Positional change of the condyle after orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment: is there a relationship to skeletal relapse?

Does mandibular advancement ortho-surgical procedure cause condyle changes? A case-series analysis

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular advancement surgery corrects bone bases while establishing patients' functional and aesthetic rehabilitation. However, little is known about the results of this procedure in the structures that make up the stomatognathic system, as the condyles.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the structural and positional changes of mandibular condyles in ortho-surgical patients who underwent mandibular advancement surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective investigation was conducted with cone-beam computed tomography images. Using Dolphin Imaging® software, seven ortho-surgical patients with Angle Class II malocclusion and mandibular deficiency were evaluated. The images assessed were obtained at pre-surgical phase and after, at least, 1 year of the procedure. To study the structural and positional changes of condyles, linear and angular measurements were obtained, and the right and left sides of patients were compared. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed and, in order to verify possible significant differences, normality tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) were applied, followed by a paired t-test to define significance.

RESULTS

For all measures evaluated in this study, no statistically significant differences were found.

CONCLUSION

The ortho-surgical procedure performed did not change the structure and position of the condyles of patients who underwent surgical mandibular advancement. Right and left mandibular condyles behaved similarly, suggesting stability and condylar adaptation after surgery.

Short-term and long-term alterations of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback: A preliminary before-after clinical trial

Background:

Materials and Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Changes of temporomandibular joint position after surgery first orthognathic treatment concept

Orthognathic surgery treatment (OGS) after orthodontic treatment of dentofacial deformities is a widely performed procedure, often accompanied by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Positioning of the condyle during this procedure is a crucial step for achieving optimal functional and anatomical results. Intraoperatively poorly positioned condyles can have a negative effect on the postoperative result and the patient’s well-being. Changes of the condylar position during OGS Procedures and its effects on the temporomandibular joint in orthognathic surgical interventions (OGS) are subject of scientific discussions. However, up to date, no study has investigated the role of condyle position in the surgery first treatment concept. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of OGS on the three-dimensional position of the condyle in the joint in a surgery first treatment concept without positioning device and to record the change in position quantitatively and qualitatively. Analysis of our data indicated that OGS in surgery first treatment concept has no significant effect on the position of the condyle and the anatomy of the temporomandibular joint.

Three-dimensional analysis of condylar changes in surgical correction for open bite patients with skeletal class II and class III malocclusions

The aim of this study was to quantify three-dimensional condylar displacements as a result of two-jaw surgery for open bite correction in patients with skeletal class II and class III malocclusion. Pre-surgical (T1) and post-surgical (T2) cone beam computed tomography scans were taken for 16 patients with skeletal class II (mean age 22.3±9.47years) and 14 patients with skeletal class III (mean age 25.6±6.27years). T2 scans were registered to T1 scans at the cranial base. Translational and rotational condylar changes were calculated by x,y,z coordinates of corresponding landmarks. The directions and amounts of condylar displacement were assessed by intra- and inter-class Mann-Whitney U-test or t-test. Class II patients presented significantly greater amounts of lateral (P=0.002) and inferior (P=0.038) translation than class III patients. The magnitudes of condylar translational displacements were small for both groups. Skeletal class III patients had predominantly medial (P=0.024) and superior (P=0.047) condylar translation. Skeletal class II patients presented greater condylar counterclockwise pitch (P=0.007) than class III patients. Two-jaw surgery for the correction of open bite led to different directions and amounts of condylar rotational displacement in patients with skeletal class II compared to class III malocclusion, with greater rotational than translational displacements.

Electromagnetic navigated condylar positioning after high oblique sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: a guided method to attain pristine temporomandibular joint conditions

OBJECTIVES

Reproduction of the exact preoperative proximal-mandible position after osteotomy in orthognathic surgery is difficult to achieve. This clinical pilot study evaluated an electromagnetic (EM) navigation system for condylar positioning after high-oblique sagittal split osteotomy (HSSO).

STUDY DESIGN

After HSSO as part of 2-jaw surgery, the position of 10 condyles was intraoperatively guided by an EM navigation system. As controls, 10 proximal segments were positioned by standard manual replacement. Accuracy was measured by pre- and postoperative cone beam computed tomography imaging.

RESULTS

Overall, EM condyle repositioning was equally accurate compared with manual repositioning (P > .05). Subdivided into 3 axes, significant differences could be identified (P < .05). Nevertheless, no significantly and clinically relevant dislocations of the proximal segment of either the EM or the manual repositioning method could be shown (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study introduces a guided method for proximal segment positioning after HSSO by applying the intraoperative EM system. The data demonstrate the high accuracy of EM navigation, although manual replacement of the condyles could not be surpassed. However, EM navigation can avoid clinically hidden, severe malpositioning of the condyles.

Are Hyoid Bone and Tongue the Risk Factors Contributing to Postoperative Relapse for Mandibular Prognathism?

Objective. The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative stability and the correlation between hyoid, tongue, and mandible position following surgery for mandibular prognathism. Materials and Methods. Thirty-seven patients, treated for mandibular prognathism using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO), were evaluated cephalometrically. A set of four standardized lateral cephalograms were obtained from each subject preoperatively (T1), immediately postoperatively (T2), six weeks to three months postoperatively (T3), and more than one year postoperatively (T4). The Student t-tests, the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the multiple linear regression were used for statistical analysis. Results. Immediately after surgery, menton (Me) setback was 12.8 mm, hyoid (H) setback was 4.9 mm, and vallecula epiglottica (V) setback was 5.8 mm. The postoperative stability significantly correlated (r = −0.512, p < 0.01) with the amount of setback. The hyoid bone and tongue did not have significant effects on postoperative stability. Multiple linear regression model (R² = 0.2658, p < 0.05) showed predictability: Horizontal Relapse Me (T4-T2) = −6.406 − 0.488Me (T2-T1) + 0.069H (T2-T1) − 0.0619V (T2-T1). Conclusion. Mandibular setback surgery may push the hyoid and tongue significantly backward, but this did not correlate with mandibular relapse. Postoperative stability significantly correlated with the amount of mandibular setback.