The role of multidetector CT in local staging and evaluation of retroperitoneal surgical margin involvement in colon cancer

Evaluation of colon cancer prognostic factors by CT and MRI: an up-to-date review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health concern. Prognostication of CRC traditionally relies on the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging classifications, yet clinical outcomes often vary independently of stage. Despite similarities, rectal and colon cancers are distinct in their diagnostic methodologies and treatments, with MRI and CT scans primarily used for staging rectal and colon cancers, respectively. This paper examines the challenges in accurately assessing prognostic factors of colon cancer such as primary tumor extramural extension, retroperitoneal surgical margin (RSM) involvement, extramural vessel invasion (EMVI), and lymph node metastases through preoperative CT and MRI. It highlights the importance of these factors in risk stratification, treatment decisions, and surgical planning for colon cancer patients. Advancements in imaging techniques are crucial for improving clinical management and optimizing patient outcomes, underscoring the necessity for ongoing research to refine diagnostic methods and incorporate novel findings into practice.

Performance of CT in the locoregional staging of colon cancer: detailed radiology-pathology correlation with special emphasis on tumor deposits, extramural venous invasion and T staging

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of computed tomography (CT) in the local staging of colon cancer in different segments, with emphasis on parameters that have been found to be significant for rectal cancer, namely, extramural venous invasion (EMVI) and tumor deposits (TDs).

METHODS

CT and pathology data from 137 patients were independently reviewed by radiology and pathology teams. The performance of CT in categorizing a given patient into good, versus poor prognostic groups was assessed for each segment, as well as the presence of lymph nodes (LNs), TDs and EMVIs. Discordant cases were re-evaluated to determine potential sources of error. Elastic stain was applied for EMVI discordance.

RESULTS

The T staging accuracy was 80.2%. For T stage stratification, CT performed slightly better in the left colon, and the lowest accuracy was in the transverse colon. Under-staging was more common (in 12.4%), and most of the mis-staged cases were in sigmoid colon. According to the first comprehensive correlative analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT for detecting TDs were found to be 57.9%, 92.4%, 87.6%, respectively. These figures were 44.7%, 72.7%, and 63.5% for LN, and 58.5%, 82.1% and 73% for EMVI. The detection rate was better for multifocal EMVI. The detection rate was also comparable (although substantially underestimated) for LNs, with the half of the LNs missed by CT being < 5 mm. Four patients that were classified as TD by CT, disclosed to be LNs by pathology. Correlative analysis led to refinement of the pathology criteria, with subsequent modifications of the initial reports in 13 (9.5%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Overall, CT performed well in the evaluation of colon cancer, as did TD and EMVI. It is advisable to include these parameters in CT-based staging. Radiologists should be aware of the pitfalls that occur more commonly in different segments.

Small arteriole sign: an imaging feature for staging T4a colon cancer

OBJECTIVES

By analyzing the distribution of existing and newly proposed staging imaging features in pT1-3 and pT4a tumors, we searched for a salient feature and validated its diagnostic performance.

METHODS

Preoperative multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images of the training cohort were retrospectively collected at three centers from January 2016 to December 2017. We used the chi-square test to analyze the distribution of several stage-related imaging features in pT1-3 and pT4a tumors, including small arteriole sign (SAS), outer edge of the intestine, tumor invasion range, and peritumoral adipose tissue. Preoperative multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images of the validation cohort were retrospectively collected at Beijing Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to December 2018. The diagnostic performance of the selected imaging feature, including accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, was validated and compared with the conventional clinical tumor stage (cT) by the McNemar test.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, a total of 268 patients were enrolled, and only SAS was significantly different between pT1-3 and pT4a tumors. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the SAS and conventional cT in differentiating T1-3 and T4a tumors were 94.4%, 81.6%, and 97.3% and 53.7%, 32.7%, and 58.4%, respectively (all p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, a total of 135 patients were collected. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the SAS and the conventional cT were 93.3%, 76.2%, and 96.5% and 62.2%, 38.1%, and 66.7%, respectively (p < 0.001, p = 0.021, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Small arteriole sign positivity, an indirect imaging feature of serosa invasion, may improve the accuracy of identifying T4a colon cancer.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Small arteriole sign helps to distinguish T1-3 and T4a colon cancer and further improves the accuracy of preoperative CT staging of colon cancer.

KEY POINTS

• The accuracy of preoperative CT staging of colon cancer is not ideal, especially for T4a tumors. • Small arteriole sign (SAS) is a newly defined imaging feature that shows the appearance of tumor-supplying arterioles at the site where they penetrate the intestine wall. • SAS is an indirect imaging marker of tumor invasion into the serosa with a great value in distinguishing between T1-3 and T4a colon cancer.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal CT for Locally Advanced Colon Tumors: Can We Really Entrust Certain Decisions to the Reliability of CT?

Many different options of neoadjuvant treatments for advanced colon cancer are emerging. An accurate preoperative staging is crucial to select the most appropriate treatment option. A retrospective study was carried out on a national series of operated patients with T4 tumors. Considering the anatomo-pathological analysis of the surgical specimen as the gold standard, a diagnostic accuracy study was carried out on the variables T and N staging and the presence of peritoneal metastases (M1c). The parameters calculated were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as the overall accuracy. A total of 50 centers participated in the study in which 1950 patients were analyzed. The sensitivity of CT for correct staging of T4 colon tumors was 57%. Regarding N staging, the overall accuracy was 63%, with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 62%; however, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.7 and 0.58, respectively. For the diagnosis of peritoneal metastases, the accuracy was 94.8%, with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 98%; in the case of peritoneal metastases, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 24.4 and 0.61, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CT in the setting of advanced colon cancer still has some shortcomings for accurate diagnosis of stage T4, correct classification of lymph nodes, and preoperative detection of peritoneal metastases.

Preoperative computed tomography assessment of circumferential resection margin in retroperitonealized colon cancer predicts disease-free survival

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to predict circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement on preoperative CT, and prognostic impact of CRM assessment by CT (ctCRM) in patients with retroperitonealized colon cancer.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent resection for ascending or descending colon cancer between July 2010 and February 2013. Positive ctCRM was defined as tumor distance to the retromesenteric plane of ≤ 1 mm. The origin of positive CRM was divided into primary tumor or other tumor components including lymph nodes, tumor deposits, or extramural venous invasions. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperative factors to predict pathologic CRM (pCRM). A Cox proportional hazards model was used in multivariable analysis to determine the preoperative factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients (mean age, 64.0 years ± 11.0 [standard deviation]; 157 men) with retroperitonealized colon cancer were evaluated. Of 274 patients, 67 patients (24.5%) had positive CRM on surgical pathology. The accuracy of preoperative CT in predicting pCRM was 79.6% (218/274). Among preoperative factors, only CRM assessment on CT was independently associated with pCRM (p < 0.001). Positive ctCRM by primary tumor was an independent factor for DFS (HR, 3.362 [1.714-6.593]) and systemic recurrence (HR, 3.715 [1.787-7.724], but not for local recurrence on multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative CT can accurately predict pCRM, and positive ctCRM by primary tumor is an independent risk factor for DFS and systemic recurrence, but not for local recurrence in retroperitonealized colon cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Preoperative CT can predict pathologic circumferential resection margin (CRM) with approximately 80% of accuracy in patients with retroperitonealized colon cancer. • Positive CRM by a primary tumor on preoperative CT is a poor prognostic factor for disease-free survival and systemic recurrence in patients with retroperitonealized colon cancer. • CRM involvement on CT was not associated with local recurrence in patients with retroperitonealized colon cancer.

The usefulness of preoperative CT in colon cancer staging: impact of radiologists' experience

PURPOSE

To assess the agreement between radiologists in the detection of specific features related to T- and N-stage and evaluate accuracy in colon cancer staging.

METHODS

Patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) before surgery were enrolled and evaluated by three radiologists with different experience. Pathological data were used as the reference standard. Tumor location, presence of tumor bulging, fat stranding, lateroconal fascia invasion, enlarged vessels, axial short diameter of the biggest node, shape, enhancement pattern, intranodal necrosis, and cluster were collected. Reliability analysis was performed with κ statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Logistic regressions were used to determine independent predictors associated with staging.

RESULTS

Seventy five patients were evaluated. The reliability analysis was moderate to substantial for tumor location (κ = 0.853), T staging (κ = 0.531), tumor bulging (κ = 0.478), fat stranding (κ = 0.490), lateroconal fascia invasion (κ = 0.436), enlarged vessels (κ = 0.401), the axial short diameter of the biggest node (ICC = 0.732), shape (κ = 0.484), enhancement pattern (κ = 0.431), intranodal necrosis (κ = 0.606), and cluster (κ = 0.358). For all readers, sensitivity was higher for T3 lesions (60-69%) and specificity was higher for T2 and T4 lesions (84.5-90.0% and 82.4-85.1%). The diagnostic accuracy was acceptable for all lesions and among all readers (50.7-92.1%). The lateroconal fascia invasion and enlarged vessels resulted as independent predictor factors (OR = 3.292 and OR = 2.651) for T staging, while nodes' cluster and dimension as independent predictor factors of N staging [OR = 3.798 and OR = 1.083].

CONCLUSION

Reader's experience is one of the most important factors associated with the correct classification of colon cancer. Moreover, CECT can help depict radiological features independently associated with the T and N stages.

Impact of the preoperative clinical N stage on the prognosis of patients with colon cancer

AIM

Although preoperative clinical staging (cStage) is performed for most cancer patients, limited information is currently available on the relationship with postoperative prognosis. We herein investigated the relationship between cStage and prognosis of colon cancer (CC) patients, particularly focusing on the presence or absence of clinical lymph node (LN) metastasis.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study on 840 consecutive patients with colon adenocarcinoma who underwent radical resection at our institution between January 2007 and December 2018. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyse the prognosis of two groups: cN(+)pN(-); a group preoperatively diagnosed with clinical LN metastasis positive, but with no pathological LN metastasis postoperatively, and cN(-)pN(-); a group without clinical and pathological LN metastasis. We also investigated whether a clinical diagnosis is a more accurate prognostic factor than other clinical factors.

RESULTS

Among pN(-) cases, the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower in preoperatively diagnosed cN(+) cases than in cN(-) cases (79.4% vs. 95.6%, 3.04 years vs. 3.85 years, p < 0.01). In a multivariate analysis of various preoperative clinical factors in pStage II cases, including high risk factors for pStage II CC, cN(+) was identified as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.02-4.27, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Preoperatively over-staged cN cases had a poorer prognosis than cases without over-staging, indicating its potential as a prognostic factor. In addition to already known high risk factors in pStage II cases, the preoperative cStage may be an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Accurate staging of non-metastatic colon cancer with CT: the importance of training and practice for experienced radiologists and analysis of incorrectly staged cases

PURPOSE

To investigate whether locoregional staging of colon cancer by experienced radiologists can be improved by training and feedback to minimize the risk of over-staging into the context of patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy and to identify potential pitfalls of CT staging by characterizing pathologic traits of tumors that remain challenging for radiologists.

METHODS

Forty-five cases of stage I-III colon cancer were included in this retrospective study. Five experienced radiologists evaluated the CTs; 5 baseline scans followed by 4 sequential batches of 10 scans. All radiologists were trained after baseline scoring and 2 radiologists received feedback. The learning curve, diagnostic performance, reader confidence, and reading time were evaluated with pathologic staging as reference. Pathology reports and H&E slides of challenging cases were reviewed to identify potential pitfalls.

RESULTS

Diagnostic performance in distinguishing T1-2 vs. T3-4 improved significantly after training and with increasing number of reviewed cases. Inaccurate staging was more frequently related to under-staging rather than over-staging. Risk of over-staging was minimized to 7% in batch 3-4. N-staging remained unreliable with an overall accuracy of 61%. Pathologic review identified two tumor characteristics causing under-staging for T-stage in 5/7 cases: (1) very limited invasive part beyond the muscularis propria and (2) mucinous composition of the invading part.

CONCLUSION

The high accuracy and specificity of T-staging reached in our study indicate that sufficient training and practice of experienced radiologists can ensure high validity for CT staging in colon cancer to safely use neoadjuvant therapy without significant risk of over-treatment, while N-staging remained unreliable.

Comparison of the practicability of ultrasound and spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of colon cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is a common malignant tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, a clear diagnosis is particularly important for the treatment of colon cancer. Ultrasound and spiral computed tomography (CT) can both be used in the diagnosis, but each has its own advantages and disadvantages, which could cause confusion in clinical choice. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the practicability of spiral CT and ultrasound in the diagnosis of colon cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed by retrieving on English databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library) and Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, Weipu [VIP], CBM). Besides, manually search for Google and Baidu academic of diagnostic experimental study of ultrasound and spiral CT in the diagnosis of Colon Cancer. The retrieval time limit was from the establishment of the database to October 2020. Two researchers independently extracted and evaluated the quality of the data in the included study. A meta-analysis was performed using Meta Disc1.4 and RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, positive Likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were used to determine the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography and helical CT in colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will compare the practicability of CT and ultrasound in the diagnosis of colon cancer and provide reliable evidence-based basis for clinicians to choose the appropriate or best evidence-based basis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The private information from individuals will not be published. This systematic review also will not involve endangering participant rights. Ethical approval is not required. The results may be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated in relevant conferences.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/WAJHQ.

[Preoperative imaging for colorectal cancer: surgeons' perspective]

Preoperative radiological diagnostics in patients with colorectal cancer has several objectives. The diagnostic localization of the colonic tumor is essential for planning the resection. The radiologically suspected infiltration of neighboring structures may lead to the decision for neoadjuvant treatment. In patients with rectal carcinomas, the T and N stages, the distance to the circumference resection margin (CRM), and the penetration of the tumor into the mesentery must be determined. This crucial to determine whether the patient should undergo neoadjuvant treatment. Prior to the planned relocation of an upstream stoma, radiological diagnostics may be added to clinical and endoscopic assessment but should not be routinely used.

CT Colonography in Preoperative Staging of Colon Cancer: Evaluation of FOxTROT Inclusion Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of and interreader agreement for CT colonography (CTC) in the local staging of colon cancer, with emphasis given to the FOxTROT (Fluoropyrimidine, Oxaliplatin, and Targeted-Receptor pre-Operative Therapy [Panitumumab]) trial inclusion criteria, which propose a new tailored treatment paradigm for colon cancer that uses neoadjuvant therapy for patients with a high-risk of locoregional disease as determined by imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This biinstitutional retrospective study involved 89 patients (with 93 tumors) who had colon cancer and underwent presurgical CTC. Two radiologists reviewed the CTC studies for local staging, including measurement of the tumor beyond the muscularis propria on a true orthogonal plane. Histopathologic findings for surgical colectomy specimens served as the reference standard for local pathologic staging. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for local determination of the T category, N category, and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) were calculated separately for each reader. High-risk T category tumors were the same as those as used in the FOxTROT trial. Interreader agreement was assessed using the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

Thirty-five of 93 tumors (37.6%) were histologically classified as high-risk tumors (T3c, T3d, or T4 tumors). The interreader agreement was substantial (κ = 0.68) for classifying high-risk tumors with the use of CTC, moderate for differentiating N0 from N1 and N2 (κ = 0.44), and slight for detecting EMVI (κ = 0.15). The diagnostic statistics for CTC for the two readers were as follows: for detection of high-risk tumors, sensitivity was 65.7% and 82.9%, and specificity was 81.0% and 87.9%; for detection of N category-positive disease, sensitivity was 50.9% and 69.8%, and specificity was 50.0% and 72.5%; and for detection of EMVI, sensitivity was 18.2% and 66.7%, and specificity was 60.0% and 91.7%.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that CTC might be a feasible imaging modality for preoperative local staging of higher-risk colon cancers for which neoadjuvant chemotherapy is more suitable on the basis of the FOxTROT trial criteria. However, further studies are required to allow a better generalization of our results.

Colorectal Cancer:: Imaging Conundrums

Progressive technological advancements in imaging have significantly improved the preoperative sensitivity for the detection of very small foci of regionally- or hematogenously-metastatic colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, this information has not translated to continued linear gains in patient survival, and might even result in the false-positive upstaging of some cases: these are two conundrums in the imaging of colorectal cancer. Both conundrums might be resolved by the widespread use of real-time imaging guidance during operative procedures. This might open the way for the widespread use of fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for the initial staging of patients with colorectal cancer.