Parents' View on Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation in Children with Auditory Neuropathy

Cochlear Implantation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients: Speech Perception and Quality of Life

OBJECTIVES

There is a limited understanding of the impact of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), given the scarcity of reported cases. We aim to evaluate the audiological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after CI in CMT.

METHODS

Multi-institutional, university-affiliated, tertiary-referral centers, retrospective chart review.Our cohort includes 5 patients with CMT. Patients' charts were reviewed for demographic characteristics, operation notes, and pre- and post-implantation audiology evaluation. Patients completed the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global questionnaire.

RESULTS

Pre-implantation, the mean pure tone average was 84.1 ± 7.2 dB, and the mean word recognition score was 2.4% in the implanted ear. AzBio sentence test was performed in quiet, revealing a mean of 4 ± 1.4% in the implanted ear. Post-implantation, PTA results were all within the mild hearing loss range (mean 33.0 ± 5.9 dB). Post-CI, AZ-Bio test results were 5%, 65%, and 74% (for 3 patients), and HINT scores were 55% and 58% (for 2 patients). The mean score of the CIQOL-10 questionnaire was 42.7 ± 10.47 (range 1-100). Patients were most satisfied with their ability to listen to the television or radio, have conversations in a quiet environment, and feel comfortable being themselves.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the most extensive series of CI in CMT-associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy. Our cohort suggests that CI is a safe and reliable method for hearing rehabilitation that can achieve good speech performance and improve QoL in CMT patients.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes: Quality of Life in Prelingually Deafened, Late-Implanted Patients

AIMS

Reevaluating and expanding cochlear implantation's (CI) indication while measuring the quality of life (QoL) outcomes regarding the parent's point of view of prelingually deafened, late-implanted patients, which are widely known to showcases a limited improvement in speech recognition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective descriptive and analytic study to assess QoL outcomes from CI in 64 early deafened, late-implanted patients, according to their parent's perspective, between January 2009 and December 2019, using the Nottingham Pediatric Cochlear Implant Program (Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom) "Children with cochlear implantation: parents perspective."

RESULTS

The most represented age interval is the 5 and 7 interval and the mean age is 10.09 years. There was no sex predominance, with rural origin and high school academicals level preponderance. Fourteen children had experienced neonatal icterus, eight had meningitis, and seven were the result of related marriage. The age of the first consultation was typically over 2 years old, with only 45 schooled children. Age had a significantly statistic correlation between Self-reliance and Well-being and happiness subscales. History of receiving aid and speech therapy has a clear correlation with Self-reliance, Well-being and happiness, and Communication and Education. Schooling statuses, sex, age of appearance, and communication mode were not correlated to any subscale score, and with the exception of Effect of implantation, all the other "Children with cochlear implantation: parent's perspective" subscales were intercorrelated.

CONCLUSION

Properly validated QoL assessments for CI are a must, as outcomes of CI expand beyond audiometric performances to include the improvement of QoL.

Perceived benefits of cochlear implants by parents: expectations, decision-making process, and barriers to care

BACKGROUND

Identifying predictive factors of the cochlear implant outcomes in pediatric patients is critical in guiding tailored rehabilitation programs. The study aimed to assess cochlear implant outcomes, identify predictors, and highlight decision-making factors and barriers to quality care.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included parents of children who received unilateral cochlear implants for bilateral severe- to- deep sensorineural hearing loss. Inclusion criteria were age ≤ 5 years and intelligence quotient (IQ) Scores ≥ 85, A pre-designed structured questionnaire was used to collect data from parents/guardians of the children attending follow-up. The Arabic validated Glasgow Children Benefit Inventory score was used to assess the health-related quality of life (QOL) after intervention.

RESULTS

The quality of life (QOL) score (outcome) after surgery was positive in all cases. Multivariate analysis showed that the site of operation (Bahtim hospital and Ain Shams Hospital [AOR(95% confidence interval CI), 5.7 (1.4-23), 5 (1.4-17.9), p = 0.015, 0.013, respectively]), education of the father (university/postgraduate [AOR (95% CI): 5 (1.4-17.9), p = 0.013]), the parents' expectation that their child would be able to participate in regular classroom activities [AOR (95% CI): 8.9 (3.7-21.3), p < 0.001], and history of Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), perinatal hypoxia, and low birth weight [AOR (95% CI): 2.5 (1.2-5.1), 3.7 (1.7-8.1), 4.7 (2.1-10.5), p = 0.013, 0.001, ≤ 0.001, respectively] are significant independent predictors of good outcome.

CONCLUSION

All parents expressed a positive change in their child's QOL. Almost all parents of children with cochlear implants face many barriers in obtaining quality healthcare services for their children. Parents, especially those with lower schooling, should receive good counselling to increase their confidence in their children's capabilities and maximize benefits of regular follow-up. Improving the quality of healthcare centers is recommended.

Parent-reported quality of life in children with cochlear implants differs across countries

Pediatric cochlear implantation affects communication skills and quality of life, specifically how children interact with others and feel about themselves. Numerous studies worldwide examine well-being among pediatric cochlear implant users, but none to date compare condition-specific quality of life across countries. This retrospective study compares parent-reported cochlear implant-specific quality of life summary data across 14 published studies spanning 11 countries and 9 languages. Sample size ranged from 7 to 370 participants, and children across studies varied in mean chronologic age (3.1–12.2 years), implantation age (1.5–4.6 years), and cochlear implant experience (1.3–8.2 years). Parents completed the Children with Cochlear Implants: Parental Perspectives (CCIPP) questionnaire, an instrument assessing parent-reported cochlear implant-specific quality of life, in their home language. Analysis of variance tests were run for each CCIPP subscale across studies using summary data to determine significant differences between published manuscripts. Across countries, parents of children with cochlear implants appraise communication, social relations, and self-reliance most positively, and the effects of implantation and supporting the child least positively. Cross-country analyses revealed a significant effect of study (country) on quality of life ratings in each domain, with the largest differences in the communication domain. Limited access to implant-related accommodations, cultural awareness of hearing loss, and varying parent expectations may explain country differences in parental ratings of quality of life. Culturally sensitive psychoeducation for the entire family may foster improved life satisfaction for pediatric cochlear implant users and their families.