Major vascular injuries complicating knee arthroscopy

The Risk of Iatrogenic Peroneal Nerve Injury in Lateral Meniscal Repair and Safe Zone to Minimize the Risk Based on Actual Arthroscopic Position: An MRI Study

BACKGROUND

Lateral meniscal repair using an all-inside meniscal repair device involves a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury. To our knowledge, there have been no previous studies evaluating the risk of injury with the knee in the standard operational figure-of-4 position with joint dilatation in arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair.

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the risk of peroneal nerve injury and establish the safe and danger zones in repairing the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial, anterolateral, or transpatellar portal in relation to the medial and lateral borders of the popliteal tendon (PT).

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Using axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of knees in the figure-of-4 position with joint fluid dilatation at the level of the lateral meniscus, we drew direct lines to simulate a straight all-inside meniscal repair device deployed from the anteromedial, anterolateral, and transpatellar portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. If the line passed through or touched the peroneal nerve, a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury was noted, and measurements were made to determine the safe and danger zones for peroneal nerve injury in relation to the medial or lateral border of the PT.

RESULTS

Axial MRI images of 29 adult patients were reviewed. Repairing the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial portal in relation to the lateral border of the PT and through the anterolateral portal in relation to the medial border of the PT had a 0% risk of peroneal nerve injury. The "safe zone" in relation to the medial border of the PT through the anterolateral portal was between the medial border of the PT and 9.62 ± 4.60 mm medially from the same border.

CONCLUSION

It is safe to repair the body of the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial portal in the area lateral to the lateral border of the PT or through the anterolateral portal in the area medial to the medial border of the PT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There is a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury during lateral meniscal repair. Thus, we recommend repairing the lateral meniscal tissue through the anteromedial portal in the area lateral to the lateral border of the PT and using the anterolateral portal in the area medial to the medial border of the PT, as neither of these approaches resulted in peroneal nerve injury. Additionally, the surgeon can decrease this risk by repairing the meniscal tissue using the all-inside meniscal device in the safe zone area.

Deep Learning for US Image Quality Assessment Based on Femoral Cartilage Boundary Detection in Autonomous Knee Arthroscopy

Knee arthroscopy is a complex minimally invasive surgery that can cause unintended injuries to femoral cartilage or postoperative complications, or both. Autonomous robotic systems using real-time volumetric ultrasound (US) imaging guidance hold potential for reducing significantly these issues and for improving patient outcomes. To enable the robotic system to navigate autonomously in the knee joint, the imaging system should provide the robot with a real-time comprehensive map of the surgical site. To this end, the first step is automatic image quality assessment, to ensure that the boundaries of the relevant knee structures are defined well enough to be detected, outlined, and then tracked. In this article, a recently developed one-class classifier deep learning algorithm was used to discriminate among the US images acquired in a simulated surgical scenario on which the femoral cartilage either could or could not be outlined. A total of 38 656 2-D US images were extracted from 151 3-D US volumes, collected from six volunteers, and were labeled as "1" or as "0" when an expert was or was not able to outline the cartilage on the image, respectively. The algorithm was evaluated using the expert labels as ground truth with a fivefold cross validation, where each fold was trained and tested on average with 15 640 and 6246 labeled images, respectively. The algorithm reached a mean accuracy of 78.4% ± 5.0, mean specificity of 72.5% ± 9.4, mean sensitivity of 82.8% ± 5.8, and mean area under the curve of 85% ± 4.4. In addition, interobserver and intraobserver tests involving two experts were performed on an image subset of 1536 2-D US images. Percent agreement values of 0.89 and 0.93 were achieved between two experts (i.e., interobserver) and by each expert (i.e., intraobserver), respectively. These results show the feasibility of the first essential step in the development of automatic US image acquisition and interpretation systems for autonomous robotic knee arthroscopy.

A Review of the Gillquist Maneuver: Modifications for a Safer and Easily Reproducible Approach for Knee Transintercondylar Notch Posterior Compartment Arthroscopy

The original Gillquist maneuver is done by passing the arthroscope through a portal in the patella tendon between the medial femoral condyle and posterior cruciate ligament to enter the posterior compartment. This is done blind and has been documented to result in broken cameras and damaged equipment. It is also necessary to do a notchplasty to aid the advancement of the camera in patients. In our paper, we have made modifications to allow the Gillquist maneuver to be done safely under direct visualization, with just the aid of a simple switching stick. Our technique starts with the arthroscope in the anteromedial portal. We insert a long, cannulated switching stick through the anterolateral portal and pass it between the medial femoral condyle and the posterior cruciate ligament. The switching stick, being tapered and narrow, is able to traverse the transcondylar notch with minimal trauma. Once the switching stick enters the posterior compartment, the camera and trocar are removed and the trocar sleeve is guided over the switching stick past the intercondylar notch gently. The switching stick is then replaced by the arthroscope, which is advanced through the trocar sleeve and into the posterior compartment.

A rare complication of knee hematoma after genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation

Background:

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an intervention to treat patients with chronic knee pain who have failed previous conservative, pharmacologic, and surgical interventions. Vascular complications following interventional procedures of the knee are extremely rare. A delay in diagnosis may be detrimental for the viability of the affected limb and may ultimately require amputation.

Case Presentation:

A 76-year-old man with a history of severe bilateral knee osteoarthritis and grade 4 chondromalacia presented to our clinic with refractory, severe bilateral knee pain and received a bilateral genicular nerve RFA. He returned 4 days later with right medial thigh pain and a magnetic resonance imaging study revealing a hematoma along the anteromedial aspect of the right distal femoral diaphysis measuring 13.3 × 4.5 × 3.0 cm. After collaboration between pain medicine and orthopedic surgery services, decision was made to treat patient conservatively with rest, compression, elevation, ice application, tramadol, and gabapentin, but with close follow-up and a low threshold to intervene with diagnostic and therapeutic angiography with embolization if bleeding worsened; he reported resolution of his pain after a 4-day and 1-month follow-up.

Conclusion:

This is the first report describing iatrogenic vascular injury in the knee after a genicular RFA procedure. Pain medicine physicians should be aware of the vascular anatomy of the knee, particularly paying close attention to variations after previous surgeries. Future trials should investigate modalities that minimize vascular complications including concomitant use of ultrasonography with fluoroscopy and other forms of RFA including pulsed or cooled RFA.

The Safe Distance to the Popliteal Neurovascular Bundle in Pediatric Knee Arthroscopic Surgery: An Age-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Anatomic Study

Background:

The close proximity of the popliteal neurovascular bundle to the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus puts it at risk of compromise during lateral meniscal repair. This is particularly important in smaller pediatric patients, who are commonly treated for lateral meniscal abnormalities in isolation (discoid meniscus) or concomitantly with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Purpose:

To quantify the distance between the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus and the popliteal neurovascular bundle along the path of meniscal repair and to investigate for associations with age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and skeletal maturity.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 144 magnetic resonance imaging scans were evaluated in a cohort of patients aged 10 to 18 years without meniscal or ligament abnormalities. Measurements were made along a line from the anterolateral portal between the popliteal neurovascular bundle and the free edge, midpoint, and meniscocapsular junctions of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. In addition to descriptive statistics of these distances by age and sex, analyses of variance and linear regression analyses were performed to investigate for associations with age, sex, height, weight, BMI, and skeletal maturity.

Results:

Male participants had a significantly larger mean free edge distance (14.4 ± 2.5 vs 13.1 ± 2.5 mm, respectively; P = .005) and midpoint distance (9.6 ± 2.2 vs 8.9 ± 1.8 mm, respectively; P = .011) than female participants but not a significantly larger meniscocapsular distance (5.2 ± 1.6 vs 4.6 ± 1.4 mm, respectively; P = .096). Linear regression analyses revealed significant associations between these distances and age, height, weight, and BMI (P < .001 for all). There were statistically significant pairwise differences for free edge and midpoint distances to the neurovascular bundle between patients with open and closed physes.

Conclusion:

The distance between the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus and the popliteal vasculature along a trajectory from the standard anterolateral arthroscopic portal increases linearly throughout development between the ages of 10 and 18 years. There were also significant associations between height, weight, BMI, and skeletal maturity and these anatomic distances. Knowing the safe distance to the popliteal vasculature will increase the safety of arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair in children, especially with all-inside devices that require setting the penetration depth for the advancement of a sharp delivery device beyond the posterior capsule.

[Clinical prospective comparative study on short-term effectiveness of arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst between cyctectomy and internal drainage combined with cyctectomy]

Objective

To compare the short-term effectiveness between arthroscopic cystectomy and internal drainage combined with cystectomy in popliteal cyst.

Methods

Between March 2014 and March 2017, 56 patients with symptomatic popliteal cyst were enrolled in the study, randomized block design was used to divided the patients into trial group (arthroscopic cystectomy combined with internal drainage group, n=28) and control group (arthroscopic internal drainage group, n=28). Excluding those who had incomplete follow-up and received surgery for other diseases postoperatively, 26 patients in the experimental group and 27 patients in the control group were finally enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side, course of disease, maximum diameter and grade of popliteal cyst, and associated diseases between two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, duration of popliteal ecchymosis and the middle back of calf tenderness were observed postoperatively. The circumference of calf at 1 day, 1 week, and 2 weeks after operation were measured and the differences were calculated with the measurement before operation. Lower extremity venous thrombosis was observed by color doppler ultrasonography at 1 week after operation. The effectiveness was evaluated by Rauschning and Lindgren grading criteria. And MRI was used to observe whether the popliteal cyst disappeared or decreased and measured its maximum diameter at 1 year after operation.

Results

Patients in both groups were followed up 12-14 months, with an average of 12.5 months. The operation time, duration of popliteal ecchymosis, and the middle back of calf tenderness of the trial group were all longer than those in the control group ( P<0.05), the differences of circumference of calf at 1 day, 1 week, and 2 weeks after operation of the trial group were greater than those in the control group ( P<0.05). Color doppler ultrasonography of the lower extremity at 1 week after operation found that the intermuscular venous thrombosis occurred in 2 cases of the trial group, while no lower extremity thrombosis was found in the control group; and the difference between two groups was not significant ( P=0.236). According to the Rauschning and Lindgren grading criteria, there were 16 cases of grade 0, 6 cases of grade 1, and 4 cases of grade 2 in the trial group, and 17 cases of grade 0, 4 cases of grade 1, and 6 cases of grade 2 in the control group at 1 year after operation. There was no significant difference between 2 groups ( Z=-1.872, P=0.078). Nine cases (34.62%) of the trial group and 13 cases (48.15%) of the control group still have residual cysts by MRI, the maximum diameter of which was less than 2 cm. The cysts disappeared in the remaining patients in both groups, and there was no recurrence during the follow-up. There was no significant difference in cyst residual rate between 2 groups ( χ ²=2.293, P=0.852).

Conclusion

Compared with arthroscopic internal drainage, the short-term effectiveness of the arthroscopic internal drainage combined with cystectomy had no significant improvement, and the operation time was prolonged, the postoperative complications were obviously increased.

Orthopaedic surgeon attitudes towards current limitations and the potential for robotic and technological innovation in arthroscopic surgery

PURPOSE

To determine the perceptions of surgeons at both consultant and resident level to the difficulties of performing knee arthroscopy and to determine their willingness to adopt robotic technology.

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed to discern the attitude of orthopaedic consultants and residents to the technical challenges of performing knee arthroscopy and the possible role of robotically enhanced surgery. The questionnaire included 31 questions across five key domains.

RESULTS

Iatrogenic damage to articular cartilage was thought to occur in at least 1 in 10 cases by 50% of respondents with 15% believing that it occurred in every case. One hundred or more procedures were thought to be necessary to overcome the learning curve by 40% of respondents and 77.5% believed that 50 procedures or above were necessary. Ninety-nine per cent of respondents agreed that higher technical skills would decrease unintended damage. Despite such difficulties with the procedure and no prior experience with robotic surgery, 47% of respondents see a role for semiautonomous arthroscopic systems in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons believe that knee arthroscopy is a difficult procedure with a long learning curve and a high incidence of iatrogenic cartilage damage. Many find it ergonomically challenging and have frustration with current tools and technology.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This is the first study that highlights surgeons' difficulties performing knee arthroscopy despite the commonly held attitudes that it is a straightforward procedure. Systems that are able to decrease these problems should improve patients' outcomes and decrease the risk of harm.

Ultrasound-guided arthroscopic management of hallux rigidus

Introduction

The use of metatarso-phalangeal joint arthroscopy in the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans was first described in 1988. The technique produces good results. However, it can be difficult to enter a joint when it is deformed by degenerative disease. Sonography is a modern visualisation modality which can be used in orthopaedic surgery.

Aim

To describe a method of intraoperative sonographic navigation during first metatarso-phalangeal joint arthroscopy.

Material and methods

The modality was used in 3 patients. The joint was visualised in the ultrasound scanner. After confirming the intra-articular position of the guide needle, a medial portal was established. The procedure started with the removal and vaporisation of the hypertrophic synovium. Gradual resection of the osteophytes was then carried out. The procedure was terminated after the ultrasound image showed that a smooth upper surface of the metatarsal head had been achieved.

Results

All 3 patients were satisfied with the procedure and function of the treated feet. Average surgery time was 81 min. No complications were found.

Conclusions

Mini-invasive treatment of hallux rigidus with sonography-guided arthroscopic cheilectomy appears to be a reproducible procedure leading to good clinical results. We encourage surgeons familiar with ultrasound visualisation of the joints to use the technique described in this paper in the arthroscopic treatment of hallux rigidus.