Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols

Technetium-99m-pyrophosphate imaging-based computed tomography-guided core-needle biopsy of internal oblique muscle in wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Technetium-99m-pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) uptake in the internal oblique muscle (IOM), which is often observed in patients with wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA), indicates amyloid transthyretin (ATTR) deposition.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of 99mTc-PYP imaging-based computed tomography (CT)-guided core-needle biopsy of the IOM as a new extracardiac screening biopsy for confirming the presence of ATTR deposits.

METHODS

Patients with suspected ATTR-CA in whom myocardial tracer uptake was detected on chest- and abdomen-centered images of 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy underwent CT-guided core-needle biopsy at the site with the highest tracer uptake in the IOM between September 2021 and November 2022.

RESULTS

All 18 consecutive patients (mean age, 86.3 years ± 6.5; 61.1% male) enrolled in the study showed 99mTc-PYP uptake into the IOM. Adequate tissue samples were obtained from all patients except one without serious complications. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed ATTR deposits in 16/18 (88.9%) patients. In the remaining two patients, ATTR deposits were observed via endomyocardial biopsy. All patients were diagnosed with wild-type ATTR-CA based on transthyretin gene sequence testing results.

CONCLUSION

In wild-type ATTR-CA, 99mTc-PYP imaging-based CT-guided core-needle biopsy of the IOM could be used as an extracardiac screening biopsy to confirm the presence of ATTR deposits.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of low-dose CT-driven biopsy for pulmonary nodules

Introduction

The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules (PNs) has traditionally relied on computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy. To reduce radiation exposure, low-dose CT-guided PN biopsy has been employed.

Aim

This meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of low-dose CT-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of PNs.

Material and methods

PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang were searched for relevant articles until June 2023. Comparing low-dose CT to normal-dose CT, we considered factors such as diagnostic yield, diagnostic accuracy, biopsy process time, dose-length product (DLP) value, the frequency of pneumothorax and pulmonary bleeding, and the frequency with which complications necessitated the placement of a chest tube.

Results

This meta-analysis included data from a total of 6 investigations. There was a total of 459 patients who had a CT-guided PN biopsy performed at a low dosage, and 384 patients who had a normal-dose CT-guided PN biopsy. There were no statistically significant differences between the low-dose CT and normal-dose CT groups in terms of diagnostic accuracy (p = 0.08), diagnostic yield (p = 0.55), biopsy procedure duration (p = 0.30), pneumothorax (p = 0.61), pulmonary hemorrhage (p = 0.29), or complications requiring a chest tube (p = 0.48). Low-dose CT patients obtained a DLP that was 91% lower than those in the standard-dose CT group (p = 0.01). According to Egger's test, there is a significant possibility of publication bias in DLP (p = 0.034).

Conclusions

The diagnostic and safety results of low-dose CT-driven PN biopsy are equivalent to those of the standard one, although patients are much less exposed to radiation.

Implementation of Individualized Low-Dose Computed Tomography-Guided Hook Wire Localization of Pulmonary Nodules: Feasibility and Safety in the Clinical Setting

Background: CT-guided hook-wire localization is an essential step in the management of small pulmonary nodules. Few studies, however, have focused on reducing radiation exposure during the procedure. Purpose: This study aims to explore the feasibility of implementing a low-dose computed tomography (CT)-guided hook wire localization using tailored kVp based on patients' body size. Materials and Methods: A total of 151 patients with small pulmonary nodules were prospectively enrolled for CT-guided hook wire localization using individualized low-dose CT (LDCT) vs. standard-dose CT (SDCT) protocols. Radiation dose, image quality, characteristics of target nodules and procedure-related variables were compared. All variables were analyzed using Chi-Square and Student's t-test. Results: The mean CTDIvol was significantly reduced for LDCT (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m2, 0.56 ± 0.00 mGy and for BMI > 21 kg/m2, 1.48 ± 0.00 mGy) when compared with SDCT (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m2, 5.24 ± 0.95 mGy and for BMI > 21 kg/m2, 6.69 ± 1.47 mGy). Accordingly, the DLP of LDCT was significantly reduced as compared with that of SDCT (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m2, 56.86 ± 4.73 vs. 533.58 ± 122.06 mGy.cm, and for BMI > 21 kg/m2, 167.02 ± 38.76 vs. 746.01 ± 230.91 mGy.cm). In comparison with SDCT, the effective dose (ED) of LDCT decreased by an average of 89.42% (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m2) and 77.68% (for BMI > 21 kg/m2), respectively. Although the images acquired with the LDCT protocol yielded inferior quality to those acquired with the SDCT protocol, they were clinically acceptable for hook wire localization. Conclusions: LDCT-guided localization can provide safety and nodule detection performance comparable to SDCT-guided localization, benefiting radiation dose reduction dramatically, especially for patients with small body mass indexes.

Computed tomography-guided biopsy for sub-centimetre pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis

Introduction

Pulmonary nodules (PNs) with a diameter from 5 to 10 mm exhibit malignancy rates anywhere from 47.5 to 61.5%. Despite the potential danger posed by these lesions, their small size makes the biopsy of these sub-centimetre (≤ 10 mm) PNs under computed tomography (CT) guidance very difficult.

Aim

A meta-analysis was performed with the goal of evaluating the safety and diagnostic utility of CT-guided biopsy procedures for sub-centimetre PNs.

Material and methods

Relevant studies published through April 2023 were identified in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases and used to conduct pooled analyses of selected endpoints, including technical success, diagnostic yield, diagnostic accuracy, pulmonary haemorrhage, and pneumothorax rates.

Results

In total, this meta-analysis incorporated 10 studies in which 1482 patients with sub-centimetre PNs underwent CT-guided biopsy procedures. Among these patients, the respective pooled rates of technical success, diagnostic yield, diagnostic accuracy, pulmonary haemorrhage, and pneumothorax were 90%, 60%, 91%, 11%, and 24%, and significant heterogeneity was detected for all of these endpoints (I2 = 93.6%, 96%, 76.9%, 80.8%, and 93.6%). A substantial difference in diagnostic accuracy was observed when comparing biopsy procedures performed using fine- and core-needle biopsy approaches (85% vs. 95%), whereas the use of the co-axial method or the selected guidance approach (conventional vs. cone-beam CT) had no impact on diagnostic accuracy. Needle type, guidance method, and co-axial method use had no impact on the rates of pulmonary haemorrhage or pneumothorax.

Conclusions

CT-guided biopsy represents a safe and effective means of accurately diagnosing sub-centimetre PNs.

Computed tomography-guided lung biopsy with rapid on-site evaluation for diagnosis of lung lesions: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung biopsy (LB) procedures performed with computed tomography (CT guidance can enable the reliable diagnosis of lung lesions. These diagnostic efforts can be further expedited through a rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) approach, allowing for the rapid assessment of collected tissue samples to gauge the adequacy of these samples, their features, and associated cytomorphological characteristics. The present analysis was developed to examine the safety and efficacy of CT-guided LB with ROSE as a means of diagnosing lung lesions.

METHODS

Studies published as of July 31, 2022 in the PubMed, Embase, and Wanfang databases were identified for this meta-analysis. Diagnostic accuracy was the primary endpoint, while secondary endpoints included the operative duration, the number of punctures, and rates of lung hemorrhage, pneumothorax, and secondary LB.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 6 total studies. Relative to CT alone, CT with ROSE was associated with a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy (P < 0.00001). In contrast, there were no significant differences between these two groups with respect to the operative duration (P = 0.86), the number of punctures (P = 0.60), or the rates of pneumothorax (P = 0.82) or lung hemorrhage (P = 0.81). Pooled secondary LB rates were significantly lower for patients that underwent CT with ROSE relative to patients in the CT only group (P = 0.0008). Significant heterogeneity was detected for the operative duration (I² = 94%) and number of punctures (I² = 98%) endpoints, while no publication bias was detected for any study endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ROSE may contribute to significant improvements in the diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided LB without contributing to higher rates of complications.

Low-dose versus standard-dose computed tomography-guided biopsy for pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To assess relative safety and diagnostic performance of low- and standard-dose computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy for pulmonary nodules (PNs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). From June 2020 to December 2020, consecutive patients with PNs were randomly assigned into low- or standard-dose groups. The primary outcome was diagnosis accuracy. The secondary outcomes included technical success, diagnostic yield, operation time, radiation dose, and biopsy-related complications. This RCT was registered on 3 January 2020 and listed within ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04217655).

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were randomly assigned to low-dose (n = 100) and standard-dose (n = 100) groups. All patients achieved the technical success of CT-guided biopsy and definite final diagnoses. No significant difference was found in operation time (n = 0.231) between the two groups. The mean dose-length product was markedly reduced within the low-dose group compared to the standard-dose group (31.5 vs. 333.5 mGy-cm, P < 0.001). The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the low-dose group were 68%, 91.5%, 100%, and 94%, respectively. The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 65%, 88.6%, 100%, and 92% in the standard-dose group. There was no significant difference observed in diagnostic yield (P = 0.653), diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.579), rates of pneumothorax (P = 0.836), and lung hemorrhage (P = 0.744) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard-dose CT-guided biopsy for PNs, low-dose CT can significantly reduce the radiation dose, while yielding comparable safety and diagnostic accuracy.

An ultra-low-dose protocol for computed tomography-guided lung radiofrequency ablations

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultra-low-dose (ULD) protocol for computed tomography (CT)-guided lung radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Patients who had undergone lung RFA between November 2017 and January 2021 were consecutively and retrospectively included. Thirty patients were treated using a conventional standard protocol (SP), including helical acquisitions with mA automatic adjustment and sequential CT at 80 kVp; and 31, with a ULD protocol defined with helical acquisitions with fixed mA and sequential series at 100 kVp. These parameters were selected from those used for a diagnostic lung low-dose CT scanner. Patient characteristics, dose indicators, technical efficacy (minimal margin [MM], recurrence during follow-up), and complications (pneumothorax, alveolar haemorrhage, and haemoptysis) were recorded. We included 61 patients (median age, 65 [54-73] and 33 women), with no significant differences according to the type of protocol, except for the type of anaesthesia. Even if the number of helical acquisitions did not significantly change, all dose indicators significantly decreased by 1.5-fold-3-fold. The median dose-length-product and effective dose, with their ranges, respectively, were 465 mGy cm (315-554) and 6.5 mSv (4.4-7.8) in the SP group versus 178 mGy cm (154-267) and 2.5 mSv (2.2-3.7) in the ULD group, (p< 001). The ULD group exhibited lower intraoperator variability and better interoperator alignment than those of the SP group. The MM was not significantly different between the two groups (4.6 mm versus 5 mm,p= 16). One local recurrence was observed in each group at 8 months in the SP and at one year in the ULD group (p= 1). The complication rates did not differ significantly. Implementing an ULD protocol during lung RFA may provide similar efficacy, a reduction of dose indicators, and intra- and interoperator variability, without increasing complication rates, compared to those associated with an SP.

Computed tomography-guided Sens-cure needle localization for scapular-blocked lung nodules

Introduction

The use of preoperative computed tomography (CT) to guide the wedge resection (WR) of lung nodules (LNs) in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is widely accepted. However, some LNs may be blocked by the scapula and a trans-scapular approach should be used when performing the localization procedures.

Aim

To investigate the feasibility, safety, and clinical effectiveness of preoperative CT-guided Sens-cure needle (SCN) localization for scapula-blocked LNs (SBLNs).

Material and methods

One hundred and eighty patients with LNs who had undergone CT-guided SCN localization before VATS were enrolled in this single-center retrospective study from January 2018 to December 2021. Ten of these patients (5.6%) had SBLNs and underwent localization using the trans-scapular approach. The technical success of localization, together with complications and VATS, was assessed.

Results

Data on the 10 patients with 10 SBLNs were analyzed. Scapular puncture was successful in all patients (100%) with no incidence of complications near the scapula. SCN localization was also successful in 100% of patients. The average duration of SCN localization was 12.5 ±4.0 min, with 1 (10%) patient experiencing pneumothorax after localization. The WR success rate was also 100%. Three patients underwent additional lobectomy due to invasive adenocarcinoma. The VATS procedure lasted on average for 97.0 ±56.0 min with an average blood loss of 44.0 ±35.0 ml.

Conclusions

Preoperative CT-guided SCN localization using the trans-scapular approach is safe, effective, and highly successful for VATS-guided WR of SBLNs.

Predictive model for the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, multiple predictive models have been developed with the goal of reliably differentiating between solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) that are malignant and those that are benign. The present meta-analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic utility of these predictive models in the context of SPN differential diagnosis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched for relevant studies published through August 31, 2021. Pooled data analyses were conducted using Stata v12.0.

RESULTS

In total, 20 retrospective studies that included 5171 SPNs (malignant/benign: 3662/1509) were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Respective pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic score values were 88% (95CI%: 0.84-0.91), 78% (95CI%: 0.74-0.80), 3.91 (95CI%: 3.42-4.46), 0.16 (95CI%: 0.12-0.21), and 3.21 (95CI%: 2.87-3.55), with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve value of 86% (95CI%: 0.83-0.89). Significant heterogeneity among studies was detected with respect to sensitivity (I² = 89.07%), NLR (I² = 87.29%), and diagnostic score (I² = 72.28%). In a meta-regression analysis, sensitivity was found to be impacted by the standard reference in a given study (surgery and biopsy vs. surgery only, P = 0.02), while specificity was impacted by whether studies were blinded (yes vs. unclear, P = 0.01). Sensitivity values were higher when surgery and biopsy samples were used as a standard reference, while unclear blinding status was associated with increased specificity. No significant evidence of publication bias was detected for the present meta-analysis (P = 0.539).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that predictive models can offer significant diagnostic utility when establishing whether SPNs are malignant or benign.