Prostate cancer detection rate and Gleason score in relation to prostate volume as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy

Comparison of data fusion strategies for automated prostate lesion detection using mpMRI correlated with whole mount histology

BACKGROUND

In this work, we compare input level, feature level and decision level data fusion techniques for automatic detection of clinically significant prostate lesions (csPCa).

METHODS

Multiple deep learning CNN architectures were developed using the Unet as the baseline. The CNNs use both multiparametric MRI images (T2W, ADC, and High b-value) and quantitative clinical data (prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), prostate gland volume & gross tumor volume (GTV)), and only mp-MRI images (n = 118), as input. In addition, co-registered ground truth data from whole mount histopathology images (n = 22) were used as a test set for evaluation.

RESULTS

The CNNs achieved for early/intermediate / late level fusion a precision of 0.41/0.51/0.61, recall value of 0.18/0.22/0.25, an average precision of 0.13 / 0.19 / 0.27, and F scores of 0.55/0.67/ 0.76. Dice Sorensen Coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the influence of combining mpMRI with parametric clinical data for the detection of csPCa. We compared the DSC between the predictions of CNN's trained with mpMRI and parametric clinical and the CNN's trained with only mpMRI images as input with the ground truth. We obtained a DSC of data 0.30/0.34/0.36 and 0.26/0.33/0.34 respectively. Additionally, we evaluated the influence of each mpMRI input channel for the task of csPCa detection and obtained a DSC of 0.14 / 0.25 / 0.28.

CONCLUSION

The results show that the decision level fusion network performs better for the task of prostate lesion detection. Combining mpMRI data with quantitative clinical data does not show significant differences between these networks (p = 0.26/0.62/0.85). The results show that CNNs trained with all mpMRI data outperform CNNs with less input channels which is consistent with current clinical protocols where the same input is used for PI-RADS lesion scoring.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered retrospectively at the German Register for Clinical Studies (DRKS) under proposal number Nr. 476/14 & 476/19.

Combination of prostate volume and apparent diffusion coefficient can stratify patients with a PI-RADS score of 3 to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, there are many patients who undergo unnecessary prostate biopsies after receiving a prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score of 3. Our purpose is to identify cutoff values of the prostate volume (PV) and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) to stratify those patients to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

METHODS

Data from 224 qualified patients who received prostate biopsies from January 2019 to June 2023 were collected. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare non-normal distributed continuous variables, which were recorded as median (interquartile ranges). The correlation coefficients were calculated using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Categorical variables are recorded by numbers (percentages) and compared by χ2 test. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent predictors. The receiver-operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of clinical variables.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 224 patients, 36 patients (16.07%) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), whereas 72 patients (32.14%) were diagnosed with any grade prostate cancer. The result of multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PV (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR]: 0.952, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.927-0.978) and ADCmin (p < 0.01, OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.989-0.998) were the independent factors for predicting csPCa. The AUC values of the PV and ADCmin were 0.779 (95% CI: 0.718-0.831) and 0.799 (95% CI: 0.740-0.849), respectively, for diagnosing csPCa. After stratifying patients by PV and ADCmin, 24 patients (47.06%) with "PV < 55 mL and ADCmin < 685 μm2/s" were diagnosed with csPCa. However, only one patient (1.25%) with PV ≥ 55 mL and ADCmin ≥ 685 μm2/s were diagnosed with csPCa.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found the combination of PV and ADCmin can stratify patients with a PI-RADS score of 3 to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. These patients with "PV ≥ 55 mL and ADCmin ≥ 685 μm2/s" may safely avoid prostate biopsies.

The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has emerged as a new cornerstone in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer. However, mpMRI is not devoid of factors influencing its detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Amongst others, prostate volume has been demonstrated to influence the detection rates of csPCa. Particularly, increasing volume has been linked to a reduced cancer detection rate. However, information about the linkage between PI-RADS, prostate volume and detection rate is relatively sparse. Therefore, the current study aims to assess the association between prostate volume, PI-RADS score and detection rate of csP-Ca, representing daily practice and contemporary mpMRI expertise. Thus, 1039 consecutive patients with 1151 PI-RADS targets, who underwent mpMRI-guided prostate biopsy at our tertiary referral center, were included. Prior mpMRI had been assessed by a plethora of 111 radiology offices, including academic centers and private practices. mpMRI was not secondarily reviewed in house before biopsy. mpMRI-targeted biopsy was performed by a small group of a total of ten urologists, who had performed at least 100 previous biopsies. Using ROC analysis, we defined cut-off values of prostate volume for each PI-RADS score, where the detection rate drops significantly. For PI-RADS 4 lesions, we found a volume > 61.5 ccm significantly reduced the cancer detection rate (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16-0.38; p < 0.001). For PI-RADS 5 lesions, we found a volume > 51.5 ccm to significantly reduce the cancer detection rate (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.62; p < 0.001). For PI-RADS 3 lesions, none of the evaluated clinical parameters had a significant impact on the detection rate of csPCa. In conclusion, we show that enlarged prostate volume represents a major limitation in the daily practice of mpMRI-targeted biopsy. This study is the first to define exact cut-off values of prostate volume to significantly impair the validity of PI-RADS assessed in a real-world setting. Therefore, the results of mpMRI-targeted biopsy should be interpreted carefully, especially in patients with prostate volumes above our defined thresholds.

Any Correlation Between Prostate Volume and Incidence of Prostate Cancer: A Review of Reported Data for the Last Thirty Years

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-skin cancer in men worldwide and more than 80% of men with PCa also have histo-anatomical findings of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). It is well documented that BPH develops in the transition zone (TZ), whereas 80-85% of PCa originates in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate. Possible causal links between both disease entities are controversially discussed in the current literature. Some studies have reported that larger prostates have a decreased incidence of PCa compared to smaller prostates. The purpose of this systematic review is to comprehensively summarize studies analyzing any association between prostate gland volume and incidence of PCa.

METHODS

A thorough literature review was performed between 01.01.1990 through 02.28.2020 using PubMed and applying the "PRISMA" guidelines. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined.

RESULTS

Our systematic review found 41 articles reporting an inverse (negative) relationship between prostate gland volume and incidence of prostate cancer. Sample sizes ranged from 114 to 6692 patients in these single institutional and multi-institutional studies. Thirty-nine (95%) of the 41 articles showed a statistically significant inverse relationship. In our search, no study was found showing a positive correlation between BPH size and the incidence of PCa.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the important clinical question of interaction between prostate size and the incidence of PCa. The results are demonstrating an inverse relationship, and therefore reveal strong evidence that large prostates may be protective of PCa when compared to smaller prostates.