Risk factors for fistula formation after interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced gynecological cancers involving vagina

Image-guided Interstitial Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Primary and Recurrent Vulvovaginal Gynaecological Malignancies

AIMS

To evaluate the use, outcomes and toxicities of high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) to the vulvovaginal region in previously irradiated and radiotherapy-naïve patients for primary or recurrent gynaecological malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2020, 94 women with a median age of 64 years (range 31-88 years) were treated with interstitial HDRB for vulvovaginal disease. Treatment details, including cumulative radiotherapy doses, were recorded together with reported toxicity, using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading. Dosimetric parameters, including D90, V100 and V150 together with treatment response at 3 months, overall survival, relapse-free survival and long-term toxicity data, were collated from referring centres.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 78 months (range 2-301). Primary sites of disease included vagina (37), endometrium (29), vulva (16), ovary (7) and cervix (5). Eighty-six (91.5%) patients were treated with curative intent, eight (8.5%) were palliative treatments. Fifty patients received HDRB for recurrent disease, 39 patients for primary disease and five as part of adjuvant treatment. The anatomical site of disease treated with HDRB ranged from vagina (76), vulva (14) and peri-urethral sites (four). The 2- and 5-year local relapse-free survival rates were 76% and 72%, respectively; 15 patients experienced local failure only, whereas six patients had local and nodal/distant failure. The median time to local recurrence was 8 months (range 2-88 months). The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates for all patients were 67% and 47%, respectively; the median overall survival was 59 months. Seventy-nine (84%) patients had a complete response measured with imaging at 3 months. Grade 3 toxicity was reported in 14 patients (14.8%).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective series suggests the use of interstitial brachytherapy for vulvovaginal gynaecological malignancy to be an effective and safe treatment option. Good local control was achieved with a tolerable toxicity profile; it is a valuable treatment modality.

Interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies: Complications, toxicities, and management

From both a disease and management perspective, locally advanced gynecologic cancers present a significant challenge. Dose escalation with brachytherapy serves as a key treatment, providing conformal radiation while sparing at-risk organs. Intracavitary brachytherapy techniques have been shown to be effective, with improving tumor control and toxicity profiles with the advent of three-dimensional image planning. Despite this, the variations in tumor size, location, and pelvic anatomy may lead to suboptimal dosimetry with standard intracavitary applicators in some clinical scenarios. The addition of interstitial needles (interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT)) can improve the conformality of brachytherapy treatments by adding needles to peripheral (and central) regions of the target volume, improving the ability to escalate doses in these undercovered regions while sparing organs at risk. Interstitial brachytherapy can be delivered by intracavitary and interstitial hybrid applicators (ICBT/ISBT), perineal template (P-ISBT), or by free-hand technique. ISBT has however yet to be widely available because of concerns of complications and toxicities from this specialized treatment. However, with the increasing use of three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy, there is an opportunity to increase the level of expertise in the gynecologic radiation oncology community with an improved understanding of the potential complications and morbidity. In this article, we review the acute and long-term toxicity in both ICBT/ISBT and P-ISBT using image-guided brachytherapy.

Complications of intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers and their management: A comprehensive review

Intracavitary gynecologic brachytherapy in the form of tandem-based brachytherapy and vaginal cylinder-based brachytherapy represents a fundamental component of the treatment of women with cervical or uterine cancer due to the ability to deliver a therapeutic dose of radiation with sharp dose falloff. This results in highly effective treatment in terms of oncologic outcomes with an overall favorable toxicity profile. Still, complications and side effects of brachytherapy do exist. While advances in brachytherapy techniques have led to a significant decrease in the rates of toxicity, a thorough understanding of the potential complications is crucial to ensuring optimal outcomes for women with gynecologic cancer undergoing brachytherapy. Use of equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) models has allowed incorporation of external beam radiotherapy dose to the brachytherapy dose leading to development of consolidated dose constraints for organs-at-risk in the modern era. This manuscript offers a comprehensive review of potential complications associated with intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecologic cancer including predictive factors, mitigation tactics, and management strategies.

Urogynaecological Symptoms among Oncological Survivors and Impact of Oncological Treatment on Pelvic Floor Disorders and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. A Six-Month Follow-Up Study

It has been widely underlined that both gynaecological malignancies and urogynaecological disorders are often associated with high stress and have a negative impact on the quality of life and psychological well-being of women affected. Knowledge of the pelvic anatomy is crucial in recommending and carrying out the least harmful although successful treatment. Subsequent chemoradiation may also induce or exaggerate troublesome symptoms. The aim of the study was to establish the frequency of urogynaecological symptoms (stress urinary incontinence, urgency, pelvic organ prolapse) and to assess the impact of surgical treatment and additional oncological therapy: pelvic radiation, chemoradiation, chemotherapy, on the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFD) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients suffering from gynecological malignancies. The study group consisted of 160 women, diagnosed with gynaecological malignancy, who underwent surgical treatment and additional adjuvant treatment as necessary. To establish the QoL and prevalence of PFD Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire 7 (II-Q7), King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and the SF-36 Questionnaire were used. Herein, 69 patients reported urinary incontinence (UI) and 67 reported symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). After the six months follow-up UI was found in 78 patients, 25 patients showed de novo symptoms, 65 patients reported POP and 10 patients demonstrated de novo POP. Our data show that urogynaecological symptoms are not correlated with the type of malignancy, but with the extensiveness of surgery.

High precision radiotherapy including intensity-modulated radiation therapy and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a retrospective monoinstitutional study

Purpose

To analyse the survival outcomes and toxicity profile of patients treated with pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (BT) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for uterine cervical cancer in a single institution.

Material and methods

Between March 2011 and December 2014, 50 patients with histologically proven stages IB1-IVB cervical cancer were treated with IMRT followed by PDR-BT boost. Radiation treatment consisted of IMRT to pelvic with or without paraaortic lymph nodes to a total dose of 45-50.4 Gy. Weekly concomitant chemotherapy was administered to 45 patients. PDR-BT boost was delivered with a median dose of 30 Gy to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) after a median time of 14 days since IMRT. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) - European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scoring criteria and Subjective Objective Management Analytic-Late Effects of Normal Tissues (SOMA-LENT) criteria.

Results

Two patients had tumour persistence at 6 months after the end of BT. After a median follow-up of 33 months, 6 distant metastases with or without regional relapse were observed. The 1- and 5-year progression-free survival was 83% (95% CI: 69-91%) and 76% (95% CI: 61-86%), whereas the 3- and 5-year overall survival was 91% (95% CI: 78-97%) and 76% (95% CI: 56-88%), respectively. Urinary and rectal toxicity higher than grade 2 was observed in 6.3% and 17% of patients, respectively. Five patients (10.6%) had grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity requiring colostomy.

Conclusions

Our study confirms that the combination of IMRT and PDR-BT can be considered an effective treatment for cervical cancer, ensuring high local control, despite the high percentage of locally advanced disease.