Endoscopic holmium laser treatment for ureterolithiasis

To Evaluate the Impact of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Removal of Proximal and Distal Ureter Calculi

Background Urinary calculus illness is a prevalent clinical issue encountered by the medical community, particularly urologists, in contemporary society. Laser technologies have been widely accepted as standard modalities for lithotripsy applications. Using the Ho:YAG laser has expanded the range of applications for ureteroscopic stone management (URS), enabling the treatment of bigger stones in all regions of the upper urinary tract. It is noteworthy that ureteroscopy (URS) demonstrates superior rates of stone clearance for distal stones, regardless of their size, with a success rate of 94.5% compared to 74% for other treatment modalities. Significant variation exists in the reported results and problems associated with Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy across different trials, as documented in the literature. The procedure's outcome might vary based on factors such as the size of the stone, the length of impaction, the presence of ureteral damage and granulation, the kind and size of endoscopes used, and the specific energy settings employed by various operators. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteroscopic removal of proximal and distal ureter calculi. Methods This prospective observational study was carried out in the Department of Urology at DY Patil Medical College and Hospital, Pune, from March 2021 to March 2023. Patients diagnosed with a case of ureteric stone who opted for URSL during the study period were included. A total of 50 patients who underwent URSL in the urology department were included in this study. These were then grouped into those with proximal ureteral stones and distal ureteral stones. (25 each) Results The study observed that patients diagnosed with proximal ureteral stones had bigger calculi, with a mean stone size of 15mm, in comparison to patients with distal ureteral stones, with a mean stone size of 10mm (P=0.010). The stone burden was significantly higher for proximal ureteral stone patients than those with distal ureteric stones (P=0.010). The average duration of the operating procedure for upper ureter stones was 70 minutes, but for lower stones, the mean operative time was 45 minutes (P<0.001). No statistical significance was seen in the median age of patients between the two groups (P=0.89). The maximum number of cases in the upper stone group were in the age group of 16-30 years, and in the lower stone group was in the age group of 31-45 years. The prevalence of DJ stents at the time of presentation was higher among patients diagnosed with proximal ureteric stones than those with distal ureteric stones, with rates of 28% and 20%, respectively (P=0.508). Full fragmentation was successfully accomplished in all patients within the distal calculus group, accounting for 100% of the cases. At the same time, for proximal ureteric stones, a single laser lithotripsy session resulted in 92% (23 patients) achieving a stone-free status after two weeks.  Conclusion The study observed that stone size, burden, and procedure duration were statistically significant among other criteria. Mean age, stone HU, prior DJ stent, and stone-free rate were statistically insignificant. The procedure indicated that Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy has efficacy in treating both proximal and distal ureteral stones, with minimal intraoperative and postoperative complications. None of the complications were due to laser energy.

Clinical Observation of UreTron Single-Probe Ultrasonic Intracorporeal Lithotripter for Ureteral Calculi

Objective

The present study aimed to observe and discuss the effectiveness and safety of the UreTron single-probe ultrasonic intracorporeal lithotripter in ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with unilateral solitary ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic lithotripsy who were hospitalized at the Department of Urology (West District) of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between March 2016 and August 2020 were selected for retrospective analysis. The patients were divided into the UreTron group (group U) and holmium laser group (group H) according to the lithotripsy method adopted. The operation duration, length of hospital stay, stone clearance rate, proportion of patients requiring flexible ureteroscopy-assisted lithotripsy, and complications were compared between the groups.

Results

There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of the general characteristics, operation duration, or length of hospital stay (P > 0.05). Regarding the stone clearance rate (group U=93.5%; group H=75%), proportion of patients requiring flexible ureteroscopy-assisted lithotripsy (group U=6.5%; group H=27.8%), and incidence of surgical complications (group U=1 case; group H=9 cases), group U was superior to group H, and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). However, the differences in other complications (cardiocerebral complications and lower extremity thrombosis) were not statistically significant between the groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The UreTron system is a new lithotripsy apparatus that is safe and effective for ureteroscopic lithotripsy and has certain advantages in terms of the stone clearance rate, proportion of patients requiring flexible ureteroscopy-assisted lithotripsy, and surgical complications, making it worthy of clinical application.

Impacted ≥ 10-mm pelvic ureteric stone treatment: laser lithotripsy alone or in combination with pneumatic lithotripsy—a prospective, comparative study

Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy of combined pneumatic and laser versus laser lithotripsy alone for the treatment of impacted pelvic ureteral stones. Ninety patients with impacted stones 10 mm or more were selected and divided into two equal groups. The combined group included patients who treated by pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) and laser lithotripsy (LL), while those in the laser group were treated by LL alone via retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy. Exclusion criteria included urinary tract infection, radiolucent stones, ipsilateral concurrent stone, previous ureteral surgery, urinary tract anomalies, musculoskeletal deformities, renal failure and pregnancy. Any stone retropulsion or any residual stone detected 1 month postoperative was considered failure.

Results

The stone-free rate was 88.8% and 91.1% for laser and combined groups, respectively, which was statistically insignificant (p ≥ 0.05). Operative complications were 11.11% versus 4.4% for laser and combined groups, respectively, which is significant statistically (p ˂ 0.05). No ureteral perforation and no stricture were developed in the combined group, while one perforation and two strictures were developed in the laser group. The DJ stenting and second session lithotripsy requirements were 64.4% versus 51.1% and 15.5% versus 8.8% for laser versus combined group, respectively, and each was statistically significant.

Conclusion

When treating impacted stones, combining PL to LL can decrease the complication rate, DJ stenting and second session lithotripsy requirement, while preserving laser fragmentation capabilities.