Perioperative Haemodynamic Optimisation

The Impact of Nursing Interventions on the Treatment Outcomes of Renal Cell Carcinoma with Postoperative Interleukin-2 and Recombinant Human Interferon

Objective

This study investigates the impact of nursing interventions on treatment outcomes and adverse reaction rates in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated postoperatively with Interleukin-2 and recombinant human Interferon.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis of 90 RCC patients, 43 received standard care (control group), while 47 received additional nursing interventions (intervention group), including psychological care, vital signs monitoring, dietary care, adverse reaction management, and post-discharge care. Patients with concurrent major diseases or other malignancies were excluded. Key assessments included clinical symptom improvement, treatment efficacy, and postoperative adverse reactions.

Results

Among the 90 participants, no significant demographic differences were found between the two groups. The intervention group showed significant improvements in fever resolution, leukocyte normalization, and shorter hospital stays. The overall treatment effectiveness was similar in both groups (90.7% in the intervention group vs 91.5% in the control group). However, the intervention group experienced significantly fewer postoperative adverse reactions, including fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, bone marrow suppression, and neurological abnormalities (6.3% vs 23.2%).

Conclusion

The study suggests that nursing interventions can improve treatment outcomes by reducing postoperative adverse reactions in RCC patients receiving postoperative Interleukin-2 and recombinant human Interferon. The overall effectiveness of treatment and care was comparable between the groups. Further extensive studies are needed to confirm these findings and fully understand the impact of nursing interventions on RCC patient outcomes.

Comparison of Bioimpedance Versus Pulse Contour Analysis for Intraoperative Cardiac Index Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation

Background

Cardiac index (CI; cardiac output indexed to body surface area) is routinely measured during kidney transplant surgery. Bioimpedance cardiometry is a transthoracic impedance as the non-invasive alternative for hemodynamic monitoring, using semi-invasive uncalibrated pulse wave or contour (UPC) analysis.

Objectives

We performed a cross-sectional observational study on 50 kidney transplant patients to compare the CI measurement agreement, concordance rate, and trending ability between bioimpedance and UPC analysis.

Methods

For each patient, CI was measured by bioimpedance analysis (ICON^TM) and UPC analysis (EV1000^TM) devices at three time points: after induction, during incision, and at reperfusion. The device measurement accuracy was assessed by the bias value, limit of agreement (LoA), and percentage error (PE) using Bland-Altman analyses. Trending ability was assessed by angular bias and polar concordance through four-quadrant and polar plot analyses.

Results

From each time point and pooled measurement, the correlation coefficients were 0.267, 0.327, 0.321, and 0.348. Bland-Altman analyses showed mean bias values of 1.18, 1.06, 1.48, and 1.30, LoA of -1.35 to 3.72, -1.39 to 3.51, -1.07 to 4.04, and -1.17 to 3.78, and PE of 82.21, 78.50, 68.74, and 74.58%, respectively. Polar plot analyses revealed angular bias values of -10.37º, -15.01º, -18.68º, and -12.62º, with radial LoA of 89.79º, 85.86º, 83.38º, and 87.82º, respectively. The four-quadrant plot concordance rates were 70.77, 67.35, 65.90, and 69.79%. These analyses showed poor agreement, weak concordance, and low trending ability of bioimpedance cardiometry to UPC analysis.

Conclusions

Bioimpedance and UPC analysis for CI measurements were not interchangeable in patients undergoing kidney transplant surgery. Cardiac index monitoring using bioimpedance cardiometry during kidney transplantation should be interpreted cautiously because it showed poor reliability due to low accuracy, precision, and trending ability for CI measurement.

Goal-directed fluid therapy using transoesophageal echocardiographic inferior venacaval index in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing major cytoreductive surgery: A clinical trial

Background and Aims:

This study aims to trans oesophageal echo cardiographically (TOE) measure inferior venacava diameter (IVCD) during inspiration and expiration in poor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) patients undergoing cytoreductive oncosurgery, to ascertain if any correlation exists between, caval index (DeltaIVCD), and stroke volume variation (SVV), and to compare DeltaIVCD-guided versus SVV-guided fluid therapy.

Methods:

In this prospective, parallel group, interventional study, seventy American Society of Anesthesiologists-III patients, aged 30-75 years, weighing 40-90 kg, with LVEF ≤40% undergoing cytoreductive surgery were included and randomised to group-D (DeltaIVCD-guided fluid therapy) and group-S (SVV-guided fluid therapy). Patients with oesophageal lesions were excluded. After standard endotracheal anaesthesia, arterial and internal jugular vein catheters were placed. A TOE probe was inserted in the interventional group-D. Quantification of IVCD respiratory variations was done. Heart rate (HR), arterial oxygen saturation (SPO₂), mean arterial pressure, end tidal carbondioxide (EtCO₂), central venous pressure, SVV, IVCD, and urine output (UO) were recorded every 30 min. Post-operative arterial blood gas analysis, lung-ultrasound, chest-radiograph, and serum creatinine were done.

Statistical Analysis:

Pearson's correlation coefficient as measure of strength of linear relationship, calculation of regression equation, and unpaired t-test for normally distributed continuous variables were used.

Results:

A positive correlation between DeltaIVCD and SVV (r = 0.751) was observed. A regression equation was obtained for SVV (SVV = [0.317 × DeltaIVCD] + 5.877). Serum lactate, estimated glomerular filtration rate, HR, and UO were within normal limits in group-D. There was no pulmonary oedema.

Conclusion:

DeltaIVCD-guided intravenous fluid therapy is valuable in low LVEF patients where tight fluid control is essential and any fluid overload may precipitate cardiac failure.