Comparison of dose volume parameters evaluated using three forward planning - optimization techniques in cervical cancer brachytherapy involving two applicators

Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation

OBJECTIVE

The majority of patients with cervical cancer in Ghana present with locally advanced disease. In October 2014, high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy was introduced at the National Center for Radiotherapy, Accra after years of using low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of patients treated with LDR versus HDR brachytherapy.

METHODS

Patients with cervical cancer treated from January 2008 to December 2017 were reviewed. Those with stage IB-IIIB who received chemoradiation plus brachytherapy were included in the study. Post-operative patients and those with stage IV were excluded. The study end points were local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years. Endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

We included 284 LDR and 136 HDR brachytherapy patients. For stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA and IIIB disease, the 2-year local control for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 63% and 61% (p=0.35), 86% and 90% (p=0.68), 86% and 88% (p=0.83), 66% and 60% (p=0.56), and 77% and 40% (p=0.005), respectively. The 2-year disease-free survival for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 64% and 61% (p=0.50), 81% and 69% (p=0.18), 81% and 80% (p=0.54), 62% and 33% (p=0.82), and 71% and 30% (p=0.001) for stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, and IIIB, respectively. The 2-year overall survival for LDR versus HDR brachytherapy was 94% and 93% (p=0.92), 98% and 68% (p=0.21), 89% and 88% (p=0.60), and 88% and 82% (p=0.34) for stages IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIB disease, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference between LDR and HDR brachytherapy in local control and disease-free survival for all stages of disease, except in stage IIIB. These findings highlight the need to refine this brachytherapy technique for this group of patients.

Preliminary results of modified interstitial MIAMI brachytherapy applicator for treatment of upper and apical vaginal tumors

Purpose

Intracavitary vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) cylinders are limited in treating upper/apical vaginal disease due to the distance between the target and radiation source positions. Interstitial brachytherapy devices directly expose the vaginal mucosa to radiation sources, increasing morbidity. To target apical disease while limiting excessive treatment to the vaginal mucosa and organs at risk, we modified the commercially available multichannel MIAMI applicator, allowing the direct extension of needles into the apex with the protection of cylinder.

Material and methods

The device has one central plastic core with six peripheral channels. The modified device permits titanium needles to surpass the apical surface into vaginal tissue. A retrospective analysis on thirteen patients treated with this device was conducted. Patient demographics, gross tumor volume (GTV)/clinical target volume (CTV), initial diagnosis and management, toxicity data, and EQD₂ data for the bladder and rectum were obtained.

Results

There were ten patients with vaginal recurrences and three with primary vaginal/cervical cancers. Mean dosage of VBT treatment was 25.5 Gy in 3-5 fractions. Mean dosage of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment was 44 Gy. Common acute toxicities included diarrhea, fatigue, cystitis, and nausea. Common chronic toxicities were pelvic pain, vaginal stenosis, and skin telangiectasia. Mean EQD₂ dose for bladder and rectum were 72.3 Gy and 62.3 Gy, respectively. Ten patients had no evidence of relapse, two suffered from distant metastases, and one patient with stage IIIA cervical adenocarcinoma had loco-regional recurrence seventeen months after radiation treatment.

Conclusions

Our data suggests that the custom applicator is associated with robust dosimetric coverage, good loco-regional control, acceptable toxicity, and reduced tissue trauma. This device allows treatment of apically located vaginal tumors without significant damage to the vaginal vault and organs at risk. Additionally, it provides the flexibility to treat multiple patients with variable vaginal diameters and sizes/depths of apical tumors using a single device.

Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of brachytherapy technique and applicator type on target dose, isodose surface volumes, and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine hundred two patients treated with tandem/ovoids (T&O) (n = 299) and tandem/ring (T&R) (n = 603) applicators from 16 EMBRACE centers were analyzed. Patients received external beam radiation therapy and magnetic resonance imaging guided brachytherapy with dose prescription according to departmental practice. Centers were divided into 4 groups, according to applicator/technique: Ovoids and ring centers treating mainly with the intracavitary (IC) technique and ovoids and ring centers treating routinely with the intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) technique. V85Gy EQD210, CTVHR D90% (EQD210), and bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and vaginal 5-mm lateral-point doses (EQD23) were evaluated among center groups. Differences between T&O and T&R were tested with multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

For similar point A doses, mean CTVHR D90% was 3.3 Gy higher and V85Gy was 23% lower for ring-IC compared with ovoids-IC centers (at median target volumes). Mean bladder/rectum doses (D2cm3 and ICRU-point) were 3.2 to 7.7 Gy smaller and vaginal 5-mm lateral-point was 19.6 Gy higher for ring-IC centers. Routine use of IC/IS technique resulted in increased target dose, whereas V85Gy was stable (T&R) or decreased (T&O); reduced bladder and rectum D2cm3 and bladder ICRU-point by 3.5 to 5.0 Gy for ovoids centers; and similar OAR doses for ring centers. CTVHR D90% was 2.8 Gy higher, bladder D2cm3 4.3 Gy lower, rectovaginal ICRU-point 4.8 Gy lower, and vagina 5-mm lateral-point 22.4 Gy higher for ring-IC/IS versus ovoids-IC/IS centers. The P values were <.002 for all comparisons. Equivalently, significant differences were derived from the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

T&R-IC applicators have better target dose and dose conformity than T&O-IC in this representative patient cohort. IC applicators fail to cover large target volumes, whereas routine application of IC/IS improves target and OAR dose considerably. Patients treated with T&R show a more favorable therapeutic ratio when evaluating target, bladder/rectum doses, and V85Gy. A comprehensive view on technique/applicators should furthermore include practical considerations and clinical outcome.

Clinical and dosimetric consequences of imperfect applicator insertion in cervical cancer brachytherapy

PURPOSE

This study analyzes clinical consequences and dosimetric variations after imperfect brachytherapy insertions. It examines treatment decisions after such insertions in patients having difficult anatomy, which leads to good subsequent insertions with acceptable dose volume parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed images of all insertions performed during last one year and sorted faulty ones out. Clinical outcome was assessed, analyzing original treatment records. Repeat three-dimensional planning using identical dose-optimization-technique compared their dosimetry. Statistical analysis using SPSS^®-Statistics-software included Fisher's-exact-test to analyze predisposing factors for faulty insertions and predictive factors for subsequent satisfactory insertion. Friedman test was used to compare dose-volume-effects of normalization.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 292 brachytherapy plans revealed imperfect insertions, including thirteen perforations (4.5%). Lack of pre-planning, obstructing mass, narrow vagina, acute anteversion of uterus, and multi-parity were significant (p ≤ 0.05) predisposing factors for atypical insertions. Satisfactory optimization was possible after correcting acute anteflexion or positioning tandem in retroverted direction in uncorrectable retroverted uterus. Dose normalization at point A shifted optimized dose from contoured volume to point of normalization, often undesirably. This difference, however, was statistically not significant (p = 0.121). In patients having obstructing mass, subsequent insertions were perfect, and dose volume parameters were acceptable only when full prescribed dose was delivered to at least 60% volume of the mass after a faulty insertion (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-planning by imaging is suggested in all cases of brachytherapy. Insertion of adequate length of tandem aligned to uterine axis is warranted for adequate tumor coverage. Whenever detected, acute anteflexion and mobile retroversion should be corrected. Tandem inserted in retroverted direction in uncorrectable retroverted uterus generates acceptable dose volume parameters. In cases with obstructive cervical mass, good subsequent insertion is possible with acceptable dose volume parameters, if planned dose can be delivered to its 60% volume.

Dosimetric evaluation of Point A and volume-based high-dose-rate plans: a single institution study on adaptive brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer

Purpose

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) with concurrent cisplatin is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. The applicability of image-guided adaptive volume-based high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy planning is an active area of investigation. In this study, we examined whether volume-based HDR-BT (HDR_VOL) plans leads to more conformal plans compared to Point A (HDR_PointA)-based plans.

Material and methods

Two hundred and forty HDR_PointA plans from 48 cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively collected. Point A plans were renormalized with respect to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) for the HDR_VOL plans. The doses to organs at risk (OAR; rectum, sigmoid, and bladder), and HR-CTV and the conformal index were compared between HDR_PointA and HDR_VOL plans.

Results

HDR_VOL plans resulted in a 6-12% reduction in the total dose (EBRT + HDR-BT) to 0.1 cc, 1.0 cc, and 2.0 cc of the OAR as well as an 8-37% reduction in the dose to 2 cc of OAR per HDR-BT fraction compared to HDR_PointA plans. Differences in the conformal indexes between the two groups of plans showed an 18-31% relative increase per HDR-BT fraction for HDR_VOL plans. The D₉₀ of the HR-CTV was reduced by 11% by HDR_VOL planning and had a median dose of 86 Gy.

Conclusions

Our study reports the relative improvement in OAR doses per HDR-BT fraction by HDR_VOL planning compared to HDR_PointA planning and demonstrates the dosimetric advantages of volume-based HDR-BT planning in creating more conformal plans.