Role of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation either alone or combined with an anticholinergic agent in treating patients with overactive bladder

Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation With versus Without Mirabegron: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To compare change in urgency urinary incontinence episodes (UUIEs) in women undergoing posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) plus mirabegron versus PTNS plus placebo for the treatment of refractory urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). The primary hypothesis was that combination therapy is superior to monotherapy.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was performed in individuals identifying as female aged ≥ 18 years with UUI symptoms refractory to second-line treatment or who could not tolerate antimuscarinic medications. Both participants and providers were blinded to medication treatment allocation. Participants were randomized (1:1) to PTNS plus mirabegron or PTNS plus placebo. Participants completed a 3-day bladder diary prior to and after 12-week treatment. Validated symptom distress and impact questionnaires were obtained pre- and post-treatment. The primary outcome was change in mean number of UUIEs on a 3-day bladder diary pre- versus post-treatment between arms. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed via sample t tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-four subjects were randomized, mean ± SD baseline age 56.2±15.6 years and body mass index 35.0±9.4 (kg/m2); no differences were noted in any clinical-demographic characteristics. There was a significant difference between arms in mean pre- to post-treatment UUIEs, 9.4±3.9, mirabegron versus 5.3±5.5, placebo (p=0.007). Significant differences were found pre- compared with post-treatment in urinary frequency, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form Symptom Bother and Symptom Health-Related Quality of Life scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects undergoing PTNS treatment for refractory UUI and OAB-wet symptoms, the addition of a β-3 agonist produced significant improvement in both objective and subjective overactive bladder symptom outcomes compared with PTNS plus placebo.

What Are the Short-term Benefits and Potential Harms of Therapeutic Modalities for the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome in Women? A Review of Evidence Under the Auspices of the European Association of Urology, Female Non-neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Guidelines Panel

CONTEXT

Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is highly prevalent among women and has a negative impact on their quality of life. The current available treatments for OAB symptoms include conservative, pharmacological, or surgical modalities.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an updated contemporary evidence document regarding OAB treatment options and determine the short-term effectiveness, safety, and potential harms of the available treatment modalities for women with OAB syndrome.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane controlled trial databases and clinicaltrial.gov were searched for all relevant publications up to May 2022. The risk of bias assessment followed the recommended tool in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and quality of evidence was assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. A meta-analysis was performed where appropriate.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Antimuscarinics and beta-3 agonists were significantly more effective than placebo across most outcomes, with beta-3 agonists being more effective at reducing nocturia episodes and antimuscarinics causing significantly higher adverse events. Onabotulinumtoxin-A (Onabot-A) was more effective than placebo across most outcomes, but with significantly higher rates of acute urinary retention/clean intermittent self-catheterisation (six to eight times) and urinary tract infections (UTIs; two to three times). Onabot-A was also significantly better than antimuscarinics in the cure of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) but not in the reduction of mean UUI episodes. Success rates of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) were significantly higher than those of antimuscarinics (61% vs 42%, p = 0.02), with similar rates of adverse events. SNS and Onabot-A were not significantly different in efficacy outcomes. Satisfaction rates were higher with Onabot-A, but with a higher rate of recurrent UTIs (24% vs 10%). SNS was associated with 9% removal rate and 3% revision rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Overactive bladder is a manageable condition, with first-line treatment options including antimuscarinics, beta-3 agonists, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation. Second-line options include Onabot-A bladder injections or SNS. The choice of therapies should be guided by individual patient factors.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Overactive bladder is a manageable condition. All patients should be informed and advised on conservative treatment measures in the first instance. The first-line treatment options for its management include antimuscarinics or beta-3 agonists medication, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation procedures. The second-line options include onabotulinumtoxin-A bladder injections or sacral nerve stimulation procedure. The therapy should be chosen based on individual patient factors.

Combination and Novel Pharmacologic Agents for OAB

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate recent literature on combination and novel pharmacologic therapies for overactive bladder (OAB).

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination therapies demonstrating greater efficacy than monotherapy include combination anticholinergics, anticholinergic plus β-3 agonist, and anticholinergic with behavioral modification, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, or sacral neuromodulation. Promising novel therapies include new bladder selective anticholinergics, new β-3 agonists, and gabapentin. OAB is a symptom complex caused by dysfunction in the interconnected neural, muscular, and urothelial systems that control micturition. Although several therapeutic targets and treatment options exist, complete resolution is not always achieved, discontinuation rate for medical therapy is high, and few patients subsequently progress to third-line treatment options. Recent literature suggests combination therapy diversifying therapeutic targets is more effective than targeting a single pathway and novel treatments targeting additional pathways have promising results.

Urgent PC Versus a Generic Posterior Tibial Neurostimulator for Overactive Bladder: A Retrospective Noninferiority Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine whether a generic posterior tibial neurostimulator was noninferior to Urgent PC in the treatment of nonneurogenic OAB, urgency urinary incontinence, and mixed urinary incontinence. Secondary outcomes include rates of starting and completing 3 months of maintenance therapy, treatment success after 3 months, and adverse events.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of women whose nonneurogenic OAB, urgency urinary incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence was treated with either Urgent PC or a generic posterior tibial neurostimulator. Previous research shows a 55% treatment success rate for posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). To demonstrate noninferiority with a limit of 14% and 80% power, our analysis required 157 patients per group.

RESULTS

We included 267 Urgent PC and 234 generic patients and excluded 51 patients from analysis. A per-protocol analysis demonstrated treatment success in 55.3% (121 of 219) of the Urgent PC and 48.6% (85 of 175) of the generic cohort (P = 0.187). An intention-to-treat analysis showed treatment success in 45.3% (121 of 267) of the Urgent PC and 36.3% (85 of 234) of the generic cohort (P = 0.690). There were no significant differences in rates of starting (82.2% vs 78.2%, P = 0.409) or completing (79.9% vs 70.9%, P = 0.129) 3 months of maintenance therapy, treatment success after 3 months (78.5% vs 73.8%, P = 0.485), and adverse events (0.37% vs 0.85%, P = 1.000) in the Urgent PC versus generic group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of women undergoing PTNS for nonneurogenic OAB, urgency urinary incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence, the generic neurostimulator demonstrated noninferior rates of treatment success compared with Urgent PC.

Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome.

METHODS

The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Trials from 2000 to May 2021 were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that referred to the use of TNS and antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Eight publications involving 420 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In the analysis, we found TNS had a comparable effect with antimuscarinic agents on micturition per day, nocturia, urge incontinence, and voided volume (P = .9; .4; .78; .44, respectively). Scores measured by questionnaires Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and Overactive Bladder questionnaire Short Form items also indicated no statistical difference between 2 groups. TNS group had a significantly less discontinuation rate and adverse events (P = .003; .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

TNS is as effective as antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB. Moreover, TNS appears to be more tolerable and safer than antimuscarinic agents.

Effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months

Purpose

To assess effectiveness and durability of Solifenacin (SS) versus tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) versus combination therapy (PTNS + SS) in women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB).

Materials and Methods

105 women with OAB were divided randomly into three groups of 35 patients each. In group A women received SS, in group B women underwent PTNS, in group C women underwent combination of PTNS + SS. Improvements in OAB symptoms were assessed with OABSS questionnaire; patients’ quality of life was assessed with OAB-q SF questionnaire. Evaluation of effectiveness of treatments was performed with PGI-I questionnaire. OABSS and PGI-I were also assessed monthly for ten months.

Results

All treatments were effective on symptoms. PTNS showed a greater effectiveness than SS, but PTNS + SS was more effective than SS and PTNS. Furthermore, PTNS + SS showed a greater duration of effectiveness than PTNS and SS.

Conclusions

Combination of PTNS with SS showed more effectiveness and more durability than PTNS and SS alone.

Acupuncture for adults with overactive bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder is stated as the occurrence of urinary urgency which will cause negative impacts and decrease patients' health-related quality of life. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the efficiency and safety of acupuncture for adults with overactive bladder (OAB) comparing with sham-acupuncture, drugs, and acupuncture plus drugs.

METHODS

We independently searched 9 databases from beginning to August 15, 2017. Two writers extracted data at the same time independently. Study outcomes were calculated by standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 794 patients were included in this systematic review. The combined results showed that electroacupuncture (EA) may be more effective than sham electroacupuncture (sham EA) in improving the 24-hour nocturia episodes and EA may enhance tolterodine for relieving voiding symptoms and enhancing patients' quality of life. However, more trials with high quality and larger sample sizes will be needed in the future to provide sufficient evidence. Only 15 of 794 OAB patients from the included studies reported mild adverse reactions related to EA, therefore, acupuncture is safe for treating OAB.

CONCLUSION

Acupuncture might have effect in decreasing the number of micturition episodes, incontinence episodes, and nocturia episodes. However, the evidence is insufficient to show the effect using acupuncture alone or the additional effect to drugs in treating OAB.

Is there any Relationship Between Bladder Trabeculation and Efficacy and Safety of Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Women?

Background:

Intradetrusor injection of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) might serve as a minimally invasive substitute in patients with refractory idiopathic overactive bladder (RIOAB). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes related to two different doses of abo-BTX-A (AboBTX-A) in patients with RIOAB.

Materials and Methods:

This prospective clinical trial was performed on 55 women with RIOAB. After determination of trabeculation grade, 300 (no or mild) or 500 (moderate or severe) unit of AboBTX-A (Dysport) was intravesicaly injected. Before 1, 3, and 6 months after intervention, lower urinary tract symptoms during 24 h were recorded.

Results:

Of the study population, 62% had severe bladder trabeculation. The mean duration of overactive bladder (OAB) was 1.76 versus 5.85 years, for no or mild versus severe trabeculation, respectively. After injections of 300- and 500-unit dosage, there were 19% and 26% early complications such as urinary retention. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in OAB score after 1 month (P < 0.001) and duration of OAB symptoms, over three follow-up times (P < 0.001). The mean preinjection OAB scores between patients with and without recurrence were statistically significant (29.36 vs. 25.07; P < 0.03). Urinary tract infection as a late complication was distinguished in four patients.

Conclusion:

In RIOAB, by adjusted dosage of AboBTX-A related to the grade of bladder trabeculation, in addition to maintain efficacy, consequent complications might not be affected by dosage and the drug dosage could be increased to nearly 60% with less concern associated to complication

Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Clinical Effectiveness, Urodynamic, and Durability Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) effectiveness, durability, and impact on the pathophysiology of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) in patients who have been previously treated with antimuscarinics without success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study that included 200 women diagnosed with OAB between 2007 and 2015 at Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital (Málaga, Spain) was conducted. OAB patients were treated with PTNS therapy after antimuscarinic treatment failed. To evaluate OAB symptoms, clinical and urodynamic studies were performed before and after PTNS treatment. Treatment's success was defined as a reduction of clinical parameters by >50% and an improvement of at least 2 urodynamic parameters by >50%. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Student's t test or Wilcoxon test were used based on the data. A linear correlation analysis and a multivariate linear regression analysis were performed to determine factors associated with the success of PTNS therapy.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 94% experienced a positive response to PTNS considering clinical and urodynamic parameters. PTNS benefits were extended by 24 months. We identified daytime urinary frequency (r = -0.165; P = .024; 95% confidence interval, -0.248 to -0.018) and first sensation of bladder filling (r = 0.208; P = .030; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.028) as significant independent predictor factors for PTNS success.

CONCLUSION

The current data confirmed a high effectiveness of PTNS improving OAB symptoms through 24 months. Furthermore, daytime urinary frequency and first sensation of bladder filling act as a significant independent predictor factors for PTNS success.

Cholinergic Antagonists Combined with Electrical Stimulation or Bladder Training Treatments for Overactive Bladder in Female Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The therapeutic effects of cholinergic antagonists combined with non-drug therapy compared with cholinergic antagonist therapy alone for overactive bladder in adult women are unclear. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the therapeutic effects of cholinergic antagonists plus non-drug therapy (electrical stimulation and bladder training) with cholinergic antagonist therapy alone among female overactive bladder patients.

METHODS

Pertinent studies were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and the Chinese Biological Medicine databases to May 31, 2016. Study-specific standardized mean differences were combined using fixed- or random-effects models depending on whether significant heterogeneity was detected.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials were identified. A total of 485 female overactive bladder patients were treated with the combined therapy and 497 were treated with the cholinergic antagonists alone. For the cholinergic antagonists combined with electrical stimulation treatment compared with cholinergic antagonist therapy alone, there were statistically significant reductions of average frequency of urination, incontinence, and urgency, with pooled standardized mean differences of -2.38, -1.32, and -0.87, respectively. There was also a statistically significant reduction of average frequency of urination (pooled standardized mean difference = - 0.30; 95 % confidence interval: -0.52 to -0.08) for the cholinergic antagonists combined with bladder training treatment compared with cholinergic antagonist therapy alone.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that female overactive bladder patients with cholinergic antagonists combined with electrical stimulation or bladder training treatment may lower the average frequency of urination, incontinence, and urgency when compared with those who received isolated drug therapy.