Bloodstream infection at hemodialysis facilities in Jeddah: a medical record review

Non-tunneled haemodialysis catheter-related blood stream infections and associated factors among first time haemodialysis patients: a prospective study from a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka

BACKGROUND

A significant number of patients require non-tunneled haemodialysis catheters (NTHCs) in the event of an urgent need for immediate haemodialysis in developing countries. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a major concern in haemodialysis, but there is a lack of local epidemiological data. This study aimed to determine the incidence of CRBSI, causative agents and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at the dialysis unit of Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Sri Lanka from December 2019 to August 2020. Adult patients who had haemodialysis for the first time with NTHCs were included.

RESULTS

Of 149 dialysis patients (104-jugular vein and 45-femoral vein, mean age 58 ± 13.7 years, mean duration of catheterization 7.9 ± 3.4 days), the incidence of CRBSI was 13.58 per 1000 catheter days. Serum albumin levels, capillary blood sugar levels at admission, haemoglobin levels and duration of catheterization were significantly associated with CRBSI. Prescence of diabetes and patients with ESRD who started routine haemodialysis had a significantly higher risk of CRBSI. Gram-positive bacteria were the most common microorganisms associated with CRBSI (87.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show high rates of infection with temporary vascular catheters in Sri Lanka, mainly due to Gram-positive bacteria. Diabetes mellitus, duration of catheterisation, low serum albumin, haemoglobin level and CBS on admission were identified as significant risk factors for CRBSI. Management strategies tailored to specific centers should be established in the nation to optimise catheter care and to monitor local microbiology for appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment.

Economic evaluation of dialysis and comprehensive conservative care for chronic kidney disease using the ICECAP-O and EQ-5D-5L; a comparison of evaluation instruments

BACKGROUND

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients often require long-term care, and while Hemodialysis (HD) is the standard treatment, Comprehensive Conservative Care (CCC) is gaining popularity as an alternative. Economic evaluations comparing their cost-effectiveness are crucial. This study aims to perform a cost-utility analysis comparing HD and CCC using the EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-O instruments to assessing healthcare interventions in CKD patients.

METHODS

This short-term economic evaluation involved 183 participants (105 HD, 76 CCC) and collected data on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory results, treatment costs, and HRQoL measured by ICECAP-O and EQ-5D-5L. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) and Net Monetary Benefit (NMB) were calculated separately for each instrument, and Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) assessed uncertainty.

RESULTS

CCC demonstrated significantly lower costs (mean difference $8,544.52) compared to HD. Both EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-O indicated higher Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) for both groups, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CCC dominated HD in terms of HRQoL measures, with ICERs of -$141,742.67 (EQ-5D-5L) and -$4,272.26 (ICECAP-O). NMB was positive for CCC and negative for HD, highlighting its economic feasibility.

CONCLUSION

CCC proves a preferable and more cost-effective treatment option than HD for CKD patients aged 65 and above, regardless of the quality-of-life measure used for QALY calculations. Both EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-O showed similar results in cost-utility analysis.

Predictive factors of infection in patients with chronic kidney disease using hemodialysis catheters

Background

Infection is the most frequent complication of central venous catheters used for hemodialysis.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to the determine the central venous catheter-related infection rate at a dialysis center in the Brazilian state of Amazonas and to identify risk factors and the microbiological profile of the infections.

Methods

This was an observational study with prospective data collection over a 12-month period by chart analysis and face-to-face interviews with patients undergoing hemodialysis using central venous catheters at a dialysis center.

Results

96 central venous catheters were analyzed in 48 patients. 78 of these were non-tunneled central venous catheters (81.3%) and 18 were tunneled central venous catheters (18.7%), 53.1% of the catheters were exchanged because of infection and blood cultures were obtained from 35.2% of the patients who had catheter-related infections. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from five of the nine blood cultures in which there was bacterial growth and Gram-positive bacteria were isolated from the other four. The most commonly isolated bacteria was Staphylococcus hominis, found in 22.2% of positive blood cultures.

Conclusion

The overall hemodialysis venous catheter infection rate was 10.1 episodes/1000 catheter days, 15.1 episodes/1000 catheters days in non-tunneled catheters and 3.3 episodes/1000 catheters days in tunneled catheters. The infection predisposing factors identified were use of non-tunneled catheters and having 2 hemodialysis sessions per week. Regarding the microbiological profile, over half of the bacteria isolated were Gram-negative.

Catheter-Related Blood Stream Infections and Associated Factors Among Hemodialysis Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Introduction

Non-tunneled central venous catheter remains the preferred vascular access at hemodialysis initiation in developing countries despite a high burden of infection complications. The goal of this study was to determine the burden, risk factors, and microbiological spectrum of catheter-related bloodstream infections at a tertiary care center in Ethiopia.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study design was applied among patients who underwent central venous catheter insertion for hemodialysis between January 2016 and June 2022 with no native arteriovenous fistula and stayed more than 48 hours. Data were collected from the patient's registration book, patient charts, and microbiology registry and analyzed using SPSS 21. Binary logistic regression was applied to assess the relationship between the independent and outcome variables. P-values less than 0.05 with AOR and 95% CI were used as statistically significant variables.

Results

In this study, 353 patients were included. The mean age was 39±17.9 years and the average duration of catheter stay was 58 ±95 days. A hundred thirty-five (38.2%) CRBSIs were documented with an incidence rate of 7.74 episodes per 1000 catheter days. The causative microorganism was predominantly gram-negatives (57.6%). Duration of a catheter (AOR: 0.3; P < 0.001), previous CVC infection (AOR: 11.9; P < 0.001), high white blood cell count (AOR: 0.31; P<0.001), urban residence (AOR: 1.92; P<0.05), and low hemoglobin levels (AOR: 2.78; P < 0.05) were independently associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection among patients on hemodialysis was high with gram-negative predominance. Early fistula must be planned to reduce the duration of temporary vascular access.

Patterns of microbial resistance in bloodstream infections of hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study from Palestine

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a prominent cause of death and hospitalization among hemodialysis (HD) patients. The emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) is making the management of these infections more challenging. This study describes the clinical characteristics, microbial profiles and antibiotic resistance patterns in patients with BSIs. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at An-Najah National University Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020. Clinical and demographic data regarding BSIs were collected from the hospital information system. Data regarding bacterial isolates and the antimicrobial resistance of BSIs were collected from the microbiology lab. Data were entered and analyzed using version 21 of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences program (IBM-SPSS). 111 BSIs occurred during the study period, with a rate of 1.5 infections per 100 patient-months. These patients had been on HD for the median duration of 747 (360, 1825) days and 62.2% had already had a BSI before the study period. 118 microorganisms were isolated; 99 (83.89%) were gram-positive and 19 (16.1%) were gram-negative. Among the gram-positive isolates, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (88, 74.57%) were predominant. As for the gram-negative isolates, the most frequent were both Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Escherichia coli, with five (4.23%) positive cultures each. Among the latter, two were Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producing (ESBL) (1.69%). The most frequently used empiric antibiotics were a combination of vancomycin and gentamicin (27%), followed by vancomycin alone (24.3%). Regarding gram-positive isolates, vancomycin was the most frequently used and effective antibiotic after cultures, whereas for gram-negative bacteria, it was found to be gentamicin. MDROs were defined as those resistant to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories. 89 (75.4%) isolates were found to be MDRO, 85 (85.85%) gram-positive bacteria and 4 (21%) gram-negative bacteria. When comparing patients according to the type of vascular access, 66 (75%) infections with MDRO were found among patients with central venous catheters (CVCs). However, no statistically significant relationship was found between the type of vascular access and infection with MDRO (p = 0.523). MDRO cause a remarkably high proportion of BSIs in Palestinian patients. The results of this study support the empiric use of vancomycin and gentamicin to treat these infections. It is vital that health care providers prevent these infections via instituting and adhering to infection control policies in hemodialysis centers and providing proper antibiotic therapy of limited use and duration when necessary to avoid breeding resistance.

Predictive factors of in-hospital mortality in patients with laboratory-confirmed Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species or Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections

Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSI) are confirmed by the presence of gram-negative bacteria in the bloodstream and pose a significant healthcare issue as they increase the risk of sepsis and mortality. In England, the aim is to reduce GNBSI cases and further deterioration through enhanced population surveillance of patients with a laboratory-confirmed GNBSI to inform on healthcare policies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with a laboratory-confirmed Escherichia coli, Klebsiella or Pseudomonas aeruginosa GNBSIs, with data obtained from the enhanced data capture for the surveillance of GNBSIs. All patients with a laboratory-confirmed GNBSI at a single centre, admitted between April 2017 and March 2019, were included in this retrospective observational study. Demographic and recent exposure to healthcare risk factors were collected and assessed for the association with in-hospital mortality. In 1113 patients with laboratory-confirmed GNBSIs, the in-hospital mortality rate was 13%. Multivariable analysis confirmed that patients with respiratory (OR = 3.73, 95%CI = 2.05-6.76), gastrointestinal (2.61; 1.22-5.58) or skin (3.61; 1.24-10.54) infection primary focus had a greater risk of in-hospital mortality, compared to upper urinary tract infections. Increased risk of in-hospital mortality was also observed in patients with hospital-onset GNBSIs (OR = 1.87; 1.17-2.97) compared with community-onset healthcare acquired GNBSIs, or who were on dialysis at the time of the GNBSI (3.28; 1.01-10.14), as well as in patients who had recently been discharged from hospital (1.55; 1.01-2.38), or had a vascular device recently manipulated (2.41; 1.01-5.74). Results confirm that the data obtained from the enhanced data capture for GNBSIs in England can predict in-hospital mortality in patients with a GNBSI. Several factors associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality have been identified. Results should be reported back to clinicians in order to identify patients at a greater risk of dying in-hospital who may benefit from further monitoring.

Microbial Repercussion on Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Outcome: A 2-Year Retrospective Study

Background

Albeit growing technical advances in the design of hemodialysis catheters, intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) still represents an utmost clinical challenge to the health-care workers (HCWs). Data regarding the influence of the culprit organism on the scenario of CRBSI in the literature are extremely lacking. Thereby, this research was carried out.

Methods

We undertook a retrospective cohort study over an interval of 2 years, involving patients who underwent regular hemodialysis via catheters in the Renal Dialysis Unit (RDU) of Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital (DSFH), Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The study enrolled 139 patients (56.8% females and 43.2% males), with mean age of 60.79 ± 11.45 years.

Results

The aggregate rate of CRBSI was 5.1/1000 catheter days. Amongst the 139 study candidates confirmed of having CRBSI, while 69.8% of CRBSIs were ascribed to Gram-positive cocci, about one-third of the infectious episodes were secondary to Gram-negative bacilli. Interestingly, fever was the most common presentation of S. aureus CRBSI compared to CoNS and Gram-negative bacilli CRBSIs (20.9% versus 12.9% versus 6.5%, p= 0.0001), whereas CRBSIs due to CoNS were presented mainly with rigors (19.4%). Of note, CRBSIs caused by Gram-negative bacilli had a tendency to manifest with unusual symptoms such as vomiting or hypotension. Besides, they were more prone to involve hospitalization or ICU admission. In this study, no mortality was attributed to CRBSIs.

Conclusion

Our study disclosed that the illicit organism has a repercussion on the clinical presentation as well as the fate of CRBSI among hemodialysis patients. This highlights the worth of identifying the infected cases in a periodic manner, to avoid the occurrence of devastating complications. A large body of work from various hemodialysis centers should take place in the near future so as to provide more insight in this perspective.