Brachytherapy in head and neck malignancies: Indian Brachytherapy Society (IBS) recommendations and guidelines

GEC-ESTRO recommendations for head & neck cancer brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy): 2nd update with focus on HDR and PDR

Modern brachytherapy (BT) is playing an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment of Head and Neck (H&N) cancer, as an organ- and function-preserving therapy. Low-dose-rate (LDR) technology has been replaced by modern remote afterloading and stepping source equipment using pulsed dose rate (PDR) or high dose rate (HDR) sources, improved image guidance and 3D treatment planning systems. This is an update of the previous GEC-ESTRO recommendations for H&N tumors, mainly applied to squamous carcinomas. Indications, results and recommended doses for different tumor sites are presented according to the published studies.

Custom made brachytherapy applicator for squamous cell carcinoma of oral commissures

ABSTRACT

Primary treatment with brachytherapy for oral cancer is uncommon in large malignant lesions; however, it is preferred by radiation oncologists for initial and smaller-sized lesions in compromised anatomical locations. The purpose of this report is to introduce and discuss the fabrication of a customized brachytherapy applicator for a case of well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral commissures using a radiotherapy thermoplastic mold (RTM). The RTM was molded into the shape of tongs and two acrylic wings were attached to these customized tongs to secure five high-dose radiotherapy catheter tubes. A mouth-stabilizing stent was used to stabilize the oral cavity throughout the brachytherapy process. A total dose of 45.5 Gy was delivered in 13 fractions to the lesion using a Cobalt-60 source over 35 days. At the end of the brachytherapy treatment and a follow-up period of 3 months, the patient responded well, and complete remission of the lesion was observed. The current brachytherapy applicator technique is a simple, viable, and curative option for patients with lesions in difficult -to- access anatomic locations.

Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) for Nasal Vestibule: Novel Strategies to Prevent Side Effects

Interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) has become the new therapeutic standard in the management of early stages nasal vestibule tumors; in fact it allows for high local control rates and low toxicity profiles. However, since more and more patients will receive interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) as primary treatment, it is desirable to implement novel strategies to reduce the dose to organs at risk with the future aim to result in further lowering long-term side effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We were able to identify two different strategies to reduce dose to the treatment volume, including the implantation technique (the implant can be interstitial, endocavitary or mixed and the catheters may be placed either using the Paris system rules or the anatomical approach) and the dose distribution within the implant (the most commonly used parameter to consider is the dose non-uniformity ratio). We subsequently propose two novel strategies to reduce dose to organs at risk, including the use of metal shields for fixed organs as in the case of the eyes and the use of a mouth swab to push away mobile organs, such in the case of the mandible. We used two different algorithms to verify the values namely the TG-43 and the TG-186.

RESULTS

We provided an accurate literature review regarding strategies to reduce toxicity to the treatment volume, underlining the pros and cons of all implantation techniques and about the use dose non-uniformity ratio. Regarding the innovative strategies to reduce the dose to organs at risk, we investigated the use of eye shielding and the use of swabs to push away the mandible by performing an innovative calculation using two different algorithms in a series of three consecutive patients. Our results show that the dose reduction, both in the case of the mandible and in the case of eye shielding, was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Proper knowledge of the best implantation technique and dose non-uniformity ratio as highlighted by existing literature is mandatory in order to reduce toxicity within the treatment volume. With regard to the dose reduction to the organs at risk we have demonstrated that the use of eye shielding and mouth swab could play a pivotal role in clinical practice; in fact, they are effective at lowering the doses to the surrounding organs and do not require any change to the current clinical workflow.

Role of sarcopenia on survival and treatment-related toxicity in head and neck cancer: a narrative review of current evidence and future perspectives

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date summary of sarcopenia and its clinical implications for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

We conducted a literature review of recent studies investigating the prevalence of sarcopenia in HNC patients, its detection using MRI or CT scans, and its association with clinical outcomes such as disease-free and overall survival time, radiotherapy-related side effects, cisplatin toxicity, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia, characterized by low skeletal muscle mass (SMM), is a prevalent condition in HNC patients and can be effectively detected using routine MRI or CT scans. Low SMM in HNC patients is associated with increased risks of shorter disease-free and overall survival times, as well as radiotherapy-related side effects such as mucositis, dysphagia, and xerostomia. In addition, cisplatin toxicity is more severe in HNC patients with low SMM, leading to higher dose-limiting toxicity and treatment interruptions. Low SMM may also predict higher risks of surgical complications in head and neck surgery. Identifying sarcopenic patients can aid physicians in better riskstratifying HNC patients for therapeutic or nutritional interventions to improve clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia is a significant concern for HNC patients and can impact their clinical outcomes. Routine MRI or CT scans can effectively detect low SMM in HNC patients. Identifying sarcopenic patients can aid physicians in better risk-stratifying HNC patients for therapeutic or nutritional interventions to improve clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to explore the potential of interventions to mitigate the negative effects of sarcopenia in HNC patients.

Modern Tools for Modern Brachytherapy

This review aims to showcase the brachytherapy tools and technologies that have emerged during the last 10 years. Soft-tissue contrast using magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging has seen enormous growth in use to plan all forms of brachytherapy. The era of image-guided brachytherapy has encouraged the development of advanced applicators and given rise to the growth of individualised 3D printing to achieve reproducible and predictable implants. These advances increase the quality of implants to better direct radiation to target volumes while sparing normal tissue. Applicator reconstruction has moved beyond manual digitising, to drag and drop of three-dimensional applicator models with embedded pre-defined source pathways, ready for auto-recognition and automation. The simplified TG-43 dose calculation formalism directly linked to reference air kerma rate of high-energy sources in the medium water remains clinically robust. Model-based dose calculation algorithms accounting for tissue heterogeneity and applicator material will advance the field of brachytherapy dosimetry to become more clinically accurate. Improved dose-optimising toolkits contribute to the real-time and adaptive planning portfolio that harmonises and expedites the entire image-guided brachytherapy process. Traditional planning strategies remain relevant to validate emerging technologies and should continue to be incorporated in practice, particularly for cervical cancer. Overall, technological developments need commissioning and validation to make the best use of the advanced features by understanding their strengths and limitations. Brachytherapy has become high-tech and modern by respecting tradition and remaining accessible to all.

Function Preservation in Head and Neck Cancers

The treatment of head and neck cancers can have a significant impact on function and appearance, which results in impairment of quality of life. Various long-term sequelae of treatment include speech and swallowing difficulty, oral incompetence, trismus, xerostomia, dental caries and osteoradionecrosis. Management has evolved from single modality treatment of either surgery or radiation to multimodality treatment to attain acceptable functional outcomes. Brachytherapy, also known as interventional radiotherapy, with its ability to deliver high doses centrally to the target, has been shown to improve local control rates. Due to the rapid fall-off of the dose of brachytherapy there is better organ at risk sparing as compared with that of external beam radiotherapy. In the head and neck region, brachytherapy has been practiced in various sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, nasal vestibule and paranasal sinuses. Additionally, brachytherapy has also been considered for reirradiation as a salvage. Brachytherapy can also be considered as a perioperative technique together with surgery. Close multidisciplinary cooperation is required for a successful brachytherapy programme. In oral cavity cancers, depending on the location of the tumour, brachytherapy has been shown to preserve oral competence, maintain tongue mobility, maintain speech, swallowing and the hard palate. Brachytherapy in oropharyngeal cancers has been shown to reduce xerostomia and also reduce dysphagia and aspiration post-radiation therapy. For the nasopharynx, paranasal sinus and nasal vestibule, brachytherapy preserves the respiratory function of the mucosa. Despite such an incomparable impact on function and organ preservation, brachytherapy is an underutilised technique for head and neck cancers. There is a strong need to improve brachytherapy utilisation in head and neck cancers.

Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy-Current Practice and Future Perspectives for Recurrent/Metastatic Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignant epithelial neoplasm affecting the oral cavity. While surgical resection is the cornerstone of a multimodal curative approach, some tumors are deemed recurrent or metastatic (R/M) and often not suitable for curative surgery. This mainly occurs due to the extent of lesions or when surgery is expected to result in poor functional outcomes. Amongst the main non-surgical therapeutic options for oral squamous cell carcinoma are radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents, and immunotherapy. Depending on the disease setting, these therapeutic approaches can be used isolated or in combination, with distinct efficacy and side effects. All these factors must be considered for treatment decisions within a multidisciplinary approach. The present article reviews the evidence regarding the treatment of patients with R/M oral squamous cell carcinoma. The main goal is to provide an overview of available treatment options and address future therapeutic perspectives.

The Quantification of Salivary Flow and pH and Stomatognathic System Rehabilitation Interference in Patients with Oral Diseases, Post-Radiotherapy

Xerostomia is a common complication post-radiotherapy in patients with oral cancer. The acute and long-term side effects can considerably reduce the patient’s quality of life. The aim of our study was to perform analysis of salivary flow and pH in patients after radiotherapy. Methodology: Clinical and laboratory evaluations were conducted in the 2014–2019 period; out of a total 58 subjects aged between 45 and 84, 28 individuals with oral cancer were selected from St. Spiridon Hospital, Clinic of Maxillo-facial Surgery and Oncology Hospital, Iasi post-radiotherapy. Results: Significant downsized mean values of the hydrogen ion concentration (pH) in saliva (p < 0.001) were recorded in patients after radiotherapy, pH value = 4.580 (±1.051). The mean value of resting salivary flow (MRSF) was significantly lower for the group of patients with radiotherapy (MRSF) = 0.145 mL/min. In 89.29% of cases (25 post-radiotherapy cases), in order to perform oral complex rehabilitation treatment, several endodontic and periodontal treatments were performed. A total of 78.57% of the cases received complex oral rehabilitation as mobile or hybrid prostheses or fixed solutions. Conclusion: Understanding post-radiotherapy salivary biochemic modifications in patients with oral cancer could be of critical importance, in view of related oral disorder prevention.

Long term outcomes of Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa treated with High Dose Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To analyze the long-term local control, overall survival and toxicity in Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa patients treated with interstitial brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This analysis included patients diagnosed as Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa on biopsy and treated with radical brachytherapy or External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by brachytherapy boost. All patients received High dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy. The total dose was 35 Gy in ten fractions for brachytherapy alone. Patients who received EBRT (50-54 Gy) were boosted by brachytherapy to a dose of 18-24 Gy in 6-8 fractions. All patients were treated using CT based planning.

RESULTS

Between 2007 to 2017, a total of 24 patients of Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa received HDR interstitial brachytherapy either alone or as a boost. Majority of the patients were tobacco chewers (80%). 17(71%) patients were clinical stage T2N0M0 and 7(29%) were clinically T1N0M0. At a median follow up of 7 years (3-12 years), the local control rate was 100% in stage I and 88% in stage II. The 5 year overall survival rate was 80%. Two patients developed nodal recurrence and one patient developed distant metastasis within two years of treatment. Tumor size and brachytherapy technique (radical vs. boost) did not impact local control or overall survival (p > 0.05). Majority of the acute toxicities were Grade 1 and 2. One patient developed osteoradionecrosis of the mandible.

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial brachytherapy in early-stage Buccal Mucosa cancer either alone or as a boost provides excellent long term local control and overall survival. The acute and late toxicities are acceptable with majority of the patients presenting with Grade 1 or 2 toxicity.