Single-stage endovascular treatment in patients with severe extracranial large vessel stenosis and concomitant ipsilateral unruptured intracranial aneurysm

Surgical Management of Ipsilateral Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Case Review and Treatment Considerations

Introduction  The coexistence of carotid artery stenosis and a concomitant downstream ipsilateral unruptured intracranial aneurysm requires unique treatment considerations to balance the risk of thromboembolic complications from carotid artery stenosis and the risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage from intracranial aneurysm rupture. These considerations include the selection of optimal treatment modalities, the order and timing of interventions, and potential management of antiplatelet agents with endovascular approaches. We present strategies to optimize treatment in such a case. Case Report  We discuss the case of a 69-year-old woman with 90% stenosis of the right internal carotid artery and an ipsilateral, wide-necked, 4.8-mm, irregular-appearing right A1-2 junction aneurysm with an associated daughter sac. Open, endovascular, and mixed treatment strategies were considered. The patient selected and underwent a staged, open treatment approach with a carotid endarterectomy followed by a right craniotomy for microsurgical clipping of the aneurysm 5 days later. Both procedures were performed on daily full-dose aspirin without complications. On follow-up, the right carotid artery was widely patent, the aneurysm was secured, and the patient remained at her neurologic baseline. Discussion  The presented strategy for ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis and an unruptured intracranial aneurysm initially optimized cerebral perfusion to mitigate ischemic risks while permitting timely aneurysm intervention without a need for dual antiplatelet therapy or to traverse an earlier procedure site.

Single-Stage Endovascular Treatment of Severe Cranial Artery Stenosis Coexisted With Ipsilateral Distal Tandem Intracranial Aneurysm

Objective

The coexistence of severe cranial artery stenosis and ipsilateral distal tandem intracranial aneurysm is an unusual phenomenon. Currently, there is no consensus to provide treatment guidelines for concomitant lesions. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of single-stage endovascular treatment in patients under this special condition.

Methods

We illustrated a case series of 10 patients with the coexistence of severe cranial artery stenosis and ipsilateral distal tandem intracranial aneurysm in our hospital. And a systematic PubMed search of English-language literature published between 1990 and 2021 was carried out using the keywords: “(carotid OR vertebral OR subclavian artery stenosis) AND (aneurysm) AND (coincident OR coexist OR concomitant OR simultaneous OR ipsilateral).” Clinical information, including age, gender of the patients, as well as symptoms (artery stenosis or aneurysm), localization of artery stenosis and aneurysm, treatment, and outcome, were collected and analyzed.

Results

In the majority of the patients, symptoms were attributed to severe artery stenosis, and the coexisted lesions were located in the anterior circulation system. Most patients achieved an excellent clinical outcome, and no death was observed. No differences were found in a prognosis between single-stage or multiple-stage endovascular treatment.

Conclusions

A single-stage endovascular procedure is technically feasible and effective to treat the coexistence of severe cranial artery stenosis and ipsilateral distal tandem intracranial aneurysm in the anterior circulation as well as in the posterior circulation.

[Treatment of patients with a cerebral arterial aneurysm and stenosis of the internal carotid artery]

AIM

The purpose of this study was to analyse the world literature dedicated to the problem concerning treatment of a combination of internal carotid artery stenosis at the extracranial level and an arterial aneurysm of the brain, as well as to demonstrate own results of surgical treatment of patients presenting with this concomitant pathology of the carotid basin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2013 to 2019, a clinical course of combined pathology of the basin of the internal carotid artery (an intracranial aneurysm and stenosis of the internal carotid artery at the extracranial level) was revealed in 35 of 1638 examined patients. There were ten men and 25 women, with a mean age of 66±7 years. In all the 35 patients, intracranial aneurysms appeared to be asymptomatic and were revealed during diagnosis of an atherosclerotic lesion of the internal carotid artery. Fifteen (43%) of the 35 patients were operated on. A two-stage surgical approach was used in 2 patients with ipsilateral location of the cerebral aneurysm and stenosis of the internal carotid artery: the first stage consisted in clipping of the arterial aneurysm, with stage 2 being carotid endarterectomy. A vascular stage alone (carotid endarterectomy or stenting of the internal carotid artery) was carried out in 9 patients, with a neurosurgical stage alone (clipping of the aneurysm) in 4 patients.

RESULTS

The incidence of internal carotid artery stenosis with an arterial cerebral aneurysm, according to our findings, amounted to 2.1%. In the group of surgical treatment, in 1 case (6.7%) after stenting of the symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery a female patient with an ipsilateral asymptomatic aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery intraoperatively developed 'minor' ischaemic stroke. Neither perioperative aneurysmal ruptures nor lethal outcomes were observed in the group of patients subjected to surgical interventions.

CONCLUSION

An individual tactical approach to patients presenting with a combination of a cerebral aneurysm and internal carotid artery stenosis at the extracranial level made it possible at this stage of the work to avoid both intracranial haemorrhagic complications and lethal outcomes. The frequency of perioperative ischaemic cerebral events amounted to 6.7%. Further collection of the clinical material is needed to work out an optimal surgical policy in a combined lesion of the extra- and intracranial basin of the internal carotid artery.

Endovascular treatment of patient with multiple extracranial large vessel stenosis and coexistent unruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysm using a WEB device and Szabo-technique

The coexistence of severe extracranial large vessel stenosis and unruptured intracranial aneurysms is not rare. There are different treatment approaches for these conditions, such as initial treatment of the aneurysm before revascularization of the stenosis; single-stage endovascular treatment of both lesions; stenosis eliminating followed by treatment of the aneurysm, or without treating the aneurysm. But, taking into account the risk of aneurysm rupture on the one hand and the risk of ischemic stroke on the other, it is sometimes difficult to choose the right management strategy. Despite this fact, there are still no guidelines or consensus on the management of these coexistent lesions. The article describes a clinical case of endovascular treatment of multiple extracranial stenosis and coexistent unruptured wide-neck aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery. The endovascular treatment of the carotid stenosis and aneurysm using a woven endobridge device was performed in one session; endovascular treatment of vertebral artery stenosis with Szabo technique was performed in another session.

Three-Month Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with/without Coexistent Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients having carotid stenosis with coexistent unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is rarely reported. Thus, we studied the 3-month outcome of CAS in the presence of coexistent UIAs in our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients receiving CAS at our institution from September 2011 to December 2019 was carried out. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: group of CAS with UIAs (CAS-UIA) and group of CAS without UIAs (CAS). The main complications within 3 months after stenting were TIA, ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), rupture of UIAs, and death. The baseline characteristics and complications of the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-six patients (CAS, n = 468; CAS-UIA, n = 88) were included and 604 stenting procedures were performed. More patients had hypertension in the CAS-UIA group (87.5 vs. 73.7%, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in TIAs, ischemic stroke, sICH, and death within 3 months after stenting between the CAS and CAS-UIA groups. None of the 113 coexistent UIAs detected in 88 patients had aneurysm rupture within 3 months after CAS.

CONCLUSIONS

In our large cohort of CAS patients, coexistent UIAs are not uncommon. Stenting of a carotid artery in the presence of coexistent UIAs could be conducted safely. Together with 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy, CAS did not increase the rupture risk of the coexistent UIAs within 3 months.

Simultaneous internal carotid artery stenosis and ipsilateral anterior communicating artery saccular aneurysm treatment: a case report

The presence of ipsilateral aneurysm in the stenosis of the internal carotid artery is determined by computed tomography angiography in 1.8%-3.2% of cases. The literature describes the most varied options for treating this pathology: isolated or alternate, and now the method of simultaneous endovascular treatment - carotid stenting and endovascular embolization of aneurysm - is gaining popularity. We presented a clinical case of treatment of 61 women with critical stenosis (90%) and tortuosity of the internal carotid artery in combination with ipsilateral saccular aneurysm of the anterior connecting artery. The uniqueness of this case lies in the fact that a hybrid approach has been applied in the treatment of pathology, not previously described in the literature. The case is highlighting the potential complexity of concomitant vascular cervical and cerebral pathology and the necessity of surgical and endovascular team interactions to choose the appropriate methods of treatment.

[Hibrid intervention for internal carotid artery stenosis and ipsilateral aneurysm of anterior communicating artery]

The presence of an ipsilateral aneurysm in stenosis of the internal carotid artery is determined by the findings of CT angiography in 1.8-3.2% of cases. The available literature has described a wide variety of treatment for this pathology: isolated or alternate, with a method of simultaneous endovascular treatment, i. e., carotid stenting and endovascular embolization of an aneurysm, currently gaining popularity. The major difficulties associated with therapeutic decision-making in this cohort of patients include stage-wise nature, temporal parameters, the need for removal of an intracranial aneurysm, and assessment of perioperative complications. A clinical case report presented herein is an example of a method of a hybrid approach, i. e., simultaneously performing carotid endarterectomy and endovascular embolization of an aneurysm. In certain cases (anatomical variants, structure of an atherosclerotic plaque, individual peculiarities), this approach is more justified than popularity-gaining simultaneous endovascular treatment.

Simultaneous Endovascular Treatment of Tandem Internal Carotid Lesions

The incidence of concomitant extracranial carotid artery stenosis and ipsilateral intracranial carotid aneurysm has been reported to vary between 2.8% and 5%. These complex lesions may present a challenge for treatment decision-making. This case report describes an asymptomatic male patient with severe carotid bifurcation stenosis, coupled with an unruptured supraclinoid internal carotid aneurysm. Both lesions were treated simultaneously. Patient underwent carotid stenting followed by aneurysm coiling in the same setting without any complication.