Efficacy and Safety of Bojungikgi-Tang for Persistent Allergic Rhinitis: A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Trial

Background

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common disease, and conventional medications are often insufficient for treatment. Bojungikgi-tang (BJIGT) is an herbal medicine widely used in traditional medicine and has anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects. We hypothesize that BJIGT would improve nasal symptoms in patients with persistent AR (PAR).

Methods

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial. A total of 105 patients, identified with perennial allergens, with a history of PAR and a mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) ≥ 5 during the run-in period will be recruited from Daejeon Korean Medicine Hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned to a high-dose BJIGT group, standard-dose BJIGT group, or control group (placebo) in a 1 : 1 : 1 allocation ratio after a week run-in period. The treatment medication will be taken three times per day for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure is the mean change in the TNSS before and after medication. The secondary outcome measures include the Korean Allergic Rhinitis-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, total IgE and eosinophil count, overall assessment of AR, pattern identification questionnaire for AR, and Sasang constitution. Discussion. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of BJIGT in the treatment of PAR and to determine the suitable dosage of BJIGT. Therefore, we planned a randomized, controlled, phase II trial of two different doses of BJIGT compared with placebo, and the results of this study are expected to provide evidence for the use of BJIGT as a treatment of PAR. Trial Registration. The National Clinical Trial Registry Clinical Research Information Service, CRIS, KCT0006616, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/20706.

Prescription rate and treatment patterns for allergic rhinitis from 2010 to 2018 in South Korea: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

There has been little investigation on how guidelines for allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment are applied in current clinical practice. We aimed to analyze prescription trends and patterns for AR treatment according to patient characteristics over a 9-year period in Korea.

METHODS

We used cross-sectional data from the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service National Patient Sample from 2010 to 2018. We analyzed 1,719,194 patients with AR as the principal diagnosis. Prescription rates of antihistamines, steroids, and other drugs; combination prescriptions; and first-choice prescriptions were analyzed.

RESULTS

The prescription rate of first-generation antihistamines decreased over the years (2010: 29.13; 2018: 23.41). By contrast, the prescription rate of systemic steroids (2010: 23.60; 2018: 28.70), nasal steroids (2010: 9.70; 2018: 14.67), and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) (2010: 11.13; 2018: 26.56) increased. The prescription rate of steroids was lower in patients aged 0-5 years and ≥ 65 years than in other age groups and that of LTRAs was the highest in patients aged 0-5 years. The rate of combination prescribing antihistamines and nasal steroids increased (2010: 7.99; 2018: 12.09). The rate of first-choice prescriptions with antihistamines and nasal steroids also increased (2010: 4.72; 2018: 7.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirmed a decrease in antihistamine prescriptions, especially with first-generation, and an increase in steroid and LTRA prescriptions in patients with AR in Korea. Regarding prescription patterns, steroids were increasingly prescribed in combination with antihistamines. However, the trend was opposite in the 0-5 years and ≥ 65 years groups.