Single access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: initial experience

Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus multi-port laparoendoscopic adrenalectomy: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

To investigate the outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) compared to multi-port laparoendoscopic adrenalectomy (m-LA).

Methods

Studies comparing LESS-A with m-LA were identified from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library before June 2020. Post-operative pain, resumption outcomes, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. We conducted meta-analyses using the Mantel-Haenszel method with random-effects model. Subset analyses were conducted according to peritoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. A small study effect was illustrated using funnel plots and Egger's test.

Results

One randomized controlled trial (RCT) and nineteen retrospective cohort studies involving 1554 patients were included for analyzed. Pooled analysis showed that LESS-A had significantly lower postoperative pain scores (MD −0.77, 95%CI −1.45 to −0.10) and less pain medication used (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.91) compared to m-LA. Besides, LESS-A had significantly shorter hospital stays (MD −0.75, 95%CI −1.18 to −0.33), shorter duration of oral intake resumption (MD −0.33, 95%CI −0.60 to −0.06), and better cosmetic satisfaction (SMD 1.15, 95%CI 0.21 to −2.09). As for perioperative outcomes, LESS-A led to significant longer operative time (MD 13.43, 95%CI 4.08 to 22.77). No significant differences were observed in terms of the remaining perioperative outcomes.

Conclusions

LESS-A is associated with less post-operative pain and quicker recovery duration. However, the longer operative time of LESS-A compared with m-LA is a drawback.

•

Multi-port laparoscopic adrenalectomy (m-LA) is widely used for treatment of benign adrenal tumor.

•

Laparoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) had significant less post-operative pain and less pain medication consumption comparing with m-LA.

•

LESS-A had better resumption outcomes, including shorter hospital stay and quicker post-operative oral intake.

•

LESS-A offer better cosmetic satisfaction.

•

Longer operative time is a drawback of LESS-A.

Feasibility of single-port retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of single-port retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SPRA) in dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

A pilot experimental study.

ANIMALS

Eight healthy beagle dogs.

METHODS

SPRA was performed on the left and right sides (4 dogs each). Resection of the adrenal gland was performed through a SILS port using a retroperitoneal approach. Operative time was defined from skin incision to the completion of skin suture. Postoperative pain was evaluated by using 3 pain scores. Integrity of the adrenal gland capsule was evaluated by histologic assessment.

RESULTS

Mean time taken to complete the SPRA was 44.1 minutes (range, 37-51) and was significantly longer on the right side than on the left side (P < .05). There were no complications intraoperatively or during 14 days of postoperative monitoring. The adrenal gland capsule was found to be injured in 3 of the 8 dogs by histologic assessment.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of SPRA in the veterinary literature. With this technique it is possible to perform adrenalectomy with some risk of capsule penetration and with excellent visibility.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study suggests that SPRA is feasible and can be used to resect small adrenal tumors with minimal complications.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery adrenalectomy - own experience and matched case-control study with standard laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Introduction

At our institution, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has been established as a technique for laparoscopic nephrectomy since 2011, and since 2012 in selected cases for adrenalectomy (AE) as well.

Aim

To compare LESS AE with standard laparoscopic AE (SLAE).

Material and methods

Between 3/2012 and 7/2014, 35 adrenalectomies were performed. In 18 (51.4%), a LESS approach was chosen. Indications were strictly non-complicated cases (body mass index (BMI) < 34 kg/m², tumour ≤ 7 cm, non-malignant aetiology, no previous surgery). All LESS procedures were done by one surgeon. Standard equipment was a 10 mm rigid 0° camera, Triport+, one pre-bent grasper, and a sealing instrument. The approach was pararectal in all cases except one (transumbilical in a slim man). Three patients with LESS were excluded (2 partial AEs only, one adrenal cancer converted to SLAE and then to open surgery). These 15 LESS AE procedures were compared to 15 SLAEs with similar characteristics chosen among 54 SLAEs performed in the period 1/2008–2/2012.

Results

In 8 cases (53.3%) of LESS AE, a 3 mm port was added to elevate the liver/spleen. Mean parameters of LESS AE vs. SLAE (Wilcoxon test): maximal tumour diameter 43.7 mm vs. 36.1 mm (p = 0.28), time of surgery 63.3 min vs. 55.3 min (p = 0.22), blood loss 38.0 ml vs. 38.0 ml (p = 0.38), BMI 26.9 kg/m² vs. 28.5 kg/m² (p = 0.13), discharge from hospital 5.4 days vs. 3.9 days (p = 0.038). There were no complications in either group.

Conclusions

The LESS AE is feasible in selected cases, especially small left-sided tumours in thin patients with no history of previous abdominal operations, but requires an additional port in half of the cases.

Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

One way how to reduce morbidity and improve cosmesic of kidney surgery is single site laparoscopy. Relatively well described concept but without defined position in clincal practise.

AIM

To report of institutional experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) nephrectomy (NE) and compare (matched case-control study) it with that of standard laparoscopic NE (LNE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the period 8/2011 to 10/2013, we performed 183 mini-invasive NE (132 tumours, 51 benign aetiology); 45 of them (24.6%) were LESS, the rest LNE. The main but not absolute indications for LESS were: non-obese men, and less advanced tumours. In 13 patients undergoing LESS-NEs (28.9%) there was a transumbilical approach. For the rest, a pararectal incision was performed and an accessory port was added in 31.1% (14) - 2/22 (9.1%) left sided, 12/23 (52.2%) right sided. Twenty-four LESS-NE were performed by a more experienced surgeon (mean operation time (MOT) 73.1 min), 21 LESS-NE by 4 other surgeons (MOT 132.8 min). These 24 were compared with 43 LNE done by the same surgeon before the period of LESS (1/2007-8/2011) and with similar characteristics of cases (body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m(2), less advanced tumour).

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences in any of the parameters studied. The MOT 73.1 min vs. 75.0 min (p = 0.78), BMI 27.4 kg/m(2) vs. 29.2 kg/m(2) (p = 0.08), blood loss 54.7 vs. 39.2 (p = 0.47). Complications (4.2% vs. 11.6%) were only of internal character in origin. No conversion in either group. In LESS-NE, staplers were used more frequently (more expensive than clips) for division of renal hilar vessels (70.8% vs. 51.2%). The mean price of LESS-NE was €367 higher.

CONCLUSIONS

The LESS NE performed by an experienced surgeon is a safe and efficient method for the surgical treatment of both malignant and benign renal conditions in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m(2) and with low-stage tumours. The LESS NE is more expensive compared to LNE.

Videoscopic adrenalectomy - when does retroperitoneal seem better?

INTRODUCTION

Videoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard for the surgical treatment of benign adrenal tumours. The two most common approaches are the lateral transperitoneal approach (LTA) and the posterior retroperitoneal approach (PRA). So far it has not been established which is the preferable one. The choice depends primarily on the surgeon's preference and contraindications for a particular approach in individual cases.

AIM

To compare the two most common approaches for videoscopic adrenalectomy, LTA and PRA, based on a literature review and our own experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature (PubMed and Cochrane 1990 - current) and analysed retrospectively our own patients who underwent videoscopic adrenalectomy between 2009 and 2013. The analysis covered patient features, tumour characteristics, reasons for qualification for each approach, operative time and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Out of 71 videoscopic adrenalectomies, 50 were performed using PRA and 21 using LTA. Patients in the PRA group on average were older, but had smaller tumours. There was no significant difference in perioperative morbidity between PRA and LTA. Mean blood loss and total operative time were smaller/shorter for the PRA group in comparison to the LTA group. Time to first oral intake and the average postoperative hospital stay were shorter for PRA than LTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Videoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and efficient technique performed using both LTA and PRA approaches. The choice of technique should be guided, most of all, by surgeon experience, patient characteristics, tumour size and location. Our preferable approach is PRA, especially for small (< 6 cm) benign tumours. We find LTA advantageous for tumours of larger size, with suspected malignant character (either primary or secondary), in ectopic position, as well as in patients lacking an ipsilateral kidney or when a simultaneous abdominal operation is planned.

Surgical treatment options for aldosteronomas

Introduction

Single access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SARA) is the most feasible approach for removing aldosteronomas.

Aim

To analyse the advantages and disadvantages of surgical approaches to treating small adrenal tumours.

Material and methods

In the period 2002-2011, 31 patients were operated on at Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics for aldosteronomas. Adrenalectomies were performed in the lateral laparoscopic (group A, n = 6), the endoscopic retroperitoneal (group B, n = 20), and the single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and SARA (group C, n = 5) approaches. Seventy five percent of patients were operated on by the same surgeon. The duration of adrenalectomies, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared. The possibility of minimally invasive adrenalectomies was evaluated.

Results

According to the patients’ age, body mass index and tumour size, the groups were equal. The average duration of surgery in group A was shorter than in groups B and C (91 ±23 min vs. 118 ±57 min vs. 144 ±88 min). Right laparoscopic adrenalectomy was longer than the left (105 ±26 min vs. 77 ±6 min), whereas right endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy was shorter than the left (109 ±50 min vs. 126 ±57 min). The best cosmetic view was in group C. The SARA method was converted into the endoscopic retroperitoneal approach and then into the laparoscopic for one patient. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Evaluating the minimal invasion of the method, its abilities and simplicity of conversion into another type of endoscopic surgical way, the SARA approach should be the first option for removing aldosteronomas.