Effect of the afterloaded external guidance embryo transfer technique on pregnancy rates in single embryo transfer cycles

The impact of difficult embryo transfer on the success of IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The procedure of embryo transfer (ET) must be as gentle as possible since any traumatism may cause uterine contractility that interferes with the implantation. However, this ideal conduct is not always possible, and additional measures may be necessary (difficult ET). Different studies have evaluated the impact of difficult ET on the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), but results were not univocal. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to provide a precise estimate of the possible detrimental effects of difficult ET on CPR. The study protocol was registered online (PROSPERO number: CRD42023387197). An electronic database search was performed to identify articles published until September 2022. The primary outcome was CPR. Fifteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Difficult ET significantly reduced the CPR (OR 0.70; 95%CI: 0.64-0.76; p < 0.0001. All pre-planned subgroup analyses according to study design (retrospective vs prospective studies), historical period (studies published before and after 2010), type of catheter, frequency of difficult cases (> or < 19%) and pregnancy rate (> or < 38%) confirmed the significant association. Difficult ET is associated with a significant reduction of CPR. Further studies are warranted to understand how to prevent or manage this common clinical situation.

Steps forward in embryo transfer technique: a retrospective study comparing direct versus afterload catheters at different time frames

PURPOSE

To assess whether embryo transfer (ET) technique can influence the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and its correlation with the embryo transfer difficulty.

DESIGN

This single center retrospective cohort analysis of fresh and frozen single blastocyst transfers performed between January 2016 and December 2021 included fresh and frozen single blastocyst transfers performed during the study timeframe. Direct technique was the only one used from January 2016 to September 2017. From September 2017 to March 2019, the choice between the two techniques was given by randomization, due to a clinical trial recruitment. From April 2019, only the afterload technique was used. Preimplantation genetic testing cycles and gamete donation procedures and cycles performed with external gametes or embryos were excluded. CPR was the primary outcome, while difficult transfer rate the secondary one. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed.

RESULTS

During the period, 8,189 transfers were performed. CPR of the afterload group resulted significantly higher compared to the direct group (44.69% versus 41.65%, OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, p = 0.017) and the rate of difficult transfers two-thirds lower (9.06% versus 26.85%, OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.24-0.31, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that CPR is significantly affected by the ET technique. In particular, with the afterload protocol, both CPR and easy transfer rates increased.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT05364528, retrospectively registered on 3rd of May 2022.

Is There Any Effect of the Physician Performing Embryo Transfer in IVF-ICSI Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate whether there is an effect of the physician who transfers the embryos on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) treatment.

METHODS

 A total of 757 participants were analyzed between 2012 and 2017. Participants were classified according to 3 physicians who transferred the embryos: ([group 1 = 164 patients]; [group 2 = 233 patients]; [group 3 = 360 patients]). Baseline parameters and IVF-ICSI outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

 No differences were determined between the groups regarding the baseline parameters (age, age subgroups [20-29, 30-39, and ≥ 40 years old)], body mass index (BMI), smoking status, infertility period, cause of infertility, baseline follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol (E₂), thyroid stimulating hormone, prolactin levels, antral follicle count, duration of stimulation, stimulation protocol, gonadotropin dose required, maximum E₂ levels, progesterone levels, endometrial thickness on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration and transfer days (p > 0.05). The numbers of oocytes retrieved, metaphase II (MII), 2 pronucleus (2PN), , transferred embryo, fertilization rate, day of embryo transfer, the catheter effect and embryo transfer technique, and clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) were also comparable between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 Our data suggests that the physician who transfers the embryos has no impact on CPRs in patients who have undergone IVF-ICSI, but further studies with more participants are required to elucidate this situation.

The effect of embryo transfer technique on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: A prospective cohort study

Objective:

To investigate whether embryo transfer affects pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) treatment.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 2,257 patients who underwent IVF-ICSI treatment between 2012 and 2017 were included in this study. Subjects were categorized according to the embryo transfer technique that was required: group 1 (n=1,657) underwent easy transfer with a soft catheter; group 2 (n=548) received external guidance transfers; and group 3 (n=52) experienced difficult transfers with a stylet. Basal parameters, clinical and laboratory IVF-ICSI outcomes, and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) were compared between the groups.

Results:

There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, body mass index, smoking status, duration and etiology of infertility, baseline folliclestimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol (E₂), thyroid-stimulating hormone, prolactin levels, antral follicle count, duration of stimulation, stimulation protocol, total gonadotropin dose required, peak E₂ levels, progesterone levels, and endometrial thickness on human chorionic gonadotropin administration and transfer days (p>0.05). The numbers of oocytes retrieved, MII and 2PN, fertilization rate, day of embryo transfer, and CPRs were also comparable between the groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion:

Our data suggest that embryo transfer has no impact on pregnancy rates in patients who undergo IVF-ICSI treatment. Further studies with more participants are required to elucidate this situation.

Influence of Catheter Type and Tenaculum Use on Intrauterine Insemination Outcome

Background

We investigated the impact of the choice of catheter type and tenaculum use on pregnancy related out- comes in intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatments.

Materials and Methods

A total of 338 consecutive IUI cycles were assessed in this retrospective study. Participants were divided according to the insemination technique - soft catheter (group 1; n=175), firm catheter (group 2; n=100), or tenaculum (group 3; n=63). Clinical, laboratory, semen parameters and pregnancy related outcomes were compared.

Results

Demographic characteristics and laboratory parameters were similar between the groups (P>0.05). The clini- cal pregnancy rate (CPR) was significantly higher in the firm catheter (19%, 19/100) and tenaculum (31.7%, 20/63) groups compared to the soft catheter group (5.1%, 9/175, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in live birth and miscarriage rates per clinical pregnancy (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that the use of a firm catheter or tenaculum for IUI might result in a higher CPR, but might not have a considerable effect on the live birth rate (LBR). Further prospective randomized studies are required to determine the long-term effects of the catheter type or tenaculum use on IUI success.