A comprehensive review of the sinuvertebral nerve with clinical applications

A new technique for low back pain in lumbar disc herniation: percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with sinuvertebral nerve ablation

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has demonstrated efficacy in alleviating leg pain among patients with lumbar disc herniation. Nonetheless, residual back pain persists as a troubling issue for surgeons following the procedure. In the treatment of discogenic back pain, sinuvertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation has shown promising results. Nevertheless, the potential benefit of simultaneously implementing sinuvertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation during PELD surgery to address residual back pain has not been thoroughly investigated in current literature.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients with low back pain who underwent combined PELD and sinuvertebral nerve ablation in our department between January 2021 and September 2023. Residual low back pain post-surgery was assessed and compared with existing literature.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients, including 53 males and 27 females, were included in the study. Following surgical intervention, patients demonstrated remarkable improvements in pain and functional parameters. One month post-operatively, the VAS score for low back pain exhibited a 75% reduction (6.45 ± 1.3 to 1.61 ± 1.67), while the VAS score for leg pain decreased by 85% (7.89 ± 1.15 to 1.18 ± 1.26). Notably, the JOA score increased from 12.89 ± 5.48 to 25.35 ± 4.96, and the ODI score decreased form 59.48 ± 9.58 to 20.3 ± 5.37. These improvements were sustained at three months post-operatively. According to the modified Mac Nab criteria, the excellent and good rate was 88.75%. Residual low back pain is observed to be comparatively reduced compared to the findings documented in earlier literature.

CONCLUSION

The combination of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and sinuvertebral nerve ablation demonstrates effective improvement in low back pain for LDH patients.

Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution and Range of Motion in Discogenic Back Pain

OBJECTIVE

Precise knowledge regarding the mechanical stress applied to the intervertebral disc following each individual spine motion enables physicians and patients to understand how people with discogenic back pain should be guided in their exercises and which spine motions to specifically avoid. We created an intervertebral disc degeneration model and conducted a finite element (FE) analysis of loaded stresses following each spinal posture or motion.

METHODS

A 3-dimensional FE model of intervertebral disc degeneration at L4-5 was constructed. The intervertebral disc degeneration model was created according to the modified Dallas discogram scale. The von Mises stress and range of motion (ROM) regarding the intervertebral discs and the endplates were analyzed.

RESULTS

We observed that mechanical stresses loaded onto the intervertebral discs were similar during flexion, extension, and lateral bending, which were greater than those occurring during torsion. Based on the comparison among the grades divided by the modified Dallas discogram scale, the mechanical stress during extension was greater in grades 3-5 than it was during the others. During extension, the mechanical stress loaded onto the intervertebral disc and endplate was greatest in the posterior portion. Mechanical stresses loaded onto the intervertebral disc were greater in grades 3-5 compared to those in grades 0-2.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that it might be beneficial for patients experiencing discogenic back pain to maintain a neutral posture in their lumbar spine when engaging in daily activities and exercises, especially those suffering from significant intravertebral disc degeneration.

CT-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Targeting the Herniation Edge of the Cervical Disc for the Treatment of Neck Pain: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Sinuvertebral nerve overactivation is one of the mechanisms of neck pain caused by cervical disc herniation. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of sinuvertebral nerves has shown efficacy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. However, relatively few studies evaluated the efficacy of RFA of sinuvertebral nerves for the treatment of chronic neck pain caused by cervical disc herniation.

METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 168 patients diagnosed with cervical disc herniated neck pain from January 1, 2019, to September 1, 2022, who were treated with computed tomography (CT)-guided cervical disc RFA of at the Pain Medicine Center of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital. A 22-G RFA needle (Inomed, Emmendingen, Germany) was inserted between the carotid artery and trachea to the intervertebral disc under the direction of CT the scanner. Depending on the position of the protruding nucleus pulposus or the rupture of the annulus fibrosus, the needle was inserted into the posterior side of the intervertebral disc until the tip of the needle reached the target position. The numeric rating scale (NRS) score, pain relief and appearance of complications after RFA were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients underwent CT-guided RFA for cervical disc herniation. The average duration of pain was 67.07 ± 70.42 months. At 6 months of follow-up, the median preoperative NRS score decreased significantly from preoperative 5.41 ± 1.08 to postoperative 1.341 ± 1.25 at 1 month, 1.4 ± 1.38 at 3 months and 1.72 ± 1.41 at 6 months after RFA (p < 0.01). The numbers of patients with ≥ 50% of their neck pain relieved were 84% (141/168), 87% (147/168), 87% (147/168) and 79% (133/168) at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after RFA, respectively. No serious complications related to treatment or long-term complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that CT-guided RFA targeting the edge of cervical disc herniation to destroy the sinuvertebral nerves can effectively relieve neck pain, and the computed tomography (CT)-guided RFA treatment strategy has the advantages of having few complications.

T2 mapping of lumbar intervertebral disc: quantitative evaluation of degeneration in relation to Pfirrmann grading system and a template for intervertebral disc segmentation

Background

To assess the feasibility of using T2 relaxation time mapping at 3 Tesla (3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection and classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration, introducing an objective model of disc segmentation for accurate disc assessment.

Materials and Methods

The present study is a single-center prospective evaluation including 185 lumbar intervertebral discs from a cohort of 37 patients with chronic lower back pain. For the quantitative classification of disc degeneration, three regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on T2 maps, and the Pfirrmann grading system was used for qualitative assessment. Intergroup evaluation was performed with paired t-tests. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean value of T2 mapping, and Tukey's multiple comparison test was applied to determine differences in mean values of T2 mapping among the Pfirrmann categories.

Results

The ANOVA test analysis of ROIs showed that there is a statistically significant difference (p <0.001) among average T2 relaxation time mapping values in different Pfirrmann score groups, and Tukey's multiple comparison tests revealed that mean values of T2 map among the different grades of Pfirrmann differ from the rest (p <0.001) except grade V. Paired t-tests revealed significant differences in mean values of T2 map between different ROIs.

Conclusion

This study showed that quantitative T2 mapping of the lumbar intervertebral discs at 3T MRI may overcome the subjective element of qualitative classification systems for degenerative intervertebral disc disease. Also, a new template of disc segmentation with more ROIs would be more sensitive for the assessment of disc degeneration. HIPPOKRATIA 2023, 27 (2):75-81.

Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Patients with Lumbosacral Disc Herniation in the Absence of Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Is Better Really the Enemy of the Best?

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with lumbosacral disc herniation by comparing its effect between those diagnosed by clinical evaluation and plain radiography only (X-ray group) and those by additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (MRI group). Additionally, we investigated the accuracy of the preliminary clinical assumption in the X-ray group using confirmative post-injection MRI.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively recruited 367 patients with back and radicular pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation from a single pain clinic. Among them, 201 and 166 patients were categorized into the X-ray and MRI groups, respectively. In the X-ray group, the pathological level assumed initially by clinical evaluation and plain radiography concurred with that confirmed later on post-injection MRI in 139 patients (corresponding group); the remaining 62 patients lacked this concurrence (non-corresponding group). The NRS scores and Macnab criteria results were compared between the X-ray and MRI groups as well as the corresponding and non-corresponding groups.

Results

Both the X-ray and MRI groups showed significant reductions in the NRS scores at 2 and 10 weeks post-injection when compared with the pretreatment scores. However, no significant difference was noted between the groups in terms of the magnitude of clinical improvement assessed by successful reduction in the NRS or Macnab scores. Furthermore, similar results were obtained in the comparison between the corresponding and non-corresponding groups of the X-ray group.

Conclusion

TFESI guarantees favorable clinical outcomes even in the absence of confirmative MRI in patients with back and radicular pain. The preemptive application of this procedure could be prioritized and justified in patients suspected of lumbosacral disc herniation based on clinical evaluation and plain radiography only without the preceding MRI verification.

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain

Introduction

Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety.

Objective

The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders.

Methods

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented.

Results

After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain.

Conclusion

The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.

The role of nerve fibers and their neurotransmitters in regulating intervertebral disc degeneration

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) has been the major contributor to chronic lower back pain (LBP). Abnormal apoptosis, senescence, and pyroptosis of IVD cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, and infiltration of immune cells are the major molecular alternations during IVDD. Changes at tissue level frequently occur at advanced IVD tissue. Ectopic ingrowth of nerves within inner annulus fibrosus (AF) and nucleus pulposus (NP) tissue has been considered as the primary cause for LBP. Innervation at IVD tissue mainly included sensory and sympathetic nerves, and many markers for these two types of nerves have been detected since 1940. In fact, in osteoarthritis (OA), beyond pain transmission, the direct regulation of neuropeptides on functions of chondrocytes have attracted researchers' great attention recently. Many physical and pathological similarities between joint and IVD have shed us the light on the neurogenic mechanism involved in IVDD. Here, an overview of the advances in the nervous system within IVD tissue will be performed, with a discussion on in the role of nerve fibers and their neurotransmitters in regulating IVDD. We hope this review can attract more research interest to address neuromodulation and IVDD itself, which will enhance our understanding of the contribution of neuromodulation to the structural changes within IVD tissue and inflammatory responses and will help identify novel therapeutic targets and enable the effective treatment of IVDD disease.

Anatomic description of the basivertebral nerve and meningeal branch of the spinal nerve in the dog

PURPOSE

The existence of the basivertebral nerve and meningeal branch of the spinal nerve has not been proven in dogs to date. The objectives of this study are to 1) determine whether dogs have a meningeal branch of the spinal nerve (MBSN) and a basivertebral nerve (BVN) and to (2) describe anatomical characteristics of these two nerves. Authors also put forward a discussion on the possible clinical relevance of these findings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Dissections were performed on six embalmed dogs at the Veterinary Faculty of Barcelona with the use of stereomicroscopy and microsurgery equipment.

RESULTS

The MBSN (grossly) and BVN (grossly and histologically) were identified in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar region in all dog specimens. In addition, other small fibers (suspected nerves) entering the vertebral body through small foramina close to the end plates were identified. Histological examination of the tissues confirmed the presence of nerve fibers (myelinated and unmyelinated) in suspected BVN samples. Results of the present study indicated that dogs have BVNs. Also, suspected nerve fibers were identified among the epidural fat, running from the intervertebral foramina, that likely represent the MBSN.

CONCLUSION

These findings open up the discussion on extrapolation of treatment options employed in human medicine for "low back pain", such as BVN ablation, which is discussed in this article. Further anatomic and clinical studies of the innervation for the vertebral body, periosteum, vasculature, dorsal longitudinal ligament and anulus fibrosus are necessary to elucidate possible anatomical variants and breed differences as well as potential clinical (e.g., therapeutic) relevance.

Intradiscal Therapies for Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease

Discogenic low back pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint in patients presenting to orthopaedic surgeons. In addition to surgical options, there are several nonsurgical intradiscal treatments that have gained interest, ranging from biologic, nonbiologic, cell-based, and molecular therapies. However, there is limited evidence for many of these techniques, and some are still in the clinical trial stage. We describe a broad overview of these intradiscal therapies, the mechanism of action, and the evidence behind them.

Computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation of cervical intervertebral discs for the treatment of refractory cervicogenic headache: A retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cervical intervertebral discs for the treatment of discogenic cervicogenic headache (CEH).

BACKGROUND

Some patients with CEH experience no obvious therapeutic effect after conventional therapy, particularly patients with refractory CEH originating from abnormal cervical intervertebral discs. Treatment for this type of CEH remains poorly characterized.

METHODS

Using a single intervention arm, pretest/posttest design, we retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent CT-guided RFA of cervical intervertebral discs for CEH at the Pain Medicine Center of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from January 2017 to April 2021. If conservative treatment failed in patients with discogenic CEH, we classified the patients as having refractory CEH and performed RFA of cervical intervertebral discs. We used a numeric rating scale (NRS) to assess pain intensity for 6 months. We also compared therapeutic outcome of patients with different characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients who underwent CT-guided RFA of cervical intervertebral discs were enrolled and 41 of them were analyzed in the present study. The preoperative median (25th, 75th) NRS score was 4 (4, 5), and it was significantly reduced to 1 (0, 4) 6 months after RFA (p < 0.001). The number of patients with ≥50% of their pain relieved after 6 months was 28 of 41 (68%). No serious treatment-related complications occurred in this study. Compared with single-level RFA, multi-level RFA shows greater effects on pain intensity reduction (p = 0.032) and pain relief rate (p = 0.047) of patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients who have discogenic CEH, CT-guided RFA of the cervical intervertebral discs appears to be a promising treatment with no serious complications.

Origin, branching pattern, foraminal and intraspinal distribution of the human lumbar sinuvertebral nerves

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The lumbar sinuvertebral nerve (SVN) innervates the outer posterior intervertebral disc (IVD); it is thought to mediate discogenic low-back pain (LBP). Controversy, however, exists on its origins at higher (L1-L2) versus lower (L3-L5) lumbar levels. Additionally, lack of knowledge regarding its foraminal and intraspinal branching patterns and extensions may lead to iatrogenic damage.

PURPOSE

To systematically describe the origins of the L2 and L5 SVNs, their morphological variation in the intervertebral foramen (IVF) and intraspinal distribution.

STUDY DESIGN

Dissection-based study of 20 SVNs with histological confirmation in five embalmed human cadavers.

METHODS

The origin, branching pattern and distribution of the L2 and L5 SVNs was investigated bilaterally in five human cadavers using dorsal and anterolateral dissection approaches. Parameters studied included somatic and/or autonomic SVN root contributions, foraminal SVN morphology and course, diameter, branching point, intraspinal distribution and IVD innervation pattern. Nerve tissue was confirmed by immunostaining for neurofilament and S100 proteins.

RESULTS

The SVN and its origins was identified in all except one IVF at L2 and in all foramina at L5. At L2, the SVN arose in nearly 90% of sides from both somatic and autonomic roots and at L5 in 40% of sides. The remaining SVNs were formed by purely autonomic roots. The SVN arose from significantly more roots at L2 than L5 (3.1 ± 0.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3, respectively; p=.022). Four different SVN morphologies could be discerned in the L2 IVF: single filament (22%), multiple (parallel or diverging) filament (33%), immediate splitting (22%) and plexiform (22%) types, whereas the L5 SVN consisted of single (90%) and multiple (10%) filament types. SVN filaments were significantly thicker at L2 than L5 (0.48 ± 0.06 mm vs. 0.33 ± 0.02 mm, respectively; p=.043). Ascending SVN filaments coursed roughly parallel to the exiting spinal nerve root trajectory at L2 and L5. Branching of the SVN into ascending and descending branches occurred mostly intraspinal both at L2 and L5. Spinal canal distribution was also similar for L2 and L5 SVNs. Lumbar posterior IVDs were innervated by the descending branch of the parent SVN and ascending branch of the subjacent SVN.

CONCLUSIONS

The SVN at L2 originates from both somatic and autonomic roots in 90% of cases and at L5 in 40% of cases. The remaining SVNs are purely autonomic. In the IVF, the L2 SVN is morphologically heterogeneous, but generally consists of numerous filaments, whereas at L5 90% contains a single SVN filament. The L2 SVN is formed by more roots and is thicker than the L5 SVN. Intraspinal SVN distribution is confined to its level of origin; lumbar posterior IVDs are innervated by corresponding and subjacent SVNs (ie, two spinal levels).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings indicate that L5 discogenic LBP may be mediated both segmentally and nonsegmentally in 40% of cases and nonsegmentally in 60% of cases. Failure of lower lumbar discogenic pain treatment may be the result of only interrupting the nonsegmental pathway, but not the segmental one as well. Relating SVN anatomy to microsurgical spinal approaches may prevent iatrogenic damage to the SVN and the formation of postsurgical back pain.

Interventional Procedures for Vertebral Diseases: Spinal Tumor Ablation, Vertebral Augmentation, and Basivertebral Nerve Ablation-A Scoping Review

Low back pain is consistently documented as the most expensive and leading cause of disability. The majority of cases have non-specific etiologies. However, a subset of vertebral diseases has well-documented pain generators, including vertebral body tumors, vertebral body fractures, and vertebral endplate injury. Over the past two decades, specific interventional procedures targeting these anatomical pain generators have been widely studied, including spinal tumor ablation, vertebral augmentation, and basivertebral nerve ablation. This scoping review summarizes safety and clinical efficacy and discusses the impact on healthcare utilization of these interventions. Vertebral-related diseases remain a top concern with regard to prevalence and amount of health care spending worldwide. Our study shows that for a subset of disorders related to the vertebrae, spinal tumor ablation, vertebral augmentation, and basivertebral nerve ablation are safe and clinically effective interventions to decrease pain, improve function and quality of life, and potentially reduce mortality, improve survival, and overall offer cost-saving opportunities.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Conservative Treatment for Cervical Angina Conservative Treatment

STUDY DESIGN

This study employed a retrospective study design.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and those of conservative treatment for patients with cervical angina.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical angina is typically characterized by intolerable and paroxysmal angina-like precordial pain, which is caused by cervical disk degeneration in patients without definitive cardiovascular abnormalities. Diagnosis is either delayed or neglected because of its various clinical manifestations. Whether conservative or surgical treatment is appropriate remains controversial because of the lack of comparative studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2009 to 2016, 163 patients with cervical angina with advanced chest pain, tightness, or palpitation were retrospectively studied. Twenty-three patients underwent ACDF, and the other 140 patients were treated nonsurgically by medication, physical therapy, collar immobilization, or stellate ganglion block. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and 20-point autonomic nervous system (ANS) score were assessed pretreatment and posttreatment. Patients' satisfaction was assessed using the Odom criteria.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was 50 years, and most of them were females. The average follow-up was 25.5 months. The pretreatment JOA and 20-point ANS scores in the conservative and ACDF groups were 13.3 versus 11.7 (P=0.110) and 13.0 versus 13.3 (P=0.928), respectively. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed that posttreatment JOA and ANS scores at each observation interval improved significantly in the ACDF group (P<0.001). Angina-like symptoms also improved significantly in the ACDF group (P<0.001). During an average 2-year follow-up, good or excellent results were obtained in 78.2% of surgical patients and 35% of nonsurgical patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conservative therapy, surgical treatment with ACDF for cervical angina provided better and more consistent relief from angina-like symptoms and overall sympathetic symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Clinical anatomy of the lumbar sinuvertebral nerve with regard to discogenic low back pain and review of literature

PURPOSE

Lumbar discogenic diffuse pain is still not understood. Authors describe the sinuvertebral nerve (SVN) as one possible cause. Body-donor studies are rare and controversial. Therefore, the aim was to revisit the origin, course and distribution in a body-donor study.

METHODS

Six lumbar blocks (3 female, 3 male) aged between 59 and 94 years were dissected. After removal of the back muscles, lamina, dura mater and cauda equina, the anterior vertebral venous plexus, spinal artery and SVN were exposed and evaluated.

RESULTS

43 nerves out of 48 levels could be evaluated. The origin of the SVN was constituted by two roots: a somatic and a sympathetic branch arising from the rami communicantes. In 4/48 intervertebral canals studied (8.3%), we found two SVN at the same level. In 35/48 cases, one SVN was found. In 9/48 cases, no SVN was found. The SVN had a recurrent course below the inferior vertebral notch; in the vertebral canal it showed different patterns: ascending branch (31/43, 72.1%), common branch diverging into two branches (10/43, 23.3%), double ascending branch (1/43, 2.3%) finalizing two levels above and a descending branch (1/43, 2.3%). In 12/43 cases (27.9%) the SVN had ipsilateral connections with another SVN. The distribution ended in the middle of the vertebral body supplying adjacent structures.

CONCLUSION

A thorough understanding of the anatomy of the SVN might lead to significant benefits in therapy of discogenic low back pain. We suggest blocking the SVN at the level of the inferior vertebral notch of two adjacent segments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Chronic Orchialgia Stemming From Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Case Report and Brief Review

Chronic orchialgia can be the result of pathological processes of the scrotal contents or stem from non-intrascrotal structures. Successful pain management depends on identifying the source of localized or referred pain. This is a case report of a 39-year-old male sports coach who presented with low back pain, right orchialgia, and sciatica refractory to conservative management. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging revealed disc protrusion at L3/L4 and L4/L5 levels. Positive outcomes in relieving back and testicular pain were obtained after a total of 30 chiropractic sessions over a 9-week period. The evidence of the subjective improvement was corroborated by regression of the herniated discs documented on the repeat MR imaging. While chronic orchialgia is not an uncommon problem for men of all ages, it has seldom been described in association with lumbar discogenic disease. The current study provided preliminary support for a link between orchialgia and lumbar disc herniation. Chiropractic manipulation had provided a mechanistic alleviation of noxious lumbar stimuli, leading to symptomatic and functional improvements.

Use of Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Discogenic Back Pain: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Low-back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequently reported symptoms of patients who visit pain clinics, and a significant proportion of them have discogenic pain. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) stimulation is an effective treatment for various types of pain.

PURPOSE

We reviewed articles which investigated the effectiveness of intradiscal PRF for controlling discogenic LBP.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We searched PubMed for papers published prior to August 7, 2020, in which intradiscal PRF was used for treating discogenic LBP. The key search phrase was (intradiscal PRF) for identifying potentially relevant articles. We included articles in which intradiscal PRF was used for controlling LBP. Review articles were excluded.

RESULTS

Nine publications were included in this review. Except for one study, all other studies showed positive therapeutic outcomes after treating discogenic LBP using intradiscal PRF. However, the quality of these studies was not high.

CONCLUSIONS

This review showed that intradiscal PRF appears to be a helpful treatment method for patients with discogenic LBP. Our review provides insights into the degree of evidence of the therapeutic effects of intradiscal PRF for alleviating discogenic LBP. For confirmation of the effectiveness of intradiscal PRF on discogenic LBP, more high-quality studies are necessary.

Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for the Treatment of Vertebrogenic Pain

Chronic low back pain affects a significant portion of patients worldwide and is a major contributor to patient disability; however, it is a difficult problem to diagnose and treat. The prevailing model of chronic low back pain has presumed to follow a discogenic model, but recent studies have shown a vertebrogenic model that involves the basivertebral nerve (BVN). Radiofrequency ablation of the BVN has emerged as a possible nonsurgical therapy for vertebrogenic low back pain. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of vertebrogenic pain diagnosis and our current understanding of BVN ablation as treatment.

Intervertebral Disc Diseases PART 2: A Review of the Current Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Intervertebral Disc Disease

With an aging population, there is a proportional increase in the prevalence of intervertebral disc diseases. Intervertebral disc diseases are the leading cause of lower back pain and disability. With a high prevalence of asymptomatic intervertebral disc diseases, there is a need for accurate diagnosis, which is key to management. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical manifestation aids in understanding the natural history of these conditions. Recent developments in radiological and biomarker investigations have potential to provide noninvasive alternatives to the gold standard, invasive discogram. There is a large volume of literature on the management of intervertebral disc diseases, which we categorized into five headings: (a) Relief of pain by conservative management, (b) restorative treatment by molecular therapy, (c) reconstructive treatment by percutaneous intervertebral disc techniques, (d) relieving compression and replacement surgery, and (e) rigid fusion surgery. This review article aims to provide an overview on various current diagnostic and treatment options and discuss the interplay between each arms of these scientific and treatment advancements, hence providing an outlook of their potential future developments and collaborations in the management of intervertebral disc diseases.

Lumbar Degenerative Disease Part 1: Anatomy and Pathophysiology of Intervertebral Discogenic Pain and Radiofrequency Ablation of Basivertebral and Sinuvertebral Nerve Treatment for Chronic Discogenic Back Pain: A Prospective Case Series and Review of Literature

Degenerative disc disease is a leading cause of chronic back pain in the aging population in the world. Sinuvertebral nerve and basivertebral nerve are postulated to be associated with the pain pathway as a result of neurotization. Our goal is to perform a prospective study using radiofrequency ablation on sinuvertebral nerve and basivertebral nerve; evaluating its short and long term effect on pain score, disability score and patients’ outcome. A review in literature is done on the pathoanatomy, pathophysiology and pain generation pathway in degenerative disc disease and chronic back pain. 30 patients with 38 levels of intervertebral disc presented with discogenic back pain with bulging degenerative intervertebral disc or spinal stenosis underwent Uniportal Full Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation application through either Transforaminal or Interlaminar Endoscopic Approaches. Their preoperative characteristics are recorded and prospective data was collected for Visualized Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and MacNab Criteria for pain were evaluated. There was statistically significant Visual Analogue Scale improvement from preoperative state at post-operative 1wk, 6 months and final follow up were 4.4 ± 1.0, 5.5 ± 1.2 and 5.7 ± 1.3, respectively, p < 0.0001. Oswestery Disability Index improvement from preoperative state at 1week, 6 months and final follow up were 45.8 ± 8.7, 50.4 ± 8.2 and 52.7 ± 10.3, p < 0.0001. MacNab criteria showed excellent outcomes in 17 cases, good outcomes in 11 cases and fair outcomes in 2 cases Sinuvertebral Nerve and Basivertebral Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation is effective in improving the patients’ pain, disability status and patient outcome in our study.