1
|
Luginbuhl A, Calder A, Kutler D, Zender C, Wise-Draper T, Patel J, Cheng M, Karivedu V, Zhan T, Parashar B, Gulati S, Yao M, Lavertu P, Takiar V, Tang A, Johnson J, Keane W, Curry J, Cognetti D, Bar-Ad V. Multi-Institutional Study Validates Safety of Intraoperative Cesium-131 Brachytherapy for Treatment of Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:786216. [PMID: 34900741 PMCID: PMC8660666 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.786216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Surgery is the primary treatment for resectable, non-metastatic recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We explore the safety and oncologic benefit of intraoperative Cesium-131 (Cs-131) brachytherapy combined with salvage local and/or regional surgical resection. Methods and Materials Findings were reported from a single arm multi-institutional prospective phase 1/2 trial involving surgery plus Cs-131 (surgery + Cs-131) treatment. The results of two retrospective cohorts—surgery alone and surgery plus intensity modulated radiation therapy (surgery + ReIMRT)—were also described. Included patients had recurrent HNSCC and radiation history. Safety, tumor re-occurrence, and survival were evaluated. Results Forty-nine patients were enrolled in the surgery + Cs-131 prospective study. Grade 1 to 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 18 patients (37%), and grade 4 AEs occurred in 2 patients. Postoperative percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes were needed in 10 surgery + Cs-131 patients (20%), and wound and vascular complications were observed in 12 patients (24%). No cases of osteoradionecrosis were reported in the surgery + Cs-131 cohort. We found a 49% 2-year disease-free survival at the site of treatment with a substantial number of patients (31%) developing metastatic disease, which led to a 31% overall survival at 5 years. Conclusions Among patients with local/regional recurrent HNSCC status-post radiation, surgery + Cs-131 demonstrated acceptable safety with compelling oncologic outcomes, as compared to historic control cohorts. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifiers NCT02794675 and NCT02467738.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Luginbuhl
- Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Alyssa Calder
- Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - David Kutler
- Department of Otolaryngology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Chad Zender
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Trisha Wise-Draper
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Jena Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Michael Cheng
- Department of Otolaryngology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Vidhya Karivedu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Tingting Zhan
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Bhupesh Parashar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, United States
| | - Shuchi Gulati
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Min Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Pierre Lavertu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Vinita Takiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Alice Tang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Jennifer Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - William Keane
- Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Joseph Curry
- Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - David Cognetti
- Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Voichita Bar-Ad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kharouta M, Zender C, Podder T, Rezaee R, Lavertu P, Fowler N, Thuener J, Li S, Clancy K, Xu Z, Yao M. Permanent Interstitial Cesium-131 Brachytherapy in Treating High-Risk Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:639480. [PMID: 33816283 PMCID: PMC8012839 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.639480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives To establish the feasibility and safety of intraoperative placement of cesium-131 (Cs-131) seeds for re-irradiation in recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC). Methods Patients with resectable recurrent HNC who were deemed to have a high risk of second recurrence were eligible. Immediately after tumor extirpation, seeds were implanted in the surgical bed based on the preoperative treatment plan with intraoperative adjustment. The surgical bed and the seeds were covered with a regional flap or microvascular free flap. A CT of the neck was obtained on postoperative day 1 for evaluation of the postoperative dose distribution. Patients were followed 1 and 3 months after surgery, then every 3 months in the first 2 years. Results From November 2016 to September 2018, 15 patients were recruited and 12 patients received treatment per protocol. For the patients who had implants, the sites of initial recurrence included 10 neck alone, 1 neck and larynx, and 1 neck/peristomal. The median follow-up was 21.4 months. After surgery, patients remained hospitalized for a median of 6 days. There were no high-grade toxicities except two patients with wound complications requiring wound care. Eight patients had recurrences, three locoregional alone, three distant alone, and two with both locoregional and distant recurrences. Only one patient had an in-field failure. Five patients died, with 1- and 2-year overall survival of 75 and 58%. Conclusions Cs-131 implant after surgical resection in recurrent HNC is feasible and safe. There were no unexpected severe toxicities. Most failures were out-of-field or distant. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02794675.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kharouta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Chad Zender
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Tarun Podder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Rod Rezaee
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Pierre Lavertu
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Nicole Fowler
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jason Thuener
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Shawn Li
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Kate Clancy
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Zhengzheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Min Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Venkat P, Han J, Demanes DJ. Brachytherapy of the head and neck: An University of California Los Angeles guide to morbidity reduction. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1014-1040. [PMID: 33487561 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The head and neck (H&N) region is among the most intricate and functional part of our anatomy. Major functional nerves and blood vessels with importance that affect the entire body emanate from the base of skull. Brachytherapy plays an important role as a single modality therapy in early cancer of the lip and oral cavity and a supplemental role in the pharynx or in advanced or recurrent disease. Morbidity in the H&N is intensely personal and disabling. Its avoidance is critical in determining the success or failure of a treatment program, and it is essential to preservation of quality of life. This article summarizes the current literature regarding morbidity related to H&N brachytherapy to aid patients and physicians to achieve optimal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja Venkat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - James Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - D Jeffrey Demanes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
A systematic review of treating recurrent head and neck cancer: a reintroduction of brachytherapy with or without surgery. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:454-462. [PMID: 30479623 PMCID: PMC6251444 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.79399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To review brachytherapy use in recurrent head and neck carcinoma (RHNC) with focus on its efficacy and complication rates. Material and methods A literature search of PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, and Scopus was conducted from 1990 to 2017. Publications describing treatment of RHNC with brachytherapy with or without surgery were included. The focus of this review is on oncologic outcomes and the safety of brachytherapy in the recurrent setting. Results Thirty studies involving RHNC treatment with brachytherapy were reviewed. Brachytherapy as adjunctive treatment to surgical resection appears to be associated with an improved local regional control and overall survival, when compared with the published rates for re-irradiation utilizing external beam radiotherapy (RT) or brachytherapy alone. Safety data remains variable with different isotopes and dose rates with implantable brachytherapy demonstrating a tolerable side effect profile. Conclusions Although surgery remains a mainstay treatment for RHNC, intraoperative interstitial brachytherapy delivery as adjunctive therapy may improve the treatment outcome and may be associated with fewer complication rates as compared to reirradiation using external beam radiotherapy. Further investigations are required to elucidate the role of brachytherapy for RHNC.
Collapse
|