|
1
|
Gimeno-Morales M, Motisi L, Rodriguez-Spiteri N, Martínez-Regueira F, Worthington T, Therapist R, Strnad V, Hannoun-Levi JM, Gutierrez C. Post- versus intra-operative implant for breast cancer interstitial brachytherapy: How to choose? J Contemp Brachytherapy 2024; 16:72-83. [PMID: 38584881 PMCID: PMC10993897 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2024.135635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Breast brachytherapy (BB) represents an important radiation therapy modality in modern breast cancer treatments. Currently, BB is mainly used for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), local boost after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT), and as salvage re-irradiation after second lumpectomy (APBrl). Two multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) techniques can be offered: intra-operative (IOB) and post-operative (POB) brachytherapy. The aim of this article was to summarize current available data on these two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer. Material and methods A literature search was performed, and different experiences published by BB expert teams were analyzed and compared. These two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer have also been presented and discussed during meetings of the GEC-ESTRO BCWG. In addition, expert recommendations were defined. Results A comprehensive description and practical comparison of both the techniques, i.e., IOB and POB, considering the latest available published data were presented. Different technical, logistic, and clinical aspects of both the methods were thoroughly examined and analyzed. This detailed comparison of the two breast brachytherapy techniques was supported by scientific data from extensive experience of experts, facilitating an objective analysis that, to our knowledge, has not been previously published. Conclusions Based on the comprehensive analysis of both the brachytherapy techniques available, this article serves as a valuable resource to guide breast teams in selecting the optimal BB technique (POB or IOB), considering hospital environment, multi-disciplinary collaboration, and patient logistics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Gimeno-Morales
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Laura Motisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zürich University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Natalia Rodriguez-Spiteri
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Tucker Worthington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zürich University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Català d’Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Radiation Therapist
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zürich University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jean Michel Hannoun-Levi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| | - Cristina Gutierrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Català d’Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - On behalf of Working Group Breast Cancer of GEC ESTRO
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zürich University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Català d’Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Moist Desquamation among Breast Radiotherapy Patients. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:4734-4747. [PMID: 35877236 PMCID: PMC9325227 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29070376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been an increasing interest in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in both the clinical and research settings to improve the quality of life among patients and to identify when clinical intervention may be needed. The primary purpose of this prospective study was to validate an acute breast skin toxicity PRO measure across a broad sample of patient body types undergoing radiation therapy. Between August 2018 and September 2019, 134 women undergoing adjuvant breast radiotherapy (RT) consented to completing serial PRO measures both during and post-RT treatment and to having their skin assessed by trained trial radiation therapists. There was high patient compliance, with 124 patients (92.5%) returning to the clinic post-RT for at least one staff skin assessment. Rates of moist desquamation (MD) in the infra-mammary fold (IMF) by PRO were compared with skin assessments completed by trial radiation therapists. There was high sensitivity (86.5%) and good specificity (79.4%) between PRO and staff-reported presence of MD in the IMF, and there was a moderate correlation between the peak severity of the MD reported by PRO and assessed by staff (rho = 0.61, p < 0.001). This prospective study validates a new PRO measure to monitor the presence of MD in the IMF among women receiving breast RT.
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Cozzi S, Augugliaro M, Ciammella P, Botti A, Trojani V, Najafi M, Blandino G, Ruggieri MP, Giaccherini L, Alì E, Iori F, Sardaro A, Finocchi Ghersi S, Deantonio L, Gutierrez Miguelez C, Iotti C, Bardoscia L. The Role of Interstitial Brachytherapy for Breast Cancer Treatment: An Overview of Indications, Applications, and Technical Notes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102564. [PMID: 35626168 PMCID: PMC9139312 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the female population. Adjuvant radiotherapy has become increasingly important as conservative treatment. Muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy is a type of radiation technique wherein the radioactive sources are directly implanted into or close to the target tissue and may be considered an extremely precise, versatile, and variable radiation technique. Literature data support muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy as the only method with strong scientific evidence to perform partial breast irradiation and reirradiation after previous conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy. The aim of our work is to provide a comprehensive view of the use of interstitial brachytherapy, with particular focus on the implant description, limits, and advantages of the technique. Abstract Breast cancer represents the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the female population, despite continuing advances in treatment options that have significantly accelerated in recent years. Conservative treatments have radically changed the concept of healing, also focusing on the psychological aspect of oncological treatments. In this scenario, radiotherapy plays a key role. Brachytherapy is an extremely versatile radiation technique that can be used in various settings for breast cancer treatment. Although it is invasive, technically complex, and requires a long learning curve, the dosimetric advantages and sparing of organs at risk are unequivocal. Literature data support muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy as the only method with strong scientific evidence to perform partial breast irradiation and reirradiation after previous conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy, with longer follow-up than new, emerging radiation techniques, whose effectiveness is proven by over 20 years of experience. The aim of our work is to provide a comprehensive view of the use of interstitial brachytherapy to perform breast lumpectomy boost, breast-conserving accelerated partial breast irradiation, and salvage reirradiation for ipsilateral breast recurrence, with particular focus on the implant description, limits, and advantages of the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-329-731-7608
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Valeria Trojani
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (V.T.)
| | - Masoumeh Najafi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shohadaye Haft-e-Tir Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Teheran 1997667665, Iran;
| | - Gladys Blandino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Maria Paola Ruggieri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Lucia Giaccherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Emanuele Alì
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Federico Iori
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Sebastiano Finocchi Ghersi
- Radiation Oncolgy Unit, AOU Sant’Andrea, Facoltà di Medicina e Psicologia, Università La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Letizia Deantonio
- Radiation Oncology Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, 6500 Lugano, Switzerland;
| | - Cristina Gutierrez Miguelez
- Brachytherapy Unit, Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.A.); (P.C.); (G.B.); (M.P.R.); (L.G.); (E.A.); (F.I.); (C.I.)
| | - Lilia Bardoscia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, S. Luca Hospital, Healthcare Company Tuscany Nord Ovest, 55100 Lucca, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|