Comparison of enhanced recovery protocol with conventional care in patients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines and Hospital Length of Stay, Readmission, Complications, and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

A comprehensive review of the evidence exploring the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines has not been completed.

Objective

To evaluate if ERAS guidelines are associated with improved hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, complications, and mortality compared with usual surgical care, and to understand differences in estimates based on study and patient factors.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception until June 2021.

Study Selection

Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that examined ERAS-guided surgery compared with a control group and reported on at least 1 of the outcomes.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were abstracted in duplicate using a standardized data abstraction form. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates for each outcome, and meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity within each outcome.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital readmission within 30 days of index discharge, 30-day postoperative complications, and 30-day postoperative mortality.

Results

Of the 12 047 references identified, 1493 full texts were screened for eligibility, 495 were included in the systematic review, and 74 RCTs with 9076 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies presented data from 21 countries and 9 ERAS-guided surgical procedures with 15 (20.3%) having a low risk of bias. The mean (SD) Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research checklist score was 13.5 (2.3). Hospital length of stay decreased by 1.88 days (95% CI, 0.95-2.81 days; I2 = 86.5%; P < .001) and the risk of complications decreased (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; I2 = 78.6%; P < .001) in the ERAS group. Risk of readmission and mortality were not significant.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this meta-analysis, ERAS guidelines were associated with decreased hospital length of stay and complications. Future studies should aim to improve implementation of ERAS and increase the reach of the guidelines.

Intra- and post-operative outcomes of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program in laparoscopic hysterectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol on perioperative and post-operative outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs) performed for benign gynecological diseases.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted with randomized 100 participants who underwent LH between 1 January and 31 December, 2022. A standard care protocol was applied to 50 participants (Group 1, control) and the ERAS protocol to the other 50 (Group 2, study). Length of hospitalization was compared between the groups as the primary outcome, and the duration of the operation, the amount of bleeding, post-operative nausea-vomiting, gas discharge time, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and complications as the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, operation indications, surgical procedures applied in addition to hysterectomy, operative time, pre-operative and post-operative hemoglobin levels, amount of bleeding, or drain use (p > 0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was observed in terms of nausea (60% vs. 26%, p = 0.001), vomiting (28% vs. 10%, p = 0.040), duration of gassing (17.74 ± 6.77 vs. 14.20 ± 7.05 h, p = 0.012), length of hospitalization (41.78 ± 12.17 vs. 34.12 ± 10.90 h, p = 0.001), analgesic requirements (4.62 ± 1.36 vs. 3.34 ± 1.27 h, p < 0.001), or VAS scores at the 1st (5.86 ± 1.21 vs. 4.58 ± 1.31, p < 0.001), 6th (5.16 ± 1.12 vs. 4.04 ± 1.08, p < 0.001), 12th (4.72 ± 1.12 vs. 3.48 ± 1.12, p < 0.001), 18th (4.48 ± 1.21 vs. 3.24 ± 1.34, p < 0.001), and 24th (4.08 ± 1.29 vs. 3.01 ± 1.30, p < 0.001) hours.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show that the ERAS protocol has a positive effect on peri- and post-operative outcomes in LH. Further prospective studies are now needed to confirm the validity of the results.

Enhanced recovery after gynecological surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach designed to improve perioperative outcomes for patients. This meta-analysis aimed to identify and elaborate on the efficacy of this protocol in women undergoing gynecologic surgery. Four databases were searched for randomized controlled trials from inception to December 2021. A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. There was a significant reduction in the length of stay, the time to first flatus and first defecation, complications, and readmission rates in patients undergoing enhanced recovery after surgery when compared to routine care. The rate of discharge on the first postoperative day significantly increased in patients from the enhanced recovery group. There was no significant difference in the surgery time and blood loss. In conclusion, the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol might have a positive effect on patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. However, there is still heterogeneity between the included studies, and we need more research to draw reliable conclusions that enhanced recovery after surgery is favorable.

Effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on recovery after laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the recommended treatment for uterine leiomyoma but it still has issues like postoperative complications and slow recovery. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol could probably reduce traumatic stress and promote the rapid postoperative recovery of patients, but there are controversies for the results of different studies. This meta-analysis was performed to resolve the controversies and provide evidence for the application of ERAS in gynecology.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Ovid, CNKI (China), Wanfang Data (China), and Google Scholar databases were searched to recruit all studies on the application of ERAS in laparoscopic myomectomy up to November 2021. The inclusion criteria of studies was established according to the PICOS principles. the Cochrane RoB 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale were used to assess the bias of the studies, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies that met the criteria were finally included with 1,441 participants. Eight of them were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two were cohort studies, all of them were with low level of bias. Meta-analysis showed that ERAS protocol after laparoscopic myomectomy could significantly shorten the first time getting out of bed after surgery [mean difference (MD) =-4.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): (-7.35, -2.36); P=0.0001], the first defecation time after surgery [MD =-4.69; 95% CI: (-5.68, -3.69); P<0.00001], and the postoperative hospital stay [MD =-1.32, 95% CI: (-2.08, -0.56); P=0.0007]. It could also markedly reduce the patient readmission rate [odds ratio (OR) =0.42; 95% CI: (0.23, 0.76); P=0.004], and notably reduced the incidence of complications [OR =0.37; 95% CI: (0.22, 0.61); Z=3.82; P=0.0001]. Yet, the cost of the ERAS protocol was not significantly different from that of routine care [MD =-127.76, 95% CI: (-997.19, 741.66); P=0.77].

DISCUSSION

The application of ERAS protocol after gynecological laparoscopic myomectomy can shorten the first defecation time, first time out of bed, hospital stay, and reduce the readmission rate as well as the incidence of postoperative complications, without additional costs. But still there was heterogeneity among the studies, the topic still deserved further exploration.

Effect of 5A nursing mode combined with fine nursing management on perioperative self-efficacy and living quality of hysteromyoma

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the effects of 5A nursing mode combined with fine nursing management on perioperative self-efficacy and living quality of hysteromyoma.

METHODS

116 hysteromyoma patients admitted to our hospital during August 2018 to August 2020 were enrolled as the research objects, and divided into control group and observation group by random-number-table method. Each group contained 58 cases. The control-group patients were treated with conventional basic nursing, while the observation-group patients received combined treatment of 5A nursing mode and fine nursing management. Subsequently, the changes of self-efficacy, living quality of the two groups of patients before and after interventions, and the occurrence of postoperative complications in both groups were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

The self-efficacy scores of both groups after intervention were markedly higher than those before intervention (P < 0.05), and the score of the observation-group after intervention was obviously higher than that of control-group (P < 0.05). The scores of the quality of life of the two groups after intervention were remarkably higher than those before intervention (P < 0.05), and the score of observation group after intervention was substantially higher than that of control group (P < 0.05). In addition, the incidence of complications in observation group was notably lower than that in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (10.34%, 29.31%, χ² = 6.5619, P = 0.0104).

CONCLUSION

The combined treatment of 5A nursing mode and fine nursing management has showed good nursing concept and standard nursing methods. It can effectively improve the self-efficacy and quality of life in hysteromyoma patients during perioperative period.

Recent advances in benign gynecological laparoscopic surgery

Minimally invasive surgery continues to transform the field of gynecological surgery and is now the standard of care for the surgical treatment of many diseases in gynecology. Owing to minimally invasive surgery's clear advantages, new advances in technology are being employed rapidly and enabling even the most complicated procedures to be performed less invasively. We examine recent literature on minimally invasive surgical innovations, advances, and common practices in benign gynecology that, from our point of view, made an impact on the way laparoscopic surgery is performed and managed in the last decade.