytherapy, using PS software and EP plaques, from 1990 through 2015. A dose of 85 Gy at a rate of 0.6 Gy/h was prescribed to the tumor apex (with a typical margin of 2 mm) over 7 days. Primary outcomes were local tumor recurrence, globe salvage, and metastasis. Secondary outcomes were changes in visual acuity and radiation complications.

RESULTS

With median followup of 42 months, 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated rates for tumor control, globe salvage, and metastatic-free survival were 98.3%, 96.4%, and 88.2%, respectively. Median doses to the macula and optic nerve were 39.9 Gy and 30.0 Gy, respectively. Forty-three percent of patients developed radiation retinopathy, and 20% developed optic neuropathy; 39% lost ≥6 Snellen lines of vision.

CONCLUSIONS

The PS/EP system is designed to improve the accuracy and conformality of the radiation dose, creating a steep dose gradient outside the melanoma to decrease radiation to surrounding ocular structures. We report favorable rates of local tumor control, globe salvage, metastases, and radiation complications when compared to the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study and other studies. Overall, the PS/EP system results in excellent tumor control and appears to optimize long-term visual and radiation-related outcomes after brachytherapy.

Bilateral episcleral brachytherapy in simultaneous choroidal melanoma and circumscribed hemangioma

Purpose

To describe the efficacy of episcleral brachytherapy in a choroidal melanoma and circumscribed hemangioma arising in both eyes of the same patient.

Case report

We present the case of a 47 year old man who presented decreased visual acuity a few months preceding initial consult. On fundoscopy, he presented a melanotic lesion in the right eye, and a red-orange choroidal mass in the macular area of the left eye.

Material and methods

B scan-ultrasound, fluorescein, and indocyanine green angiography, confirmed the diagnosis of choroidal melanoma in the right eye, and circumscribed choroidal hemangioma in the left eye. Episcleral brachytherapy with ¹²⁵I was performed in both eyes consecutively.

Results and Conclusions

Bilateral episcleral brachytherapy successfully treated both tumors, preserving the eyes and useful visual function.