Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the primary treatment of inoperable glioblastoma multiforme

Revolutionizing Glioblastoma Treatment: A Comprehensive Overview of Modern Therapeutic Approaches

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in the adult population, with an average survival of 12.1 to 14.6 months. The standard treatment, combining surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, is not as efficient as we would like. However, the current possibilities are no longer limited to the standard therapies due to rapid advancements in biotechnology. New methods enable a more precise approach by targeting individual cells and antigens to overcome cancer. For the treatment of glioblastoma, these are gamma knife therapy, proton beam therapy, tumor-treating fields, EGFR and VEGF inhibitors, multiple RTKs inhibitors, and PI3K pathway inhibitors. In addition, the increasing understanding of the role of the immune system in tumorigenesis and the ability to identify tumor-specific antigens helped to develop immunotherapies targeting GBM and immune cells, including CAR-T, CAR-NK cells, dendritic cells, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Each of the described methods has its advantages and disadvantages and faces problems, such as the inefficient crossing of the blood-brain barrier, various neurological and systemic side effects, and the escape mechanism of the tumor. This work aims to present the current modern treatments of glioblastoma.

Brachytherapy is an effective and safe salvage option for re-irradiation in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM): A systematic review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of brachytherapy as a salvage therapy for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries from its inception to June 2023, for eligible studies in which patients underwent brachytherapy for rGBM. Outcomes of interest were mOS, mPFS, OS, PFS, and adverse events (AEs). For individual clinical survival outcomes and common AEs, weighted-mean descriptive statistics were calculated as a summary measure using study sample size as the weight. The calculation formula is as follows: weighted-mean = Σwx/Σw (w is the sample size and x is the outcome).

RESULTS

This review included 29 studies with a total of 1202 rGBM patients, including 22 retrospective and 7 prospective studies. The results showed that from the time of brachytherapy, the mOS and mPFS were 6.8 to 24.4 months and 3.7 to 11.7 months. The OS of 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years, and 3 years after brachytherapy were 58.3 % to 85.2 % (weighted-mean 76.2 %), 26 % to 66 % (weighted-mean 41.9 %), 20 % to 37 % (weighted-mean 27.6 %), 11 % to 23 % (weighted-mean 14.8 %), and 8 % to 15 % (weighted-mean 12.1 %), respectively. The PFS of 6 months and 1 year after brachytherapy were 26.7 % to 86 % (weighted-mean 53.4 %) and 14 % to 81 % (weighted-mean 24.1 %). Most patients with rGBM will experience treatment failure again during the follow-up period, mainly local (10.7 % to 79.4 %) or marginal(3.6 % to 22.2 %) recurrence, followed by distant failure (6.7 % to 57.7 %). Although therapeutic AEs had not been uniformly reported, the overall toxicity rate was considered to be low. The common AEs reported included progressive neurologic deterioration, seizures, CSF leak, brain necrosis, hemorrhage, and infection/meningitis, with a weighted-mean incidence of 1.9 %, 2.4 %, 4.1 %, 5.4 %, 2.1 %, and 3.8 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence summarized above, albeit mostly level III, suggests that brachytherapy has acceptable safety and good post-treatment clinical efficacy for selected patients with rGBM. Well-designed, high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled and prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.

Molecular Pathways Implicated in Radioresistance of Glioblastoma Multiforme: What Is the Role of Extracellular Vesicles?

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a primary brain tumor that is very aggressive, resistant to treatment, and characterized by a high degree of anaplasia and proliferation. Routine treatment includes ablative surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, GMB rapidly relapses and develops radioresistance. Here, we briefly review the mechanisms underpinning radioresistance and discuss research to stop it and install anti-tumor defenses. Factors that participate in radioresistance are varied and include stem cells, tumor heterogeneity, tumor microenvironment, hypoxia, metabolic reprogramming, the chaperone system, non-coding RNAs, DNA repair, and extracellular vesicles (EVs). We direct our attention toward EVs because they are emerging as promising candidates as diagnostic and prognostication tools and as the basis for developing nanodevices for delivering anti-cancer agents directly into the tumor mass. EVs are relatively easy to obtain and manipulate to endow them with the desired anti-cancer properties and to administer them using minimally invasive procedures. Thus, isolating EVs from a GBM patient, supplying them with the necessary anti-cancer agent and the capability of recognizing a specified tissue-cell target, and reinjecting them into the original donor appears, at this time, as a reachable objective of personalized medicine.

Glioblastoma Break-in; Try Something New

Context: Glioblastoma is the most invasive brain tumor with a poor prognosis and rapid progression. The standard therapy (surgical resection, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) ensures survival only up to 18 months. In this article, we focus on innovative types of radiotherapy, various combinations of temozolomide with novel substances, and methods of their administration and vector delivery to tumor cells. Evidence Acquisition: For a detailed study of the various options for chemotherapy and radiotherapy, Elsevier, NCBI MedLine, Scopus, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Global Health, CyberLeninka, and RSCI databases were analyzed. Results: The most available method is oral or intravenous administration of temozolomide. More efficient is the combined chemotherapy of temozolomide with innovative drugs and substances such as lomustine, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and chloroquine, as well as olaparib. These combinations improve patient survival and are effective in the treatment of resistant tumors. Compared to standard fractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy, 30 fractions, 6 weeks), hypofractionated is more effective for elderly patients due to lack of toxicity; brachytherapy reduces the risk of glioblastoma recurrence, while radiosurgery with bevacizumab is more effective against recurrent or inoperable tumors. Currently, the most effective treatment is considered to be the intranasal administration of anti-Ephrin A3 (anti-EPHA3)-modified containing temozolomide butyl ester-loaded (TBE-loaded) poly lactide-co-glycolide nanoparticles (P-NPs) coated with N-trimethylated chitosan (TMC) to overcome nasociliary clearance. Conclusions: New radiotherapeutic methods significantly increase the survival rates of glioblastoma patients. With some improvement, it may lead to the elimination of all tumor cells leaving the healthy alive. New chemotherapeutic drugs show impressive results with adjuvant temozolomide. Anti-EPHA3-modified TBE-loaded P-NPs coated with TMC have high absorption specificity and kill glioblastoma cells effectively. A new “step forward” may become a medicine of the future, which reduces the specific accumulation of nanoparticles in the lungs, but simultaneously does not affect specific absorption by tumor cells.