Evaluation of BEBIG HDR (60)Co system for non-invasive image-guided breast brachytherapy

Implementation of the Sievert integral for the calculation of dose distribution around the BEBIG Co-60 high dose rate brachytherapy source

Introduction: In radiotherapy, a computerized treatment planning system (TPS) is used for performing treatment planning to estimate the dose distribution within a patient. To simplify the dose calculation, mathematical algorithms are employed. TG43 formalism is widely used for brachytherapy. Before the implementation of a particular dose calculation algorithm in clinical practice, it is imperative to acknowledge the limitations and uncertainties associated with the algorithm. Regarding this, outputs of the algorithm are compared to measurements or dose calculation approaches using simple source placement geometries. The manual dose calculation method has to be robust, straightforward, and devoid of complexities to reduce the likelihood of committing errors in the dose calculation process. A lot of manual dose calculation approaches have been proposed for Brachytherapy sources, but one needs to ascertain their reliability.

Material and methods: Considering this, the output of an HDRplus treatment planning system dedicated to brachytherapy treatment planning and using the TG43 formalism to calculate the dose distribution around a BEBIG Co-60 source was validated with Sievert integral dose calculation approach. Simple source placement geometries were created with the TPS using the universal applicator, LLA1200-20, selected from the applicator library, and doses at various equidistant points from the applicator calculated with the TPS and the Sievert integral. Various steps to enhance the efficacy of the Sievert integral approach have been outlined.

Results: The doses compared favourably well with deviations ranging from 0.03 – 10.51% (mean of 3.13%), and 0.03 – 5.63% (mean of 2.55%) for angles along the perpendicular bisector of the source, ranging from 0° < θ < 70° and 0° < θ < 48°, respectively.

Conclusions: The Sievert integral breaks down at angles: θ ≥ 60°, and therefore, neglecting large angles, the Sievert integral would be an efficient, effective, and valid tool for quality control of the HDRplus TPS for the Co-60 source.

Evaluation of bone dose arising from skin cancer brachytherapy: A comparison between 192Ir and 60Co sources through Monte Carlo simulations

PURPOSE

This study aimed to calculate and compare absorbed dose to bone following exposure to ¹⁹²Ir and ⁶⁰Co sources in high dose rate (HDR) skin brachytherapy. Moreover, effects of the bone thickness and soft tissue thickness before the bone on absorbed dose to the bone are evaluated .

MATERIALS AND METHODS

¹⁹²Ir and ⁶⁰Co sources inserted in Leipzig applicators with internal diameters of 1, 2 and 3 cm with/without their optimal flattening filters were simulated by MCNPX Monte Carlo code. Then, heterogeneous phantoms (including skin, soft tissue before and after the bone, cortical bone and bone marrow) were defined. Finally, relative depth dose values for the bone and other tissues in the heterogeneous phantoms were obtained and compared.

RESULTS

The average relative depth dose values of the skin, soft tissue before and after bone and bone marrow were almost similar for both ¹⁹²Ir and ⁶⁰Co sources, with a maximum difference less than 2%. However, a 0.1-6.8% difference was observed between average relative depth dose values of these two sources for the cortical bone. The results showed that with increasing the bone thickness and bone distance from the skin surface, the average relative depth dose values of the bone marrow and cortical bone decreased for both ¹⁹²Ir and ⁶⁰Co sources inserted in the applicators without/with their optimal flattening filters. For most of evaluated the applicators without/with their flattening filters, the average relative depth dose values of the bone marrow arisen from the ⁶⁰Co source were higher than those obtained from the ¹⁹²Ir source, while an opposite trend was observed for the cortical bone .

CONCLUSION

The obtained findings showed that the average relative depth dose values of ¹⁹²Ir and ⁶⁰Co sources at the corresponding depths of the designed heterogeneous phantoms were almost similar (expect for the cortical bone). Hence, it is concluded that ⁶⁰Co source can be used instead of ¹⁹²Ir source in HDR skin brachytherapy, particularly in developing countries.

Design and characterization of flattening filter for high dose rate 192Ir and 60Co Leipzig applicators used in skin cancer brachytherapy: A Monte Carlo study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to design optimal flattening filters for high dose rate (HDR) ¹⁹²Ir and ⁶⁰Co Leipzig applicators which are used to treat skin cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MCNPX Monte Carlo code was used to design flattening filters for Leipzig applicators with inner diameters of 1, 2 and 3 cm. Then, their dosimetric characterizations such as dose distribution, dose profile, percentage depth dose, flatness, symmetry and homogeneity were evaluated in a 20 × 20 × 20 cm³ water phantom and compared with those without the flattening filter.

RESULTS

The flattening filter thickness varied from 0 mm (at the edge) to the maximum values of 0.30, 1.18, and 2.41 mm for the ¹⁹²Ir Leipzig applicators of H1, H2, and H3 type, respectively. This quantity has maximum values of 0.96, 6.27, and 12.31 mm for the ⁶⁰Co double wall applicators of D1, D2, and D3 type, respectively. The dose profile flatness values for the H1, H2, and H3 ¹⁹²Ir Leipzig applicators with the optimal flattening filters were 0.76, 1.26, and 1.85%, respectively. Furthermore, the dose profile flatness values for the D1, D2, and D3 ⁶⁰Co double wall applicators with the optimal flattening filters were 1.11, 2.10 and 3.12%, respectively. The dose profile symmetry values obtained from various source-applicator combinations were less than 1.02. Compared to the applicators without flattening filter, the homogeneity values for the H1, H2, and H3 ¹⁹²Ir Leipzig applicators with the optimal flattening filters were improved 1.68, 6.51, and 13.17 times, respectively, and for the D1, D2, and D3 ⁶⁰Co double wall applicators were improved 1.23, 6.21 and 9.54 times, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The findings revealed that the inhomogeneous dose distribution resulted from the Leipzig applicators without the optimal flattening filter at the treatment surface could be improved by insertion of optimal lead flattening filters between the sources and treatment surface.

A comparative assessment of inhomogeneity and finite patient dimension effects in 60Co and 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Purpose

To perform a comparative study of heterogeneities and finite patient dimension effects in ⁶⁰Co and ¹⁹²Ir high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Clinically equivalent plans were prepared for 19 cases (8 breast, 5 esophagus, 6 gynecologic) using the Ir2.A85-2 and the Co0.A86 HDR sources, with a TG-43 based treatment planning system (TPS). Phase space files were obtained for the two source designs using MCNP6, and validated through comparison to a single source dosimetry results in the literature. Dose to water, taking into account the patient specific anatomy and materials (D_w,m), was calculated for all plans using MCNP6, with input files prepared using the BrachyGuide software tool to analyze information from DICOM RT plan exports.

Results

A general TG-43 dose overestimation was observed, except for the lungs, with a greater magnitude for ¹⁹²Ir. The distribution of percentage differences between TG-43 and Monte Carlo (MC) in dose volume histogram (DVH) indices for the planning target volume (PTV) presented small median values (about 2%) for both ⁶⁰Co and ¹⁹²Ir, with a greater dispersion for ¹⁹²Ir. Regarding the organs at risk (OARs), median percentage differences for breast V_50% were 3% (5%) for ⁶⁰Co (¹⁹²Ir). Differences in median skin D_2cc were found comparable, with a larger dispersion for ¹⁹²Ir, and the same applied to the lung D_10cc and the aorta D_2cc. TG-43 overestimates D_2cc for the rectum and the sigmoid, with median differences from MC within 2% and a greater dispersion for ¹⁹²Ir. For the bladder, the median of the difference is greater for ⁶⁰Co (~2%) than for ¹⁹²Ir (~0.75%), demonstrating however a greater dispersion again for ¹⁹²Ir.

Conclusions

The magnitude of differences observed between TG-43 based and MC dosimetry and their smaller dispersion relative to ¹⁹²Ir, suggest that ⁶⁰Co HDR sources are more amenable to the TG-43 assumptions in clinical treatment planning dosimetry.