Assessment of quality of life in patients with non-operated pancreatic cancer after videothoracoscopic splanchnicectomy

Pain in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multidisciplinary, International guideline for optimized management

Abdominal pain is an important symptom in most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Adequate control of pain is often unsatisfactory due to limited treatment options and significant variation in local practice, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach. This review contends that improvement in the management of PDAC pain will result from a synthesis of best practice and evidence around the world in a multidisciplinary way. To improve clinical utility and evaluation, the evidence was rated according to the GRADE guidelines by a group of international experts. An algorithm is presented, which brings together all currently available treatment options. Pain is best treated early on with analgesics with most patients requiring opioids, but neurolytic procedures are often required later in the disease course. Celiac plexus neurolysis offers medium term relief in a substantial number of patients, but other procedures such as splanchnicectomy are also available. Palliative chemotherapy also provides pain relief as a collateral benefit. It is stressed that the assessment of pain must take into account the broader context of other physical and psychological symptoms. Adjunctive treatments for pain, depression and anxiety as well as radiotherapy, endoscopic therapy and neuromodulation may be required in selected patients. There are few comparative studies to help define which combination and order of these treatment options should be applied. New pain therapies are emerging and could for example target neural transmitters. However, until better methods are available, management of pain should be individualized in a multidisciplinary setting to ensure optimal care.

Invasive treatment of pain associated with pancreatic cancer on different levels of WHO analgesic ladder

Background

Pancreatic cancer is a malignant neoplasm with a high mortality rate, often associated with a delayed diagnosis, the early occurrence of metastasis and an overall, poor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Pain management in pancreatic cancer consists mainly of pharmacological treatment according to the WHO analgesic ladder. Surgical treatment for pain relief, such as splanchnicectomy, is considered amongst the final step of pain management. It has been proven that splanchnicectomy is a safe procedure with a small percentage of complications, nevertheless, it is often used as a last resort, which can significantly decrease its effectiveness. Performance of thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy along the first step of the analgesic ladder may lead to long-lasting protection against the presence and severity of pain.

Methods/Design

A prospective, open label, 1:1 randomized, controlled trial, conducted at a single institution to determine the effectiveness of invasive treatment of pain via splanchnicectomy, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The size of tested group will consist of 26 participants in each arm of the trial, to evaluate the level of pain relief and its impact on quality of life. To evaluate the influence on patients’ rate of overall survival, a sample size of 105 patients is necessary, in each trial arm. Assessments will not only include the usage of analgesic pharmacotherapy throughout the course of disease, and overall patient survival, but also subjective pain perception at rest, in movement, and after meals (measured by NRS score questionnaire), the patient’s quality of life (measured using the QLQ-C30 and FACIT questionnaires), and any pain-related suffering (measured with the PRISM projection test). The primary endpoint will consist of pain intensity. Questionnaires will be obtained upon the initial visit, the day of surgery, the day after surgery, as well as during long-term follow-up visits, held every two weeks thereafter.

Discussion

Earlier implementation of invasive treatment, such as thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy, can provide a higher efficacy of pain management, prevent deterioration in the patient’s quality of life, and lengthen their overall survival.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02424279. Date of registration January 2, 2015.

Splanchnicectomy for pancreatic cancer pain

Persistent pain is a serious problem that often contributes to a poor quality of life in pancreatic cancer patients. Medical management by opioid analgesics is often accompanied by side effects and incomplete pain relief. A celiac plexus block is a simple treatment which relieves pain, but the procedure demands a certain degree of proficiency and the duration of the effects obtained can be rather limited. Transhiatal bilateral splanchnicectomy achieves a certain denervation of splanchnic nerves, but it requires a laparotomy. Unilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy is a minimally invasive procedure to cause definite denervation. Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy is recommended for unsatisfactory cases or recurrent pain occurring after the initial unilateral splanchnicectomy. It is important to select the most suitable treatment depending on patients' actual medical state and the predicted outcomes.

Videothoracoscopic identification of chondromatous hamartoma of the lung

Introduction

The main disadvantage of a videothoracoscopic procedure is the lack of touch sensation. The probability of easily finding the lesion is usually estimated according to computed tomography (CT).

Aim

To find useful parameters of location of chondromatous hamartoma of the lung parenchyma in relation to its size to assess the probability of successful search via a videothoracoscopic approach only.

Material and methods

A group of 55 patients operated on for chondromatous hamartoma of the lung at the First Department of Surgery in Olomouc from January 2006 to June 2011 was analyzed. Initially, the tumor's longest diameter and its nearest distance to the pleural surface were measured on CT scans. Subsequently, the surgery began using the videothoracoscopic approach. A short thoracotomy with direct palpation followed when videothoracoscopy failed.

Results

No significant differences in age, sex and side of localization between the group with and without successful videothoracoscopic detection were found. A significant difference was found in the median size (p = 0.026) and the depth of the tumor (p < 0.0001) and in the calculated index “tumor size/depth” (p < 0.0001). Deeper analysis revealed that the parameters “depth” and “index size/depth” are considered to be good predictors but the parameter “size” is not a suitable predictor.

Conclusions

The main predictors of successful videothoracoscopic detection of lung chondromatous hamartoma are considered to be the depth of the tumor in the lung parenchyma with a cut-off value ≤ 7.5 mm and the index “size/depth” with a cut-off value ≥ 1.54; the tumor size is not considered to be a good predictor.

Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of focal lesions of the breast - own experience

Introduction

Vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB) guided by ultrasound is a minimally invasive method used in diagnosis and treatment of breast focal lesions. Vacuum-assisted core biopsy is an interesting minimally invasive alternative to open surgical biopsy.

Aim

To assess the value of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of breast focal lesions.

Material and methods

In the period 2009-2010, 397 ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core biopsies were performed. Mean age of the patients was 41.7 years (18-92 years), and size of the lesions ranged from 3 mm to 65 mm, mean size being 12 mm. All women with diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia or cancer were qualified for surgery. The patients with histopathologically benign lesions were under follow-up.

Results

Samples sufficient for histopathological examination were obtained from 394 cases (99.2%). Of all 397 lesions, 293 (73.7%) were diagnosed as benign, there were 6 (1.6%) cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia and 98 (24.7%) malignant lesions. Three hundred and sixty-nine lesions were below 15 mm in diameter, of which 339 (91.9%) were totally removed during the VACB.

Conclusions

The results obtained confirm high efficiency of ultrasound-guided VACB in the differential diagnosis of breast focal lesions, including impalpable ones. It is a safe method with a low complication rate. In the case of benign lesions with a diameter not exceeding 15 mm, it allows one to excise the whole lesion and is a very good alternative to an open surgical biopsy. Vacuum-assisted core biopsy should be a standard and the method of choice in diagnosing breast lesions.