Intracorporeal laparoscopic U-shaped ileal neobladder construction with three ports: a pilot study

Three-port approach vs conventional laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent three-port laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) with orthotopic neobladder (ONB) and traditional five-port method.

METHODS

From January 2017 to November 2020, 100 patients underwent LRC + ONB at a third-level grade A hospital.

RESULTS

Our study included 55 patients who underwent three-port LRC and 45 patients who underwent the five-port method. There were no significant differences in perioperative data such as operation time (253.00 ± 43.89 vs. 259.07 ± 52.31 min, P = 0.530), estimated blood loss (EBL)(97.64 ± 59.44 vs. 106.67 ± 55.35 min, P = 0.438), day to flatus (2.25 ± 1.49 vs. 2.76 ± 1.77 days, P = 0.128), day to regular diet (7.07 ± 2.99 vs. 7.96 ± 3.32 days, P = 0.165), day to pelvic drain removal (9.58 ± 3.25 vs. 10.53 ± 3.80 days, P = 0.180), and hospital stay after operation (11.62 ± 3.72 vs. 11.84 ± 4.37 days, P = 0.780) between the two groups. The only significant difference was in the treatment cost (P = 0.035). Similarly, postoperative complications, quality of life, and tumor outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The three-port method is safe and feasible for patients suitable for traditional five-port LRC with an orthotopic neobladder.

Laparoscopic Cystectomy with Totally Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Orthotopic Neobladder for Bladder Cancer: A Single Center Experience

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the perioperative, oncological, and functional results and complications of extracorporeal orthotopic neobladder (EON) and totally intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder (ION) after laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. Methods: From January 2013 to October 2019, 152 patients underwent LRC and U-shape neobladder urinary diversion at a single tertiary referral hospital. We then compared the extracorporeal (n = 62) and intracorporeal (n = 90) orthotopic neobladder after laparoscopic cystectomy groups. Results: Of all patients, 90 with ION and 62 with EON were included in the study. Concerning perioperative outcomes, the ION group had lower estimated blood loss (455.7 versus 371.7 mL, P = .019), a shorter interval to solid food (6.9 versus 8.7 days, P = .006), and a shorter length of hospital stay (14.6 versus 16.0 days, P = .009). No statistically significant differences were identified in overall (P = .649), early (P = .509), and late (P = .367) complications. However, in terms of gastrointestinal complications, the ION group had a lower complication rate than the EON group (11.1% versus 27.4%, P = .018). There were no statistically significant differences in cancer-specific or noncancer-specific mortality. Daytime and nocturnal continence rates for the ION versus EON groups were 86.7% and 87.1% (P = 1) and 70.0% versus 66.1% (P = .614), respectively. Patients who underwent intracorporeal urinary diversion had a higher health-related quality of life within 3 months postoperative than the extracorporeal urinary diversion group. Conclusion: LRC with ION could be an alternative to EON with similar oncological and functional outcomes at tertiary referral centers. ION had advantages of faster bowel recovery, fewer gastrointestinal complications, and higher quality of life within 3 months postoperative. Clinical Trial Registration No. ChiCTR2100042063.

Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder: a comparison with transperitoneal approach

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer is one of the most common genitourinary cancers. Traditional transperitoneal radical cystectomy is the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Our study was to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (ELRC) with intracorporeal neobladder versus transperitoneal urinary diversion for bladder cancer.

METHOD

A total of 113 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy performed at our center were included in this retrospective study. The perioperative data of the extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (ELRC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (TLRC) with ICUD groups were compared. The demographic, perioperative, oncological, and complication data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 113 patients were enrolled for the final analysis. The median follow-up period was 22 months. The ELRC group had shorter interval to flatus (p < 0.001), solid food (p < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (p < 0.01), and fewer early gastrointestinal complications (p < 0.05). Furthermore, urinary continence, recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival rates and recurrence patterns did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical technique of ELRC with ICUD can achieve the established oncologic criteria of TLRC, and such technique can improve perioperative and early postoperative outcomes.