The clinical phenotype associated with antisynthetase autoantibodies

Joint and muscle inflammatory disease: A scoping review of the published evidence

OBJECTIVES

Polyarthritis is commonly reported in idiopathic inflammatory myositis patients, but few studies have focused on the overlap of myositis with rheumatoid arthritis which is a difficult diagnosis in the absence of well-defined diagnostic criteria. The primary objective of this scoping review was to map the field of research to explore the potential diagnoses in patients presenting with both myositis and polyarthritis.

METHODS

Two electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed® and Web of Science®) were systematically searched using the terms (myositis OR 'inflammatory idiopathic myopathies') AND (polyarthritis OR 'rheumatoid arthritis') without any publication date limit.

RESULTS

Among individual records, 280 reports met inclusion criteria after full-text review. There was heterogeneity in the definition of overlap myositis as well as the characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis. In many studies, key data were lacking; rheumatoid factor status was reported in 56.8% (n=151), anti-citrullinated proteins antibodies status in 18.8% (n=50), and presence or absence of bone erosions in 45.1% (n=120) of the studies. Thirteen different diagnoses were found to associate myositis with polyarthritis: antisynthetase syndrome (29.6%, n=83), overlap myositis with rheumatoid arthritis (16.1%, n=45), drug-induced myositis (20.0%, n=56), rheumatoid myositis (7.5%, n=21), inclusion body myositis (1.8%, n=5), overlap with connective tissue disease (20.0%, n=56), and others (5.0%, n=14).

CONCLUSION

The spectrum of joint and muscle inflammatory diseases encompasses many diagnoses including primitive and secondary myositis associated with RA or arthritis mimicking RA. This review highlights the need for a consensual definition of OM with RA to better individualise this entity from the numerous differential diagnoses.

Clinical and autoantibody phenotypes of juvenile dermatomyositis

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a heterogeneous autoimmune inflammatory myositis with symmetrical proximal muscle weakness and a characteristic rash. Juvenile dermatomyositis is characterized by variable presentation and phenotypes. Detection of myositis autoantibodies is useful in improving JDM diagnosis and predicting the prognosis. In this literature review based on case series we analyze clinical and autoantibody phenotypes of JDM in four patients who were hospitalized in one regional center in Ukraine during the last 3 years and three of them presented in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. The reviewed literature showed the last updates for the JDM diagnosis and the role of myositis autoantibodies in the prediction of disease course, systemic involvement, and malignancy risk. The presence of anti-synthetase syndrome in all presented patients, mainly due to anti-PL-7 autoantibodies, encourages further study with more patients and with detection of other myositis-specific autoantibodies to identify or refute certain regional features.

A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of antisynthetase syndrome

Antisynthetase syndrome is a subtype of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, strongly associated with the presence of interstitial lung disease. Diagnosis is made by identifying myositis-specific antibodies directed against aminoacyl tRNA synthetase, and relevant clinical and radiologic features. Given the multisystem nature of the disease, diagnosis requires the careful synthesis of subtle clinical and radiological features with the interpretation of specialized autoimmune serological testing. This is provided in a multidisciplinary environment with input from rheumatologists, respiratory physicians, and radiologists. Differentiation from other idiopathic interstitial lung diseases is key; treatment and prognosis differ between patients with antisynthetase syndrome and idiopathic interstitial lung disease. In this review article, we look at the role of the multidisciplinary team and its individual members in the initial diagnosis of the antisynthetase syndrome, including the role of physicians, radiologists, and the wider team.

Update on Cutaneous Signs to Assist in the Diagnosis of Dermatomyositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a heterogeneous idiopathic inflammatory myopathy that can be challenging to diagnose. Learning about the cutaneous manifestations in DM can assist with prompt diagnosis as well as subgroup classification. This review highlights recent data regarding cutaneous signs in DM and their associations with myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs).

RECENT FINDINGS

Several novel DM skin signs have recently been reported. Novel and confirmatory data have helped to define more clearly the associations between various cutaneous manifestations and MSAs. Awareness of the diverse cutaneous phenotypes can help with the timely diagnosis of DM. As some MSAs are associated with atypical skin features and/or characteristic patterns of clinical findings, knowledge of these associations can help clinicians to recognize DM patients. Understanding how the prevalence and presentation of various cutaneous signs differ among ethnically diverse patients is a high priority for further study.

Clinical features and diagnostic tools in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are rare autoimmune disorders affecting primarily muscles, but other organs can be involved. This review describes the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment for IIMs, namely polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), and myositis associated with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS). The diagnostic approach has been updated recently based on the discovery of circulating autoantibodies, which has enhanced the management of patients. Currently, validated classification criteria for IIMs allow clinical studies with well-defined sets of patients but diagnostic criteria to guide the care of individual patients in routine clinical practice are still missing. This review analyzes the clinical manifestations and laboratory findings of IIMs, discusses the efficiency of modern and standard methods employed in their workup, and delineates optimal practice for clinical care. Α multidisciplinary diagnostic approach that combines clinical, neurologic and rheumatologic examination, evaluation of electrophysiologic and morphologic muscle characteristics, and assessment of autoantibody immunoassays has been determined to be the preferred approach for effective management of patients with suspected IIMs.

Description and Analysis of a Novel Subtype of the Anti-Synthetase Syndrome Characterized by Frequent Attacks of Fever and Systemic Inflammation in a Single-Center Cohort Study

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) patients who presented with recurrent episodes of fever and systemic inflammation.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of Chinese ASyS patients (n=126) in our center (between January 2013 and January 2020) was included. Patients presenting with concomitant autoimmune rheumatic diseases or malignancies were subsequently excluded. The number of non-infectious fever attacks and attack frequency were recorded and calculated. Patients with two or more attacks and within the upper three quartiles of attack frequency were defined as high-inflammation group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to characterize the high-inflammation subtype.

Results

Out of 113 eligible patients with an average of 5 years follow up, 25 patients were defined as the high-inflammation group (16 for anti-Jo1, 9 for anti-PL7), with an average of 1.12 attack/patient-year. Compared to low-inflammation group (0-1 attack only and a frequency lower than 0.5 attack/patient-year), the high-inflammation group had higher occurrence of fever and rapid progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) as the first presentation (84% vs. 21% and 40% vs. 9%, respectively, both p<0.01). Anti-PL-7 was related to the more inflammatory phenotype (p=0.014). Cumulative disease-modifying agent exposures (>=3) were much higher in the high-inflammation group (60% vs. 26%), while biological agents, i.e., rituximab and tocilizumab, showed better "drug survival" for Jo-1+ and PL-7+ ASyS patients with high inflammation, respectively, in our cohort.

Conclusions

ASyS with recurrent systemic inflammatory episodes reflects a subtype of more aggressive and refractory disease in the spectrum of ASyS. Increased awareness of this subtype might lead to more appropriate management.

Antisynthetase syndrome - much more than just a myopathy

The aim of the study was to summarize current knowledge on antisynthetase syndrome (ASS), including its epidemiology, pathogenesis, proposed so far diagnostic criteria, heterogeneity of clinical manifestations, prognostic factors and therapeutic possibilities. PubMed database was screened for "antisynthetase syndrome" OR "antisynthetase antibodies" between February and April 2020. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases participate in the immune system activation as antigens, but also serve chemoattractive and cytokine-resembling roles, initiating innate and adaptive pathways. Exposure to various inhaled antigens may induce the autoimmune cascade leading to ASS. NK cells with its impaired INF-y production as well as formation of NETs by neutrophils contribute to pathogenesis. The prevalence of symptoms vary significantly depending on the study with muscular, articular and pulmonary involvement being the most frequently observed. Although classified as subtype of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, myositis may not necessarily be the prominent manifestation. Since clinical presentation is heterogeneous and symptoms can emerge gradually, ASS could be considered as a heterogeneous spectrum rather than a homogenous disease entity. The currently available classification criteria do not fully correspond with the clinical patterns of the disease. Therapy is based on glucocorticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents. Randomized controlled trials, dedicated for patients with ASS, are needed to form treatment algorithms.

[Myositis: From classification to diagnosis]

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, or IIM, are a group of acquired diseases that affect the muscle to a certain extent, and may also affect other organs. They include dermatomyositis, which can affect the muscle eventualy, with a typical skin rash; inclusion body myositis, with a purely muscular expression resulting in a slow progressive deficit; and the former group of "polymyositis", a misnomer that actually includes other categories of IIM, such as immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies, with a severe muscle involvement often presents from the onset of the disease; antisynthetase syndrome, which combines muscle damage, joint involvement and a potentially life-threatening lung disease; and overlapping myositis, which combines muscle damage with other organs involvement connected to another autoimmune disease. The diagnosis of IIM is based on rigorous clinical examination and interrogation, electromyographic data and immunological testing for myositis specific antibodies. This antibody dosage must be extended or repeated if necessary to classify correctly the muscle disease under investigation, as the available tests may not perform well enough. Muscle biopsy, although very informative, is not anymore systematically recommended when the clinic and the antibodies are typical. However, some forms of IIM are sometimes difficult to classify; in these cases, muscle biopsy plays a crucial role in the precise etiological diagnosis.