A pictorial review on clinicopathologic and radiologic features of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms on enhanced CT: establishing a diagnostic model with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the non-ampullary area and analyzing the value of predicting prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To identify CT features and establish a diagnostic model for distinguishing non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNENs) from non-ampullary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (dGISTs) and to analyze overall survival outcomes of all dNENs patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 98 patients with pathologically confirmed dNENs (n = 44) and dGISTs (n = 54). Clinical data and CT characteristics were collected. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors and establish a diagnostic model between non-ampullary dNENs (n = 22) and dGISTs (n = 54). The ROC curve was created to determine diagnostic ability. Cox proportional hazards models were created and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed for survival analysis of dNENs (n = 44).

RESULTS

Three CT features were identified as independent predictors of non-ampullary dNENs, including intraluminal growth pattern (OR 0.450; 95% CI 0.206-0.983), absence of intratumoral vessels (OR 0.207; 95% CI 0.053-0.807) and unenhanced lesion > 40.76 HU (OR 5.720; 95% CI 1.575-20.774). The AUC was 0.866 (95% CI 0.765-0.968), with a sensitivity of 90.91% (95% CI 70.8-98.9%), specificity of 77.78% (95% CI 64.4-88.0%), and total accuracy rate of 81.58%. Lymph node metastases (HR: 21.60), obstructive biliary and/or pancreatic duct dilation (HR: 5.82) and portal lesion enhancement ≤ 99.79 HU (HR: 3.02) were independent prognostic factors related to poor outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We established a diagnostic model to differentiate non-ampullary dNENs from dGISTs. Besides, we found that imaging features on enhanced CT can predict OS of patients with dNENs.

Imaging spectrum of non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions of the duodenum: a pictorial review

Given its crucial location at the crossroads of the gastrointestinal tract, the hepatobiliary system and the splanchnic vessels, the duodenum can be affected by a wide spectrum of abnormalities. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, in conjunction with endoscopy, are often performed to evaluate these conditions, and several duodenal pathologies can be identified on fluoroscopic studies. Since many conditions affecting this organ are asymptomatic, the role of imaging cannot be overemphasized. In this article we will review the imaging features of many conditions affecting the duodenum, focusing on cross-sectional imaging studies, including congenital malformations, such as annular pancreas and intestinal malrotation; vascular pathologies, such as superior mesenteric artery syndrome; inflammatory and infectious conditions; trauma; neoplasms and iatrogenic complications. Because of the complexity of the duodenum, familiarity with the duodenal anatomy and physiology as well as the imaging features of the plethora of conditions affecting this organ is crucial to differentiate those conditions that could be managed medically from the ones that require intervention.

Investigation of the factors influencing surgical treatment of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (DGIST) is a rare tumor with a specific anatomic site and biological characteristics. As the incidence of lymph node metastasis is very low, the main treatment method is surgery. Two main surgical techniques (local resection and Whipple) are performed in patients with DGISTs. The critical question is which surgical technique to choose.

AIM

To identify factors influencing the choice of surgery for DGISTs.

METHODS

The clinicopathological data of patients with DGISTs who underwent surgery between January 1999 and January 2021 were analyzed. We used the Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test and the χ² test or Fisher’s exact test to determine the differences between the two groups of patients. Furthermore, we used logistic analysis to identify the relevant factors and independent factors related to the type of surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the patient’s survival information and Cox regression analysis was performed to determine prognostic risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 86 patients were analyzed, including 43 men (50%) and 43 women (50%). We divided the patients into two groups based on surgical technique (local resection or Whipple surgery). There were no differences in the age, mitotic figures, and complications between the two groups; however, the tumor size, tumor location, risk grade, postoperative hospital stay, and abdominal drainage time were significantly different. Based on univariate logistic analysis, the Whipple procedure was chosen if the tumor size was ≥ 5.0 cm, the tumor was located in the descending part of the duodenum, or the risk grade was medium or high. In our research, the five-year overall survival rate of patients was more than 90%. We also describe two DGIST patients with liver metastases at first diagnosis and analyzed their management in order to provide advice on complicated cases.

CONCLUSION

The Whipple procedure was performed if the primary tumor was in the descending part of the duodenum, tumor size was ≥ 5.0 cm, or the tumor risk grade was medium or high.