1
|
Scholl Schell M, Xavier de Araujo F, Silva MF. Physiotherapy assessment and treatment of patients with tibial external fixator: a systematic scoping review. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:1673-1684. [PMID: 37118977 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2202419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To map evidence regarding physiotherapy assessment and treatment of patients with tibial external fixator (EF), and to point out literature gaps for further research. METHODS Systematic scoping review conducted in four databases. We included both experimental and non-experimental studies involving patients with tibial EF and outcomes of interest. We recorded study design, population, sample size, sample age, reason for EF use, type of surgery, type of EF used, instruments used for assessing function, pain, quality of life, satisfaction, psychosocial aspects, and physiotherapy treatment descriptions from included studies. We categorised data accordingly to outcomes assessed and physiotherapy treatments description. RESULTS Eighty-six studies were included involving 3070 patients. Causes of fixator use were traumatic conditions, acquired and congenital deformities, and non-traumatic conditions, like compartmental osteoarthritis. Function was assessed in about three-quarters of included studies, though other outcomes were not presented in most studies. Only one study described satisfactorily the physiotherapy treatment. Almost half of the studies did not provide any description of the rehabilitation process. CONCLUSIONS There is little evidence about the assessment of function, pain, quality of life, satisfaction, psychosocial aspects, and other outcomes in tibial EF patients. Physiotherapy treatment in these patients is poorly reported.Protocol registration: Open Science Framework: doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/UT2DA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio Scholl Schell
- Physiotherapy Department, Post Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Marcelo Faria Silva
- Physiotherapy Department, Post Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e32501. [PMID: 36654595 PMCID: PMC9840411 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia, also known as CPT, is a rare bone disease mostly occurring in the pediatric age group of 10. The case generally represents anterolateral bowing of the tibia with refractures. This condition is quite rare and has very few cases per year. CPT is still a challenging concern in orthopedics. Bone reunion often requires repeated surgical measurements. With advancements, we have new treatment plans that include induced membrane techniques and bone marrow stromal cell grafts of various induced and morphogenetic protein, which still requires confirmation. Different treatment strategies based on surgical, mechanical, and biological concepts have been shown with varying success rates. Ilizarov technique and vascularised fibular grafts have vastly increased the effectiveness in treating CPT of the tibia. Constant and recurrent refracture, residual deformities, and difficulty obtaining bone union remain the challenges in managing CPT. Hence, phasing CPT as bowing the tibia in an anterolateral fashion is more appropriate because it's a heterogeneous entity with varying prognoses.
Collapse
|
3
|
Siebert MJ, Makarewich CA. Anterolateral Tibial Bowing and Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia: Current Concept Review and Future Directions. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2022; 15:438-446. [PMID: 35841513 PMCID: PMC9789274 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-022-09779-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) is a rare condition closely associated with neurofibromatosis type I. Affected children are born with anterolateral bowing of the tibia which progresses to pathologic fracture, pseudarthrosis, and high risk of refracture even after initial union has been attained. There is currently no consensus on the classification of this disease or consensus on its treatment. The purpose of this review is to (1) review the clinical presentation, etiology, epidemiology, classification, and natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia and (2) review the existing trends in treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia and its associated complications. RECENT FINDINGS Current treatment protocols focus primarily on combining intramedullary fixation with external or internal fixation to achieve union rates between 74 and 100%. Intramedullary devices should be retained as long as possible to prevent refracture. Cross-union techniques, though technically difficult, have a reported union rate of 100% and no refractures at mid- to long-term follow-up. Vascularized fibular grafting and induced membrane technique can be successful, but at the cost of numerous surgical procedures. Growth modulation is a promising new approach to preventing fracture altogether, though further study with larger patient series is necessary. The primary consideration in treatment of CPT is expected union rate and refracture risk. Combined intramedullary and external or internal fixation, especially with cross-union techniques, show most promise. Perhaps most exciting is further research on preventing fracture through guided growth, which may reduce the morbidity of multiple surgical procedures which have been the mainstay of treatment for CPT thus far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Siebert
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Christopher A Makarewich
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
- Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Shriners Children's, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borzunov DY, Kolchin SN, Mokhovikov DS, Malkova TA. Ilizarov bone transport combined with the Masquelet technique for bone defects of various etiologies (preliminary results). World J Orthop 2022; 13:278-288. [PMID: 35317249 PMCID: PMC8935333 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Ilizarov bone transport (IBT) and the Masquelet induced membrane technique (IMT) have specific merits and shortcomings, but numerous studies have shown their efficacy in the management of extensive long-bone defects of various etiologies, including congenital deficiencies. Combining their strong benefits seems a promising strategy to enhance bone regeneration and reduce the risk of refractures in the management of post-traumatic and congenital defects and nonunion that failed to respond to other treatments.
AIM To combine IBT and IMT for the management of severe tibial defects and pseudarthrosis, and present preliminary results of this technological solution.
METHODS Seven adults with post-traumatic tibial defects (subgroup A) and nine children (subgroup B) with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) were treated with the combination of IMT and IBT after the failure of previous treatments. The mean number of previous surgeries was 2.0 ± 0.2 in subgroup A and 3.3 ± 0.7 in subgroup B. Step 1 included Ilizarov frame placement and spacer introduction into the defect to generate the induced membrane which remained in the interfragmental gap after spacer removal. Step 2 was an osteotomy and bone transport of the fragment through the tunnel in the induced membrane, its compression and docking for consolidation without grafting. The outcomes were retrospectively studied after a mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 2.7 mo in subgroup A and 25.3 ± 2.3 mo in subgroup B.
RESULTS The “true defect” after resection was 13.3 ± 1.7% in subgroup A and 31.0 ± 3.0% in subgroup B relative to the contralateral limb. Upon completion of treatment, defects were filled by 75.4 ± 10.6% and 34.6 ± 4.2%, respectively. Total duration of external fixation was 397 ± 9.2 and 270.1 ± 16.3 d, including spacer retention time of 42.4 ± 4.5 and 55.8 ± 6.6 d, in subgroups A and B, respectively. Bone infection was not observed. Postoperative complications were several cases of pin-tract infection and regenerate deformity in both subgroups. Ischemic regeneration was observed in two cases of subgroup B. Complications were corrected during the course of treatment. Bone union was achieved in all patients of subgroup A and in seven patients of subgroup B. One non-united CPT case was further treated with the Ilizarov compression method only and achieved union. After a follow-up period of two to three years, refractures occurred in four cases of united CPT.
CONCLUSION The combination of IMT and IBT provides good outcomes in post-traumatic tibial defects after previous treatment failure but external fixation is longer due to spacer retention. Refractures may occur in severe CPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry Y Borzunov
- Department of Taumatology and Orthopedics, Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg 620109, Russia
| | - Sergey N Kolchin
- Orthopaedic Department 4, Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan 640014, Russia
| | - Denis S Mokhovikov
- Orthopaedic Department 4, Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan 640014, Russia
| | - Tatiana A Malkova
- Department of Medical Information and Analysis, Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan 640014, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Surgical treatment options for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia in children: cross-union versus other options: a systematic review. J Pediatr Orthop B 2022; 31:139-149. [PMID: 35102104 DOI: 10.1097/bpb.0000000000000924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive update on various surgical treatment options for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia (CPT) in children and the outcome achieved in terms of union, union time and complications of non-union and refracture. A literature search was performed in PubMed (including Medline) database for broad keywords: 'Congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia and children'. Studies selected included full-text articles on surgical treatments of CPT following: intra-medullary rod (IMR)/Ilizarov/combined IMR with Ilizarov/vascularized fibular graft (VFG) and cross-union. Out of 719 studies, 57(1227 CPT patients/1235 tibias) were included for review. Cross-union group had 100% union rate with no non-unions, least refracture rate (22.5%) and minimal time to primary union (4.5 months). For IMR, Ilizarov, combined IMR with Ilizarov and VFG, the respective results were as follows: primary union rates - 67.7, 84.2, 83.7 and 65.3%; final union - 76.5, 81.5, 92.4 and 87.1%; primary union time - 12.6, 9.3, 5.3 and 9.5 months; non-union rates - 17.0, 13.6, 6.0 and 7.9%; refracture rates - 48.1, 47.7, 33.7 and 34.6%. The success probability was lowest for IMR (35.2%), 44% for Ilizarov, 55.5% for combined IMR with Ilizarov, 42.7% for VFG and highest 77.5% for cross-union group. Outcomes of the more recent cross-union technique fare better than other surgical methods. However, studies on cross-union are few and longer follow-up is lacking. Combined IMR with Ilizarov and VFG have better results compared to IMR or Ilizarov alone.
Collapse
|
6
|
Georgiadis AG, Morrison SG, Dahl MT. What's New in Limb Lengthening and Deformity Correction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:1467-1472. [PMID: 34156990 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew G Georgiadis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St. Paul, Minnesota.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Stewart G Morrison
- The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark T Dahl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St. Paul, Minnesota.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang X, Shi L, Zhang R, Wang W, Wang F, Wang M, Xu Z, Zuo R, Xu J, Kang Q. Efficacy of the "Eiffel tower" double titanium elastic nailing in combined management of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: preliminary outcomes of 17 cases with review of literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:490. [PMID: 34049518 PMCID: PMC8162002 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04382-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Difficulty in obtaining union, recurrent fractures, and residual deformities remain the problems challenging the management of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT). We applied the “Eiffel Tower” double titanium elastic nails (TENs) in the existing combined approach, which takes advantages of TEN’s mechanical stability with the protection against refracture, Ilizarov’s high fusion rate with alignment control and the biologic environment provided by bone grafting for bony union. The results of this procedure are presented and discussed. Methods Seventeen patients with CPT treated by combined surgery including pseudarthrosis resection, the “Eiffel Tower” double TENs technique, autogenous iliac bone grafting, and Ilizarov fixation between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively investigated. Signs of bone union, limb length discrepancy (LLD), rate of refracture, and degree of residual deformities were reviewed. The AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot scale and measurement of ankle motion were used to evaluate ankle function. The mean follow-up time was 40.5 (11 to 91) months. Results The mean age at index surgery was 6.2 (2.5 to 15) years. Union of the pseudarthrosis was achieved in 100% of cases. Among them, 15 (88.2%) patients obtained union of the pseudarthrosis on the first attempt (primary union). The average time to primary union was 3.8 (2 to 6) months. The rest 2 cases achieved union after additional surgeries (secondary union). In terms of complications, refracture occurred in 2 patients (11.8%) and 4 patients (23.5%) developed pin infection. The mean limb length discrepancy at the final follow up was 33.4 (6–141) mm. The average AOFAS score improved from 38.2 (27 to 51) pre-operatively to 77 (63 to 87) post-operatively (p < 0.01). Conclusions The “Eiffel Tower” double TENs technique is an ideal intramedullary fixation method in the surgical treatment of CPT. The combination of TENs technique with bone grafting and Ilizarov fixation has the advantages of early bone union, less injury on metaphysis, and early functional recovery. Level of evidence Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Li Shi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Wenbo Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Mengwei Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Ze Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Rongtai Zuo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Jia Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
| | - Qinglin Kang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
| |
Collapse
|