Impact of metabolic syndrome on pre- and postoperative parameters in patients undergoing a HoLEP surgery

Metabolic syndrome and surgical complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 million individuals

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterised by the presence of at least three of the five following components: insulin resistance, obesity, chronic hypertension, elevated serum triglycerides, and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. It is estimated to affect 1 in 3 people around the globe and is reported to affect 46% of surgical patients. For people with MetS who undergo surgery, an emerging body of literature points to significantly poorer postoperative outcomes compared with nonaffected populations. The aim of this study is to review the current evidence on the risks of surgical complications in patients with MetS compared to those without MetS.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis using PRISMA and AMSTAR reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 63 studies involving 1 919 347 patients with MetS and 11 248 114 patients without MetS. Compared to individuals without the condition, individuals with MetS were at an increased risk of mortality (OR 1.75 95% CI: 1.36-2.24; P <0.01); all surgical site infection types as well as dehiscence (OR 1.64 95% CI: 1.52-1.77; P <0.01); cardiovascular complications (OR 1.56 95% CI: 1.41-1.73; P <0.01) including myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest, cardiac arrythmias and deep vein thrombosis; increased length of hospital stay (MD 0.65 95% CI: 0.39-0.9; P <0.01); and hospital readmission (OR 1.55 95% CI: 1.41-1.71; P <0.01).

CONCLUSION

MetS is associated with a significantly increased risk of surgical complications including mortality, surgical site infection, cardiovascular complications, increased length of stay, and hospital readmission. Despite these risks and the high prevalence of MetS in surgical populations there is a lack of evidence on interventions for reducing surgical complications in patients with MetS. The authors suggest prioritising interventions across the surgical continuum that include (1) preoperative screening for MetS; (2) surgical prehabilitation; (3) intraoperative monitoring and management; and (4) postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up.

Comparison of effects of tamsulosin and silodosin on subfoveal choroidal thickness and pupil size diameters in patients with prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of selective α-1 adrenoceptor antagonists on subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and pupil diameter size (PDS).

METHODS

This prospective study included 87 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia who were treated with tamsulosin hydrochloride (n = 41) or silodosin (n = 46). SFCT measurements were obtained using spectral domain optic coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and PDS measurements were obtained under mesopic, photopic and scotopic conditions using a photography-based topography system. SFCT and PDS were evaluated at baseline and 3-, 6- and 12-mo follow-ups.

RESULTS

The initial mean SFCT was 270.53 ± 21.48 µm in tamsulosin group and 271.95 ± 24. 73 in silodosin group (P = 0.078). There was no statistically significant change in SFCT at the 3-mo visit. At the 6-mo follow-up, the mean SFCT was 281.34 ± 22.09 µm in tamsulosin group and 272.5 ± 22.4 µm in silodosin group. At the 12th month, the mean SFCT in tamsulosin group was 290.80 ± 17.27 µm, and it was 270.80 ± 13.14 µm in silodosin group. There was statistically significant difference in at 6th and 12-mo visits (P = 0.014 and P = 0.00). During the follow-up, both drugs induced a similar significant decrease in PDS under all conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamsulosin hydrochloride caused a significant increase in SFCT. In contrast, SFCT did not increase in silodosin group. The decreases in PDS achieved using both drugs were similar. This should be kept in mind when choroidal disease and its response to treatment are followed by CT imaging.

Morcellation After Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: Efficiency and Safety of Currently Available Devices

CONTEXT

Although several studies have compared different morcellators and enucleation techniques for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), there is sparse literature on morcellation, so further experimental and clinical research is required for its optimization.

OBJECTIVE

To critically appraise the contemporary literature on prostate morcellation and to evaluate the safety and efficiency of currently available morcellators for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) in the context of BPH.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive review of the English and French literature relevant to prostate morcellation was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Library database from 1998 to 2020 using PICOS (patient population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design) criteria.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We retrieved 26 studies involving 5652 patients treated with a morcellator that were eligible for data extraction and analysis. The mean patient age was 67.4 (range 61.4-72.8) yr. The weighted mean efficiency of Piranha, VersaCut, and DrillCut morcellators was 5.29, 3.95, and 5.3 g/min, respectively. Several approaches, such as en bloc, two-lobe, inverse, and improved techniques, may increase morcellation efficiency and safety. The lowest weighted mean rate of bladder wall injury was 1.24% for Piranha, followed by 1.98% for DrillCut, and 5.23% for VersaCut, while the VersaCut morcellator had the lowest weighted mean rate of device malfunction at 0.74%, compared to 2.07% for Piranha and 7.86% for DrillCut.

CONCLUSIONS

All three morcellators are efficient and safe for prostatic morcellation after EEP. Further development of devices and techniques may improve the efficiency and safety profile of morcellation. To increase safety, surgeon expertise, technical equipment, and patient characteristics should be considered. Therefore, interdisciplinary exchange of knowledge and further technological innovations are strongly encouraged.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the safety and efficacy of devices called morcellators. These devices cut tissue into small pieces that are easier to remove from the body, and are used during laser surgery for benign enlargement of the prostate. Three morcellators are currently available on the market and are comparable in safety and efficacy.