Evaluation of early and late-term infections after renal transplantation: Clinical experiences of Sanko University Medical Faculty Transplantation Center

Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes before or after Renal Transplant: A Retrospective Large Cohort Analysis

Background

While it is known that patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at an increased risk of complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is a gap in the literature in comparing patients with ESRD to patients who undergo renal transplant (RT) before or after THA. This study is to address this gap by analyzing outcomes of THA in ESRD patients, RT patients, and RT candidates.

Methods

Using the PearlDiver Mariner database, ESRD patients, RT patients, and RT candidates undergoing primary THA were identified and compared. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were done for medical complications up to 90 days and surgical complications up to 2 years. Ninety-day emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient readmission were also documented.

Results

A total of 7,868 patients were included: 5,092 had ESRD, 2,520 had RT before THA, and 256 were candidates for RT. Compared to patients with ESRD, RT patients demonstrated lower rates of medical complications such as pneumonia (3.61% vs. 5.99%, p = 0.039) and transfusion (4.60% vs. 7.66%, p < 0.001). Additionally, RT patients displayed decreased rates of surgical complications, including wound complications (2.70% vs. 4.22%, p = 0.001), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) at 1 year (2.30% vs. 4.81%, p < 0.001) and 2 years (2.58% vs. 5.42%, p < 0.001), and aseptic loosening at 2 years (0.79% vs. 1.43%, p = 0.006). Similarly, when compared to RT candidates, RT patients demonstrated a lower incidence of postoperative complications, including 1-year PJI (2.30% vs. 5.08%, p = 0.013), 2-year PJI (2.58% vs. 5.08%, p = 0.028), 1-year aseptic loosening (0.56% vs. 2.73%, p < 0.001), and 2-year aseptic loosening (0.79% vs. 2.73%, p = 0.005). RT patients also had lower rates of ED visits and hospital readmissions.

Conclusions

Compared to ESRD patients and RT candidates, patients with RT have a significantly lower likelihood of medical complications, PJI, aseptic hardware loosening, ED visits, and hospital readmission. Patients with ESRD on the RT waiting list should delay THA until after RT surgery. For those not eligible for RT, it is vital to take extra precautions to reduce the risk of complications.

Evaluation of the correlation between oral infections and systemic complications in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the efficacy of the dental clearance required prior to kidney transplantation (KT) for preventing post-transplant complications is controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate a possible correlation between any untreated oral infectious foci and the onset of systemic complications in KT patients.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for regular check-ups during the post-transplant period were visited at the C.I.R. Dental School in Turin, Italy. Patients were asked to bring orthopantomography (OPT) acquired prior to transplantation to compare the possible presence of untreated infectious foci at the time of transplantation with the time of their post-transplant visit. Patients were then divided, according to the evaluation of the OPT obtained prior to the transplantation, into two groups according to their dental status prior to the transplant. "Group Infected" was comprised of patients with no dental clearance, and "Group Clear" included patients with dental clearance. The medical records were then retrospectively reviewed for the evaluation of any systemic complications that occurred after transplantation. The following medical complications were considered: fever, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, systemic infections, kidney rejection, and death. Complications were divided in two groups: early complications, which occurred within 100 days of transplantation, and late complications, which occurred more than 100 days after transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients were enrolled in the study. Group Infected was composed of 19 subjects (25%), while Group Clear was composed of 58 patients (75%). In Group Infected, 13 (68%) patients developed complications within 100 days of transplantation, and 11 (58%) did so after 100 days. In Group Clear, 31 (53%) patients had complications within 100 days of the transplant, and 23 (40%) did after 100 days. Patients in Group Infected had a statistically significant increase in episodes of fever (p = 0.03), compared to Group Clear, with a higher relative risk (RR) of 3.66 in the first 100 days after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the present retrospective pilot study, and based on the results, a correlation between the absence of dental clearance prior to KT and a higher RR of developing a fever within the first 100 days post transplantation was highlighted. The present results encourage doctors to continue research on the topic, which remains controversial. Further prospective studies are required to confirm the results of the present study.

Incidence and Causes of Late Hospital Readmissions After Living Donor Renal Transplant: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Our primary aim was to find the incidence, causes, and factors responsible for late hospital readmissions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 185 patients included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with late readmission after discharge and those with no late readmission. Inpatient records and charts were assessed for the medical status of the patients, cause of chronic kidney disease, comorbidities, vintage and modality of dialysis, and hospital admissions 3 months before transplant. Collected patient data included recipient age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, hepatitis C status, donor age, methods of immunosuppression and induction, duration of hospital stay, postoperative complications and secondary procedures, number, duration, and causes of hospital readmission after transplant, and methods of evaluation and management during readmission.

RESULTS

There were 80 patients who received 127 late hospital readmissions. The most common cause of late hospital readmission was infection, which led to 45 admissions (35.43%). Of 45 admissions for infections, 18 were caused by urinary tract infections. Other reasons for admission were pneumonia (10 admissions), cytomegalovirus infection (11 admissions), and tuberculosis (6 admissions). The second most common cause of readmission was infectious or noninfectious diarrhea, which led to 29 admissions (22.88%). There were 28 late hospital readmissions (22.4%) for the evaluation or management of graft dysfunction. Newonset diabetes after transplant and febrile illness were causes of late hospital readmission in 8 cases each (6.9%), with 9 late hospital readmissions (7.08%) the result of other causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of late hospital readmission is high (43.2%), and the most common cause is infection, particularly urinary tract infections. Age of the recipient and early hospital readmission are predictive factors for late hospital readmission.

Care Needs for Organ Transplant Recipients Scale: Development and psychometric testing

BACKGROUND

Needs assessment can determine how large the gap is between needs and available services; however, no tools are available to assess the unmet needs of renal transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop the Care Needs for Organ Transplant Recipients Scale (CNOTRS) and examine its psychometric properties.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional design for instrument development and psychometric testing.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 217 renal transplant recipients were recruited through convenience sampling.

METHODS

An initial 36-item CNOTRS was developed after a comprehensive literature review. After the CNOTRS was tested through content validity and face validity, the factor structure was explored using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Convergent validity was examined using Pearson's correlation between the CNOTRS and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Known-group validity was tested by comparing CNOTRS scores of patients grouped based on whether they had experienced complications or rejection.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight items with three factors (namely daily care and social interaction needs, psychological needs, and health system and service needs) were identified in EFA by parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. The psychological needs domain had a stronger positive correlation with the HADS than the other two domains. The known-group validity was supported as a significant association between complications or rejection occurrence and unmet needs. The Cronbach's α of the CNOTRS was 0.94.

CONCLUSIONS

The CNOTRS demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity to assess the care needs for renal transplant recipients and can assist health care professionals to tailor more personalised care for their individual needs.