Evaluation of the Effect of Regional Anaesthesia on Microvascular Free Flaps

Novel Challenges and Opportunities for Anesthesia and Perioperative Care in Microvascular Flap Surgery: A Narrative Review

Complex microvascular techniques and in-depth knowledge of blood rheology and microanastomosis function are required for success in microvascular flap surgery. Substantial progress has been achieved in preventing complications, but the rate of flap loss is still significant and can have significant adverse effects on the patient. Flap thrombosis, flap hematoma, and flap loss are the most frequent and severe major surgical complications. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of different flap complications, the use of preoperative risk assessment and new treatment concepts could improve the perioperative care of microvascular flap surgery patients. Our aim was to outline novel avenues for best practice and provide an outlook for further research of anesthesia and perioperative care concepts in microvascular flap surgery.

The Effect of Regional Anaesthesia on Free Flap Survival in Lower Extremity Reconstructions

Background

The effect of different modalities of anaesthesia in microvascular free flap surgery has been a topic of ongoing debate. Comparative data to study the effect of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia in the form of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) on lower extremity free flap survival is lacking to date. This study aims to elucidate the effect of regional anaesthesia on flap survival in lower extremity free flap reconstructions.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent free vascularised flap reconstruction of the lower extremities between 2012 and 2021 at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), The Netherlands, and between 2019 and 2021 at the Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. In this cohort, we analysed partial and total flap failures.

Results

In this cohort, 87 patients received a total of 102 microvascular free flap reconstructions of the lower extremity. In 20.5% of these operations, patients received a supplemental PNB. Total flap failure was 23.8% in the regional anaesthesia group compared to 21% in the group with general anaesthesia only (p = 0.779). Operation time was longer for patients with regional anaesthesia (p = 0.057). Length of stay was on average 2 days shorter for patients with supplemental regional anaesthesia (p = 0.716).

Discussion

This is the largest cohort comparing flap survival in patients receiving general anaesthesia to general anaesthesia with a PNB in lower extremity reconstructions to date. We cannot attribute a significant beneficial or detrimental effect of regional anaesthesia to flap survival. High failure rates stress the need for future studies.

How to cite this article

Koster ITS, den Os MM, Rutten MVH, et al. The Effect of Regional Anaesthesia on Free Flap Survival in Lower Extremity Reconstructions. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):15-20.

Anaesthetic implications of free-flap microvascular surgery for head and neck malignancies – A relook

Head and neck free-flap microvascular surgery is a type of surgery where multiple anaesthetic factors play a very important role in the outcome of the surgery while the conduct of anaesthesia itself may be quite challenging for the anaesthesiologist. In microvascular reconstruction of head and neck malignancies, flaps are used to reconstruct a primary defect formed by wide local excision. A free flap is raised after removing the neurovascular pedicle from the donor site and transplanting it by microvascular anastomosis to the new location. This gives rise to a secondary defect which is then repaired by direct suture or skin graft. The anaesthesiologist’s role includes optimizing the physiological conditions for the survival of the flap while decreasing morbidity at the same time. Failure of the free flap is attributed to numerous causes. This is an attempt to highlight them along with discussion of the anaesthesia-related issues that are faced during this type of surgery. The various pre-, intra- and postoperative factors affecting flap survival and overall postoperative outcome in the patient are discussed here.