Eleven-year review of data on Pap smears in Saudi Arabia: We need more focus on glandular abnormalities!

Prevalence of abnormal pap smears in the western region of Saudi Arabia from 2010 to 2022

Objectives

The objectives of the study were to assess the prevalence of abnormal Pap smears and their quality metrics in a tertiary health-care facility in the western region of Saudi Arabia and to share our data with other researchers in Saudi Arabia to potentially establish benchmark data based on a Saudi population.

Material and Methods

A retrospective study was carried out by the Department of Pathology at King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on Pap smear statistics for 14,376 Pap smears of both conventional and liquid-based cytology (LBC) between 2010 and 2022.

Results

The prevalence of abnormal Pap smears of both conventional and LBC was 3.05% (438 Pap smears). The percentages of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma were 0.08% and 0.02%, respectively, and the ratio of atypical squamous cells (ASCs) to squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) (ASC/SIL) was 2.61.

Conclusion

The prevalence of abnormal Pap smears and the ASC/SIL ratio were consistent with the international benchmark data provided by the College of American Pathologists for each preparation type and within the range of the data provided by published studies, highlighting the need for greater focus on glandular abnormalities.

More focus on atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: Risk of significant abnormalities and low histological follow-up rate

Objectives

Atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected by Papanicolaou (Pap) smears are in close relation with adenocarcinoma and precursors detected by histopathology. Yet, sometimes the cytological diagnosis of AGC has been neglected. With increase of adenocarcinoma and precursors, we need more focus on glandular abnormalities.

Material and Methods

Clinicopathological data of patients who had AGC on Pap smears between April 2015 and October 2018 and underwent histological follow-up were retrieved from the computerized database of Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. Patients with a prior history of cancer were excluded from the study. Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson's Chi-square test in SPSS software version 23. P < 0.05 (two sided) was considered as statistical significance.

Results

Liquid-based cytological examination of the uterine cervix was carried out in 164,080 women. Five hundred and twenty-five women were diagnosed with AGC, 314 with not otherwise specified (AGC-NOS), and 211 with favor neoplastic (AGC-FN). Only 310 cases had histological follow-up, 168 women (168/314, 53.5%) originally with AGC-NOS on Pap smears, and 142 (142/211, 67.3%) with AGC-FN. The median age of histological significant abnormalities was 46.7 years, and 126 women (126/162, 77.8%) were postmenopausal. Sixty-six cases (66/168, 39.3%) of AGC-NOS had significant abnormalities (96/142, 67.6%, AGC-FN). One hundred and sixty-two cases of significant abnormalities included 40 high-grade squamous abnormalities and 122 glandular abnormalities. AGC-FN was more likely to be associated with a clinically significant abnormalities (P < 0.001) compared to AGC-NOS.

Conclusions

Patients with AGC on Pap smears are in close relation with significant abnormalities, especially with significant glandular abnormalities on histopathology slices. AGC should be evaluated vigilantly with histological workup, especially if patients are diagnosed with AGC-FN and are aged 41-60 years. We need more focus on AGC.

Human papillomavirus: present and future perspective in Saudi Arabia

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a widely dispersed DNA double-stranded carcinogenic virus worldwide. Many cancers have been attributed to HPV subtypes as a major aetiological factor. Around 90% of cervical cancers have been attributed to the HPV infection, in addition to other cancers such as head and neck cancer, breast cancer and other cancers. As the carcinogenic high risk and low-risk, HPV subtypes are sexually transmitted viruses, and the Saudi community is religiously conservative, lots of measures of the precise burden of the HPV and its related cancers are still obscure. With the absence of cervical-screening programmes and in-depth research in HPV-related cancers, there a lack of literature except for literature pertained to awareness and perceptions. Consequently, the present review is deemed to explore the present state of the HPV-related issues, the future perspective in light of the current scientific evidence, as well as, Saudi community practices, and health policies in this regard. Making accessible data on HPV-related cancers can assist in designing HPV-related early detection and control sustainable programmes. Therefore, this review aimed to discuss the most important magnitudes related to the HPV, concerning the available literature from Saudi Arabia and the data in the neighbouring Arab countries interrelated to Saudi Arabia. The review depended on searching Electronic databases using strongly considered indexes including PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, ABSCO, EMBASE, and others. In conclusion, though Saudi Arabia is pronounced as a conservative community with low sexual transmitted diseases, there is an alarming menace of HPV-attributable diseases necessitating a quick intervention.

Comparison of papanicolaou smear and human papillomavirus (HPV) test as cervical screening tools: can we rely on HPV test alone as a screening method? An 11-year retrospective experience at a single institution

Background

The decrease in incidence of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma has not been as dramatic as expected with the development of improved research tools and test methods. The human papillomavirus (HPV) test alone has been suggested for screening in some countries. The National Cancer Screening Project in Korea has applied Papanicolaou smears (Pap smears) as the screening method for cervical dysplasia and carcinoma. We evaluated the value of Pap smear and HPV testing as diagnostic screening tools in a single institution.

Methods

Patients co-tested with HPV test and Pap smear simultaneously or within one month of each other were included in this study. Patients with only punch biopsy results were excluded because of sampling errors. A total of 999 cases were included, and the collected reports encompassed results of smear cytology, HPV subtypes, and histologic examinations.

Results

Sensitivity and specificity of detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were higher for Pap smears than for HPV tests (sensitivity, 97.14%; specificity, 85.58% for Pap smears; sensitivity, 88.32%; specificity, 54.92% for HPV tests). HPV tests and Pap smears did not differ greatly in detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (85.35% for HPV test, 80.31% for Pap smears). When atypical glandular cells were noted on Pap smears, the likelihood for histologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma following Pap smear was higher than that of high-risk HPV test results (18.8 and 1.53, respectively).

Conclusions

Pap smears were more useful than HPV tests in the diagnosis of HSIL, SCC, and glandular lesions.

Modelling risk assessment for cervical cancer in symptomatic Saudi women

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the utility of cervical cancer screening could be improved by combining multiple factors in addition to the pap test. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 300 symptomatic women who were suspected to have cervical cancer and referred for biopsy examination at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between February 2017 and December 2017. Results: A high risk of cervical cancer in Saudi women was associated with 4 risk factors: family history (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.216; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.433-12.400), vaginal bleeding (aOR, 3.959; 95% CI, 1.272-12.318), hypertension (aOR, 4.554; 95% CI, 1.606-12.912), and an abnormal pap smear test (aOR, 13.985; 95% CI, 5.108-38.284). The model yields an adequate utility (area under the curve, 87.5%, 95% CI, 80.9-94.0%) with acceptable goodness-of-fit (p=0.6915). Conclusion: The pap smear test alone is inadequate to assess high risk for cervical cancer in our center. Early detection of cervical cancer may require consideration of a combination of factors including the pap test. This study has shown that using a combination of abnormal family history, vaginal bleeding, hypertension, and the pap smear test improved the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening.