Pulse cyclophosphamide therapy for steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rationale & Objective

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare condition that can lead to kidney function decline and chronic kidney failure. Immunosuppressants are used to treat primary FSGS. However, their efficacy and safety in FSGS are not clearly established. We assessed current knowledge on clinical effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for primary FSGS.

Study Design

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, interventional nonrandomized controlled trials, observational studies, retrospective studies, and registries.

Setting & Participants

Patients with primary and genetic FSGS.

Selection Criteria for Studies

Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for English-language, primary-FSGS studies from inception to 2019. Clinical outcomes were changes from baseline in proteinuria, kidney function, and kidney survival.

Data Extraction

2 investigators independently screened studies and extracted data.

Analytical Approach

Study results were summarized using random-effects models either as ratios of means between follow-up and baseline measurements or as HRs.

Results

We included 98 articles. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in patient baseline characteristics and study designs. Most studies assessed treatment with corticosteroids alone or combined with other drugs, mainly immunosuppressants. Patients treated with immunosuppressants showed reduced proteinuria (14 studies; ratio of means, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47), decreased creatinine clearance (mean difference, −25.03; 95% CI, −59.33 to −9.27) and (significantly) lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (mean difference, −7.61 mL/min/1.73 m²; 95% CI, −14.98 to 0.25 mL/min/1.73 m²). Immunosuppressant therapy had an uncertain effect on reducing the chronic kidney failure risk. Hypertension and infections were the most commonly reported adverse events.

Limitations

Heterogeneity in study designs, patient populations, and treatment regimens; no access to individual patient–level data.

Conclusions

This systematic review supports proteinuria reduction with immunosuppressant therapy in primary FSGS over varying follow-up periods. The effects of immunosuppressants on kidney survival remain uncertain. This review underscores the need for better-designed and adequately controlled studies to assess immunosuppressant therapy in patients with primary FSGS.

Second-line options for refractory steroid-sensitive and -resistant nephrotic syndrome

Although initially, many children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome respond to steroid therapy, a repeated course for patients with relapses often causes significant steroid toxicity. Patients with frequent relapses or steroid dependency thus require alternative treatment, and so far, cyclophosphamide or levamisole have been regarded as first-choice options, although the latter is no longer available in many countries. Data are accumulating that mycophenolic acid may be an alternative for these patients. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus) are usually effective and are often used after cytotoxic treatment, but long-term treatment is necessary, raising concerns regarding the accumulation of side effects. Still, some patients show a tendency to relapse even on this maintenance regimen and some even have a refractory course that creates a medical dilemma. For this situation, recent data have demonstrated an effect of monoclonal antibodies directed to B cells - rituximab, a drug that may also prove to be a therapeutic option in less complicated cases. Patients that do not respond to initial steroid treatment need genetic testing and a renal biopsy, since focal segmental glomerulosclerosis may be present. Treatment options include pulse methylprednisolone, often in addition to calcineurin inhibitors (mainly cyclosporine but also, recently, tacrolimus). Cyctotoxic treatment, especially intravenous cyclophosphamide, has been found to be effective in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome by some studies but is inferior to calcineurin inhibitors. In addition, mycophenolic acid and rituximab have been used in children with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; however, response seems to be inferior in comparison with patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Taken together, idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, including steroid-sensitive as well as steroid-resistant patients, is a potentially serious disorder. Although much progress has been made in recent years and a wide arsenal of immunological interventions is available, some patients have a treatment refractory course. Prospective studies or at least standardization of treatment for complicated cases is urgently needed.

New therapies in steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Although many children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) respond initially to steroid therapy, repeated courses for patients with relapses often cause significant steroid toxicity. Patients with frequent relapses who develop steroid dependency thus require alternative treatment. The first such options have been considered to be cyclophosphamide or levamisole, although the latter is no longer available in many countries. There is also an increasing body of data indicating that mycophenolic acid (MPA) may be an alternative for these patients. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus) are usually effective and often used after cytotoxic treatment, but long-term treatment with these agents is necessary, raising concerns of a possible accumulation of side effects. Some patients show a tendency to relapse even on such maintenance regimens, and some even have a refractory course that creates a medical dilemma. For this situation, recent data indicate that monoclonal antibodies directed to B-cells (e.g. rituximab) may have some effect and that such drugs may also prove to be a therapeutic option in less complicated cases. Patients that do not respond to steroid treatment need genetic testing and a renal biopsy since focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) may be present. Treatment options include pulse methylprednisolone, often in addition to calcineurin inhibitors, mainly in the form of cyclosporine, but tacrolimus has also come into recent favor. Some studies have found cytotoxic treatment, especially intravenous cyclophosphamide, to be effective in steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome, but it seems to be inferior to calcineurin inhibitors. MPA and rituximab have also been used in children with primary FSGS, but the response seems to be inferior to that in patients with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Taken together, INS in both steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant patients is a potentially complicated disorder, and despite a wide arsenal of immunological interventions, some patients have a treatment refractory course. Prospective studies or at least standardized treatment for complicated cases is urgently needed.

Cyclosporin A is superior to cyclophosphamide in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome-a randomized controlled multicentre trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie

First line immunosuppressive treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children is still open to discussion. We conducted a controlled multicentre randomized open label trial to test the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A (CSA) versus cyclophosphamide pulses (CPH) in the initial therapy of children with newly diagnosed primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and histologically proven minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangial hypercellularity. Patients in the CSA group (n = 15) were initially treated with 150 mg/m(2) CSA orally to achieve trough levels of 120-180 ng/ml, while patients in the CPH group (n = 17) received CPH pulses (500 mg/m(2) per month intravenous). All patients were on alternate prednisone therapy. Patients with proteinuria >40 mg/m(2) per hour at 12 weeks of therapy were allocated to a non-responder protocol with high-dose CSA therapy or methylprednisolone pulses. At week 12, nine of the 15 (60%) CSA patients showed at least partial remission, evidences by a reduction of proteinuria <40 mg/h per m(2). In contrast, three of the 17 (17%) CPH patients responded (p < 0.05, intention-to-treat). Given these results, the study was stopped, in accordance with the protocol. After 24 weeks, complete remission was reached by two of the 15 (13%) CSA and one of the 17 (5%) CPH patients (p = n.s.). Partial remission was achieved by seven of the 15 (46%) CSA and two of the 15 (11%) CPH patients (p <0.05). Five patients in the CSA group and 14 patients in the CPH group were withdrawn from the study, most of them during the non-responder protocol. The number of adverse events was comparable between both groups. We conclude that CSA is more effective than CPH in inducing at least partial remission in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children.