Prospective multi-center dosimetry study of low-dose Iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy performed after transurethral resection

Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for localized prostate Cancer: Efficacy and late urinary toxicity according to transurethral resection of the prostate history

Background and purpose

Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic alternative for localized low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Despite the availability of several studies, the toxicity profile of SBRT has not been comprehensively described. This real-world evidence study assessed the efficacy and toxicities associated with this regimen, and potential prognosis factors for genitourinary toxicities.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 141 consecutive patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with CyberKnife™ SBRT, as primary irradiation, at the Oscar Lambret Center between 2010 and 2020. The prescribed dose was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. Acute and late toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE (version 5.0). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (cBR) was estimated using the Kalbfleisch-Prentice method.

Results

Among the included patients, 13.5 % had a history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The median follow-up was 48 months. At 5 years, bRFS, cBR, and OS were 72 % (95 %CI: 61-81), 7 % (95 %CI: 3-14), and 82 % (95 %CI: 73-89), respectively. Twenty-nine patients experienced at least one late toxicity of grade ≥ 2; genitourinary (N = 29), including 3 cases of chronic hematuria, and/or gastrointestinal (N = 1). The cumulative incidence of late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2 was 20.6 % at 5 years (95 %CI: 13.9-28.1). Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of TURP was significantly associated with late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2, after adjusting for clinical target volume (Odds Ratio = 3.06; 95%CI: 1.05-8.86; P = 0.04).

Conclusion

Extreme hypofractionated SBRT is effective for localized prostate cancer with a low risk of late toxicity. A history of TURP is associated with a higher risk of late urinary toxicity. These findings may contribute to the optimal management of patients treated with this regimen, particularly those with a history of TURP.

GEC-ESTRO ACROP prostate brachytherapy guidelines

This is an evidence-based guideline for prostate brachytherapy. Throughout levels of evidence quoted are those from the Oxford Centre for Evidence based Medicine (https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/oxford-centre-for-evidence-based-medicine-levels-of-evidence-march-2009). Prostate interstitial brachytherapy using either permanent or temporary implantation is an established and evolving treatment technique for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Permanent brachytherapy uses Low Dose Rate (LDR) sources, most commonly I-125, emitting photon radiation over months. Temporary brachytherapy involves first placing catheters within the prostate and, on confirmation of accurate positioning, temporarily introducing the radioactive source, generally High Dose Rate (HDR) radioactive sources of Ir-192 or less commonly Co-60. Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy has also been used for prostate cancer [1] but few centres have adopted this approach. Previous GEC ESTRO recommendations have considered LDR and HDR separately [2-4] but as there is considerable overlap, this paper provides updated guidance for both treatment techniques. Prostate brachytherapy allows safe radiation dose escalation beyond that achieved using external beam radiotherapy alone as it has greater conformity around the prostate, sparing surrounding rectum, bladder, and penile bulb. In addition there are fewer issues with changes in prostate position during treatment delivery. Systematic review and randomised trials using both techniques as boost treatments demonstrate improved PSA control when compared to external beam radiotherapy alone [5-7].

Minimal channel GreenLight photovaporization before permanent implant prostate brachytherapy for patients with obstructive symptoms: Technically feasible and safe

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy (BrT) is a standard treatment for low-risk to favorable-intermediate-risk prostate cancer but is a relative contraindication for patients with obstructive symptoms. We aimed to assess the feasibility and urinary toxicity of a minimal photovaporization (mPVP) before implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 04/2009 and 08/2016, 50 patients candidates for BrT but with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)>15, uroflowmetry <15 mL/s, obstructive prostate or large median lobe underwent a mPVP (GreenLight Laser) at least 6 weeks (median 8.5) before permanent seed implantation (loose seeds, ¹²⁵I, 160 Gy).

RESULTS

Two patients (4%) did not have sufficient improvement and did not undergo BrT, although it would have been possible at 3 months. For the 48 (96%) other patients, at the baseline, mean IPSS was 15.5 (±5.3), vs. 8.6 (±4.4) after mPVP (p = 1 × 10^-6), and uroflowmetry 11.7 mL/s (±4), vs. 17.4 (±5.4) (p = 1.4 × 10^-5). We did not experience any difficulty for BrT. Mean IPSS did not significantly increase 1, 3, or 6 months after BrT. With a median followup of 60 months [30-120], (92% assessed at last followup), only 4 patients (4/48 = 8.3%) experienced urinary retention and 5 (10.4%) needed surgery for urinary toxicity. In addition, only 2 patients (4%) needed medical treatment at last followup. Considering the 8 patients with de novo incontinence at 1 year, only 2 (4%) had persistent mild symptoms at last followup (36 months) (ICS1-2).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that a two-step approach with an mPVP at least 6 weeks before BrT is feasible, with no excessive urinary toxicity, and may be a good strategy for obstructive patients seeking BrT.

A history of transurethral resection of the prostate should not be a contra-indication for low-dose-rate 125I prostate brachytherapy: results of a prospective Uro-GEC phase-II trial

Purpose

Early reports suggested that transurethral resection (TURP) prior to permanent seed brachytherapy (BT) results in high incontinence rates. Guidelines consider prior TURP as a contra-indication to treatment, but improvements in imaging and treatment planning may reduce this risk, and are investigated in this prospective study.

Material and methods

99 men with histologically proven low- to intermediate-risk, localized prostate cancer, with a history of TURP performed at least 3 months before BT procedure were enrolled. All patients received a permanent seed implant between March 2009 and June 2015. Intra-operative interactive planning was recommended to ensure optimal accuracy of seed placement during the procedure. No supplemental external beam was allowed. Target and organ at risk contouring, definition of clinical target volume (CTV), and dosimetric parameters followed the modified GEC-ESTRO guidelines for permanent seed implants, as described an earlier report of our group. Follow-up was scheduled every 3 months for the first year, and every 6 months afterwards, with minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Study endpoints

The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-implant urinary incontinence. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary and gastro-intestinal toxicity, the eventual impact on the sexual function, and the freedom from biochemical failure.

Results

The median follow-up time for these 99 patients was 49 months (min. 24, max. 96). In this series, the incontinence rate was 2% after TURP + BT and 2% in case of TURP + BT + re-TURP, ending up with a total urinary incontinence rate of 4%. Acute and late urinary toxicities were extremely low. No significant late gastro-intestinal toxicity was seen, and the 5-year biochemical non-evidence of disease (bNED) was 93%.

Conclusions

The excellent long-term results and low morbidity presented as well as many advantages of prostate brachytherapy over other treatments demonstrates that brachytherapy is an effective treatment for patients with transurethral resection and organ-confined prostate cancer.

A single institution analysis of low-dose-rate brachytherapy: 5-year reported survival and late toxicity outcomes

Purpose

To report the 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), overall survival (OS), and long-term toxicity outcomes of patients treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Material and methods

Between 2004 and 2011, 371 patients were treated with LDR brachytherapy as monotherapy. Of these, 102 patients (27%) underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) prior to implantation. Follow-up was performed every 3 months for 12 months, then every 6 months over 4 years and included prostate specific antigen evaluation. The biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) was defined according to the Phoenix criteria. Acute and late toxicities were documented using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The BRFS and OS estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier plots. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate outcomes by pre-treatment clinical prognostic factors and radiation dosimetry.

Results

The median follow-up of all patients was 5.45 years. The 5-year BRFS and OS rates were 95% and 96%, respectively. The BRFS rates for patients with Gleason score (GS) > 7 and GS ≤ 6 were 96% and 91% respectively (p = 0.06). On univariate analysis, T1 and T2 staging, risk-group classification, and prostate volumes had no impact on survival at 5 years (p > 0.1). Late grade 2 and 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were observed in 10% and 5% of patients respectively. Additionally, patients with prior TURP had a greater incidence of late grade 2 or 3 urinary retention (p = 0.001). There were 14 deaths in total; however, none were attributed to prostate cancer.

Conclusions

LDR brachytherapy is an effective treatment option in low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. We observed low biochemical relapse rates and minimal GU toxicities several years after treatment in patients with or without TURP. However, a small risk of urinary retention was observed in some patients.

The impact of body mass index on dosimetric quality in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

Purpose

Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy has been established as an effective and safe treatment option for men with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer. In this retrospective analysis, we sought to study the effect of body mass index (BMI) on post-implant dosimetric quality.

Material and methods

After institutional approval, records of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer treated in Puerto Rico with LDR brachytherapy during 2008-2013 were reviewed. All patients were implanted with ¹²⁵I seeds to a prescription dose of 145 Gy. Computed tomography (CT) based dosimetry was performed 1 month after implant. Patients with at least 1 year of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) follow-up were included. Factors predictive of adequate D₉₀ coverage (≥ 140 Gy) were compared via the Pearson χ² or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate.

Results

One-hundred and four patients were included in this study, with 53 (51%) patients having a D₉₀ ≥ 140 Gy. The only factor associated with a dosimetric coverage detriment (D₉₀ < 140 Gy) was BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² (p = 0.03). Prostate volume (p = 0.26), initial PSA (p = 0.236), age (p = 0.49), hormone use (p = 0.93), percent of cores positive (p = 0.95), risk group (p = 0.24), tumor stage (p = 0.66), and Gleason score (p = 0.61) did not predict D₉₀.

Conclusions

In this study we show that BMI is a significant pre-implant predictor of D₉₀ (< 140 Gy vs. ≥ 140 Gy). Although other studies have reported that prostate volume also affects D₉₀, our study did not find this correlation to be statistically significant, likely because all of our patients had a prostate volume < 50 cc. Our study suggests that in patients with higher BMI values, more rigorous peri-implant dosimetric parameters may need to be applied in order to achieve a target D₉₀ > 140 Gy.

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with transurethral resection before implantation in prostate cancer. Longterm results

Objectives

We analyzed the long-term oncologic outcome for patients with prostate cancer and transurethral resection who were treated using low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy.

Methods and Materials

From January 2001 to December 2005, 57 consecutive patients were treated with clinically localized prostate cancer. No patients received external beam radiation. All of them underwent LDR prostate brachytherapy. Biochemical failure was defined according to the “Phoenix consensus”. Patients were stratified as low and intermediate risk based on The Memorial Sloan Kettering group definition.

Results

The median follow-up time for these 57 patients was 104 months. The overall survival according to Kaplan-Meier estimates was 88% (±6%) at 5 years and 77% (±6%) at 12 years. The 5 and 10 years for failure in tumour-free survival (TFS) was 96% and respectively (±2%), whereas for biochemical control was 94% and respectively (±3%) at 5 and 10 years, 98% (±1%) of patients being free of local recurrence. A patient reported incontinence after treatment (1.7%). The chronic genitourinary complains grade I were 7% and grade II, 10%. At six months 94% of patients reported no change in bowel function.

Conclusions

The excellent long-term results and low morbidity presented, as well as the many advantages of prostate brachytherapy over other treatments, demonstrates that brachytherapy is an effective treatment for patients with transurethral resection and clinical organ-confined prostate cancer.

Effect of a urinary catheter on seed position and rectal and bladder doses in CT-based post-implant dosimetry for prostate cancer brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the variability in rectal and bladder dosimetric parameters determined according to post-implant computed tomography (CT) images in patients with or without a urethral catheter.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with prostate cancer who were scheduled to undergo CT after brachytherapy between October 2012 and January 2014 were included. We obtained CT series with and without a urinary catheter in each patient. We compared the rectal and bladder doses in 18 patients on each CT series.

RESULTS

The shifts in the seed positions between with and without a catheter in place were 1.3 ± 0.3 mm (mean ± standard deviation). The radiation doses to the rectum, as determined on the CT series, with a urethral catheter were higher than those on CT without a catheter (p < 0.001). Radiation doses to the bladder with a catheter were significantly lower than those without a catheter (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-implant dosimetry (PID) with no catheter showed significantly lower rectal doses and higher bladder doses than those of PID with a catheter. We recommend the PID procedure for CT images in patients without a catheter. Use of CT with a catheter is limited to identifying urethral position.

Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of loss and displacement of seeds in prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To analyze the seed loss and displacement and their dosimetric impact in prostate low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy while utilizing the combination of loose and stranded seeds.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred and seventeen prostate cancer patients have been treated with LDR brachytherapy. Loose seeds were implanted in the prostate center and stranded seeds in the periphery of the gland. Patients were imaged with transrectal ultrasound before implant and with computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MR) one month after implant. The seed loss and displacement had been analyzed. Their impact on prostate dosimetry had been examined. The seed distribution beyond the prostate inferior boundary had been studied.

RESULTS

The mean number of seeds per patient that were lost to lung, pelvis/abdomen, urine, or unknown destinations was 0.21, 0.13, 0.03, and 0.29, respectively. Overall, 40.1% of patients had seed loss. Seed migration to lung and pelvis/abdomen occurred in 15.5% and 10.5% of the patients, respectively. Documented seed loss to urine was found in 3% of the patients while 20% of patients had seed loss to unknown destinations. Prostate length difference between pre-plan and post-implant images was within 6 mm in more than 98% of cases. The difference in number of seeds inferior to prostate between pre-plan and post-implant dosimetry was within 7 seeds for 93% of patients. At time of implant, 98% of seeds, inferior to prostate, were within 5 mm and 100% within 15 mm, and in one month post-implant 83% within 9 mm and 96.3% within 15 mm. Prostate post-implant V100, D90, and rectal wall RV100 for patients without seed loss were 94.6%, 113.9%, and 0.98 cm(3), respectively, as compared to 95.0%, 114.8%, and 0.95 cm(3) for the group with seed loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Seed loss and displacement have been observed to be frequent. No correlation between seed loss and displacement and post-plan dosimetry has been reported.

Improved dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy using high resolution contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study

Purpose

To assess detailed dosimetry data for prostate and clinical relevant intra- and peri-prostatic structures including neurovascular bundles (NVB), urethra, and penile bulb (PB) from postbrachytherapy computed tomography (CT) versus high resolution contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (HR-CEMRI).

Material and methods

Eleven postbrachytherapy prostate cancer patients underwent HR-CEMRI and CT imaging. Computed tomography and HR-CEMRI images were randomized and 2 independent expert readers created contours of prostate, intra- and peri-prostatic structures on each CT and HR-CEMRI scan for all 11 patients. Dosimetry data including V₁₀₀, D₉₀, and D₁₀₀ was calculated from these contours.

Results

Mean V₁₀₀ values from CT and HR-CEMRI contours were as follows: prostate (98.5% and 96.2%, p = 0.003), urethra (81.0% and 88.7%, p = 0.027), anterior rectal wall (ARW) (8.9% and 2.8%, p < 0.001), left NVB (77.9% and 51.5%, p = 0.002), right NVB (69.2% and 43.1%, p = 0.001), and PB (0.09% and 11.4%, p = 0.005). Mean D₉₀ (Gy) derived from CT and HR-CEMRI contours were: prostate (167.6 and 150.3, p = 0.012), urethra (81.6 and 109.4, p = 0.041), ARW (2.5 and 0.11, p = 0.003), left NVB (98.2 and 58.6, p = 0.001), right NVB (87.5 and 55.5, p = 0.001), and PB (11.2 and 12.4, p = 0.554).

Conclusions

Findings of this study suggest that HR-CEMRI facilitates accurate and meaningful dosimetric assessment of prostate and clinically relevant structures, which is not possible with CT. Significant differences were seen between CT and HR-CEMRI, with volume overestimation of CT derived contours compared to HR-CEMRI.

Influence of zonal dosimetry on prostate brachytherapy outcomes

Purpose

To examine the influence of zone-specific dosimetry on outcomes during permanent prostate implantation (PI), where the peripheral zone (PZ) and transitional zone (TZ) may receive varying radiation doses.

Material and methods

Four hundred and sixteen patients treated with I-125 PI (target dose: 144 Gy) between 1996 and 2003 were included in this Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, retrospective analysis. Whole prostate (WP), TZ, and PZ were contoured, and zone-specific D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ were computed. Their influence on biochemical failure (BF) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results

The median age and initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 68 years and 6.1 ng/ml, respectively, and the median follow-up time was 8.8 years. There were 329 subjects with Gleason score (GS) 6 disease (79.1%), and 82 subjects had GS 7 disease (19.7%). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was used in 20.4% of patients. Median D₉₀ and V_100% in the WP, PZ, and TZ were 141.2 Gy, 156.1 Gy, and 134.5 Gy; and 88.8%, 93.3%, and 84.2%, respectively. Ten-year rates for biochemical recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and prostate cancer-specific mortality were 82.4%, 92.4%, and 0.97% respectively. Only initial PSA, GS7+ disease, ADT, and PSA frequency were significant on multivariate analysis. Ten-year rates of grade 3 or higher GU and GI toxicity was 10.9% and 1.8%, respectively. TZ V₂₀₀ and TZ V₃₀₀ were significantly associated with late genitourinary toxicity.

Conclusions

The TZ received significantly lower doses of radiation compared to the PZ. On multivariate analysis, no dosimetric parameter was associated with efficacy. Higher TZ doses may be associated with higher late GU toxicity without improving efficacy.

Pre-plan parameters predict post-implant D90 ≥ 140 Gy for (125)I permanent prostate implants

Purpose

To find permanent prostate implant (PPI) pre-plan dosimetric parameters that predict post-implant D₉₀ ≥ 140 Gy.

Material and methods

Pre-plans were evaluated for 504 patients undergoing PPI with ¹²⁵I seeds for low or intermediate risk prostate cancer. Baseline patient and disease factors, numbers of seeds, ratios of number of seeds to available positions (occupancy proportion), and distances between the 100% isodose line and edge of the prostate (margin) planned for the whole prostate (WP), superior (S), inferior (I), anterior (A), and posterior (P) halves, SA, SP, IA, and IP quarters, and superior (S_T), inferior (I_T), and middle (M_T) thirds, and anterior (A_T) and posterior (P_T) middle one-sixth segments were analyzed by post-implant D₉₀ subset (≥ 140 Gy vs. < 140 Gy).

Results

20% had post-implant D₉₀ < 140 Gy (mean: 128.0 Gy, range: 97.5-139.2) vs. ≥ 140 Gy (mean: 154.4 Gy, range: 140.0-193.5). The D₉₀ ≥ 140 Gy subset had larger A_T and IA segment mean numbers of seeds (p = 0.01, 0.046), larger WP, S, A, SA, S_T, A_T, and M_T segment mean margins (p = 0.01, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, 0.03, 0.005, 0.02), and lower P_T segment occupancy proportion (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of post-implant D₉₀ ≥ 140 Gy were increased SA mean margin, no pre-implant 5-α-reductase inhibitor, higher pre-plan D₉₀, decreased P occupancy proportion, no pre-implant hormone therapy, and decreased SP mean margin.

Conclusions

Higher occupancy proportion and larger margins anteriorly and reduced occupancy proportion, and smaller margins posteriorly on PPI pre-plans predict post-implant D₉₀ ≥ 140 Gy.

Brachytherapy in the therapy of prostate cancer - an interesting choice

Brachytherapy is a curative alternative to radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation [i.e. 3D conformal external beam radiation therapy (CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)] with comparable long-term survival and biochemical control and the most favorable toxicity. HDR brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in treatment of prostate cancer is most frequently used together with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) as a boost (increasing the treatment dose precisely to the tumor). In the early stages of the disease (low, sometimes intermediate risk group), HDR-BT is more often used as monotherapy. There are no significant differences in treatment results (overall survival rate – OS, local recurrence rate – LC) between radical prostatectomy, EBRT and HDR-BT. Low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) is a radiation method that has been known for several years in treatment of localized prostate cancer. The LDR-BT is applied as a monotherapy and also used along with EBRT as a boost. It is used as a sole radical treatment modality, but not as a palliative treatment. The use of brachytherapy as monotherapy in treatment of prostate cancer enables many patients to keep their sexual functions in order and causes a lower rate of urinary incontinence. Due to progress in medical and technical knowledge in brachytherapy (“real-time” computer planning systems, new radioisotopes and remote afterloading systems), it has been possible to make treatment time significantly shorter in comparison with other methods. This also enables better protection of healthy organs in the pelvis. The aim of this publication is to describe both brachytherapy methods.