Evaluation of Cisplatin Neurotoxicity in Cultured Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia via Cytosolic Calcium Accumulation

Alleviation of cisplatin-induced neuropathic pain, neuronal apoptosis, and systemic inflammation in mice by rapamycin

Platinum-based chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer patients is associated with debilitating adverse effects. Several adverse effects have been well investigated, and can be managed satisfactorily, but chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) remains poorly treated. Our primary aim in this study was to investigate the neuroprotective effect of the immunomodulatory drug rapamycin in the mitigation of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Pain assays were performed in vivo to determine whether rapamycin would prevent or significantly decrease cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity in adult male Balb/c mice. Neuropathic pain induced by both chronic and acute exposure to cisplatin was measured by hot plate assay, cold plate assay, tail-flick test, and plantar test. Rapamycin co-treatment resulted in significant reduction in cisplatin-induced nociceptive-like symptoms. To understand the underlying mechanisms behind rapamycin-mediated neuroprotection, we investigated its effect on certain inflammatory mediators implicated in the propagation of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity. Interestingly, cisplatin was found to significantly increase peripheral IL-17A expression and CD8- T cells, which were remarkably reversed by the pre-treatment of mice with rapamycin. In addition, rapamycin reduced the cisplatin-induced neuronal apoptosis marked by decreased neuronal caspase-3 activity. The rapamycin neuroprotective effect was also associated with reversal of the changes in protein expression of p21^Cip1, p53, and PUMA. Collectively, rapamycin alleviated some features of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity in mice and can be further investigated for the treatment of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.

2-Aminoethoxydiphenyl borate ameliorates functional and structural abnormalities in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy

AIM OF THE STUDY

Cisplatin is a platinum-derived chemotherapeutic agent commonly used in the treatment of various tumors. Ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and peripheral neuropathy are the most common side effects of this drug. 2-Aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB), boron- containing compound, has some protective effects against various tissue damage. The present study aimed to investigate the potential protective effects of 2-APB on in vitro and in vivo cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MTT assay was used to determine cell viability in DRG cells. Peripheral neuropathy was induced in forty male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250g) by administering cisplatin (3 mg/kg/week) intraperitoneally (i.p) for five weeks. 2-APB (2, 4, and 8 mg/kg, i.p) was administered. Mechanical allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, cold allodynia, mechanical stimuli, motor coordination, and locomotor activity tests were performed. DRG cells and sciatic nerves were analyzed histologically. NGF, BDNF, TNF-α, GSH, MDA, and LDH levels were investigated in rat DRG tissue homogenates.

RESULTS

Our results revealed that 2-APB ameliorated cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity by improving mechanical and cold allodynia and motor coordination impairment. It also reduced cisplatin-induced structural toxicity in peripheral tissues.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrated that 2-APB could be considered as a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Protective effects of anandamide against cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in rats

Background/aim

Cisplatin (CIS) is an effective antineoplastic agent used in the treatment of several cancer types. Peripheral neuropathy is a major dose-limiting side-effect in CIS therapy. Cannabinoids may alleviate this painful side effect. This study investigated the analgesic effects of anandamide (AN) on CIS-induced peripheral neuropathy, in vitro effects of AN in CIS neurotoxicity, and the contribution of nitric oxide (NO) in this effect.

Materials and methods

This is an experimental animal study. Primary dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cultures were prepared from one-day-old rats for in vitro investigations. DRG cells were incubated with CIS (100–300 M), and AN (10, 50, 100, and 500 μM) was administered with the submaximal concentration of CIS. Female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into control, CIS, CIS+AN, CIS+AN+L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester (LNAME). CIS was administered 3 mg/kg i.p once weekly for 5 weeks. AN (1 mg/kg i.p) or in combination with 10 mg/kg i.p LNAME was administrated 30 min before CIS injection. Mechanical allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, and tail clip tests were performed. After intracardiac perfusion, sciatic nerves (SN), and DRGs were isolated and semi-thin sections were stained with toluidine blue and investigated histologically. SPSS v. 21.0 and Sigma STAT 3.5 were used for statistical analysis. One/two way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were used. A p-value of 0.05 was accepted as significant.

Results

CIS caused significant mechanical allodynia. AN and AN+LNAME significantly increased hind paw withdrawal latency in mechanical allodynia test. The degenerated axons significantly increased in CIS group, while decreased in AN group. The frequency of larger neurons seemed to be higher in CIS+AN group.

Conclusion

AN may be a therapeutic alternative for the treatment of CIS-induced peripheral neuropathy. However, its central adverse effects must be considered.

Pathogenesis of platinum-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: Insights from preclinical studies

One of the most relevant dose-limiting adverse effects of platinum drugs is the development of a sensory peripheral neuropathy that highly impairs the patients' quality of life. Nowadays there are no available efficacy strategies for the treatment of platinum-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (PIPN), and the only way to prevent its development and progression is by reducing the dose of the cytostatic drug or even withdrawing the chemotherapy regimen. This clinical issue has been the main focus of hundreds of preclinical research works during recent decades. As a consequence, dozens of in vitro and in vivo models of PIPN have been developed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in its development and to find neuroprotective targets. The apoptosis of peripheral neurons has been identified as the main mechanism involved in PIPN pathogenesis. This mechanism of DRG sensory neurons cell death is triggered by the nuclear and mitochondrial DNA platination together with the increase of the oxidative cellular status induced by the depletion of cytoplasmic antioxidant mechanisms. However, since there has been no successful transfer of preclinical results to clinical practise in terms of therapeutic approaches, some mechanisms of PIPN pathogenesis still remain to be elucidated. This review is focused on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying PIPN described up to now, provided by the critical analysis of in vitro and in vivo models.

Does Nimodipine, a Selective Calcium Channel Blocker, Impair Chondrocyte Proliferation or Damage Extracellular Matrix Structures?

Background:

The study aimed to investigate the effects of the active ingredient, nimodipine, on chondrocyte proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) structures in cartilage tissue cells.

Methods:

Chondrocyte cultures were prepared from tissues resected via surgical operations. Nimodipine was then applied to these cultures and molecular analysis was performed. The data obtained were statisti-cally calculated.

Results:

Both, the results of the (3-(4,5 dimethylthiazol2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT) assay and the fluorescence microscope analysis [a membrane permeability test carried out with acridine or-ange/propidium iodide staining (AO/PI)] confirmed that the active ingredient, nimodipine, negatively af-fects the cell cultures.

Conclusion:

Nimodipine was reported to suppress cellular proliferation; chondroadherin (CHAD) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) expression thus decreased by 2.4 and 1.7 times, respectively, at 24 hrs when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, type II collagen (COL2A1) ex-pression was not detected (p < 0.05). The risk that a drug prescribed by a clinician in an innocuous man-ner to treat a patient by relieving the symptoms of a disease may affect the proliferation, differentiation, and viability of other cells and/or tissues at the molecular level, beyond its known side effects or adverse events, should not be forgotten.

The Role of Ionic Homeostasis in Cisplatin-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Preliminary Study

Objective

The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of ionic homeostasis in cisplatin (cisdiamminedichloroplatinum (II), CDDP)-induced neurotoxicity. CDDP is a severely neurotoxic antineoplastic agent that causes neuronal excitotoxicity. According to some studies, calcium influx increases, whereas potassium efflux decreases neuronal death. Nimodipine and glibenclamide were used to analyze the role of ionic flows in CDDP-induced neurotoxicity in rat primary cerebellar granule cell (CGC) culture.

Materials and Methods

CGC culture was prepared from the cerebella of Sprague Dawley 5-day-old pups. The submaximal concentration of CDDP was determined and then given with 1, 10, or 50 µM of drugs into culture. Neurotoxicity was investigated using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, a tetrazole) assay. One-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and Tukey test were applied for statistical analysis.

Results

CDDP induced neurotoxicity in a concentration-dependent manner. Neither nimodipine nor glibenclamide was able to protect CGCs against CDDP neurotoxicity.

Conclusion

By blocking L-type voltage-gated calcium channels, nimodipine did not prevent CDDP neurotoxicity in CGCs. Ca²⁺ influx via these channels seemed to be insufficient to cause a change in CDDP-induced neurotoxicity. Similarly, glibenclamide failed to prevent CDDP neurotoxicity. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of these preliminary results.

Ion channels and neuronal hyperexcitability in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; cause and effect?

Abstract

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide and is a major global health burden. Significant improvements in survival have been achieved, due in part to advances in adjuvant antineoplastic chemotherapy. The most commonly used antineoplastics belong to the taxane, platinum, and vinca alkaloid families. While beneficial, these agents are frequently accompanied by severe side effects, including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CPIN). While CPIN affects both motor and sensory systems, the majority of symptoms are sensory, with pain, tingling, and numbness being the predominant complaints. CPIN not only decreases the quality of life of cancer survivors but also can lead to discontinuation of treatment, thereby adversely affecting survival. Consequently, minimizing the incidence or severity of CPIN is highly desirable, but strategies to prevent and/or treat CIPN have proven elusive. One difficulty in achieving this goal arises from the fact that the molecular and cellular mechanisms that produce CPIN are not fully known; however, one common mechanism appears to be changes in ion channel expression in primary afferent sensory neurons. The processes that underlie chemotherapy-induced changes in ion channel expression and function are poorly understood. Not all antineoplastic agents directly affect ion channel function, suggesting additional pathways may contribute to the development of CPIN Indeed, there are indications that these drugs may mediate their effects through cellular signaling pathways including second messengers and inflammatory cytokines. Here, we focus on ion channelopathies as causal mechanisms for CPIN and review the data from both pre-clinical animal models and from human studies with the aim of facilitating the development of appropriate strategies to prevent and/or treat CPIN.